‘Does it answer the question or is it French fries?’: an exploration of language supports for scientific argumentation

References

• Andriessen, J. (2007). Arguing to learn. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 443–460). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2012). The Australian curriculum: Science (Version 3.0). Sydney: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, P., & Linn, M. (2000). Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: Designing for learning from the Web with KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 797–817. doi: 10.1080/095006900412284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berland, L. K., & Hammer, D. (2012). Framing for scientific argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(1), 68–94. doi: 10.1002/tea.20446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Echevarria, J., Vogt, M. E., & Short, D. J. (2008). Making content comprehensible for English learners: The SIOP model (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Erduran, S., Ozdem, Y., & Park, J. Y. (2015). Research trends on argumentation in science education: A journal content analysis from 1998–2014. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(1), 1–12. doi: 10.1186/s40594-015-0020-1
   Google Scholar
• Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin’s argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915–933. doi: 10.1002/sce.20012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evagorou, M., Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Osborne, J. (2012). ‘Should we kill the grey squirrels?’ A study exploring students’ justifications and decision-making. International Journal of Science Education, 34(3), 401–428. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2011.619211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evagorou, M., & Osborne, J. (2013). Exploring young students’ collaborative argumentation within a socioscientific issue. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(2), 209–237. doi: 10.1002/tea.21076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, M. (2008). Disciplinary authority and accountability in scientific practice and learning. Science Education, 92(3), 404–423. doi: 10.1002/sce.20263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, M. J. (2012). A dialogic account of sensemaking in scientific argumentation and reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 30(3), 207–245. doi: 10.1080/07370008.2012.689383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geva, E., & Farnia, F. (2012). Developmental changes in the nature of language proficiency and reading fluency paint a more complex view of reading comprehension in ELL and EL1. Reading and Writing, 25, 1819–1845. doi: 10.1007/s11145-011-9333-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Howard, M., & McNeill, K. L. (2016). Learning in a community of Practice: Factors impacting English-learning students’ engagement in scientific argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(4), 527–553. doi: 10.1002/tea.21310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakuta, K., Santos, M., & Fang, Z. (2013). Challenges and opportunities for language learning in the context of the CCSS and the NGSS. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 56(6), 451–454. doi: 10.1002/JAAL.164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, B. J., MacPherson, A., Osborne, J., & Wild, A. (2015). Beyond construction: Five arguments for the role and value of critique in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 37(10), 1668–1697. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2015.1043598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Erduran, S. (2008). Argumentation in science education: An Overview. In S. Erduran & M. P. Jimenez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research (pp. 3–28). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Knain, E. (2001). Ideologies in school science textbooks. International Journal of Science Education, 23(3), 319–329. doi: 10.1080/095006901750066547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, O., & Buxton, C. (2013). Integrating science and English proficiency for English language learners. Theory into Practice, 52, 36–42. doi: 10.1080/07351690.2013.743772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, O., Llosa, L., Jiang, F., Haas, A., O'Connor, C., & Van Booven, C. D. (2016). Elementary teachers’ science knowledge and instructional practices: Impact of an intervention focused on English language learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(4), 579–597. doi: 10.1002/tea.21314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, O., Miller, E. C., & Januszyk, R. (2014). Next generation science standards: All standards, all students. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(2), 223–233. doi: 10.1007/s10972-014-9379-y
   Google Scholar
• Lee, O., Quinn, H., & Valdés, G. (2013). Science and language for English language learners in relation to next generation Science standards and with implications for common core state standards for English language arts and mathematics. Educational Researcher, 42, 223–233. doi: 10.3102/0013189X13480524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lervag, A., & Aukrust, V. G. (2010). Vocabulary knowledge is a critical determinant of the difference in reading comprehension growth between first and second language learners. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51(5), 612–620. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02185.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limbird, C. K., Maluch, J. T., Rjosk, C., Stanat, P., & Merkens, H. (2014). Differential growth patterns in emerging reading skills of Turkish-German bilingual and German monolingual primary school students. Reading and Writing, 27(5), 945–968. doi: 10.1007/s11145-013-9477-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marco-Bujosa, L., McNeill, K. L., González-Howard, M., & Loper, S. (2017). An exploration of teacher learning from an educative reform-oriented curriculum: Case studies of teacher curriculum use. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(2), 141–168. doi: 10.1002/tea.21340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L., González-Howard, M., Katsh-Singer, R., & Loper, S. (2016). Lessons learned developing a teacher PCK assessment for scientific argumentation: Using classroom contexts to assess rich argumentation rather than pseudoargumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(2), 261–290. doi: 10.1002/tea.21252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2008). Scientific explanations: Characterizing and evaluating the effects of teachers’ instructional practices on student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 53–78. doi: 10.1002/tea.20201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. W. (2006). Supporting students’ construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in instructional materials. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 153–191. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls1502_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L., & Pimentel, D. (2010). Scientific discourse in three urban classrooms: The role of the teacher in engaging high school students in argumentation. Science Education, 94(2), 203–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nasir, N. S., Rosebery, A. S., Warren, B., & Lee, C. D. (2014). Learning as a cultural process: Achieving equity through diversity. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed., pp. 686–706). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). The condition of education 2012 (NCES 2012-045). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states (Appendix F). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. (2010). Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse. Science, 328, 463–466. doi: 10.1126/science.1183944
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. (2014). Teaching scientific practices: Meeting the challenge of change. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(2), 177–196. doi: 10.1007/s10972-014-9384-1
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, P. D., Moje, E., & Greenleaf, C. (2010). Literacy and science: Each in the service of the other. Science, 328, 459–463. doi: 10.1126/science.1182595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regents of the University of California. (2013a). Metabolism. Filed trial version of Middle School science unit developed by the Learning Design Group. Lawrence Hall of Science.
   Google Scholar
• Regents of the University of California. (2013b). Microbiome. Filed trial version of Middle School science unit developed by the Learning Design Group. Lawrence Hall of Science.
   Google Scholar
• Rosebery, A. S., & Warren, B. (Eds.). (2008). Teaching science to English language learners: Building on students’ strengths. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, V., & Clark, D. (2009). The impact of collaboration on the outcomes of scientific argumentation. Science Education, 93(3), 448–484. doi: 10.1002/sce.20306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W. A., & Millwood, K. A. (2005). The quality of students’ use of evidence in written scientific explanations. Cognition and Instruction, 23(1), 23–55. doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci2301_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Science Teacher Education Advanced Methods. (2010). Report on argumentation and teacher education in Europe. Trondheim: S-TEAM/NTNU.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2–3), 235–260. doi: 10.1080/09500690500336957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suárez-Orozco, C., Suárez-Orozco, M., & Todorova, I. (2008). Learning a new land: Immigrant students in American society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, L. H., Bianchini, J. A., & Lee, J. S. (2014). Engaging in argument and communicating information: A case study of English language learners and their science teacher in an urban high school. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(1), 31–64. doi: 10.1002/tea.21124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. (2012). Statistical abstract of the United States, 2012. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/library/publications/2011/compendia/statab/131ed/education.html
   Google Scholar
• Valdés, G., Capitelli, S., & Alvarez, L. (2010). Latino children learning English: Steps in the journey. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Von Aufschnaiter, C., Erduran, S., Osborne, J., & Simon, S. (2008). Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Case studies of how students’ argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 101–131. doi: 10.1002/tea.20213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students’ knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35–62. doi: 10.1002/tea.10008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar