Students’ Learning Activities While Studying Biological Process Diagrams

References

• Akyol, G., Sungur, S., & Tekkaya, C. (2010). The contribution of cognitive and metacognitive strategy use to students’ science achievement. Educational Research and Evaluation, 16, 1–21. doi:10.1080/13803611003672348
   Google Scholar
• Azevedo, R., & Cromley, J. G. (2004). Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students’ learning with hypermedia? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 523–535. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2008). Writing in multimodal texts: A social semiotic account of designs for learning. Writing Communications, 25, 166–195. doi:10.1177/0741088307313177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boekaerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and Instruction, 7, 161–186. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00015-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butcher, K. R. (2006). Learning from text with diagrams: Promoting mental model development and inference generation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 182–197. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canham, M., & Hegarty, M. (2010). Effects of knowledge and display design on comprehension of complex graphics. Learning and Instruction, 20, 155–166. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, R., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). Learning and understanding science instructional material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(3), 629–640. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.3.629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catley, K. M., Novick, L. R., & Shade, C. K. (2010). Interpreting evolutionary diagrams: When topology and process conflict. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 861–882. doi:10.1002/tea.20384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. (2000). Self-explaining expository texts: The dual process of generating inferences and repairing mental models. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 161–238). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Chittleborough, G., & Treagust, D. (2008). Correct interpretation of chemical diagram requires transforming from one level of representation to another. Research in Science Education, 38, 463–482. doi:10.1007/s11165-007-9059-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, M. P. (2006). Visual representations in science education: The influence of prior knowledge and cognitive load. Science Education, 90, 1073–1091. doi:10.1002/sce.20164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, M., Carter, G., & Wiebe, E. N. (2008). The interpretation of cellular transport graphics by students with low and high prior knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 239–261. doi:10.1080/09500690601187168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cromley, J. G., Snyder-Hogan, L. E., & Luciw-Dubas, U. A. (2010). Cognitive activities in complex science text and diagrams. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 59–74. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dos Santos, V. J., & Galembeck, E. (2015). Metabolic pathways visualization skills development by undergraduate students. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education. doi:10.1002/bmb.20858
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K., & Simon, H. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hannus, M., & Hyönä, J. (1999). Utilization of illustrations during learning of science textbook passages among low- and high-ability children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 95–123. doi:10.1006/ceps.1998.0987
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegarty, M. (2005). Multimedia learning about physical systems. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 447–465). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hegarty, M., & Just, M. (1993). Constructing mental models of machines from text and diagrams. Journal of Memory & Language, 32, 717–742. doi:10.1006/jmla.1993.1036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heiser, J., & Tversky, B. (2006). Arrows in comprehending and producing mechanical diagram. Cognitive Science, 30, 581–592. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0000_70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmqvist, K., Nyström, M., Andersson, R., Dewhurst, R., Jarodzka, H., & Van de Weijer, J. (2011). Eye tracking: A comprehensive guide to methods and measures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hox, J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1976). Eye fixations and cognitive processes. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 441–480. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(76)90015-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A. (1989). Effects of self-questioning training on college students’ comprehension of lectures. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 14, 366–381. doi:10.1016/0361-476X(89)90022-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Körner, C. (2005). Concepts and misconceptions in comprehension of hierarchical graphs. Learning and Instruction, 15, 281–296. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knippels, M. C. P. J. (2002). Coping with the abstract and complex nature of genetics in biology education. The yo-yo learning and teaching strategy. Utrecht: CD-ß Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kragten, M., Admiraal, W., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2013). Diagrammatic literacy in secondary science education. Research in Science Education, 43, 1785–1800. doi:10.1007/s11165-012-9331-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriz, S., & Hegarty, M. (2007). Top-down and bottom-up influences on learning from animations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65, 911–930. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2007.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodish, H., Berk, A., Kaiser, C. A., Krieger, M., Bretscher, A., Ploegh, H., … Scott, M. P. (2012). Molecular cell biology (7th ed.). New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Lowe, R. K. (1999). Extracting information from an animation during complex visual learning. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14, 225–244. doi:10.1007/bf03172967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, L., Pluchino, P., & Tornatora, M. C. (2013). An eye-tracking study of learning from science text with concrete and abstract illustrations. The Journal of Experimental Education, 81, 356–384. doi:10.1080/00220973.2012.727885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, J., Veenman, M. V. J., & Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. (2006). Metacognitive activities in text-studying and problem-solving: Development of a taxonomy. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12, 209–237. doi:10.1080/13803610500479991
   Google Scholar
• Pohlmann, A., Fricke, W. F., Reinecke, F., Kusian, B., Liesegang, H., Cramm, R. … Bowien, B. (2006). Genome sequence of the bioplastic-producing ‘Knallgas’ bacterium Ralstonia eutropha H16. Nature Biotechnology, 24, 1257–1262. doi: 10.1038/nbt1244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pressley, M. (2000). Development of grounded theories of complex cognitive processing: Exhaustive within- and between-study analyses of think-aloud data. In G. Schraw & J. C. Impara (Eds.), Issues in the measurement of metacognition (pp. 261–296). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
   Google Scholar
• Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Quillin, K., & Thomas, S. (2015). Drawing-to-Learn: A Framework for Using Drawings to Promote Model-Based Reasoning in Biology. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 14, 1–16. doi:10.1187/cbe.14-08-0128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reece, J. B., Urry, L. A., Cain, M. L., Wasserman, S. A., Minorsky, P. V., & Jackson, R. B. (2010). Campbell biology (9th ed.). San Francisco: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M., & McGinn, M. K. (1998). Inscriptions: A social practice approach to representations. Review of Educational Research, 68, 35–59. doi:10.3102/00346543068001035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schönborn, K. J., Anderson, T. R., & Grayson, D. J. (2002). Student difficulties with the interpretation of a textbook diagram of Immunoglobulin G (IgG). Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 30, 93–97. doi:10.1002/bmb.2002.494030020036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwonke, R., Berthold, K., & Renkl, A. (2009). How multiple external representations are used and how they can be made more useful. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 1227–1243. doi:10.1002/acp.1526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• She, H., & Chen, Y. (2009). The impact of multimedia effect on science learning: Evidence from eye movements. Computers & Education, 53, 1297–1307. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1994). Modeled variance in two-level models. Sociological Methods & Research, 22, 342–363. doi:10.1177/0049124194022003004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Gog, T., Paas, F., & Van Merriënboer, J. (2005). Uncovering expertise-related differences in troubleshooting performance. Combining eye movement and concurrent verbal protocol data. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 205–221. doi:10.1002/acp.1112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Gog, T., Paas, F., Van Merriënboer, J., & Witte, P. (2005). Uncovering the problem-solving process: Cued retrospective reporting versus concurrent and retrospective reporting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11, 237–244. doi:10.1037/1076-898x.11.4.237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veenman, M. V. J. (2012). Metacognition in science education: Definitions, constituents, and their intricate relation with cognition. In A. Zohar & Y. J. Dori (Eds.), Metacognition in science education: Trends in current research (Vol. 40, pp. 21–36). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Verhoeff, R. P. (2003). Towards systems thinking in cell biology education. Utrecht: CD-ß Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, M. C., Haertel, G. D., & Walberg, H. J. (1990). What influences learning? A content analysis of review literature. Journal of Educational Research, 84, 30–34. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40539680 doi: 10.1080/00220671.1990.10885988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar