1,747
Views
22
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Context-based learning in the middle years: achieving resonance between the real-world field and environmental science concepts

ORCID Icon &
Pages 1221-1238 | Received 18 Apr 2018, Accepted 24 Apr 2018, Published online: 11 May 2018

References

  • Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2009). Shape of the Australian curriculum: Science. Retrieved from https://acaraweb.blob.core.windows.net/resources/Australian_Curriculum_-_Science.pdf
  • Barber, M. (2000). A comparison of NEAB and Salters’ A-level chemistry students’ views and achievements (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of York, York, UK.
  • Bellocchi, A., King, D. T., & Ritchie, S. M. (2016). Context-based assessment: Creating opportunities for resonance between classroom fields and societal fields. International Journal of Science Education, 38(8), 1304–1342. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2016.1189107
  • Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Burns, R. B. (2000). Introduction to research methods (4th ed.). French Forest, NSW: Longman Publishers.
  • Conle, C. (1996). Resonance in preservice teacher inquiry. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 297–325. doi: 10.3102/00028312033002297
  • Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
  • Du Bois, J. W. (2001). Towards a dialogic syntax (Unpublished paper).
  • Du Bois, J. W. (2007). The stance triangle. In R. Englebretson (Ed.), Stance in discourse: Subjectivity in interaction (pp. 139–182). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  • Du Bois, J. W. (2010). Representing discourse (Unpublished paper).
  • Eick, C. J. (2012). Use of the outdoor classroom and nature-study to support science and literacy learning: A narrative case study of a third-grade classroom. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23, 789–803. doi: 10.1007/s10972-011-9236-1
  • Erickson, F. (1998). Qualitative research methods for science education. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 1155–1174). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.
  • Gibbs, R., & Poskitt, J. (2010). Student engagement in the middle years of schooling (years 7–10): A literature review (Report to the Ministry of Education). Ministry of Education: New Zealand.
  • Gilbert, J. K. (2006). On the nature of ‘context’ in chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 957–976. doi: 10.1080/09500690600702470
  • Goodrum, D., Druhan, A., & Abbs, J. (2012). The status and quality of year 11 and 12 science in Australian schools. Canberra, ACT: Australian Academy of Science.
  • Gutwill-Wise, J. (2001). The impact of active and context-based learning in introductory chemistry courses: An early evaluation of the modular approach. Journal of Chemical Education, 78(5), 684–690. doi: 10.1021/ed078p684
  • Hamilton-Ekeke, J.-T. (2007). Relative effectiveness of expository and field trip methods of teaching on students’ achievement in ecology. International Journal of Science Education, 29(15), 1869–1889. doi: 10.1080/09500690601101664
  • Hart, C., Fry, M., & Vignouli, V. (2002). What does it mean to teach physics “in context”? A second case study. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 48(3), 6–13.
  • Hofstein, A., Kesner, M., & Ben-Zvi, R. (2000). Student perceptions of industrial chemistry classroom learning environments. Learning Environments Research, 2, 291–306. doi: 10.1023/A:1009973908142
  • Jenkins, E. W. (2003). Environmental education and the public understanding of science. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 1, 437–443. doi: 10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001[0437:EEATPU]2.0.CO;2
  • Jenkins, E., & Nelson, N. W. (2005). Important but not for me: Students’ attitudes towards secondary school science in England. Research in Science & Technological Education, 23(1), 41–57. doi: 10.1080/02635140500068435
  • Kennedy, J., Lyons, T., & Quinn, F. (2014). The continuing decline of science and mathematics enrolments in Australian high schools. Teaching Science, 60(2), 34–46.
  • King, D. (2009). Context-based chemistry: Creating opportunities for fluid transitions between concepts and context. Teaching Science: Journal of the Australian Science Teachers Association, 55(4), 13–20.
  • King, D. T. (2012). New perspectives on context-based chemistry education: Using a dialectical sociocultural approach to view teaching and learning. Studies in Science Education, 48(1), 51–87. doi: 10.1080/03057267.2012.655037
  • King, D., Bellocchi, A., & Ritchie, S. (2008). Making connections: Learning and teaching chemistry in context. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 365–384. doi: 10.1007/s11165-007-9070-9
  • King, D. T., & Ginns, I. (2015). Implementing a context-based environmental science unit in the middle years: Teaching and learning at the creek. Teaching Science, 61(3), 26–36.
