References
- Archer, L., Dawson, E., DeWitt, J., Seakins, A., & Wong, B. (2015). ‘Science capital’: A conceptual, methodological, and empirical argument for extending bourdieusian notions of capital beyond the arts. Journal Research in Science Teaching, 52, 922–948. doi: 10.1002/tea.21227
- Archer, L., & DeWitt, J. (2014). Science aspirations and gender identity: Lessons from the aspires project. In E. K. Henriksen, J. Dillon, & J. Ryder (Eds.), Understanding student participation and choice in science and technology education (pp. 89–102). Dordrecht: Springer.
- Babbage, C. (1830). Reflections on the decline of science in England and some of its causes. Retrieved July, 2014, from Project Guttenberg: http://www.gutenberg.org/files/1216/1216-h/1216-h.htm#link2HCH0001
- Ball, S. (1987). The micropolitics of the School. London: Routledge.
- Ball, S. (2013). The education debate (2nd ed.). Bristol: The Policy Press.
- Ball, S., & Junemann, C. (2012). Networks, new governance and education. Bristol: The Policy Press.
- BERA. (2011). Ethical guidelines for educational research. London: BERA.
- Braun, V., & Clarke, C. (2013). Successful qualitative research. London: Sage.
- Breiner, J., Harness, S., Johnson, C., & Koehler, C. (2012). What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112, 3–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00109.x
- Bybee, R. (2010). What is STEM education? Science, 329, 996. doi: 10.1126/science.1194998
- Bybee, R. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. Arlington, TX: National Science Teachers Association.
- Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
- Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Reserach methods in education. Abingdon: Routledge.
- Department for Education and Skills. (2006). The STEM programme report. Retrieved July, 2014, from National STEM Centre elibrary: http://www.nationalstemcentre.org.uk/res/documents/page/050110114146stem_programme_report_2006.pdf
- Edwards, A. (2011). Building common knowledge at the boundaries between professional practices: Relational agency and relational expertise in systems of distributed expertise. International Journal of Educational Research, 50, 33–39. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2011.04.007
- European Commission. (2016, February 22). Research and innovation. Retrieved from European Commission: http://ec.europa.eu/geninfo/query/resultaction.jsp?query_source=RTD&swlang=en&QueryText=STEM+education
- Fairbrother, R., & Dillon, J. (2009). Triple science back on the Agenda. School Science Review, 91, 65–69.
- Garton, S., & Copland, F. (2010). ‘I like this interview I get cake and cats!’: The effect of prior relationships on interview talk. Qualitative Research, 10, 533–551. doi: 10.1177/1468794110375231
- Goodson, I. (1995). Becoming a school subject. In I. Goodson (Ed.), The making of curriculum (pp. 155–177). London: The Falmer Press.
- Hill, M. J. (2013). The public policy process (5th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.
- HM Treasury, Department for Education and Skills, Department for Trade and Industry. (2004). Science and innovation investment framework. HMSO. Retrieved September, 2014, from http://www.nationalstemcentre.org.uk/stem-programme/stem-background
- HM Treasury, Department of Trade and Industry, Department for Education and Skills, Department of Health. (2006). Science and innovation investment framework: Next steps. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. Retrieved May, 2015, from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http:/www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/media/7/8/bud06_science_332v1.pdf
- Hodgen, J., Pepper, D. S., & Ruddock, G. (2010). Is the UK an outlier? An international comparison of upper secondary mathematics education. London: Nuffield Foundation.
- Holman, J. (2011). Forward. Design and technology: An international journal, 16(1), 6.
- Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an Agenda for research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved September, 2014, from http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=18612
- Institute of Physics. (2015). Opening doors: A guide to good practice in countering gender stereotyping in schools. London: Institute of Physics. Retrieved October, 2015, from http://www.iop.org/education/teacher/support/girls_physics/opening-doors/page_63803.html
- Joint Council for Qualifications. (2016). GCE Trends 2015. Retrieved from Examination results – A-levels: http://www.jcq.org.uk/examination-results/a-levels/2015
- Miles, M., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Millar, R. (2014). Designing a science curriculum fit for purpose. School Science Review, 95, 15–20.
- Mohr-Shroeder, M., Cavalcanti, M., & Blyman, K. (2015). STEM education understanding the changing landscape. In A. Sahin (Ed.), A practice based model of STEM teaching (pp. 3–14). Rotterdam: Sense.
- Morgan, N. (2014). Nicky Morgan speaks at launch of Your Life campaign. Retrieved from UK Government: https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/nicky-morgan-speaks-at-launch-of-your-life-campaign
- National Academies Press. (2006). Rising above the gathering storm. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved September, 2015, from http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11463/rising-above-the-gathering-storm-energizing-and-employing-america-for
- NFER. (2011). The STEM cohesion programme: Final report. Department for Education. Retrieved July, 2014, from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/182142/DFE-RR147.pdf
- Roberts, G. (2002). Get SET for success: The supply of people with science, technology, engineering and mathematics skills. London: UK Government.
- Robinson, M. (1994). Using email and the internet in science teaching. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 3(2), 229–238. doi: 10.1080/0962029940030209
- Rubin, H., & Rubin, I. (1995). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Sainsbury, D. (2007). The race to the top. HMSO. Retrieved from http://www.nationalstemcentre.org.uk/stem-programme/stem-background
- Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM education, STEM mania. Technology Teacher, 68, 20–26.
- Sturges, J., & Hanrahan, K. (2004). Comparing telephone and face-to-tace qualitative interviewing: A research note. Qualitative Research, 4, 107–118. doi: 10.1177/1468794104041110
- Walford, G. (2012). Researching the powerful in education: A reassessment of the problems. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 35, 111–118. doi: 10.1080/1743727X.2012.669523
- Williams, J. (2011). STEM education: Proceed with caution. Design and Technology Education: An international journal, 16(1), 26–35.