The building of knowledge, language, and decision-making about climate change science: a cross-national program for secondary students

References

• Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Ackerson, V. L. (2004). Learning as conceptual change: Factors mediating the development of preservice elementary teachers' views of nature of science. Science Education, 88(5), 785–810. doi: 10.1002/sce.10143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abd-El-Khalick, F., BouJaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N. G., Mamiok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., … Tuan, H. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88, 397–419. doi: 10.1002/sce.10118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ackerson, V. L., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. S. (2005). ‘How should I know what scientists do? I’m just a kid’: Fourth-grade students’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 17(1), 1–11. doi: 10.1007/BF03174669
   Google Scholar
• Ackerson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 295–317. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200004)37:4<295::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, R. (2010). Speaking but not listening? Accountable talk in an unaccountable context. Literacy, 44(3), 103–111. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-4369.2010.00562.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvermann, D. E. (2002). Adolescents and literacies in a digital world. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Applebee, A. N., Langer, J. A., Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (2003). Discussion-based approaches to developing understanding: Classroom instruction and student performance in middle and high school English. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 685–730. doi: 10.3102/00028312040003685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ares, N., & Evans, D. M. (2014). Mathematics and numeracy as social and spatial practice. Education Research International, 2014, 1–14. doi: 10.1155/2014/742197
   Google Scholar
• Arya, D. J., Hiebert, E. H., & Pearson, P. D. (2011). The effects of syntactic and lexical complexity on the comprehension of elementary science texts. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4(1), 107–125.
   Google Scholar
• Arya, D. J. & Maul, A. (2012). The role of the scientific discovery narrative in middle school science education: An experimental study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1022–1032. doi: 10.1037/a0028108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arya, D. J. & Parker, J. K. (2015). Dialogic action in climate change discussions: An international study of high school students in China, New Zealand, Norway and the United States. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 3. doi:10.5195/dpj.2015.53
   Google Scholar
• Attewell, P. (2001). Comment: The first and second digital divides. Sociology of Education, 74(3), 252–259. doi: 10.2307/2673277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• August, D., Carlo, M., Dressler, C., & Snow, C. (2005). The critical role of vocabulary development for English langauge learners. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20(1), 50–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5826.2005.00120.x
   Google Scholar
• Avraamidou, L., & Osborne, J. (2009). The role of narrative in communicating science. International Journal of Science Education, 31(12), 1683–1707. doi: 10.1080/09500690802380695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, A. L. (2007). The language demands of school: Putting academic English to the test. New York, NY: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bajah, S. T. (1985). A nigerian case study of perceptions of science. Prospects, 15(4), 577. doi: 10.1007/BF02197925
   Google Scholar
• Baram-Tsabari, A., & Yarden, A. (2005). Text genre as a factor in the formation of scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(4), 403–428. doi: 10.1002/tea.20063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, D., & Hamilton, M. (1998). Local literacies: A study of reading and writing in one community. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bazerman, C. (1982). Scientific writing as a social act: A review of the literature of 
the sociology of science. In P. V. Anderson, J. Brockman, & C. R. Miller (Eds.), New essays in technical and scientific communication: Research, theory, and practice (pp. 156–184). Farmingdale, NY: Baywood.
   Google Scholar
• Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Billeh, V. Y. & Hasan, O. E. (1975). Factors affecting teachers' gain in understanding the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 12(3), 209–219. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660120303
   Google Scholar
• Bomer, K., & Bomer, R. (2001). For a better world: Reading and writing for social action. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Bowker, G. C. (2005). Memory practices in the sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, C. L. (1986). Learning how to ask: A sociolinguistic appraisal of the role of the interview in social science research (No. 1). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brinkmann, S. (2014). Unstructured and semi-structured interviewing. In P. Leavy (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of qualitative research (pp. 277–299). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buckler, C., & Creech, H. (2014). Global monitoring and evaluation report, shaping the future we want. UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development (2005–2014).
