Exploring science teachers’ perceptions of experimentation: implications for restructuring school practical work

References

• Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665–701. doi: 10.1080/09500690050044044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abd-El-Khalick, F., Waters, M., & Le, A.-P. (2008). Representations of nature of science in high school chemistry textbooks over the past four decades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(7), 835–855. doi: 10.1002/tea.20226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrahams, I., & Millar, R. (2008). Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1945–1969. doi: 10.1080/09500690701749305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrahams, I. Z., & Saglam, M. (2010). A study of teachers’ views on practical work in secondary schools in England and Wales. International Journal of Science Education, 32(6), 753–768. doi: 10.1080/09500690902777410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, R. L. (2008). Teaching the nature of science through process skills: Activities for grades 3–8. Hong Kong: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly, J. (1998). The place of the laboratory in secondary science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 20(5), 585–596. doi: 10.1080/0950069980200506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 32, 268–291. doi: 10.3102/0091732X07309371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erduran, S., & Dagher, Z. (2014). Reconceptualizing the nature of science for science education. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ezzy, D. (2002). Qualitative analysis: Practice and innovation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gooding, D., Pinch, T., & Schaffer, S. (Eds.). (1993). The uses of experiment: Studies in the natural sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodson, I. F., & Marsh, C. J. (1996). Studying school subjects: A guide. London: Falmer, pp. 69–83.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, R. (2014). The distinction between experimental and historical sciences as a framework for improving classroom inquiry. Science Education, 98(2), 327–341. doi: 10.1002/sce.21098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harré, R. (1984). The philosophies of science: An introductory survey (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, D. (1996). Laboratory work as scientific method: Three decades of confusion and distortion. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28(2), 115–135. doi: 10.1080/0022027980280201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstein, A., Kipnis, M., & Abrahams, I. Z. (2013). How to learn in and from the chemistry laboratory. In A. Hofstein & I. Eilks (Eds.), Teaching chemistry – A studybook (pp. 153–182). Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28–54. doi: 10.1002/sce.10106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irzik, G., & Nola, R. (2011). A family resemblance approach to the nature of science for science education. Science & Education, 20(7), 591–607. doi: 10.1007/s11191-010-9293-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, N. H., & Wallace, C. S. (2005). Secondary science teachers’ use of laboratory activities: Linking epistemological beliefs, goals, and practices. Science Education, 89(1), 140–165. doi: 10.1002/sce.20013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, J. (1964). Practical work in school science. Leicester: Leicester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2006). Scientific thinking and science literacy. In W. Damon, R. Lerner, K. A. Renninger, & I. E. Sigel (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, 6th edition, volume 4: Child psychology in practice (pp. 153–196). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mayo, D. G. (1996). Error and the growth of experimental knowledge. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). A science framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nivalainen, V., Asikainen, M. A., & Hirvonen, P. E. (2013). Preservice teachers’ objectives and their experience of practical work. Physical Review Special Topics – Physics Education Research, 9(1), 1–17. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.9.010102
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. (2011). Science teaching methods: A rationale for practices. School Science Review, 98(343), 93–103.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. (2015). Practical work in science: Misunderstood and badly used? School Science Review, 96(357), 16–24.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What ‘ideas about science’ should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 692–720. doi: 10.1002/tea.10105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekmez, E. S., Johnson, P., & Gott, R. (2005). Teachers’ understanding of the nature and purpose of practical work. Research in Science and Technological Education, 23(1), 3–23. doi: 10.1080/02635140500068401
   Google Scholar
• Radder, H. (Ed.). (2003). The philosophy of scientific experimentation. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radder, H. (2009). The philosophy of scientific experimentation: A review. Automated Experimentation, 1(2), 1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reid, N., & Shah, I. (2007). The role of laboratory work in university chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(2), 172–185. doi: 10.1039/B5RP90026C
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W. A., & Millwood, K. (2005). The quality of students’ use of evidence in written scientific explanations. Cognition and Instruction, 23(1), 23–55. doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci2301_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapin, S., & Schaffer, S. (1985). Leviathan and the air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle and the experimental life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, J. (1980). Teaching children in the laboratory. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stroupe, D. (2015). Describing ‘science practice’ in learning settings. Science Education, 99(6), 1033–1040. doi: 10.1002/sce.21191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellington, J., & Ireson, G. (2012). Science learning, science teaching (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, J., & Ward, M. (1997). A comparative study of students’ and their teachers’ perceptions of laboratory work in secondary schools. Research in Science Education, 27(4), 599–610. doi: 10.1007/BF02461483
   Google Scholar