5,468
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Students’ intentions towards studying science at upper-secondary school: the differential effects of under-confidence and over-confidence

Pages 1256-1277 | Received 11 Nov 2015, Accepted 03 May 2016, Published online: 13 Jun 2016

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  • Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2010). ‘Doing’ science versus ‘being’ a scientist: Examining 10/11-year-old schoolchildren’s constructions of science through the lens of identity. Science Education, 94(4), 617–639. doi:10.1002/sce.20399
  • Aschbacher, P., Li, E., & Roth, E. (2010). Is science me? High school students’ identities, participation and aspirations in science, engineering, and medicine. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(5), 564–582. doi:10.1002/tea.20353
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
  • Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (2001). Self-efficacy beliefs as shapers of children’s aspirations and career trajectories. Child Development, 72(1), 187–206. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00273
  • Baron, R., & Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
  • Bennett, J., Lubben, F., & Hampden-Thompson, G. (2013). Schools that make a difference to post-compulsory uptake of physical science subjects: Some comparative case studies in England. International Journal of Science Education, 35(4), 663–689. doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.641131
  • Bøe, M. V., & Henriksen, E. K. (2015). Expectancy-value perspectives on choice of science and technology education in late-modern Societies. In E. K. Henriksen, J. Dillon, & J. Ryder (Eds.), Understanding student participation and choice in science and technology education (pp. 17–29). Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7793-4_2
  • Bong, M. (2001). Role of self-efficacy and task-value in predicting college students’ course performance and future enrollment intentions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(4), 553–570. doi:10.1006/ceps.2000.1048
  • Bong, M., & Clark, R. (1999). Comparison between self-concept and self-efficacy in academic motivation research. Educational Psychologist, 34(3), 139–153. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3403_1
  • Bong, M., & Skaalvik, E. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really? Educational Psychology Review, 15(1), 1–40. doi:10.1023/A:1021302408382
  • Bouffard, T., & Narciss, S. (2011). Benefits and risks of positive biases in self-evaluation of academic competence: Introduction. International Journal of Educational Research, 50(4), 205–208. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2011.08.001
  • Chen, P. (2003). Exploring the accuracy and predictability of the self-efficacy beliefs of seventh-grade mathematics students. Learning and Individual Differences, 14(1), 77–90. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2003.08.003
  • Chen, P., & Zimmerman, B. (2007). A cross-national comparison study on the accuracy of self-efficacy beliefs of middle-school mathematics students. The Journal of Experimental Education, 75(3), 221–244. doi:10.3200/JEXE.75.3.221-244
  • Chiu, M. M., & Klassen, R. (2010). Relations of mathematics self-concept and its calibration with mathematics achievement: Cultural differences among fifteen-year-olds in 34 countries. Learning and Instruction, 20(1), 2–17. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.11.002
  • Department for Education. (2013). National curriculum in England: Science programmes of study. London: Author. Retrieved November 1, 2015, from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-science-programmes-of-study
  • Department of Education. (2015, March 31). School performance tables [2014]: 2014 download data. Author. Retrieved November 1, 2015, from http://www.education.gov.uk/schools/performance/download_data.html
  • DeWitt, J., & Archer, L. (2015). Who aspires to a science career? A comparison of survey responses from primary and secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 37(13), 2170–2192. doi:10.1080/09500693.2015.1071899
  • DeWitt, J., Archer, L., & Osborne, J. (2014). Science-related aspirations across the primary–secondary divide: Evidence from two surveys in England. International Journal of Science Education, 36(10), 1609–1629. doi:10.1080/09500693.2013.871659
  • DeWitt, J., Archer, L., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2011). High aspirations but low progression: The science aspirations-careers paradox amongst minority ethnic students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(2), 243–271. doi:10.1007/s10763-010-9245-0
  • Dignath, C., & Büttner, G. (2008). Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students. A meta-analysis on intervention studies at primary and secondary school level. Metacognition and Learning, 3(3), 231–264. doi:10.1007/s11409-008-9029-x
  • Dupeyrat, C., Escribe, C., Huet, N., & Régner, I. (2011). Positive biases in self-assessment of mathematics competence, achievement goals, and mathematics performance. International Journal of Educational Research, 50(4), 241–250. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2011.08.005
  • Eccles, J. (2009). Who am I and what am I going to do with my life? Personal and collective identities as motivators of action. Educational Psychologist, 44(2), 78–89. doi:10.1080/00461520902832368
  • Education, Audiovisual, and Culture Executive Agency. (2011). Science Education in Europe: National policies, practices and research. Brussels: European Commission. doi:10.2797/7170
  • Foy, P., Arora, A., & Stanco, G. (Eds.). (2013). TIMSS 2011 user guide for the international database [Released items (Science – Eighth Grade)]. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Centre.
