Talking modelling: examining secondary science teachers’ modelling-related talk during a model-based inquiry unit

References

• Berland, L. K., Schwarz, C. V., Krist, C., Kenyon, L., Lo, A. S., & Reiser, B. J. (2016). Epistemologies in practice: Making scientific practices meaningful for students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(7), 1082–1112. doi: 10.1002/tea.21257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, M. F., & Brown, D. E. (2015). The role of scientific modeling criteria in advancing students’ explanatory ideas of magnetism. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(8), 1053–1081. doi: 10.1002/tea.21234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement, J. (2000). Model based learning as a key research area for science education. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 1041–1053. doi: 10.1080/095006900416901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, M. (1998). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coll, R. K., France, B., & Taylor, I. (2005). The role of models/and analogies in science education: Implications from research. International Journal of Science Education, 27(2), 183–198. doi: 10.1080/0950069042000276712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Duschl, R. A., & Grandy, R. (2013). Two views about explicitly teaching nature of science. Science & Education, 22(9), 2109–2139. doi: 10.1007/s11191-012-9539-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, M. J. (2008). “Grasp of practice” as a reasoning resource for inquiry and nature of science understanding. Science & Education, 17(2–3), 147–177. doi: 10.1007/s11191-006-9045-7
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2004). Language in the science classroom: Academic social languages as the heart of school-based literacy. In W. Saul (Ed.), Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives on theory and practice (pp. 13–22). Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giere, R. N. (1988). Explaining science: A cognitive approach. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giere, R. N. (2004). How models are used to represent reality. Philosophy of Science, 71(5), 742–752. doi: 10.1086/425063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. K. (2004). Models and modelling: Routes to more authentic science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(2), 115–130. doi: 10.1007/s10763-004-3186-4
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. London: Weidenfield & Nicolson.
   Google Scholar
• Gobert, J., & Discenna, J. (1997). The relationship between students’ epistemologies and model-based reasoning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Gobert, J., O’Dwyer, L., Horwitz, P., Buckley, B., Levy, S., & Wilensky, U. (2011). Examining the relationship between students’ understanding of the nature of models and conceptual learning in biology, physics, and chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 33, 653–684. doi: 10.1080/09500691003720671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gouvea, J. S., & Passmore, C. M. (2017). “Models of” versus “Models for”. Science & Education, 26(1), 49–63. doi: 10.1007/s11191-017-9884-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, R. E., Rogan-Klyve, A. M., & Clark-Huyck, B. (2016). Investigating Axial Seamount: Using student generated models to understand plate tectonics. Science Scope, 40(1), 26–34.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, P., & McDonald, M. (2008). Back to the future: Directions for research in teaching and teacher education. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 184–205. doi: 10.3102/0002831207312906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., Bransford, J., Berliner, D., Cochran-Smith, M., McDonald, M., & Zeichner, K. (2005). How teachers learn and develop. In L. Darling- Hammond, J. Bransford, P. LePage, K. Hammerness, & H. Duffy (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 358–389). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Hubber, P., & Tytler, R. (2013). Models and learning science. In R. Tytler, V. Prain, P. Hubber, & B. Waldrip (Eds.), Constructing representations to learn in science (pp. 109–133). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchison, P., & Hammer, D. (2010). Attending to student epistemological framing in a science classroom. Science Education, 94(3), 506–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665–701. doi: 10.1080/09500690050044044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, D. M., Hammer, D., & Coffey, J. E. (2009). Novice teachers’ attention to student thinking. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(2), 142–154. doi: 10.1177/0022487108330245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundqvist, E., Almqvist, J., & Ostman, L. (2009). Epistemological norms and companion meanings in science classroom communication. Science Education, 93(5), 859–874. doi: 10.1002/sce.20334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manz, E. (2014). Representing student argumentation as functionally emergent from scientific activity. Review of Educational Research, 85(4), 553–590. doi: 10.3102/0034654314558490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, M. R. (2007). Models in science and in science education: An introduction. Science & Education, 16(7–8), 647–652. doi: 10.1007/s11191-007-9089-3