  • King, D. T., & Ritchie, S. M. (2013). Academic success in context-based chemistry: Demonstrating fluid transitions between concepts and context. International Journal of Science Education, 35, 1159–1182. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2013.774508
  • King, D., Winner, E., & Ginns, I. (2011). Outcomes and implications of one teacher’s approach to context-based science in the middle years. Teaching Science, 57(2), 15–30.
  • Lyons, T., King, D., Dawes, L., O’Loughlin, M., & Doyle, T. (2016). Queensland STEM hubs: Building teacher capability using STEM partnership models (Unpublished manuscript).
  • Magntorn, O., & Helldén, G. (2007). Reading new environments: Students’ ability to generalise their understanding between different ecosystems. International Journal of Science Education, 29(1), 67–100. doi: 10.1080/09500690600708543
  • Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education. A qualitative approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.
  • National Research Council (NRC). (2013). Monitoring progress toward successful K-12 STEM education: A nation advancing? Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • Oropeza-Escobar, M. (2011). Represented discourse, resonance and stance in joking interaction in Mexican Spanish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079. doi: 10.1080/0950069032000032199
  • Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Tytler, R. (2009, April). Attitudes towards science: An update. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, California.
  • Parchmann, I., Grasel, C., Baer, A., Nentwig, P., Demuth, R., Ralle, B., & Group, C. P. (2006). ‘Chemie im Kontext’: A symbiotic implementation of a context-based teaching and learning approach. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 1041–1062. doi: 10.1080/09500690600702512
  • Prokop, P., Tuncer, G., & Kvasnicak, R. (2007). Short-term effects of field programme on students’ knowledge and attitude toward biology: A Slovak experience. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(3), 247–255. doi: 10.1007/s10956-007-9044-8
  • Ramsden, J. M. (1997). How does a context-based approach influence understanding of key chemical ideas at 16+? International Journal of Science Education, 19(6), 697–710. doi: 10.1080/0950069970190606
  • Rennie, L. (2007). Blurring the boundary between the classroom and the community: Challenges for teachers’ professional knowledge. In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The professional knowledge base of science teaching (pp. 13–29). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Rennie, L. J. (2014). Learning science outside of school. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 120–144). New York: Routledge.
  • Roth, W.-M., & Lee, S. (2004). Science education as/for participation in the community. Science Education, 88(2), 263–291. doi: 10.1002/sce.10113
  • Rozenszayn, R., & Ben-Zvi Assaraf, O. (2011). When collaborative learning meets nature: Collaborative learning as a meaningful learning tool in the ecology inquiry based project. Research in Science Education, 41(1), 123–146. doi: 10.1007/s11165-009-9149-6
  • Sennett, R. (2008). The craftsman. Camberwell: Penguin Books.
  • Smith, L. A., & Bitner, B. L. (1993, April). Comparison of formal operations: Students enrolled in ChemCom versus a traditional chemistry course. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Science Teachers’ Association, Kansas City, Missouri.
  • Stake, R. E. (1994). Case studies. In N. Denzin & S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 236–247). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Tannen, D. (1995). Waiting for the mouse: Constructed dialogue in conversation. In D. Tedlock & B. Mannheim (Eds.), The dialogic emergence of culture (pp. 198–217). Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
  • Thomson, S. (2016). Latest PISA results: Australia at the crossroad. Retrieved from https://www.acer.edu.au/about-us/media/media-releases/latest-pisa-results-australia-at-the-crossroad
  • Thomson, S., Wernert, N., O’Grady, E., & Rodrigues, S. (2016). TIMSS 2015: A first look at Australia’s results. Camberwell: ACER Melbourne: ACER.
  • Upadhyay, B., & DeFranco, C. (2008). Elementary students’ retention of environmental science knowledge: Connected science instruction versus direct instruction. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 20(2), 23–37. doi: 10.1007/BF03173668
  • Weed. (n.d.). Oxford Dictionary. Retrieved from https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/weed
  • Wilkinson, J. (1999). The contextual approach to teaching physics. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 45(4), 43–50.
  • Wilson, R., & Mack, J. (2014). Declines in high school mathematics and science participation: Evidence of students’ and future teachers’ disengagement with maths. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 22(7), 35–48.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.