Simulation-based performance assessment: an innovative approach to exploring understanding of physical science concepts

References

• Alonzo, A., & Steedle, J. (2008). Developing and assessing a force and motion learning progression. Science Education, 93, 389–421. doi: 10.1002/sce.20303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS] Project 2061. (n.d.) [Pilot and field test data collected between 2006 and 2010]. Unpublished raw data.
   Google Scholar
• American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education (AERA, APA, NCME). (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Atasoy, S., Kucuk, M., & Akdeniz, A. R. (2011). Remedying science student teachers’ misconceptions of force and motion using worksheets based on constructivist learning theory. Energy Education and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies, 3(4), 519–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champagne, A. B., Klopfer, L. E., & Anderson, J. (1980). Factors influencing the learning of classical mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 48, 1074–1079. doi: 10.1119/1.12290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelhard, G., Jr. (2013). Invariant measurement: Using Rasch models in the social, behavioral, and health sciences. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hickey, D. T., Ingram-Goble, A. A., & Jameson, E. M. (2009). Designing assessments and assessing designs in virtual educational environments. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(2), 187–208. doi: 10.1007/s10956-008-9143-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickey, D. T., & Zuiker, S. J. (2012). Multilevel assessment for discourse, understanding, and achievement. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(4), 522–582. doi: 10.1080/10508406.2011.652320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, S., & Stone, C. (2006). Performance assessment. In R. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 387–431). Westport, CT: American Council on Education and Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• McCloskey, M. (1983). Intuitive physics. Scientific American, 248(4), 114–122. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0483-122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1996). Validity and washback in language testing. Language Testing, 13, 241–256. doi: 10.1177/026553229601300302
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. H., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L. S., Almond, R. G., Haertel, G. D., & Penuel, W. R. (2001). Leverage points for improving educational assessment. CSE Technical Report.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC). (2014). Developing assessments for the next generation science standards. Committee on Developing Assessments of Science Proficiency in K-12. Board on Testing and Assessment and Board on Science Education, J. W. Pellegrino, M. R. Wilson, J. A. Koenig, & A. S. Beatty (Eds.). Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neil Jr, H. F., & Klein, D. C. (1997). Feasibility of machine scoring of concept maps.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, R. J. (1985). Building on children’s intuitive ideas. In R. Osborne & P. Freyberg (Eds.), Learning in Science. The implications of childrens’ science (pp. 41–50). Auckland: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, R. J., & Gilbert, J. K. (1980). A technique for exploring students’ views of the world. Physics Education, 15, 376–379. doi: 10.1088/0031-9120/15/6/312
   Google Scholar
• Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (Eds.). (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Penuel, W. R., & Fishman, B. J. (2012). Large-scale science education intervention research we can use. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(3), 281–304. doi: 10.1002/tea.21001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasch. (1960/1980). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Educational Research (Expanded edition, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1980).
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Shavelson, R. J., Hamilton, L., & Klein, S. (2002). On the evaluation of systemic science education reform: Searching for instructional sensitivity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(5), 369–393. doi: 10.1002/tea.10027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77–100. doi: 10.1177/2345678906292430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson Tutwiler, M., Metcalf, S., Kamarainen, A. M., Grotzer, T. A., & Dede, C. (2016). A blended assessment strategy for EcoXPT: An experimentation-driven ecosystems science-based multiuser virtual environment. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• Usselman, M., & Ryan, M. (2015). SLIDER: Science learning integrating design, engineering and robotics. In C. Sneider (Ed.), The go-to guide for engineering curricula, grades 6–8: Choosing and using the best instructional materials for your students (pp. 53–65). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Usselman, M., Ryan, M., Gane, B., Grossman, S., Rosen, J., Robinson, S., & Stillwell, F. (2013). Integrating K-12 engineering and science: Balancing inquiry, design, standards, and classroom realities. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education, Atlanta GA.
   Google Scholar
• Venville, G., Gribble, S. J., & Donovan, J. (2005). An exploration of young children’s understandings of genetics concepts from ontological and epistemological perspectives. Science Education, 89(4), 614–633. doi: 10.1002/sce.20061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1994). Mental models of the day/night cycle. Cognitive Science, 18, 123–183. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1801_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, B., & Frederiksen, J. (2000). Metacognitive facilitation: An approach to making scientific inquiry accessible to all. In J. Minstrel & E. van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into Inquiry Learning and Teaching in Science (pp. 331–370). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
   Google Scholar
• Wind, S. A., & Gale, J. D. (2015). Diagnostic opportunities using Rasch measurement in the context of a misconceptions-based physical science assessment. Science Education, 99(4), 721–741. doi: 10.1002/sce.21172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar