Developing and evaluating a paper-and-pencil test to assess components of physics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge

References

• Abell, S. K. (2007). Research on science teachers’ knowledge. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1105–1149). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Abell, S. K. (2008). Twenty years later: Does pedagogical content knowledge remain a useful idea? International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1405–1416. doi: 10.1080/09500690802187041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonzo, A. C., & Kim, J. (2015). Declarative and dynamic pedagogical content knowledge as elicited through two video-based interview methods. Journal of Research in Science Teaching.
   Google Scholar
• Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., … Tsai, Y.-M. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133–180. doi: 10.3102/0002831209345157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blömeke, S., Felbrich, A., Müller, C., Kaiser, G., & Lehmann, R. (2008). Effectiveness of teacher education. ZDM, 40(5), 719–734. doi: 10.1007/s11858-008-0096-x
   Google Scholar
• Blömeke, S., Kaiser, G., & Lehmann, R. (Eds.). (2008). Professionelle Kompetenz angehender Lehrerinnen und Lehrer.: Wissen, Überzeugungen und Lerngelegenheiten deutscher Mathematikstudierender und -referendare [Pre-service teachers’ professional competence: Knowledge, beliefs and learning oportunities of German pre-service teachers at university and school]. Münster: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Bonsen, M., Bos, W., & Frey, K. A. (2008). Germany. In Ina V. S. Mullis (Ed.), TIMSS 2007 encyclopedia. A guide to mathematics and science education around the world. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center; Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
   Google Scholar
• Boone, W. J., & Scantlebury, K. (2006). The role of Rasch analysis when conducting science education research utilizing multiple-choice tests. Science Education, 90(2), 253–269. doi: 10.1002/sce.20106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boone, W. J., Staver, J. R., & Yale, M. S. (2014). Rasch analysis in the human sciences. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Boone, W. J., Townsend, J. S., & Staver, J. R. (2016). Utilizing multifaceted Rasch measurement through FACETS to evaluate science education data sets composed of judges, respondents, and rating scale items: An exemplar utilizing the elementary science teaching analysis matrix instrument. Science Education, 100(2), 221–238. doi: 10.1002/sce.21210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borowski, A., Neuhaus, B. J., Tepner, O., Wirth, J., Fischer, H. E., Leutner, D., … Sumfleth, E. (2010). Professionswissen von Lehrkräften in den Naturwissenschaften (ProwiN) – Kurzdarstellung des BMBF-Projekts [Professional knowledge of science teachers (ProwiN) – A brief outline of the BMBF project]. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 16, 341–349.
   Google Scholar
• Bromme, R. (1994). Beyond subject matter: A psychological topology of teachers’ professional knowledge. In R. Biehler, R. W. Scholz, R. Sträßer, & B. Winkelmann (Eds.), Mathematics didactics as a scientific discipline: The state of the art (pp. 73–88). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Brovelli, D., Bölsterli, K., Rehm, M., & Wilhelm, M. (2013). Erfassen professioneller Kompetenzen für den naturwissenschaftlichen Unterricht: Ein Vignettentest mit authentisch komplexen Unterrichtssituationen und offenem Antwortformat [Assessing professional competencies for science teaching: A vignette test using authentically complex teaching contexts and an open-ended answer format]. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 41(4), 306–329.
   Google Scholar
• Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2004). Multimodel inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods & Research, 33(2), 261–304. doi: 10.1177/0049124104268644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran, K. F., DeRuiter, J. A., & King, R. A. (1993). Pedagogical content knowing: An integrative model for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4), 263–272. doi: 10.1177/0022487193044004004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daehler, K., Heller, J., & Wong, N. (2015). Supporting growth of pedagogical content knowledge in science. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 45–59). London: Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dollny, S. (2011). Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Testinstruments zur Erfassung des fachspezifischen Professionswissens von Chemielehrkräften [Developing and evaluating a test for chemistry teachers’ subject specific professional knowledge]. Berlin: Logos.
   Google Scholar
• van Driel, J., Verloop, N., & de Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 673–695. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199808)35:6<673::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-J
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, S. S., & Luft, J. A. (2011). Early career secondary science teachers: A longitudinal study of beliefs in relation to field experiences. Science Education, 95(6), 1124–1146. doi: 10.1002/sce.20450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedrichsen, P. (2015). My PCK research trajectory. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 147–161). London: Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geddis, A. N. (1993). Transforming subject-matter knowledge: the role of pedagogical content knowledge in learning to reflect on teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 15(6), 673–683. doi: 10.1080/0950069930150605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Pedagogical content knowledge: An introduction and orientation. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 3–17). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Gess-Newsome, J. (2015). A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK: Results of the thinking from the PCK summit. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 28–42). London: Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gess-Newsome, J., Carlson, J., Gardner, A., & Taylor, J. (2010). Impact of educative materials and professional development on teachers’ professional knowledge, practice, and student achievement. Retrieved from http://bscs.org/primepapers
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, E., & Rutkowski, L. (2010). Principles of multiple matrix booklet designs and parameter recovery in large-scale assessments. In IERI Monograph Series – Issues and Methodologies in Large-Scale Assessments (Vol. 3). Retrieved from http://www.ierinstitute.org/fileadmin/Documents/IERI_Monograph/IERI_Monograph_Volume_03_Chapter_6.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gramzow, Y. (2015). Fachdidaktisches Wissen von Lehramtsstudierenden im Fach Physik: Modellierung und Testkonstruktion [Pedagogical content knowledge of pre-service physics teachers at university]. Berlin: Logos.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. Professional development and practice series. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hashweh, M. (2005). Teacher pedagogical constructions: A reconfiguration of pedagogical content knowledge. Teachers and Teaching, 11(3), 273–292. doi: 10.1080/13450600500105502
   Google Scholar
• Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 238–247. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force concept inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30(3), 141.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371–406. doi: 10.3102/00028312042002371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakubowski, M. (2010). Institutional tracking and achievement growth: Exploring difference-in-differences approach to PIRLS, TIMSS, and PISA Data. In J. Dronkers (Ed.), Quality and inequality of education (pp. 41–81). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jüttner, M., & Neuhaus, B. J. (2012). Development of items for a pedagogical content knowledge test based on empirical analysis of pupils’ errors. International Journal of Science Education, 34(7), 1125–1143. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2011.606511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kind, V. (2014). Science teachers’ content knowledge. In H. Venkat, M. Rollnick, J. Loughran, & M. Askew (Eds.), Exploring mathematics and science teachers’ knowledge (pp. 15–29). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschner, S. (2013). Modellierung und Analyse des Professionswissens von Physiklehrkräften [Modeling and analysing physics teachers’ professional knowledge]. Berlin: Logos.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschner, S., Borowski, A., & Fischer, H. E. (2011a). ProwiN-Test zum fachdidaktischen Wissen von Physiklehrkräften [ProwiN PCK test for physics teachers]. In A. Borowski, H. E. Fischer, M. Jüttner, S. Kirschner, B. J. Neuhaus, E. Sumfleth, … S. Witner (Eds.), ProwiN-Testinstrumente. Essen: Universität Duisburg-Essen.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschner, S., Borowski, A., & Fischer, H. E. (2011b). ProwiN-Test zum Fachwissen von Physiklehrkräften [ProwiN CK test for physics teachers]. In A. Borowski, H. E. Fischer, M. Jüttner, S. Kirschner, B. J. Neuhaus, E. Sumfleth, … S. Witner (Eds.), ProwiN-Testinstrumente. Essen: Universität Duisburg-Essen.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschner, S., Taylor, J., Rollnick, M., Borowski, A., & Mavhunga, E. (2015). Gathering evidence for the validity of PCK measures: Connecting ideas to analytic approaches. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 229–241). London: Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krauss, S., Brunner, M., Kunter, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Neubrand, M., & Jordan, A. (2008). Pedagogical content knowledge and content knowledge of secondary mathematics teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 716–725. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krauss, S., Neubrand, M., Blum, W., & Baumert, J. (2008). The professional knowledge of German secondary mathematics teachers: Investigations in the context of the COACTIV project. Retrieved from http://tsg.icme11.org/document/get/397
   Google Scholar
• Lenske, G., Thillmann, H., Leutner, D., & Wirth, J. (2015). Pädagogisch-psychologisches Professionswissen von Lehrkräften: Evaluation des ProwiN-Tests [Evaluation of a test to capture teachers’ pedagogical-psychological professional knowledge]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 18(2), 225–245.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre, J. M. (2014). Facets computer program for many-facet Rasch measurement. Beaverton, OR: Winsteps.com.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre, J. M. (2015). Winsteps® Rasch measurement computer program user’s guide (3.91.0th ed.). Beaverton, OR: Winsteps.com.
   Google Scholar
• Loughran, J., Berry, A., & Mulhall, P. (2006). Understanding and developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Lunetta, V. (1998). The school science laboratory: Historical perspectives and contexts for contemporary teaching. In K. Tobin & B. J. Fraser (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 249–264). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teacher. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95–132). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, R. (1990). Pedagogical content knowledge: From a mathematical case to a modified conception. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 3–11. doi: 10.1177/002248719004100302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L., González-Howard, M., Katsh-Singer, R., & Loper, S. (2015). Pedagogical content knowledge of argumentation: Using classroom contexts to assess high-quality PCK rather than pseudoargumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(2), 261–290. doi: 10.1002/tea.21252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1989). Meaning and values in test validation: The science and ethics of assessment. Educational Researcher, 18(2), 5–11. doi: 10.3102/0013189X018002005
   Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1998). Test validity: A matter of consequence. Social Indicators Research, 45, 35–44. doi: 10.1023/A:1006964925094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olszewski, J. (2010). The impact of physics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge on teacher action and student outcomes. Berlin: Logos.
   Google Scholar
• Paris, S. G., Lipson, M. Y., & Wixson, K. K. (1983). Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 293–316. doi: 10.1016/0361-476X(83)90018-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S., & Chen, Y.-C. (2012). Mapping out the integration of the components of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): Examples from high school biology classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(7), 922–941. doi: 10.1002/tea.21022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S., & Oliver, S. J. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 261–284. doi: 10.1007/s11165-007-9049-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S., & Suh, J. (2015). From portraying toward assessing PCK: Drivers, dilemmas, and directions for future research. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 104–119). London: Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riese, J. (2009a). Professionelles Wissen und professionelle Handlungskompetenz von (angehenden) Physiklehrkräften [Professional knowledge and professional competence of (pre-service) physics teachers]. Berlin: Logos.
   Google Scholar
• Riese, J. (2009b, October 1). PCK-Test and Codebook (Word document ).
   Google Scholar
• Rollnick, M., Bennett, J., Rhemtula, M., Dharsey, N., & Ndlovu, T. (2008). The place of subject matter knowledge in pedagogical content knowledge: A case study of South African teachers teaching the amount of substance and chemical equilibrium. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1365–1387. doi: 10.1080/09500690802187025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönnebeck, S., Schöps, K., Prenzel, M., Mildner, D., & Hochweber, J. (2010). Naturwissenschaftliche Kompetenz von PISA 2006 bis PISA 2009 [Competencies in science from PISA 2006 to PISA 2009]. In E. Klieme, C. Artelt, J. Hartig, N. Jude, O. Köller, M. Prenzel, … P. Stanat (Eds.), PISA 2009. Bilanz nach einem Jahrzehnt (pp. 117–198). Münster: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Schmelzing, S., van Driel, Jan H., Jüttner, M., Brandenbusch, S., Sandmann, A., & Neuhaus, B. J. (2013). Development, evaluation, and validation of a paper-and-pencil test for measuring two components of biology teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge concerning the ‘cardiovascular system’. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(6), 1369–1390. doi: 10.1007/s10763-012-9384-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. doi: 10.3102/0013189X015002004
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22. doi: 10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D. C., & Neale, D. C. (1989). The construction of subject matter knowledge in primary science teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 5(1), 1–20. doi: 10.1016/0742-051X(89)90015-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, S., & Banilower, E. (2015). Assessing PCK: A new application of the uncertainty principle. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 89–103). London: Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tamir, P. (1988). Subject matter and related pedagogical knowledge in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(2), 99–110. doi: 10.1016/0742-051X(88)90011-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tepner, O., Borowski, A., Dollny, S., Fischer, H. E., Jüttner, M., Kirschner, S., … Wirth, J. (2012). Modell zur Entwicklung von Testitems zur Erfassung des Professionswissens von Lehrkräften in den Naturwissenschaften [Item development model for assessing professional knowledge of science teachers]. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 18, 7–28.
   Google Scholar
• Thillmann, H. (2010). Test zum pädagogischen Wissen von Lehrkräften, unveröffentlicht [PK test for teachers, unpublished ].
   Google Scholar
• Thorndike, R. M., & Thorndike-Christ, T. (2014). Measurement and evaluation in psychology and education (Pearson new international edition). Harlow: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Veal, W. R., & MaKinster, J. G. (1999). Pedagogical content knowledge taxonomies. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 3(4).
   Google Scholar
• Voss, T., Kunter, M., & Baumert, J. (2011). Assessing teacher candidates’ general pedagogical/psychological knowledge: Test construction and validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(4), 952–969. doi: 10.1037/a0025125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woitkowski, D., Riese, J., & Reinhold, P. (2011). Modellierung fachwissenschaftlicher Kompetenz angehender Physiklehrkräfte [Modelling content knowledge of prospective physics teachers]. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 17, 289–313.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, M., Adams, R., & Wilson, M. (1998). Acer conquest-generalised item response modelling software. Melbourne: ACER Press.
   Google Scholar