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright, N. (1983). How the laws of physics lie. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, D. W. (1983). Stereotypic images of the scientist: The Draw-a-Scientist-Test. Science Education, 67, 255–265. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730670213
   Google Scholar
• Common Core Standards Initiative. (2012). Common core state standards for English language arts & literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards/org/assets/CCSSI_ELA%20Standards.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Constantinou, C., Hadjilouca, R., & Papadouris, N. (2010). Students' epistemological awareness concerning the distinction between science and technology. International Journal of Science Education, 32(2), 143–172. doi: 10.1080/09500690903229296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213–238. doi: 10.2307/3587951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coxhead, A., & Hirsch, D. (2007). A pilot science-specific word list. Revue Francaise de linguistique appliquee.
   Google Scholar
• Coxhead, A., & Nation, P. (2001). The specialised vocabulary of English for academic purposes. In J. Flowerdew & M. Peacock (Eds.), Research perspective on English for academic purposes (pp. 252–267). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Custer, R. L. (1995). Examining the dimensions of technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 5(3), 219–244. doi: 10.1007/BF00769905
   Google Scholar
• Debell, M., & Chapman, C. (2003). Computer and internet use by children and adolescents in 2001 (NCES 2004-014). Retrieved from nces.ed.gov/programs/quarterly/vol_5/5_4/2_1.asp
   Google Scholar
• Elby, A., & Hammer, D. (2001). On the substance of a sophisticated epistemology. Science Education, 85(5), 554–567. doi: 10.1002/sce.1023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk, H., & Yarden, A. (2009). ‘Here the scientists explain what I said.’ Coordination practices elicited during the enactment of the results and discussion sections of adapted primary literature. Research in Science Education, 39, 349–383. doi: 10.1007/s11165-008-9114-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire, P., & Macedo, D. (1987). Literacy: Reading the word and the world. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, J. J. (1991). Perspective and practicing secondary school science teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about the philosophy of science. Science Education, 75, 121–134. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730750111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (1991). Socio-cultural approaches to literacy (literacies). Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 12, 31–48. doi: 10.1017/S0267190500002130
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in Discourses (2nd ed.). London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2005). The new literacy studies: From socially situated to the work. Situated Literacies: Reading and Writing in Context, 2, 177–194.
   Google Scholar
• Giere, R. (1988). Explaining science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gleick, P. H., Adams, R. M., Amasino, R. M., Anders, E., Anderson, D. J., Anderson, W. W., … Bax, A. (2010). Letters: Climate change and the integrity of science. Science Magazine, 328(5979), 689–690.
   Google Scholar
• Goeschl, T., & Perino, G. (2012). Instrument choice and motivation: Evidence from a climate change experiment. Environmental and Resource Economics, 52(2), 195–212. doi: 10.1007/s10640-011-9524-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths, A. K., & Barman, C. R. (1995). High school students’ views about the nature of science: Results from three countries. School Science and Mathematics, 95, 248–356. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1995.tb15775.x
   Google Scholar
• Gutberlet, J. (2012). Recovering resources-recycling citizenship: Urban poverty reduction in Latin America. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Gutierrez, K., Baquedano-Lopez, P., & Tejaeda, C. (1999). Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 64, 286–303. doi: 10.1080/10749039909524733
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, L. C. (2011). Education, politics and opinions about climate change evidence for interaction effects. Climatic Change, 104(2), 231–242. doi: 10.1007/s10584-010-9957-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, P. S., Feldman, L., Leiserowitz, A., & Maibach, E. (2015). Extending the impacts of hostile media perceptions influences on discussion and opinion polarization in the context of climate change. Science Communication, 37(4), 506–532. doi: 10.1177/1075547015592067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatt, B. E., Deletic, A., & Fletcher, T. D. (2006). Integrated treatment and recycling of stormwater: A review of Australian practice. Journal of Environmental Management, 79(1), 102–113. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, D. (1996). Contextual inquiries: A discourse-oriented study of classroom learning. In D. Hicks (Ed.), Discourse, learning, and schooling (pp. 104–144). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoadley, C. M., & Enyedy, N. (1999). Between information and communication: Middle spaces in computer media for learning. In C. Hoadley & J. Roschelle (Eds.), Proceedings of the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 1999. ACM Digital Library. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1150270
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, K. (2006). Bins, bulbs, and shower timers: On the ‘techno-ethics’ of sustainable living. Ethics Place and Environment, 9(3), 317–336. doi: 10.1080/13668790600902375
   Google Scholar
• Hurlimann, A., Dolnicar, S., & Meyer, P. (2009). Understanding behaviour to inform water supply management in developed nations – a review of literature, conceptual model and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(1), 47–56. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.07.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2010). Retrieved from http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/publications_and_data_reports.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C. (2008). Multimodality and literacy in school classrooms. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 241–267. doi: 10.3102/0091732X07310586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jungwirth, E. (1970). An evaluation of the attained development of the intellectual skills needed for “understanding of the nature of scientific enquiry” by BSCS pupils in Israel. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 7(2), 141–151. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660070210
   Google Scholar
• Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (1997). Multiliteracies: Rethinking what we mean by literacy and what we teach as literacy [in] the context of global cultural diversity and new communications teachnologies. Haymarket: Centre for Workplace Communication and Culture.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, N. H. & Wallace, C. S. (2005). Secondary science teachers' use of laboratory activities: Linking epistemological beliefs, goals, and practices. Science Education, 89(1), 140–165. doi: 10.1002/sce.20013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khishfe, R., & Abd-El_Khalick, F. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 551–578. doi: 10.1002/tea.10036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobel, M. (2001). “I'm not a pencil man”: How one student challenges our notions of literacy “failure” in school. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 44(5), 404–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korsager, M., & Slotta, J. D. (2015). International peer collaboration to learn about global climate changes. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 10(5), 717–736.
   Google Scholar
• Korsager, M., Slotta, J. D., & Jorde, D. (2014). Global climate exchange: Peer collaboration in a “global classroom.” Nordic Studies in Science Education, 10(1), 105–120.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Ogborn, J., & Tsatsarelis, C. (2001). Multimodal teaching and learning: The rhetorics of the science classroom. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, J. (2000). Distributive judgments under uncertainty: Paccioli’s game revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 546–558. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.129.4.546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2011). New literacies. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331–359. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660290404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497–521. doi: 10.1002/tea.10034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. (1990). Talking science: Language learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 296–316. doi: 10.1002/1098-2736(200103)38:3<296::AID-TEA1007>3.0.CO;2-R
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, C. (2001). Literary practices as social acts: Power, status, and cultural norms in the classroom. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R. & Halliday, M. A. K. (1993). Writing science. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Masini, A., & Menichetti, E. (2012). The impact of behavioural factors in the renewable energy investment decision making process: Conceptual framework and empirical findings. Energy Policy, 40, 28–38. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.06.062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meichtry, Y. J. (1992). Influencing student understanding of the nature of science: Data from a case of curriculum development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 389–407. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660290407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., Dawes, L., Wegerif, R., & Sams, C. (2004). Reasoning as a scientist: Ways of helping children to use language to learn science. British Educational Research Journal, 30(3), 359–377. doi: 10.1080/01411920410001689689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking: A sociocultural approach. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moje, E. B., Ciechanowski, K. M., Kramer, K., Elllis, L., Carrillo, R., & Collazo, T. (2004). Working toward third space in content area literacy: An examination of everyday funds of knowledge and discourse. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(1), 38–70. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.39.1.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moje, E. B., Collazo, T., Carrillo, R., & Marx, R. W. (2001). “Maestro, what is ‘quality’?”: Language, literacy, and discourse in project-based science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(4), 469–498. doi: 10.1002/tea.1014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss, D. M., Abrams, E. D., & Robb, J. (2001). Examining student conceptions of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 23(8), 771–790. doi: 10.1080/09500690010016030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nersessian, N. J. (1999). Model-based reasoning in conceptual change. In L. Magnani, N. J. Nersessian, & P. Thagard (Eds.), Model-based reasoning in scientific discovery (pp. 5–22). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• New London Group. (2000). A pedagogy of multiliteracies designing social futures. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 9–38). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87, 224–240. doi: 10.1002/sce.10066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, S. P., Phillips, L. M., & Osborne, J. (2007). Scientific inquiry: The place of interpretation and argumentation. In J. Luft, R. L. Bell, & J. Gess-Newsome (Eds.), Science as inquiry in the secondary setting (pp. 87–98). Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nystrand, M., Gamoran, A., Kachur, R., & Prendergast, C. (1997). Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of learning and teaching in the English classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• O'Brien, D. G., Stewart, R. A., & Moje, E. B. (1995). Why content literacy is difficult to infuse into the secondary school: Complexities of curriculum, pedagogy, and school culture. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(3), 442–463. doi: 10.2307/747625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2012). Program for International Student Assessment (PISA). Technical report. PISA: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Pahl, K., & Roswell, J. (2005). Understanding literacy education: Using new literacies in the elementary classroom. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, P. D., Moje, E., & Greenleaf, C. (2010). Literacy and science: Each in the service of the other. Science, 328(5977), 459–463. doi: 10.1126/science.1182595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., & Peter, W. (2002). Considerate text. Literacy in America: NZ, 2, 167–199.
