A Competence-Based Science Learning Framework Illustrated Through the Study of Natural Hazards and Disaster Risk Reduction

References

• Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., & Norman, M. K. (2010). How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2001). Atlas of science literacy. Arlington, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Anderman, E. M., Sinatra, G. M., & Gray, D. L. (2012). The challenges of teaching and learning about science in the twenty-first century: Exploring the abilities and constraints of adolescent learners. Studies in Science Education, 48(1), 89–117. doi: 10.1080/03057267.2012.655038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arjomand, G., Erstad, O., Gilje, O., Gordon, J., Kallunki, V., Kearney, C., … von Reis Saari, J. (2013). KeyCoNet 2013 literature review: Key competence development in school education in Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Arthur, M. (2011). Development of action competence using education for sustainability in a New Zealand school (Doctoral dissertation). Hamilton: University of Waikato.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and chool: Expanded edition. Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning, National Research Council, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, K., Lee, H., Shin, N., Kim, S. W., & Krajcik, J. (2011). Re-conceptualization of scientific literacy in South Korea for the 21st century. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 670–697. doi: 10.1002/tea.20424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyle, K. (2005). Environmental literacy in America: What ten years of NEETF/Roper research and related studies say about environmental literacy in the U.S. Washington, DC: The National Environmental Education and Training Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Dimopolous, K., & Koulaidis, V. (2003). Science and technology education for citizenship: The potential role of the press. Science Education, 87(2), 241–256. doi: 10.1002/sce.10054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eames, C. (2010). A framework for developing action competence in education for sustainability (EfS). Summary. Wellington: Teaching and Learning Research Initiative – PDF – 134.45 KB.
   Google Scholar
• Eames, C., Barker, M., Wilson-Hill, F., & Law, B. (2010). A framework for developing action competence in EfS. Retrieved from http://www.tlri.org.nz/investigating-the-relationship-between-whole-school-approaches-to-education-for-sustainability-and-student-learning/
   Google Scholar
• Earth Science Literacy Initiative. (2010). Earth science literacy principles: The big ideas and supporting concepts of Earth science. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.earthscienceliteracy.org/es_literacy_6may10.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ecclestone, K., & Lewis, L. (2014). Interventions for resilience in educational settings: Challenging policy discourses of risk and vulnerability. Journal of Education Policy, 29(2), 195–216. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2013.806678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eiser, R. J., Bostrom, A., Burton, I., Johnston, D. M., McClure, J., Paton, D., … White, M. P. (2012). Risk interpretation and action: A conceptual framework for responses to natural hazards. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 1, 5–16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2012.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A. (2006). The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance, 683–704. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511816796.038
   Google Scholar
• Ernst, J., & Theimer, S. (2011). Evaluating the effects of environmental education programming on connectedness to nature. Environmental Education Research, 17(5), 577–598. doi: 10.1080/13504622.2011.565119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2007). Science education now: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe. Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/report-rocard-on-science-education_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Council. (2006). Recommendation of the European Parliament and the Council of 18 December 2006 on key competencies for lifelong learning. Brussels: Official Journal of the European Union, 30(12), 10–18.
   Google Scholar
• Eurydice. (2002). Key competencies: A developing concept in general compulsory education (Vol. 5). Brussels: Ministerio de Educación.
   Google Scholar
• Eurydice. (2012). Developing key competences at school in Europe: Challenges and opportunities for policy – 2011/12. Eurydice Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Fazey, I., Fazey, J. A., Fischer, J., Sherren, K., Warren, J., Noss, R. F., & Dovers, S. R. (2007). Adaptive capacity and learning to learn as leverage for social-ecological resilience. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 5(7), 375–380. doi: 10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[375:ACALTL]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fensham, P. J. (2011). Globalization of science education: Comment and a commentary. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 698–709. doi: 10.1002/tea.20426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fensham, P. J. (2012). The challenge of generic competences to science education. E-Book proceedings of the ESERA 2011 conference: Science learning and citizenship. European Science Education Research Association, Lyon, France.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, P., McGaw, B., & Care, E. (2012). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, T. L., & Kim, J. O. (2007). Measuring resilience and youth development: The psychometric properties of the healthy kids survey (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2007–No. 034). Washington, DC. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory West. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, M. (2008). Learning progressions: Supporting instruction and formative assessment. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers. Retrieved from www.cse.ucla.edu/products/misc/cse_heritage_learning.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hess, K. K. (2010). Using learning progressions to monitor progress across grades. Science and Children, 47(6), 57–61.
   Google Scholar
• Holbrook, J., & Rannikmäe, M. (2007). Nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1347–1362. doi: 10.1080/09500690601007549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook, J., & Rannikmäe, M. (2009). The meaning of scientific literacy. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(3), 275–288.
   Google Scholar
• Holbrook, J., & Rannikmäe, M. (2014). The philosophy and approach on which the PROFILES project is based. CEPS Journal, 4(1), 9–29. Slovenia: University of Ljubljana.
   Google Scholar
• Hollweg, K. S., Taylor, J. R., Bybee, R. W., Marcinkowski, T. J., McBeth, W. C., & Zoido, P. (2011). Developing a framework for assessing environmental literacy. Washington, DC: North American Association for Environmental Education. Retrieved from http://www.naaee.net
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, E. (1999). School science, citizenship and the public understanding of science. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 703–710. doi: 10.1080/095006999290363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, B. B. & Schnack, K. (2006). The action competence approach in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 12(3–4), 471–486. doi: 10.1080/13504620600943053
   Google Scholar
• Kolstø, S. D. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science education, 85(3), 291–310. doi: 10.1002/sce.1011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krapp, A., & Prenzel, M. (2011). Research on interest in science: Theories, methods, and findings. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 27–50. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2010.518645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McBeth, W. & Volk, T.L. (2009). The national environmental literacy project: A baseline study of middle grade students in the United States. The Journal of Environmental Education, 41(1), 55–67. doi: 10.1080/00958960903210031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar, R. (2006). Twenty first century science: Insights from the design and implementation of a scientific literacy approach in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(13), 1499–1521. doi: 10.1080/09500690600718344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Committee on Science Learning, Kindergarten Through Eighth Grade. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2010). Exploring the intersection of science education and 21st century skills: A workshop summary. Margaret Hilton, Rapporteur. Board on Science Education, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). A Framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Committee on a Conceptual Framework for New K-12 Science Education Standards. Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, F. H., Stevens, S. P., Pfefferbaum, B., Wyche, K. F., & Pfefferbaum, R. L. (2008). Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(1–2), 127–150. doi: 10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2006). Assessing scientific, reading and mathematical literacy: A framework for PISA 2006. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2009). Get Green at Fifteen? How fifteen-year-olds perform in environmental science and geoscience in PISA 2006. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2008). 21st century skills, education and competitiveness: A resource and policy guide. Retrieved from www.p21.org/storage/documents/21st_century_skills_education_and...
   Google Scholar
• Paton, D. (2003). Disaster preparedness: A social-cognitive perspective. Disaster Prevention and Management, 12(3), 210–216. doi: 10.1108/09653560310480686
   Google Scholar
• Paton, D. & Johnston, D. (2001). Disasters and communities: Vulnerability, resilience and preparedness. Disaster Prevention and Management, 10(4), 270–277. doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000005930
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, D. (2007). Scientific literacy/science literacy. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 729–780). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Primo, M. A. (2009). Towards a framework for assessing 21st century science skills. In Workshop on exploring the intersection of science education and the development of 21st century skills. National Research Council. Retrieved from http://www.nationalacademies.org/bose/Ruiz-Primo.pdf [retrieved June 2009]
   Google Scholar
• Rychen, D. S., & Salganik, L. H. (2005). The definition and selection of key competencies: Executive summary. Obtenido el, 14, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2009). Scientific literacy, PISA, and socioscientific discourse: Assessment for progressive aims of science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 909–921. doi: 10.1002/tea.20327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, P. W. (2002). Inclusion with nature: The psychology of human-nature relations. In P. Schmuck & W. P. Schultz (Eds.), Psychology of sustainable development (pp. 61–79). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Selby, D., & Kagawa, F. (2012). Disaster risk reduction in school curricula: Case studies from thirty countries Disaster risk reduction in school curricula: Case studies from thirty countries. Geneva: United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF); United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2004). Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis, 24(2), 311–322. doi: 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00433.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, S. Y., Delgado, C., & Krajcik, J. S. (2010). Developing a hypothetical multi-dimensional learning progression for the nature of matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(6), 687–715. doi: 10.1002/tea.20324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, C. C. (2001). Ideas about earthquakes after experiencing a natural disaster in Taiwan: An analysis of students' worldviews. International Journal of Science Education, 23(10), 1007–1016. doi: 10.1080/09500690010016085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tytler, R. (2007). Re-imagining science education: Engaging students in science for Australia's future. Retrieved from www.ut.ee/BG/sts/Reimagining20Sc20Ed%20Tytler.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (2012). Education for sustainable development sourcebook. Learning and Training Tools No4. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• UNICEF Canada. (2010). When disaster strikes. Understanding humanitarian emergencies. A cross-curricular educational resource for grades K-8. Retrieved from http://www.unicef.ca/sites/default/files/imce_uploads/UTILITYNAV/TEACHERS/DOCS/GC/WhenDisasterStrikesSecondaryResourceGuide.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Westera, W. (2001). Competences in education: A confusion of tongues. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33(1), 75–88. doi: 10.1080/00220270120625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisner, B. (2006). Let our children teach us!: A review of the role of education and knowledge in disaster risk reduction. Retrieved from http://www.unisdr.org/files/609_10030.pdf
   Google Scholar