1,295
Views
24
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Context-based assessment: creating opportunities for resonance between classroom fields and societal fields

, &
Pages 1304-1342 | Received 04 Dec 2014, Accepted 09 May 2016, Published online: 26 May 2016

References

  • Ahmed, A., & Pollitt, A. (2007). Improving the quality of contextualized questions: An experimental investigation of focus. Assessment in Education, 14, 201–232. doi: 10.1080/09695940701478909
  • Avargil, S., Herscovitz, O., & Dori, Y. H. (2012). Teaching thinking skills in context-based leaning: Teachers’ challenges and assessment knowledge. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21, 207–225. doi: 10.1007/s10956-011-9302-7
  • Barker, V., & Millar, R. (2000). Students’ reasoning about basic chemical thermodynamics and chemical bonding: What changes occur during a context-based post-16 chemistry course? International Journal of Science Education, 22, 1171–1200. doi: 10.1080/09500690050166742
  • Beach, K. (2003). Consequential transitions: A developmental view of knowledge propagation through social organizations. In T. Tuomi-Grohn, & Y. Engeström (Eds.), Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing (pp. 39–61). Amsterdam: Pergemon.
  • Beasley, W., & Butler, J. (2002, July). Implementation of context-based science within the freedoms offered by Queensland schooling. Paper presented at the annual meeting of Australasian Science and Education Research Association Conference, Townsville, Queensland.
  • Bellocchi, A., King, D. T., & Ritchie, S. M. (2011). Assessing students in senior science: An analysis of questions in contextualized chemistry exams. In Lee, K.- T., King, D. T., Hudson, P. B., & Chandra, V. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1st international conference of STEM in Education 2010, Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics in Education Conference, Brisbane, Australia.
  • Bennett, J., & Holman, J. (2002). Context-based approaches to the teaching of chemistry: What are they and what are their effects? In J. K. Gilbert, O. de Jong, R. Justi, D. F. Treagust, & J. H. van Driel (Eds.), Chemical education: Towards research-based practice (pp. 165–184). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic.
  • Bennett, J., & Lubben, F. (2006). Context-based chemistry: The Salters approach. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 999–1015. doi: 10.1080/09500690600702496
  • Bohm, D. (1994). Thought as a system. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Broman, K., & Parchmann, I. (2014). Students’ application of chemical concepts when solving chemistry problems in different contexts. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15, 516–529. doi:10.1039/c4rp00051j
  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32–42. doi: 10.3102/0013189X018001032
  • Bucat, R. B. (1983). Elements of chemistry: Earth, air, fire, & water. Canberra City, ACT: Australian Academy of Sciences.
  • Bulte, A. M., W., Westbroek, H. B., de Jong, O., & Pilot, A. (2006). A research approach to designing chemistry education using authentic practices as contexts. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 1063–1086. doi:10.1080/09500690600702520
  • Conle, C. (1996). Resonance in preservice teacher inquiry. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 297–325. doi: 10.3102/00028312033002297
  • Davidowitz, B., & Chittleborough, G. (2009). Linking the macroscopic and sub-microscopic levels: Diagrams. In J. K. Gilbert, & D. Treagust (Eds.), Multiple representations in chemical education (pp. 169–191). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
  • Duranti, A., & Goodwin, C. (Eds.). (1992). Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Fensham, P. J., & Bellocchi, A. (2013). Higher order thinking in chemistry curriculum and its assessment. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 250–264. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2013.06.003
  • Fensham, P. J., & Rennie, L. J. (2013). Towards and authentically assessed science curriculum. In D. Corrigan, R. Gunstone, & A. Jones (Eds.), Valuing assessment in science education: Pedagogy, curriculum, policy (pp. 69–100). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Gilbert, J., Bulte, A. M. W., & Pilot, A. (2011). Concept development and transfer in context-based science education. International Journal of Science Education, 33, 817–837. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2010.493185
  • de Jong, O. (2006). Making chemistry meaningful. Conditions for successful context-based teacher. Education Quimica, 17, 215–221.
  • Kim, J.-S. (2010). Within-subjects design. In N. J. Saskind (Ed.), Encyclopedia of research design (pp. 1639–1645). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • King, D. T., Bellocchi, A., & Ritchie, S. M. (2008). Making connections: Learning and teaching chemistry in context. Research in Science Education, 38, 365–384. doi: 10.1007/s11165-007-9070-9
  • King, D. T., & Ritchie, S. M. (2012). Learning science through real-world contexts. In B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 69–80). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • King, D. T., & Ritchie, S. M. (2013). Academic success in context-based chemistry: Demonstrating fluid transitions between concepts and contexts. International Journal of Science Education, 35, 1159–1182. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2013.774508
  • Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Madaus, G. F., & O’Dwyer, L. M. (1999). A short history of performance assessment: Lesson learned. Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 688–695.
  • Nentwig, P., Roennebeck, S., Schoeps, K., Rumann, S., & Carstensen, C. (2009). Performance and levels of contextualization in a selection of OECD countries in PISA 2006. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 897–908. doi: 10.1002/tea.20338
  • Queensland Studies Authority. (2007). Chemistry. Spring Hill, Queensland: Queensland Studies Authority.
  • Stake, R. E. (2010). Qualitative research. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  • Webb, N. L. (2007). Issues related to judging the alignment of curriculum standards and assessments. Applied Measurement in Education, 20, 7–25. doi: 10.1080/08957340709336728
  • Wilbraham, A. C., Stanley, D. D., Matta, M. S., & Waterman, E. L. (2007). Chemistry. Boston: Prentice Hall.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.