Misconceptions and biases in German students’ perception of multiple energy sources: implications for science education

References

• Araujo, K. (2014). The emerging field of energy transitions: Progress, challenges, and opportunities. Energy Research & Social Science, 1, 112–121. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2014.03.002
   Google Scholar
• Associated Press Beijing. (2012, October 22). Chinese protesters clash with police over power plant. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/oct/22/chinese-protesters-power-plant
   Google Scholar
• Barke, R., & Jenkins-Smith, H. (1993). Politics and scientific expertise: Scientists, risk perception, and nuclear waste policy. Risk Analysis, 13(4), 425–439. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb00743.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barke, R., Jenkins-Smith, H., & Slovic, P. (1997). Risk perceptions of men and women scientists. Social Science Quarterly, 78(1), 167–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becher, T. (1994). The significance of disciplinary differences. Studies in Higher Education, 19(2), 151–161. doi: 10.1080/03075079412331382007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodzin, A. (2012). Investigating urban eighth-grade students’ knowledge of energy resources. International Journal of Science Education, 34(8), 1255–1275. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2012.661483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyes, E., & Stanisstreet, M. (1990). Pupils’ ideas concerning energy sources. International Journal of Science Education, 12(5), 513–529. doi: 10.1080/0950069900120505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, D. J., & Freudenburg, W. R. (1996). Gender and environmental risk concerns: A review and analysis of available research. Environment and Behavior, 28(3), 302–339. doi: 10.1177/0013916596283003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drottz-Sjöberg, B.-M., & Sjöberg, L. (1991). Adolescents’ attitudes to nuclear power and radioactive wastes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21(24), 2007–2036. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1991.tb00519.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EU Commission. (2007, January). Energy technologies: Knowledge, perception, measures: Special barometer 262. Special Eurobarometer. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_262_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Finucane, M., Slovic, P., Mertz, C., Flynn, J., & Satterfield, T. (2000). Gender race and perceived risk: The ‘white male’ effect. Health, Risk & Society, 2(2), 159–172. doi: 10.1080/713670162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, S., Pratto, F., & Pavelchak, M. (1983). Citizens’ images of nuclear war: Contents and consequences. Journal of Social Issues, 39, 41–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1983.tb00129.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederick, S. (2009). Automated choice heuristics. In T. Gilovich, D. W. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases. The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 548–558). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fritsche, U. R., & Rausch, L. (2011, July). Kurzstudie: Der nichterneuerbare Primärenergieverbrauch des nationalen Strommix in Deutschland im Jahr 2010. Retrieved from http://www.iinas.org/tl_files/iinas/downloads/GEMIS/2011_KEV-Strom-2010_HEA_OEKO.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. (2011). Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62(1), 451–482. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145346
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M., & the ABC Research Group. (Eds.). (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grässler, B., Levitz, D., & Knight, B. (2011, March 13). Tens of thousands of Germans take to the streets in anti-nuclear protest. Retrieved from http://www.dw.de/tens-of-thousands-of-germans-take-to-the-streets-in-anti-nuclear-protest/a-14907859-1
   Google Scholar
• Huber, L. (1990). Disciplinary cultures and social reproduction. European Journal of Education, 25(3), 241–261. doi: 10.2307/1503315
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins-Smith, H., & Herron, K. (2007, January). American views on energy and environmental security: Comparing phone and internet surveys (2006). Retrieved from http://crcm.ou.edu/downloads/nuclear/EE06_Full.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (1992). Reference points, anchors, norms, and mixed feelings. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 51, 296–312. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(92)90015-Y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, C., Visschers, V., & Siegrist, M. (2012). Affective imagery and acceptance of replacing nuclear power plants. Risk Analysis, 32(3), 464–477. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01691.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakshmi, R., & Denyer, S. (2012, September 15). Protest disrupt India’s nuclear energy plan. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/protests-disrupt-indias-nuclear-energy-plan/2012/09/15/ec75ca58-fdad-11e1-98c6-ec0a0a93f8eb_story.html
   Google Scholar
• Lee, R. P. (2015a). Analysis of psychological determinants and factors influencing energy evaluations and preferences: Implications for managing the human dimension of energy system (Dissertation). TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, R. P. (2015b). Stability of energy imageries and affect following shocks to the global energy system: The case of Fukushima. Journal of Risk Research, 18(7), 965–988. doi: 10.1080/13669877.2015.1042501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, R. P., & Gloaguen, S. (2015). Path-dependence, lock-in, and student perceptions of nuclear energy in France: Implications from a pilot study. Energy Research & Social Science, 8, 86–99. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2015.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiserowitz, A. (2006). Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic Change, 77(1–2), 45–72. doi: 10.1007/s10584-006-9059-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newby, H. (1997). Risk analysis and risk perception: Social limits to technological change. Transactions of the Institution of Chemical Engineers, Part B(75), 133–137.
