Making PCK Explicit—Capturing Science Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) in the Science Classroom

References

• Abell, S. (2007). Research on science teachers’ knowledge. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1105–1149). Mahwa, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Adamson, B., & Walker, E. (2011). Messy collaboration: Learning from a learning study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 29–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., Hill, H. C., & Bass, H. (2005). Knowing mathematics for teaching: Who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide? American Educator, 29(1), 14–17.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, J. A., & Lederman, N. G. (1999). Assessment and measurement of pedagogical content knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 147–161). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Calderhead, J. (1981). Stimulated recall: A method for research on teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 211–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran, K. F., DeRuiter, J. A., & King, R. A. (1993). Pedagogical content knowing: An integrative model for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 44, 263–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Pedagogical content knowledge: An introduction and orientation. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 3–17). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Elliot, J. (2012). Developing a science for teaching through lesson study. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 1, 108–125.
   Google Scholar
• Elliot, J. (2013). Placing lesson study at the heart of the school-based curriculum development process and the development of teachers’ knowledge. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 1(2), 108–125.
   Google Scholar
• Friedrichsen, P., Driel, J. H. V., & Abell, S. K. (2011). Taking a closer look at science teaching orientations. Science Education, 95, 358–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement.New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heywood, D., & Parker, J. (2010). The pedagogy of physical science. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis. Foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kind, V. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge in science education: Perspectives and potential for progress. Studies in Science Education, 45(2), 169–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kullberg, A. (2010). What is taught and what is learned. Professional insights gained and shared by teachers of mathematics (Doctoral thesis). University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Ling, M. L., & Marton, F. (2012). Towards a science of the art of teaching: Using variation theory as a guiding principle for pedagogical design. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 1(1), 7–22.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, M. L. (2012). Variation theory and the improvement of teaching and learning. Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
   Google Scholar
• Loughran, J. J., Berry, A., & Mulhall, P. (2006). Understanding and developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teachers. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95–132). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F. (2014). Necessary conditions of learning. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Pang, M. F. (2006). On some necessary conditions for learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 193–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Tsui, A. (Eds.) (2004). Classroom discourse and the space of learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, P. (2008). Teaching for understanding – The complex nature of PCK in pre-service teacher education. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1281–1299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, P. (2014). When teaching makes a difference: Developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge through learning study. International Journal of Science Education, 36(11), 1794–1814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, P., & Loughran, J. (2012). Exploring the development of pre-service elementary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(7), 699–721.
   Google Scholar
• Nuthall, G. (2004). Relating classroom teaching to student learning: A critical analysis of why research has failed to bridge the theory-practice gap. Harvard Educational Review, 74(3), 273–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang, M., & Ling, M. L. (2012). Learning study: Helping teachers to use theory, develop professionally and produce new knowledge to be shared. Instructional Science, 40(3), 589–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang, M. F., & Marton, F. (2013). Interaction between the learners’ initial grasp of the object of learning a resource afforded. Instructional Science, 41(6), 1065–1082.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 261–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S., Jang, J. Y., Chen, Y. C., & Jung, J. (2011). Is pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) necessary for reformed science teaching? Evidence from an empirical study. Research in Science Education, 41, 245–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runesson, U. (2006). What is possible to learn? On variation as a necessary condition for learning. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(4), 397–410.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, R. M., & Plasman, K. (2011). Science teacher learning progressions: A review of science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge development. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 530–565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, Y. S. M., & Nashon, S. M. (2013). Promoting teacher learning through learning study discourse: The case of science teachers in Singapore. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24, 859–877.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, K., & Rohrer, D. (2010). The effects of interleaved practice. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 837–848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Driel, J. H., & Berry, A. (2012). Teacher professional development focusing on pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Researcher, 41(1), 26–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Driel, J., Verloop, N., & De Vos, W. de. (1998). Developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 673–695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vikström, A. (2008). What is intended, what is realized, and what is learned? Teaching and learning biology in the primary school classroom. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19, 211–233.
   Google Scholar
• Vikström, A. (2014). What makes the difference? Teachers explore what must be taught and what must be learned in order to understand the particulate character of matter. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(6), 709–727.
   Google Scholar