1,012
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Impact of an inquiry unit on grade 4 students’ science learning

&
Pages 2239-2258 | Received 10 Mar 2016, Accepted 05 Sep 2016, Published online: 01 Oct 2016

References

  • Brownell, S. E., Wenderoth, M. P., Theobald, R., Okoroafor, N., Koval, M., Freeman, S., & Crowe, A. J. (2014). How students think about experimental design: Novel conceptions revealed by in-class activities. Bioscience, 64(2), 125–137. doi: 10.1093/biosci/bit016
  • Cañal, P. (2007). La investigación escolar hoy. Alambique, 52, 9–19.
  • Carey, S., Evans, R., Honda, M., Jay, E., & Unger, C. (1989). ‘An experiment is when you try it and see if it works’: A study of grade 7 students’ understanding of the construction of scientific knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 11(5), 514–529. doi: 10.1080/0950069890110504
  • Chen, Z., & Klahr, D. (1999). All other things being equal: Children’s acquisition of the control of variables strategy. Child Development, 70, 1098–1120. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00081
  • Cochran-Smith, M. (2004). Walking the road: Race, diversity and social justice in teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Dean Jr., D., & Kuhn, D. (2007). Direct instruction vs. discovery: The long view. Science Education, 91(3), 384–397. doi: 10.1002/sce.20194
  • Di Mauro, M. F., Furman, M., & Bravo, B. (2015). Las habilidades científicas en la escuela primaria: un estudio del nivel de desempeño en niños de 4to año. Revista Electrónica de Investigación en Educación en Ciencias, 10(2), 1–10.
  • Dirección General de Cultura y Educación de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. (2008). Diseño Curricular para la Educación Primaria. Segundo Ciclo. [ Curricular guidelines for the elementary level]. La Plata: Author.
  • Ergül, R., Şımşeklı, Y., Çaliş, S., Özdılek, Z., Göçmençelebı, Ş., & Şanli, M. (2011). The effects of inquiry-based science teaching on elementary school students’ science process skills and science attitudes. Bulgarian Journal of Science & Education Policy, 5(1), 48–68.
  • Federal Board of Education [Consejo Federal de Cultura y Educación]. (2004). Núcleos de Aprendizaje Prioritarios. Buenos Aires: Ministerio de Educación, Ciencia y Tecnología.
  • Furman, M. (2012). ¿Qué ciencia estamos enseñando en escuelas de contextos de pobreza? [Which science are we teaching in schools from vulnerable contexts?] Praxis & Saber. Revista de Investigación Y Pedagogia, 3(5), 15–52.
  • Harlen, W. (2000). The teaching of science in primary schools. London: David Fulton Publichers.
  • Harlen, W. (2007). Criteria for evaluating systems for student assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 33(1), 15–28. doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2007.01.003
  • Harlen, W. (2010). Principles and big ideas of science education. Hatfield: ASE.
  • Herron, M. D. (1971). The nature of scientific inquiry. The School Review, 79(2), 171–212. doi: 10.1086/442968
  • Hidalgo, V. H. (2010). Diseños experimentales: breve semblanza de su importancia en las ciencias naturales. Ciencia y Mar, XIV(40), 45–52.
  • Khun, D. (2007). Jumping to conclusions. Scientific American Mind, 18(1), 44–51. doi: 10.1038/scientificamericanmind0207-44
  • Khun, D., & Dean, D. (2005). Is developing scientific thinking all about learning to control variables? Psychological Science, 16(11), 866–870. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01628.x
  • Klahr, D. (2000). Exploring science. The cognition and development of discovery processes. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Klahr, D., & Li, J. (2005). Cognitive research and elementary science instruction: From the laboratory, to the classroom, and back. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14, 217–238. doi: 10.1007/s10956-005-4423-5
  • Klahr, D., & Nigam, M. (2004). The equivalence of learning paths in early science instruction: Effects of direct instruction and discovery learning. Psychological Science, 15, 661–667. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00737.x
  • Metz, K. E. (2004). Children’s understanding of scientifc inquiry: Their conceptualization of uncertainty in investigations of their own design. Cognition and Instruction, 22, 219–290. doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci2202_3
  • Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2009). Inquiry-based science instruction-what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474–496. doi: 10.1002/tea.20347
  • NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • Osborne, J. F., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079. doi: 10.1080/0950069032000032199
  • Roesch, F., Nerb, J., & Riess, W. (2015). Promoting experimental problem-solving ability in sixth-grade students through problem-oriented teaching of ecology: Findings of an intervention study in a complex domain. International Journal of Science Education, 37(4), 1–22. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2014.1000427
  • The Royal Society. (2010). Primary science and mathematics education: Getting the basics right. London: The Royal Society.
  • Toth, E. E., Klahr, D., & Chen, Z. (2000). Bridging research and practice: A cognitively-based classroom intervention for teaching experimentation skills to primary school children. Cognition and Instruction, 18, 423–459. doi: 10.1207/S1532690XCI1804_1
  • UK Department for Education. (Ed.). (2013). The national curriculum in England. Key stages 1 and 2 framework document. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/335133/PRIMARY_national_curriculum_220714.pdf
  • Van Joolingen, W., de Jong, T., & Dimitrakopoulout, A. (2007). Issues in computer supported inquiry learning in science. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(2), 111–119. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00216.x
  • Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. Baltimore, MD: ASCD.
  • Zimmerman, C. (2007). The development of scientific thinking skills in elementary and middle school. Developmental Review, 27, 172–223. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2006.12.001

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.