   Google Scholar
• Nippa, M., & Lee, R. P. (2015). Another case of ‘same bed, different dreams’? Assessing divergence and multidimensionality in energy evaluations and implications for interdisciplinary research and energy management. International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management, 18(2), 199–220. doi: 10.1504/IJRAM.2015.069024
   Google Scholar
• Nippa, M., Lee, R. P., Gloaguen, S., Meschke, S., & Hanebuth, A. (2013, December 4). Kohle - Akzeptanzdiskussionen im Zeichen der Energiewende: Denkanstöße aus der Wissenschaft. Retrieved from http://energierohstoffzentrum.com/assets/Uploads/Media/Studien/Studie-Kohle-Akzeptanzdiskussionen-Auflage-2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nisbett, R., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, C. (2003). Risk perception: Another look at the ‘white male’ effect. Health, Risk & Society, 5(1), 71–83. doi: 10.1080/1369857031000066014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pidgeon, N. (1998). Risk assessment, risk values and the social science programme: why we do need risk perception research. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 59, 5–15. doi: 10.1016/S0951-8320(97)00114-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz, F. (2012, August 1). Brown coal makes a comeback amid protests. Retrieved from http://www.dw.de/brown-coal-makes-a-comeback-amid-protests/a-16136728-1
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N., & Vaughn, L. A. (2009). The availability heuristic revisited: Ease of recall and content of recall as distinct sources of information. In T. Gilovich, D. W. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases. The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 103–119). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sjöberg, L. (1999). Risk perception by the public and by experts: A dilemma in risk management. Human Ecology Review, 6(2), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Sjöberg, L. (2004). Explaining individual risk perception: The case of nuclear waste. Risk Management, 6(1), 51–64. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.rm.8240172
   Google Scholar
• Sjöberg, L., & Drottz-Sjöberg, B.-M. (1994). Risk perception of nuclear waste: Experts and the public. Risk research report, 16. Stockholm School of Economics, Rhizikon.
   Google Scholar
• Sjöberg, L., & Drottz-Sjöberg, B.-M. (2008). Risk perception by politicians and the public. Energy & Environment, 19(3/4), 454–483.
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. (2007). The affect heuristic. European Journal of Operational Research, 177(3), 1333–1352. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2005.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., Flynn, J., & Layman, M. (1991). Perceived risk, trust, and the politics of nuclear waste. Science, 254, 1603–1607. doi: 10.1126/science.254.5038.1603
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., Layman, M., & Flynn, J. (1990, November). What comes to mind when you hear the words ‘nuclear waste repository’?: A study of 10,000 images. Prepared for Nevada Agency for Nuclear Projects: Yucca Mountain Socioeconomic Project. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1589823
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., Layman, M., & Flynn, J. (1991). Risk perception, trust, and nuclear waste: Lessons from Yucca Mountain. Environment, 33(3), 6–30. doi: 10.1080/00139157.1991.9931375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., & Peters, E. (2006). Risk perception and affect. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(6), 322–325. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00461.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., MacGregor, D. G., & Peters, E. (1998). Imagery, affect, and decision-making. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1589800
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L., & Prosser, D. (2011, July 11). Half of planned wind farms blown away by force of local protests. The Independent. Retrieved from http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/green-living/half-of-planned-wind-farms-blown-away-by-force-of-local-protests-2311645.html
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C. (1956, October 6). The two cultures. Retrieved from http://www.newstatesman.com/cultural-capital/2013/01/c-p-snow-two-cultures
   Google Scholar
• Stagl, S. (2006). Multicriteria evaluation and public participation: The case of UK energy policy. Land Use Policy, 23(1), 53–62. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todd, P. M., & Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Precis of simple heuristics that make us smart. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 727–780. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00003447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truelove, H. B. (2012). Energy source perceptions and policy support: Image associations, emotional evaluations, and cognitive beliefs. Energy Policy, 45, 478–489. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, New Series, 185(4157), 1124–1131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weidman, J., Twale, D., & Stein, E. (2001). Socialization of graduate and professional students in higher education: A perilous passage? ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 28(3), 1–137. doi: 10.1002/1536-0709(2001)28:3<1::AID-AEHE2803>3.0.CO;2-M
   Google Scholar
• Windolf, P. (1995). Selection and self-selection at German mass universities. Oxford Review of Education, 21(2), 207–231. doi: 10.1080/0305498950210206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynarczyk, P., & Renner, C. (2006). The ‘gender gap’ in the scientific labour market: The case of science, engineering and technology-based SMEs in the UK. Equal Opportunities International, 25(8), 660–673. doi: 10.1108/02610150610719128
   Google Scholar
• Yang, F.-Y., & Anderson, O. R. (2003). Senior high school students’ preference and reasoning modes about nuclear energy use. International Journal of Science Education, 25(2), 221–244. doi: 10.1080/09500690210126739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yim, M., & Vaganov, P. (2003). Effects of education on nuclear risk perception and attitude: Theory. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 42(2), 221–235. doi: 10.1016/S0149-1970(03)80010-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeit Online. (2012, December 4). Fracking - Eine Technik spaltet Amerika. Retrieved from http://www.zeit.de/wirtschaft/2012-12/erdoel-fracking-usa
   Google Scholar