   Google Scholar
• Reich, J., Murmane, R., & Willett, J. (2012). The state of wiki usage in k-12 schools: Leveraging web 2.0 data warehouses to assess quality and equity in online learning environments. Educational Researcher, 41(1), 7–15. doi: 10.3102/0013189X11427083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, A. G., & Aikenhead, G. S. (1992). Students’ preconceptions about the epistemology of science. Science Education, 76(6), 559–580. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730760602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanjek, R. (1993). Anthropology’s hidden colonialism: Assistants and their ethnographers. Anthropology Today, 9(2), 13–18. doi: 10.2307/2783170
   Google Scholar
• Slotta, J. D., & Aleahmad, T. (2009). WISE technology lessons: Moving from a local proprietary system to a global open source framework. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(2), 169–189. doi: 10.1142/S1793206809000684
   Google Scholar
• Slotta, J. D., & Linn, M. C. (2009). WISE science: Web-based inquiry in the classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Songer, N. B., & Linn, M. C. (1991). How do students’ views of science influence knowledge integration? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 761–784. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660280905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southerland, S. A., Smith, L. K., Sowell, S. P., & Kittleson, J. M. (2007). Resisting unlearning: Understanding science education's response to the United States' national accountability movement. Review of Research in Education, 31(1), 45–77. doi: 10.3102/0091732X07300046045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, C. E. (2010). Academic language and the challenge of reading for learning about science. Science, 328(5977), 450–452. doi: 10.1126/science.1182597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørvik, G. O., Blikstad-Balas, M., & Ødegaard, M. (2015). ‘Do books like these have authors?’ New roles for text and new demands on students in integrated science-literacy instruction. Science Education, 99(1), 39–69. doi: 10.1002/sce.21143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stagg Peterson, S., & Slotta, J. (2009). Saying yes to online learning: A first-time experience teaching an online graduate course in literacy education. Literacy Research and Instruction, 48(2), 120–136. doi: 10.1080/19388070802226303
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, S. A. (2003). Vocabulary and readability: How knowing word meanings affects comprehension. Topics in Language Disorders, 23(3), 241–247. doi: 10.1097/00011363-200307000-00009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Street, B. (1995). Social literacies: Critical perspectives on literacy in development, ethnography and education. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Street, B. (2003). What’s ‘new’ in new literacy studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5(2), 77–91.
   Google Scholar
• Tamir, P. (1972). Understanding the process of science by students exposed to different science curricula in Isreal. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 9(3), 239–245. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660090309
   Google Scholar
• Unsworth, K. L., & Fielding, K. S. (2014). It’s political: How the salience of one’s political identity changes climate change beliefs and policy support. Global Environmental Change, 27, 131–137. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wals, A. E. (2012). Shaping the education of tomorrow: 2012 full-length report on the UN decade of education for sustainable development. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. (2002). Voices of collective remembering. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whitemarsh, L. (2011). Scepticism and uncertainty about climate change: Dimensions, determinants and change over time. Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 690–700. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilensky, U., & Resnick, M. (1999). Thinking in levels: A dynamic systems approach to making sense of the world. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8(1), 3–19. doi: 10.1023/A:1009421303064
   Google Scholar
• Zaman, A. U., & Lehmann, S. (2011). Urban growth and waste management optimization towards ‘zero waste city’. City, Culture and Society, 2(4), 177–187. doi: 10.1016/j.ccs.2011.11.007
   Google Scholar