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council [NRC]. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: Social Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Nersessian, N. J. (2008). Model-based reasoning in scientific practice. In R. A. Duschl, & R. E. Grandy (Eds.), Teaching scientific inquiry: Recommendations for research and implementation (pp. 57–79). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, A. W., Akerson, V. L., Colak, H., Pongsanon, K., & Genel, A. (2012). The implicit communication of nature of science and epistemology during inquiry discussion. Science Education, 96(4), 652–684. doi: 10.1002/sce.21005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passmore, C., Gouvea, J. S., & Giere, R. (2014). Models in science and in learning science: Focusing scientific practice on sense-making. In International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 1171–1202). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pluta, W. J., Chinn, C. A., & Duncan, R. G. (2011). Learners’ epistemic criteria for good scientific models. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(5), 486–511. doi: 10.1002/tea.20415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2012). Learning through constructing representations in science: A framework of representational construction affordances. International Journal of Science Education, 34(17), 2751–2773. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2011.626462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherr, R. E., & Hammer, D. (2009). Student behavior and epistemological framing: Examples from collaborative active-learning activities in physics. Cognition and Instruction, 27(2), 147–174. doi: 10.1080/07370000902797379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, C. (2002). Is there a connection? The role of meta-modeling knowledge in learning with models. Paper presented at the fifth International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Seattle, WA.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, C., & Gwekwerere, Y. (2007). Using a guided inquiry and modeling instructional framework (EIMA) to support preservice K-8 science teaching. Science Education, 91(1), 158–186. doi: 10.1002/sce.20177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, C. V., & White, B. (2005). Metamodeling knowledge: Developing students’ understanding of scientific modeling. Cognition and Instruction, 23(2), 165–205. doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci2302_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherwood, C.-A., Moorthy, S., D’Angelo, C., Bemis, C. A., Stanford, T., & Harris, C. J. (2014). Between the lines: The role of curriculum materials and teacher language in communicating ideas about scientific modeling. National association for research in science teaching annual conference, Pittsburgh, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, J., Cartier, J., & Passmore, C. (2005). Developing understanding through model-based inquiry. In M. S. Donovan & J. Bransford (Eds.), How students learn: History, mathematics, and science in the classroom (pp. 515–565). Washington, DC: National Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stroupe, D. (2014). Examining classroom science practice communities: How teachers and students negotiate epistemic agency and learn science-as-practice. Science Education, 98(3), 487–516. doi: 10.1002/sce.21112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svoboda, J., & Passmore, C. M. (2011). Models as epistemic anchors: A framework for model-based instruction. Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, K.-S. (2017). Analyzing teachers’ use of metadiscourse: The missing element in classroom discourse analysis. Science Education, 101(4), 548–583. doi: 10.1002/sce.21275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tannen, D. (1993). Framing in discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Treagust, D. F., Chittleborough, G., & Mamiala, T. L. (2002). Students’ understanding of the role of scientific models in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 357–368. doi: 10.1080/09500690110066485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tytler, R., Prain, V., & Hubber, P. (2013). Constructing representations to learn in science. Rotterdam: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Waldrip, B., & Prain, V. (2013). Teachers’ initial response to a representational focus. In R. Tytler, P. Hubber, & B. Waldrip (Eds.), Constructing representations to learn science (pp. 15–30). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V. (1993). Voices of the mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2008). Beyond the scientific method: Model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Science Education, 92(5), 941–967. doi: 10.1002/sce.20259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., Braaten, M., & Stroupe, D. (2012). Proposing a core set of instructional practices and tools for teachers of science. Science Education, 96(5), 878–903. doi: 10.1002/sce.21027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1989). The effect of teachers’ language on students’ conceptions of the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(9), 771–783. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660260903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar