Co-development of Conceptual Understanding and Critical Attitude: Analyzing texts on radiocarbon dating

References

• Besson, U., De Ambrosis, A., & Mascheretti, P. (2010). Studying the physical basis of global warming: Thermal effects of the interaction between radiation and matter and greenhouse effect. European Journal of Physics, 31, 375–388. doi:10.1088/0143-0807/31/2/015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colin, P. (2011). Enseignement et vulgarisation scientifique: une frontière en cours d'effacement? Une étude de cas autour de l'effet de serre [Education and scientific popularization: A border which tends to disappear? A case study about greenhouse effect]. Spirale, 48, 63–84. Retrieved from http://spirale-edu-revue.fr/spip.php?article1081
   Google Scholar
• DiSessa, A. A. (1983). Phenomenology and the evolution of intuition. In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 15–33). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• DiSessa, A. A. (2008). A bird's-eye view of the ‘pieces’ vs. ‘coherence’ controversy (from the ‘Pieces’ side of the fence). In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 35–60). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Driver, R., Guesnes, E., & Tiberghien, A. (1985). Some features of children's ideas and their implications for teaching. In R. Driver, E. Guesne, & A. Tiberghien (Eds.), Children's ideas in science (pp. 193–201). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duit, R. (2009). Bibliography STCSE, students’ and teachers’ conceptions and science education. Retrieved from http://archiv.ipn.uni-kiel.de/stcse/
   Google Scholar
• Ennis, R. H. (1992). The degree to which critical thinking is subject specific: Clarification and needed research. In S. Norris (Ed.), The generalizability of critical thinking: Multiple perspective on an educational ideal (pp. 21–37). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fauconnet, S. (1984). Etude de résolution de problèmes analogues, In A. Tiberghien (Ed.), Research on physics education: Proceedings of the first international workshop, La Londe les Maures 1983 (pp. 261–269). Paris: CNRS.
   Google Scholar
• Feller, I., Colin, P., & Viennot, L. (2009). Critical analysis of popularisation documents in the physics classroom. An action-research in grade 10. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 17, 72–96. Retrieved from http://journals.indexcopernicus.com/abstract.php?icid=900326
   Google Scholar
• Flavell, J. H. (1987). Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition. In F. E. Weinert & R. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 21–29). Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Furtak, E. M., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., & Briggs, D. C. (2012). Experimental and quasi-experimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 82, 300–329. doi:10.3102/0034654312457206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giancoli, D. C. (2005). Physics (6th ed.): Instructor resource center CD-ROM. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1981). The theory of communicative action. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, E. W. (2007). School science: A questionable construct? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 39, 265–282. doi:10.1080/00220270701245295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2007). Designing argumentation learning environments. In S. Erduran & M. P. Jiménez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research (pp. 91–115). New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6670-2
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Erduran, S. (2007). Argumentation in science education: An overview. In S. Erduran & M. P. Jimenez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in science education perspectives from classroom-based research (pp. 3–28). Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6670-2
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Puig, B. (2009). Argumentation, evidence evaluation and critical thinking. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 1001–1015). Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7
   Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75–86. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komorek, M., & Duit, R. (2004). The teaching experiment as a powerful method to develop and evaluate teaching and learning sequences in the domain of non-linear systems. Internatinal Journal of Science Education, 26, 619–633. doi:10.1080/09500690310001614717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of arguments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Libby, W. F. (1964). Nobel lecture: Radiocarbon dating. In Nobel foundation staff (Eds.), Nobel lectures, chemistry 1942–1962 (pp. 587–612). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography: Describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10, 177–200. doi:10.1007/BF00132516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F. (1986). Phenomenography—A research approach to investigating different understandings of reality. Journal of Thought, 21, 28–49.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mathé, S., & Viennot, L. (2009). Stressing the coherence of physics: Students journalists’ and science mediators’ reactions. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 11, 104–128. Retrieved from http://journals.indexcopernicus.com/abstract.php?icid=886218
   Google Scholar
• McPeck, J. (1981). Critical thinking and education. New York, NY: St Martin's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge 1—Linkages to ways of thinking and practising. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning—Ten years on. Oxford: OCSLD. Retrieved from http://www.colorado.edu/ftep/documents/ETLreport4-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2009). Inquiry-based science instruction—What is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 474–496. doi:10.1002/tea.20347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, T. (2004). The critical thinking debate: How general are general thinking skills? Higher Education Research & Development, 23, 3–18. doi:10.1080/0729436032000168469
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (1996). The national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ogborn, J. (1997). Constructivist metaphors of learning science. Science & Education, 6, 121–133. doi:10.1023/A:1008642412858
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflexions. Nuffield Foundation. Retrieved from www.nuffieldfoundation.org/sites/default/files/Sci_Ed_in_Europe_Report_Final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rocard, Y., Csermely, P., Jorde, D., Lenzen, D., Walberg-Henriksson, H., & Hemmo, V. (2007). Science education now: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe. Report EU22–845. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Rozier, S., & Viennot, L. (1991). Students’ reasoning in elementary thermodynamics. International Journal of Science Education, 13, 159–170. doi:10.1080/0950069910130203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory, procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Vermunt, J. D. (1996). Metacognitive, cognitive and affective aspects of learning styles and strategies: A phenomenographic analysis. Higher Education, 31, 25–50. doi:10.1007/BF00129106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viennot, L. (1988). Tendance à la réduction fonctionnelle: Obstacle au savoir scientifique et objet de consensus. In N. Berdnaz & C. Garnier (Eds.), Construction des savoirs. Obstacles et conflits (pp. 84–92). Montréal: CIRADE, Université du Québec.
   Google Scholar
• Viennot, L. (2001). Reasoning in physics (chap. 5). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Viennot, L. (2006). Teaching rituals and students’ intellectual satisfaction. Physics Education, 41, 400–408. doi:10.1088/0031-9120/41/5/004
   Google Scholar
• Viennot, L., & de Hosson, C. (2012). Beyond a dichotomic approach: The case of colour phenomena. International Journal of Science Education, 34, 1315–1336. doi:10.1080/09500693.2012.679034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viennot, L., & de Hosson, C. (2015). From a substractive to multiplicative approach: A concept-driven interactive pathway on the selective absorption of light. International Journal of Science Education, 37, 1–30. doi:10.1080/09500693.2015.950186
   Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S. (2002). On the nature of naïve physics. In M. Limon & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice (pp. 61–76). Dordrecht: Kluwer. doi:10.1007/0-306-47637-1_3
   Google Scholar
• Walton, D. N. (1996). Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Willingham, D. T. (2007). Critical thinking why is it so hard to teach? American Educator, 1–19. Retrieved from http://www.aft.org/sites/default/files/periodicals/Crit_Thinking.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Zohar, A., & Barzilai, S. (2013). A review of research on metacognition in science education: Current and future directions. Studies in Science Education, 49(2), 121–169. doi:10.1080/03057267.2013.847261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar