Understanding Middle School Students’ Difficulties in Explaining Density Differences from a Language Perspective

References

• Christie, F., & Derewianka, B. (2008). School discourse: Learning to write across the years of schooling. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, C. J. (1981). Volume and density: How much do students really understand? Some effects of an ASEP unit at year 9 level. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 27(3), 75–82.
   Google Scholar
• De Jong, O., & Taber, K. S. (2007). Teaching and learning the many faces of chemistry. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 631–652). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhart, M. (2006). Representing qualitative data. In J. L. Green, G. Camilli, P. B. Elmore, A. Skukauskaite & E. Grace (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 567–581). Mahwah, NJ: American Educational Research Association; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, Z. H. (2005). Scientific literacy: A systemic functional linguistics perspective. Science Education, 89(2), 335–347. doi: 10.1002/sce.20050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, Z. H. (2006). The language demands of science reading in middle school. International Journal of Science Education, 28(5), 491–520. doi: 10.1080/09500690500339092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, Z. H., & Wei, Y. (2010). Improving middle school students’ science literacy through reading infusion. Journal of Educational Research, 103(4), 262–273. doi: 10.1080/00220670903383051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fassoulopoulos, G., Kariotoglou, P., & Koumaras, P. (2003). Consistent and inconsistent pupils’ reasoning about intensive quantities: The case of density and pressure. Research in Science Education, 33(1), 71–87. doi:10.1023/A:1023658419034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frändberg, B., Lincoln, P., & Wallin, A. (2013). Linguistic resources used in Grade 8 students’ submicro level explanations—science items from TIMSS 2007. Research in Science Education, 43(6), 2387–2406. doi:10.1007/s11165-013-9363-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J., & Treagust, D. F. (2009). Multiple representations in chemical education. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1993). Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education, 5, 93–116. doi: 10.1016/0898-5898(93)90026-7
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (2004). The language of science (Jonathan J. Webster, Ed.). New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hewson, M. G. (1986). The acquisition of scientific knowledge: Analysis and representation of student conceptions concerning density. Science Education, 70(2), 159–170. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730700210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewson, M. G., & Hewson, P. W. (1983). Effect of instruction using students’ prior knowledge and conceptual change strategies in science learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(8), 731–743. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660200804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaipal, K. (2010). Meaning making through multiple modalities in a biology classroom: A multimodal semiotics discourse analysis. Science Education, 94, 48–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, P., & Papageorgiou, G. (2010). Rethinking the introduction of Particle Theory: A substance-based framework. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(2), 130–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kloos, H., Fisher, A., & Van Orden, G. C. (2010). Situated naïve physics: Task constraints decide what children know about density. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139(4), 625–637. doi: 10.1037/a0020977
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Pub. Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. (1998). Analysing verbal data: Priniciples, methods and problems. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (Vol. 2, pp. 1175–1189). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers BV.
   Google Scholar
• Leont'ev, A. N. (1981). The problem of activity in psychology (J. V. Wertsch, Trans.). In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in soviet psychology (2nd ed., pp. 37–71). New York: ME Sharpe (Reprinted from: 1981).
   Google Scholar
• Márquez, C., Izquierdo, M., & Espinet, M. (2006). Multimodal science teachers’ discourse in modeling the water cycle. Science Education, 90, 202–226. doi: 10.1002/sce.20100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. H. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Berkshire: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87(2), 224–240. doi: 10.1002/sce.10066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pines, A. L., & West, L. H. T. (1986). Conceptual understanding and science learning: An interpretation of research within a sources-of-knowledge framework. Science Education, 70(5), 583–604. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730700510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seah, L. H., Clarke, D. J., & Hart, C. E. (2011). Understanding students' language use about expansion through analyzing their lexicogrammatical resources. Science Education, 95(5), 852–876. doi:10.1002/sce.20448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seah, L. H., Clarke, D. J., & Hart, C. E. (2013). Understanding the Language Demands on Science Students from an Integrated Science and Language Perspective. International Journal of Science Education, 36(6), 952–973. doi:10.1080/09500693.2013.832003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleppegrell, M. J. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C., Carey, S., Wiser, M. (1985). On differentiation: A case study of the development of the concepts of size, weight and density. Cognition, 21(3), 177–237. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(85)90025-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C., Maclin, D., Grosslight, L., & Davis, H. (1997). Teaching for understanding: A study of students’ preinstruction theories of matter and a comparison of the effectiveness of two approaches to teaching about matter and density. Cognition and Instruction, 15(3), 317–393. doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci1503_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snir, J. (1991). Sink or float—What do the experts think?: The historical development of explanations for floatation. Science Education, 75(5), 595–609. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730750508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thörne, K., & Gericke, N. (2014). Teaching genetics in secondary classrooms: A linguistic analysis of teachers’ talk about proteins. Research in Science Education, 44(1), 81–108. doi:10.1007/s11165-013-9375-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veel, R. (1997). Learning how to mean—scientific speaking: Apprenticeship into scientific discourse in the secondary school. In F. Christie & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Genre and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school (pp. 161–194). London: Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wellington, J. J., & Osborne, J. (2001). Language and literacy in science education. Philadelphia, PA: Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, L., & Clarke, D. (2012). Student difficulties in learning density: A distributed cognition perspective. Research in Science Education, 42, 769–789. doi: 10.1007/s11165-011-9232-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar