4,700
Views
29
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Studying Gender Bias in Physics Grading: The role of teaching experience and country

References

  • Babad, E. Y. (1985). Some correlates of teachers’ expectancy bias. American Educational Research Journal, 22(2), 175–183. doi:10.3102/00028312022002175
  • Baird, J. (1998). What’s in a name? Experiments with blind marking in A-level examinations. Educational Research, 40(2), 191–202. doi:1080/0013188980400207
  • Bartlett, S. F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Berliner, D. C. (2001). Learning about and learning from expert teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 35(5), 463–482. doi:10.1080/0013188980400207
  • Brewer, M. B. (1988). A dual process model of impression formation. In T. K. Srull & R. S. Wyer, Jr. (Eds.), Advances in social cognition (pp. 1–36). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Carter, K., Sabers, D., Cushing, K., Pinnegar, S., & Berliner, D. C. (1987). Processing and using information about students: A study of expert, novice, and postulant teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3(2), 147–157. doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(02)00004-6
  • Ceci, S. J., Williams, W. M., & Barnett, S. M. (2009). Women’s underrepresentation in science: Sociocultural and biological considerations. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 218–261. doi:10.1037/a0014412218
  • Chaiken, S., & Maheswaran, D. (1994). Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(3), 460–473.
  • Coladarci, T. (1986). Accuracy of teacher judgments of student responses to standardized test items. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(2), 141–146.
  • De Boer, H., Bosker, R. J., & van der Werf, M. P. C. (2010). Sustainability of teacher expectation bias effects on long-term student performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(1), 168–179. doi:10.1037/a0017289
  • Destatis. (2013). Prüfungen an Hochschulen [Exams at universities]. Wiesbaden: Federal Statistical Office.
  • Dünnebier, K., Gräsel, C., & Krolak-Schwerdt, S. (2009). Urteilsverzerrungen in der schulischen Leistungsbeurteilung: Eine experimentelle Studie zu Ankereffekten. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 23(34), 187–195. doi:10.1024/1010-0652.23.34.187
  • Eagly, A. H., & Koenig, A. M. (2008). Gender prejudice: On the risks of occupying incongruent roles. In E. Borgida & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), Beyond common sense: Psychological science in the courtroom (pp. 63–81). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (2013). The nature–nurture debates: 25 years of challenges in understanding the psychology of gender. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 340–357. doi:10.1177/1745691613484767
  • Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • ETH Zurich Annual Report. (2013). Retrieved from https://www.ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/common/docs/publications/annual-reports/2013/ETH_Annualreport_2013_updated.pdf
  • European Commission. (2013). She figures 2012: Gender in research and innovation. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/she-figures-2012_en.pdf
  • Farenga, S. J., & Joyce, B. A. (1999). Intentions of young students to enroll in science courses in the future: An examination of gender differences. Science Education, 83(1), 55–75.
  • Fiske, A. P., Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., & Nisbett, R. E. (1998). The cultural matrix of social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology, Vols. 1 and 2 (4th ed.) (pp. 915–981). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 1–74.
  • Glock, S., & Kovacs, C. (2013). Educational psychology: Using insights from implicit attitude measures. Educational Psychology Review, 25(4), 503–522. doi:10.1007/s10648-013-9241-3
  • Glock, S., & Krolak-Schwerdt, S. (2013). Does nationality matter? The impact of stereotypical expectations on student teachers’ judgments. Social Psychology of Education, 16(1), 111–127. doi:10.1007/s11218-012-9197-z
  • Glock, S., & Krolak-Schwerdt, S. (2014). Stereotype activation versus application: How teachers process and judge information about students from ethnic minorities and with low socioeconomic background. Social Psychology of Education, 17(4), 589–607. doi:10.1007/s11218-014-9266-6
  • Goddard Spear, M. (1984a). Sex bias in science teachers’ ratings of work and pupil characteristics. European Journal of Science Education, 6(4), 369–377. doi:10.1080/0140528840060407
  • Goddard Spear, M. (1984b). The biasing influence of pupil sex in a science marking exercise. Research in Science & Technological Education, 2(1), 55–60. doi:10.1080/0263514840020107
  • Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R., Rudman, L. A., Farnham, S. D., Nosek, B. A., & Mellott, D. S. (2002). A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychological Review, 109(1), 3–25. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.109.1.3
  • Heller, K. A., Finsterwald, M., & Ziegler, A. (2010). Implicit theories of mathematics and physics teachers on gender-specific giftedness and motivation. In K. A. Heller (Ed.), Munich studies of giftedness (pp. 239–252). Berlin: LIT.
  • Hofer, S. I., Schumacher, R., & Rubin, H. (2015). The Test of basic Mechanics Conceptual Understanding (bMCU): Using Rasch analysis to develop and evaluate an efficient multiple-choice test on Newton’s mechanics. Manuscript in preparation.
  • Hofer, S. I., Schumacher, R., Rubin, H., & Stern, E. (2015). Fostering physics learning with cognitively activating instruction: A classroom intervention study. Manuscript in preparation.
  • Hopkins, K. D., George, C. A., & Williams, D. D. (1985). The concurrent validity of standardized achievement tests by content area using teachers’ ratings as criteria. Journal of Educational Measurement, 22(3), 177–82.
  • Jussim, L., & Eccles, J. S. (1992). Teacher expectations II: Construction and reflection of student achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(6), 947–961.
  • Jussim, L., & Harber, K. D. (2005). Teacher expectations and self-fulfilling prophecies: Knowns and unknowns, resolved and unresolved controversies. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(2), 131–155.
  • Kessels, U., Rau, M., & Hannover, B. (2006). What goes well with physics? Measuring and altering the image of science. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 761–780. doi:10.1348/000709905X59961
  • Koenig, A. M., & Eagly, A. H. (2014). Evidence for the social role theory of stereotype content: Observations of groups’ roles shape stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(3), 371–392. doi:10.1037/a0037215
  • Krolak-Schwerdt, S., Böhmer, M., & Gräsel, C. (2009). Verarbeitung von schülerbezogener Information als zielgeleiteter Prozess: Der Lehrer als «flexibler Denker». Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 23(34), 175–186. doi:10.1024/1010-0652.23.34.175
  • Krolak-Schwerdt, S., Böhmer, M., & Gräsel, C. (2012). Leistungsbeurteilungen von Schulkindern: Welche Rolle spielen Ziele und Expertise der Lehrkraft? Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 44(3), 111–122. doi:10.1026/0049-8637/a000062
  • Kunda, Z., & Spencer, S. J. (2003). When do stereotypes come to mind and when do they color judgment? A goal-based theoretical framework for stereotype activation and application. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4), 522–544. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.522
  • Kunda, Z., & Thagard, P. (1996). Forming impressions from stereotypes, traits, and behaviors: A parallel-constraint-satisfaction theory. Psychological Review, 103(2), 284–308.
  • Leiner, D. J. (2014). SoSciSurvey—oFb—der onlineFragebogen. Retrieved from https://www.soscisurvey.de
  • Leinhardt, G., & Greeno, J. G. (1986). The cognitive skill of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(2), 75–95. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.78.2.75
  • Lorenzo, M., Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2006). Reducing the gender gap in the physics classroom. American Journal of Physics, 74(2), 118–122. doi:10.1119/1.2162549
  • Madon, S., Jussim, L., Keiper, S., Eccles, J., Smith, A., & Palumbo, P. (1998). The accuracy and power of sex, social class, and ethnic stereotypes: A naturalistic study in person perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(12), 1304–1318. doi:10.1177/01461672982412005
  • Marchand, G. C., & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2013). Stereotype threat and women's performance in physics. International Journal of Science Education, 35(18), 3050–3061. doi:10.1080/09500693.2012.683461
  • Miller, D. I., Eagly, A. H., & Linn, M. C. (2014). Women's representation in science predicts national gender-science stereotypes: Evidence from 66 nations. Journal of Educational Psychology, No Pagination Specified. doi:10.1037/edu0000005
  • Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(41), 16474–16479.
  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus user's guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. Retrieved from http://www.statmodel.com/download/usersguide/Mplus%20user%20guide%20Ver_7_r3_web.pdf
  • Nguyen, H.-H. D., & Ryan, A. M. (2008). Does stereotype threat affect test performance of minorities and women? A meta-analysis of experimental evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1314–1334.
  • Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Math = male, me = female, therefore math ≠ me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1), 44–59. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.44
  • Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Hansen, J. J., Devos, T., Lindner, N. M., Ranganath, K. A., … Banaji, M. R. (2007). Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes. European Review of Social Psychology, 18(1), 36–88. doi:10.1080/10463280701489053
  • Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Sriram, N., Lindner, N. M., Devos, T., Ayala, A., … Greenwald, A. G. (2009). National differences in gender–science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), 10593–10597. doi:10.1073/pnas.0809921106
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2011). PISA 2009 results: What students know and can do: Student performance in reading, mathematics and science (Vol. 1). Paris: OECD Publications.
  • Palmer, D. J., Stough, L. M., Burdenski, Jr., T. K., & Gonzales, M. (2005). Identifying teacher expertise: An examination of researchers’ decision making. Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 13–25. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4001_2
  • Robinson-Cimpian, J. P., Lubienski, S. T., Ganley, C. M., & Copur-Gencturk, Y. (2014). Teachers’ perceptions of students’ mathematics proficiency may exacerbate early gender gaps in achievement. Developmental Psychology, 50(4), 1262–1281. doi:10.1037/a0035073
  • Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461–464.
  • Sclove, S. L. (1987). Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis. Psychometrika, 52(3), 333–343.
  • Südkamp, A., Kaiser, J., & Möller, J. (2012). Accuracy of teachers’ judgments of students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 743–762. doi:10.1037/a0027627
  • Swim, J. K., Borgida, E., Maruyama, G., & Myers, D. G. (1989). Joan McKay versus John McKay: Do gender stereotypes bias evaluations? Psychological Bulletin, 105(3), 409–429.
  • UCLA: Statistical Consulting Group. (2014, July 18). Mplus FAQ. How can I compute a chi-square test for nested models with the MLR or MLM estimators? Retrieved July 18, 2014, from http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/mplus/faq/s_b_chi2.htm
  • Walton, G. M., & Spencer, S. J. (2009). Latent ability: Grades and test scores systematically underestimate the intellectual ability of negatively stereotyped students. Psychological Science, 20(9), 1132–1139. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02417.x

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.