Scientific explanations in Greek upper secondary physics textbooks

References

• Berland, L., & McNeill, K. (2012). For whom is argument and explanation a necessary distinction? A response to Osborne and Patterson. Science Education, 96(5), 808–813. doi: 10.1002/sce.21000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berland, L., & Reiser, B. (2009). Making sense of argumentation and explanation. Science Education, 93, 26–55. doi: 10.1002/sce.20286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braaten, M., & Windschitl, M. (2011). Working toward a stronger conceptualization of scientific explanation for science education. Science Education, 95(4), 639–669. doi: 10.1002/sce.20449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, W., Chinn, C., & Samarapungavan, A. (1998). Explanation in scientists and children. Minds and Machines, 8, 119–136. doi: 10.1023/A:1008242619231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brigandt, I. (2016). Why the difference between explanation and argument matters to science education. Science & Education, 25, 251–275. doi: 10.1007/s11191-016-9826-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earman, J., & Salmon, W. (1992). The confirmation of scientific hypotheses. In M. Salmon, J. Earman, C. Glymour, J. Lennox, P. Machamer, J. McGuire, & K. Schaffner (Eds.), Introduction to the philosophy of science (pp. 42–103). Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. (1974). Explanation and scientific understanding. The Journal of Philosophy, 71, 5–19. doi: 10.2307/2024924
   Google Scholar
• Govier, T. (1987). Problems in argument analysis and evaluation. Dordrecht: Foris.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, D., Resnick, R., & Walker, J. (2008). Fundamentals of physics. Hoboken,NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Extended version, 8th ed.
   Google Scholar
• Hempel, C. (1965). Aspects of scientific explanation and other essays in the philosophy of science. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hempel, C. (2002). Two models of scientific explanation. In Y. Balashov & A. Rosenberg (Eds.), Philosophy of science. Contemporary readings (pp. 45–55). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hempel, C., & Oppenheim, P. (1948). Studies in the logic of explanation. Philosophy of Science, 15(2), 135–175. doi: 10.1086/286983
   Google Scholar
• Horwood, R. (1988). Explanation and description in science teaching. Science Education, 72(1), 41–49. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730720104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kampourakis, K., & Zogza, V. (2008). Students’ intuitive explanations of the causes of homologies and adaptations. Science & Education, 17, 27–47. doi: 10.1007/s11191-007-9075-9
   Google Scholar
• Kitcher, P. (1989). Explanatory unification and the causal structure of the world. In P. Kitcher, & W. Salmon (Eds.), Scientific explanation, Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (pp. 410–505). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota. Vol. XIII.
   Google Scholar
• Koulaidis, V., & Tsatsaroni, A. (1996). A pedagogical analysis of science textbooks: How can we proceed? Research in Science Education, 26(1), 55–71. doi: 10.1007/BF02356963
   Google Scholar
• Ladyman, J. (2002). Understanding philosophy of science. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McCain, K. (2015). Explanation and the nature of scientific knowledge. Science & Education, 24, 827–854. doi: 10.1007/s11191-015-9775-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L. (2011). Elementary students’ views of explanation, argumentation, and evidence, and their abilities to construct arguments over the school year. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(7), 793–823. doi: 10.1002/tea.20430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2007). Middle school students’ use of appropriate and inappropriate evidence in writing scientific explanations. In M. Lovett & P. Shah (Eds.), Thinking with data (pp. 233–265). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2008). Scientific explanations: Characterizing and evaluating the effects of teachers’ instructional practices on student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 53–78. doi: 10.1002/tea.20201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2009). Synergy between teacher practices and curricular scaffolds to support students in using domain-specific and domain-general knowledge in writing arguments to explain phenomena. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(3), 416–460. doi: 10.1080/10508400903013488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohanian, H. C. (1989). Physics ( 2nd ed. expanded). New York: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Ohanian, H. C., & Markert, J. T. (2007). Physics for Engineers and Scientists (3rd edition). New York - London: W.W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., & Patterson, A. (2011). Scientific argument and explanation: A necessary distinction? Science Education, 95(4), 627–638. doi: 10.1002/sce.20438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmon, W. (1989). Four decades of scientific explanation. In P. Kitcher, & W. Salmon (Eds.), Scientific explanation, Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (pp. 3–219). Minneapolis: University of Minessota. Vol. XIII.
   Google Scholar
• Salmon, W. (1992). Scientific explanation. In M. Salmon, J. Earman, C. Glymour, J. Lennox, P. Machamer, J. McGuire, & K. Schaffner (Eds.), Introduction to the philosophy of science (pp. 7–41). Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Serway, R. A. (1990). Physics for scientists & engineers. Philadelphia: Saunders College. 3rd ed.
   Google Scholar
• Serway, R. A., & Jewett, J. W. (2008). Physics for scientists and engineers with mondern physics (7th Edition). Belmont: Thomson-Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Thagard, P. (1989). Explanatory coherence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 435–502. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00057046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Fraassen, B. C. (1980). The scientific image. Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Young, H. (1992). University physics. New York: Addison-Wesley. 8th ed.
   Google Scholar
• Young, H. D., & Freedman, R. A. (2008). University physics (12th edition). New York: Pearson - Addison Wesley.
   Google Scholar