The role of involvement and emotional well-being for preschool children’s scientific observation competency in biology

References

• Alberdi, E., Sleeman, D. H., & Korpi, M. (2000). Accommodating surprise in taxonomic tasks: The role of expertise. Cognitive Science, 24(1), 53–91. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2401_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydoğan, C., Farran, D. C., & Sağsöz, G. (2015). The relationship between kindergarten classroom environment and children’s engagement. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 23(5), 604–618. doi:10.1080/1350293X.2015.1104036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. W. (2006). Scientific inquiry and science teaching. In L. B. Flick & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science (pp. 1–14). Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-5814-1_1
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, I. S. (1992). Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Declercq, B. (2011). Levels of well-being and involvement of young children in centre-based provision in the Free State Province of South Africa. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 1(2), 64–80. doi:10.4102/sajce.v1i2.85
   Google Scholar
• Eberbach, C., & Crowley, K. (2009). From everyday to scientific observation: How children learn to observe the biologist’s world. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 39–68. doi:10.3102/0034654308325899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabes, R. A., Eisenberg, N., Nyman, M., & Michealieu, Q. (1991). Young children’s appraisals of others’ spontaneous emotional reactions. Developmental Psychology, 27(5), 858–866. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.27.5.858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Ufer, S., Sodian, B., Hussmann, H., Pekrun, R., … Eberle, J. (2014). Scientific reasoning and argumentation: Advancing an interdisciplinary research agenda in education. Frontline Learning Research, 2(3), 28–45. doi:10.14786/flr.v2i2.96
   Google Scholar
• Fleer, M. (2013). Affective imagination in science education: Determining the emotional nature of scientific and technological learning of young children. Research in Science Education, 43(5), 2085–2106. doi:10.1007/s11165-012-9344-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, J. E., & Lee, J. (2013). When children draw vs when children don’t: Exploring the effects of observational drawing in science. Creative Education, 4(7A1), 11–14. doi:10.4236/ce.2013.47A1002
   Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. doi:10.3102/00346543074001059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldspink, C., Winter, P., & Foster, M. (2008). Student engagement and quality pedagogy. In European Conference on Educational Research in Goteborg (pp. 10–12). Retrieved from http://www.learningtolearn.sa.edu.au/tfel/files/links/Student_Engagement_and_Qu_1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, J. S. (2009). What does the skill of observation look like in young children? International Journal of Science Education, 31(18), 2511–2525. doi:10.1080/09500690802644637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohlhauf, L., Rutke, U., & Neuhaus, B. (2011). Influence of previous knowledge, language skills and domain-specific interest on observation competency. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(5), 667–678. doi:10.1007/s10956-011-9322-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosso, P. (2011). A summary of scientific method. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1614-8
   Google Scholar
• Laevers, F. (1993). Deep level learning: An exemplary application on the area of physical knowledge. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 1(1), 53–68. doi:10.1080/13502939385207351
   Google Scholar
• Laevers, F. (2000). Forward to basics! Deep-level-learning and the experiential approach. Early Years, 20(2), 20–29. doi:10.1080/0957514000200203
   Google Scholar
• Laevers, F. (2003). Experiential education: Making care and education more effective through well-being and involvement. In F. Laevers & L. Heylen (Eds.), Involvement of children and teacher style: Insights from an international study on experiential education (pp. 13–24). Leuven: Leuven University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laevers, F., & Schlömer, K. (2006). Die Leuvener Engagiertheits-Skala für Kinder: LES-K; deutsche Fassung der Leuven involvement scale for young children. Berufskolleg Erkelenz, Fachschule für Sozialpädagogik.
   Google Scholar
• Laukenmann, M., Bleicher, M., Fuss, S., Gläser-Zikuda, M., Mayring, P., & Rhöneck, C. v. (2000). Eine Untersuchung zum Einfluss emotionaler Faktoren auf das Lernen im Physikunterricht. Zeitschrift Für Didaktik Der Naturwissenschaften, 6, 139–155.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497–521. doi:10.1002/tea.10034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linnenbrink, E. A. (2007). The role of affect in student learning: A multi-dimensional approach to considering the interaction of affect, motivation, and engagement. In P. A. Schutz & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotion in education (pp. 107–124). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, D., Sodian, B., Koerber, S., & Schwippert, K. (2014). Scientific reasoning in elementary school children: Assessment and relations with cognitive abilities. Learning and Instruction, 29, 43–55. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, A., Klingenberg, K., & Wilde, M. (2014). The benefits of mouse keeping—an empirical study on students’ flow and intrinsic motivation in biology lessons. Research in Science Education, 46(1), 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, N., Sujan, H., Hirt, E. R., & Sujan, M. (1990). The influence of mood on categorization: A cognitive flexibility interpretation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(3), 411–425. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.3.411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, S. P. (1984). Defining observational competence. Science Education, 68(2), 129–142. doi:10.1002/sce.3730680206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oguz, A., & Yurumezoglu, K. (2007). The primacy of observation in inquiry-based science teaching. Paper presented at the International Workshop: Science Education in School. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED498653
   Google Scholar
• Pascal, C., Bertram, T., Mould, C., & Hall, R. (1998). Exploring the relationship between process and outcome in young children’s learning: Stage one of a longitudinal study. International Journal of Educational Research, 29(1), 51–67. doi:10.1016/S0278-4343(98)00013-5
   Google Scholar
• Pekrun, R., & Bühner, M. (2014). Self-report measures of academic emotions. In R. Pekrun & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 561–579). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pekrun, R., Hall, N. C., Goetz, T., & Perry, R. P. (2014). Boredom and academic achievement: Testing a model of reciprocal causation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(3), 696–710. doi:10.1037/a0036006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekrun, R., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2012). Academic emotions and student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 259–282). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pekrun, R., & Perry, R. P. (2014). Control-value theory of achievement emotions. In R. Pekrun & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 120–141). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pekrun, R., & Stephens, E. J. (2010). Achievement emotions: A control-value approach. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(4), 238–255. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00259.x
   Google Scholar
• Rogoff, B., Paradise, R., Arauz, R. M., Correa-Chávez, M., & Angelillo, C. (2003). Firsthand learning through intent participation. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 175–203. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinatra, G. M., & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2011). Intentional conceptual change: The self-regulation of science learning. In B. Zimmermann & D. Shunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 203–216). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Taasoobshirazi, G., & Sinatra, G. M. (2011). A structural equation model of conceptual change in physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(8), 901–918. doi:10.1002/tea.20434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tokarczyk, S. (2015). Using technology and phenology to increase students’ observation skills (Master’s thesis). Hamline University, Saint Paul, Minnesota. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.hamline.edu/hse_all/162/
   Google Scholar
• Tomkins, S. P., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2001). Looking for ideas: Observation, interpretation and hypothesis-making by 12-year-old pupils undertaking science investigations. International Journal of Science Education, 23(8), 791–813. doi: 10.1080/09500690119322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomkins, S., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2007). Nature tables: Stimulating children’s. Journal of Biological Education, 41(4), 150–155. doi: 10.1080/00219266.2007.9656090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellnitz, N., & Mayer, J. (2011). Modelling and assessing scientific methods. Annual Meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching (NARST), Orlando, FL. Retrieved from https://www.uni-kassel.de/fb10/fileadmin/datas/fb10/biologie/didaktik/Publikationslisten/Artikelanh%C3%A4nge/Wellnitz_NARST2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, C. (2000). The development of scientific reasoning skills. Developmental Review, 20(1), 99–149. doi:10.1006/drev.1999.0497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar