1,918
Views
29
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Transformation of topic-specific professional knowledge into personal pedagogical content knowledge through lesson planning

ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 1690-1714 | Received 06 Jul 2016, Accepted 03 Jul 2017, Published online: 26 Jul 2017

References

  • Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Baumert, J. (2009). Professionswissen von Lehrkräften, kognitiv aktivierender Mathematikunterricht und die Entwicklung von mathematischer Kompetenz (COACTIV): Dokumentation der Erhebungsinstrumente [Teachers’ professional knowledge, cognitive activation and the development of mathematical competence (COACTIV): Documentation of the assessment instruments]. Berlin: Max-Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung.
  • Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., … Tsai, Y.-M. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133–180. doi:10.3102/0002831209345157 doi: 10.3102/0002831209345157
  • Berliner, D. C. (1986). In pursuit of the expert pedagogue. Educational Researcher, 15(7), 5–13. doi: 10.3102/0013189X015007007
  • Berry, A., Friedrichsen, P. J., & Loughran, J. (Eds.). (2015). Teaching and learning in science series. Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Borko, H., & Livingston, C. (1989). Cognition and improvisation: Differences in mathematics instruction by expert and novice teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 26(4), 473–498. doi:10.3102/00028312026004473 doi: 10.3102/00028312026004473
  • Borko, H., Roberts, S. A., & Shavelson, R. J. (2008). Teachers’ decision making: From Alan J. Boshop to today. In A. J. Bishop, P. C. Clarkson, & N. C. Presmeg (Eds.), Critical issues in mathematics education. Major contributions of Alan Bishop (pp. 37–67). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Bransford, J., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Bromme, R., & Tillema, H. (1995). Fusing experience and theory: The structure of professional knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 5, 261–267. doi:10.1016/0959-4752(95)00018-6 doi: 10.1016/0959-4752(95)00018-6
  • Brovelli, D., Bölsterli, K., Rehm, M., & Wilhelm, M. (2013). Erfassen professioneller Kompetenzen für den naturwissenschaftlichen Unterricht: Ein Vignettentest mit authentischen komplexen Unterrichtssituationen und offenem Antwortformat [Assessing professional competencies for science teaching: A vignette test using authentical complex teaching contexts and open-ended answer format]. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 41(1), 306–329.
  • Carlson, J., Stokes, L., Helms, J., Gess-Newsome, J., & Gardner, A. (2015). The PCK-summit: A process and structure for challenging current ideas, provoking future work, and considering new directions. In A. Berry, P. J. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Teaching and learning in science series. Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education. (pp. 14–27). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Cochran, K. F., DeRuiter, J. A., & King, R. A. (1993). Pedagogical content knowing: An integrative model for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4), 263–272. doi:10.1177/0022487193044004004 doi: 10.1177/0022487193044004004
  • Field, A. P., Miles, J., & Field, Z. (2012). Discovering statistics using R. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
  • Fischler, H. (2008). Fachdidaktisches Wissen und Handlungskompetenz [PCK and teaching competence]. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 14, 27–49.
  • Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Pedagogical content knowledge: An introduction and orientation. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 3–17). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
  • Gess-Newsome, J. (2015). A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK. In A. Berry, P. J. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Teaching and learning in science series. Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education. (pp. 28–41). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. Professional development and practice series. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Haenlein, M., & Kaplan, A. M. (2004). A beginner’s guide to partial least squares analysis. Understanding Statistics, 3(4), 283–297. doi:10.1207/s15328031us0304_4 doi: 10.1207/s15328031us0304_4
  • Hair, J. F., Hult, G. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, C. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Hashweh, M. (2005). Teacher pedagogical constructions: A reconfiguration of pedagogical content knowledge. Teachers and Teaching, 11(3), 273–292. doi:10.1080/13450600500105502 doi: 10.1080/13450600500105502
  • Henze, I., & van Driel, J. H. (2015). Towards a more comprehensive way to capture PCK in its complexity. In A. Berry, P. J. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Teaching and learning in science series. Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education. (pp. 120–134). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • John, P. D. (2006). Lesson planning and the student teacher: Re-thinking the dominant model. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(4), 483–498. doi:10.1080/00220270500363620 doi: 10.1080/00220270500363620
  • Kirschner, S., Borowski, A., Fischer, H. E., Gess-Newsome, J., & von Aufschnaiter, C. (2016). Developing and evaluating a paper-and-pencil test to assess components of physics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 38(8), 1343–1372. doi:10.1080/09500693.2016.1190479 doi: 10.1080/09500693.2016.1190479
  • Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Baumert, J., Richter, D., Voss, T., & Hachfeld, A. (2013). Professional competence of teachers: Effects on instructional quality and student development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 805–820. doi:10.1037/a0032583 doi: 10.1037/a0032583
  • Landis, R., & Koch, G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174. doi: 10.2307/2529310
  • LimeSurvey Project Team. (2015). LimeSurvey: An open source survey tool. Retrieved from http://www.limesurvey.org.
  • Lipowsky, F., Rakoczy, K., Pauli, C., Drollinger-Vetter, B., Klieme, E., & Reusser, K. (2009). Quality of geometry instruction and its short-term impact on students’ understanding of the Pythagorean theorem. Learning and Instruction, 19(6), 527–537. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.11.001 doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.11.001
  • Livingston, C., & Borko, H. (1989). Expert-novice differences in teaching: A cognitive analysis and implications for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 40(4), 36–42. doi:10.1177/002248718904000407 doi: 10.1177/002248718904000407
  • Loughran, J., Berry, A., & Mulhall, P. (2012). Understanding and developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Professional learning. Rotterdam: Sense.
  • Magnusson, S., Krajcik, L., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education. (pp. 95–132). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
  • Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 261–284. doi:10.1007/s11165-007-9049-6 doi: 10.1007/s11165-007-9049-6
  • Peterson, P. L., Marx, R. W., & Clark, C. M. (1978). Teacher planning, teacher behavior, and student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 15(3), 417–432. doi:10.3102/00028312015003417 doi: 10.3102/00028312015003417
  • Renkl, A. (1996). Träges Wissen: Wenn Erlerntes nicht genutzt wird [Tacit knowledge: If knowledge is not used]. Psychologische Rundschau, 47, 78–92.
  • Ringle, C., Wende, S., & Will, S. (2005). SmartPLS 2.0 (beta). Hamburg: SmartPLS. Retrieved from http://www.smartpls.de
  • Rumelhart, D. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. Spiro, B. Bruce, & W. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 33–58). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Schank, R., & Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Schnotz, W. (1994). Aufbau von Wissensstrukturen: Untersuchungen zur Kohärenzbildung beim Wissenserwerb mit Texten [Development of knowledge structures: Studies on the formation of coherence in knowledge acquisition with texts]. Weinheim: Beltz.
  • Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1999). Skalen zur Erfassung von Lehrer- und Schülermerkmalen: Dokumentation der psychometrischen Verfahren im Rahmen der wissenschaftlichen Begleitung des Modellversuchs Selbstwirksame Schulen [Scales measuring teacher and student characteristics: Documentation of psychometric procedures within the framework of the scientific accompanied pilot project of self-effective schools]. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin.
  • Seidel, T., Prenzel, M., Duit, R., & Lehrke, M. (2006). Technischer Bericht zur Videostudie ‘Lehr-Lern-Prozesse im Physikunterricht’ [Technical report of the IPN video study]. Kiel: IPN.
  • Seidel, T., Rimmele, R., & Prenzel, M. (2005). Clarity and coherence of lesson goals as a scaffold for student learning. Learning and Instruction, 15, 539–556. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.08.004 doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.08.004
  • Shavelson, R. J. (1986). Toma de decision interactiva: algunas reflexiones sobre los procesos cognoscitivos de los profesores [Interactive decision making: Some thoughts on teacher cognition]. In L. M. V. Angulo (Ed.), Pensiamentos de los profesores y toma de decisiones (pp. 164–184). Servicio de Publicaciones.
  • Shavelson, R. J., & Stern, P. (1981). Research on teachers’ pedagogical thoughts, judgments, decisions, and behavior. Review of Educational Research, 51(4), 455–498. doi:10.3102/00346543051004455 doi: 10.3102/00346543051004455
  • Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. doi:10.3102/0013189X015002004 doi: 10.3102/0013189X015002004
  • Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–23. doi: 10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
  • Sorge, S., Kröger, J., Petersen, S., & Neumann, K. (2017). Structure and development of pre-service physics teachers’ professional knowledge. International Journal of Science Education. doi:10.1080/09500693.2017.1346326
  • Staub, F. C., & Stern, E. (2002). The nature of teachers’ pedagogical content beliefs matters for students’ achievement gains: Quasi-experimental evidence from elementary mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 344–355. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.344 doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.344
  • Stender, A. (2014). Unterrichtsplanung: Vom Wissen zum Handeln: Theoretische Entwicklung und empirische Überprüfung des Transformationsmodells der Unterrichtsplanung [Lesson planning: From knowledge to action – theoretical development and empirical validation of the transformation model of lesson planning]. Berlin: Logos-Verlag.
  • Taylor, P. H. (1970). How teachers plan their courses. Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research in England and Wales.
  • Veal, R., & MaKinster, J. G. (1999). Pedagogical content knowledge taxonomies. Electronic Journal for Science Education, 3(4). Retrieved from http://ejse.southwestern.edu/article/view/7615/5382
  • Wiesner, H., Schecker, H., & Hopf, M. (Eds.). (2011). Physikdidaktik kompakt [physik didactics – compact]. Hallbergmoos: Aulis Verlag.
  • Yinger, R. J. (1980). A study of teacher planning. The Elementary School Journal, 80(3), 107–127. doi: 10.1086/461181
  • Zahorik, J. A. (1975). Teachers’ planning models. Educational Leadership, 33(2), 134–139.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.