  • Gonida, E., & Leondari, A. (2011). Patterns of motivation among adolescents with biased and accurate self-efficacy beliefs. International Journal of Educational Research, 50(4), 209–220. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2011.08.002
  • Holmegaard, H. T., Ulriksen, L., & Madsen, L. M. (2015). A narrative approach to understand students’ identities and choices. In E. K. Henriksen, J. Dillon, & J. Ryder (Eds.), Understanding student participation and choice in science and technology education (pp. 31–42). Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7793-4_3
  • Homer, M., Ryder, J., & Banner, I. (2014). Measuring determinants of post-compulsory participation in science: A comparative study using national data. British Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 610–636. doi:10.1002/berj.3106
  • Huang, C. (2011). Self-concept and academic achievement: A meta-analysis of longitudinal relations. Journal of School Psychology, 49(5), 505–528. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2011.07.001
  • Jenkins, E., & Nelson, N. (2005). Important but not for me: Students’ attitudes towards secondary school science in England. Research in Science and Technological Education, 23(1), 41–57. doi:10.1080/02635140500068435
  • Jiang, Y., Song, J., Lee, M., & Bong, M. (2014). Self-efficacy and achievement goals as motivational links between perceived contexts and achievement. Educational Psychology, 34(1), 92–117. doi:10.1080/01443410.2013.863831
  • Maltese, A., Melki, C., & Wiebke, H. (2014). The nature of experiences responsible for the generation and maintenance of interest in STEM. Science Education, 98(6), 937–962. doi:10.1002/sce.21132
  • Möller, J., & Pohlmann, B. (2010). Achievement differences and self-concept differences: Stronger associations for above or below average students? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 435–450. doi:10.1348/000709909X485234
  • Mujtaba, T., & Reiss, M. J. (2014). A survey of psychological, motivational, family and perceptions of physics education factors that explain 15-year-old students’ aspirations to study physics in post-compulsory English schools. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(2), 371–393. doi:10.1007/s10763-013-9404-1
  • Mullis, I., Martin, M., Ruddock, G., O’Sullivan, C., & Preuschoff, C. (2009). TIMSS 2011 assessment frameworks. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
  • Multon, K., Brown, S., & Lent, R. (1991). Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38(1), 30–38. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.38.1.30
  • National Science and Technology Council. (2013). Federal Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) education: 5-year strategic plan. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President of the United States.
  • Pajares, F., & Graham, L. (1999). Self-efficacy, motivation constructs, and mathematics performance of entering middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24(2), 124–139. doi:10.1006/ceps.1998.0991
  • Parker, P., Marsh, H., Ciarrochi, J., Marshall, S., & Abduljabbar, A. S. (2014). Juxtaposing math self-efficacy and self-concept as predictors of long-term achievement outcomes. Educational Psychology, 34(1), 29–48. doi:10.1080/01443410.2013.797339
  • Peugh, J., & Enders, C. (2004). Missing data in educational research: A review of reporting practices and suggestions for improvement. Review of Educational Research, 74(4), 525–556. doi:10.3102/00346543074004525
  • Regan, E., & DeWitt, J. (2015). Attitudes, interest and factors influencing STEM enrolment behaviour: An overview of relevant literature. In E. K. Henriksen, J. Dillon, & J. Ryder (Eds.), Understanding student participation and choice in science and technology education (pp. 63–88). Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7793-4_5
  • Riegle-Crumb, C., Moore, C., & Ramos-Wada, A. (2011). Who wants to have a career in science or math? Exploring adolescents’ future aspirations by gender and race/ethnicity. Science Education, 95(3), 458–476. doi:10.1002/sce.20431
  • Sheldrake, R., Mujtaba, T., & Reiss, M. J. (2014). Calibration of self-evaluations of mathematical ability for students in England aged 13 and 15, and their intentions to study non-compulsory mathematics after age 16. International Journal of Educational Research, 64, 49–61. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2013.10.008
  • Sheldrake, R., Mujtaba, T., & Reiss, M. J. (2015). Students’ intentions to study non-compulsory mathematics: The importance of how good you think you are. British Educational Research Journal, 41(3), 462–488. doi:10.1002/berj.3150
  • Sjaastad, J. (2012). Sources of inspiration: The role of significant persons in young people’s choice of science in higher education. International Journal of Science Education, 34(10), 1615–1636. doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.590543
  • Snijders, T., & Bosker, R. (2012). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling (2nd ed.). London: SAGE.
  • StataCorp. (2013). STATA structural equation modeling reference manual release 13. College Station, TX: StataCorp. Retrieved November 1, 2015, from http://www.stata.com/manuals13/sem.pdf
  • Tai, R., Qi Liu, C., Maltese, A., & Fan, X. (2006). Planning early for careers in science. Science, 312(5777), 1143–1144. doi:10.1126/science.1128690
  • Viljaranta, J., Tolvanen, A., Aunola, K., & Nurmi, J.-E. (2014). The developmental dynamics between interest, self-concept of ability, and academic performance. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 58(6), 734–756. doi:10.1080/00313831.2014.904419
  • Wang, M.-T. (2012). Educational and career interests in math: A longitudinal examination of the links between classroom environment, motivational beliefs, and interests. Developmental Psychology, 48(6), 1643–1657. doi:10.1037/a0027247
  • Wang, M.-T., & Degol, J. (2013). Motivational pathways to STEM career choices: Using expectancy-value perspective to understand individual and gender differences in STEM fields. Developmental Review, 33(4), 304–340. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2013.08.001
  • Wang, X. (2013). Why students choose STEM majors: Motivation, high school learning, and postsecondary context of support. American Educational Research Journal, 50(5), 1081–1121. doi:10.3102/0002831213488622
  • Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1015