Students’ development of socio-scientific reasoning in a mobile augmented reality learning environment

References

• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Arvanitis, T. N., Petrou, A., Knight, J. F., Savas, S., Sotiriou, S., Gargalakos, M., & Gialouri, E. (2009). Human factors and qualitative pedagogical evaluation of a mobile augmented reality system for science education used by learners with physical disabilities. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 13, 243–250. doi: 10.1007/s00779-007-0187-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkatsas, A., Kasimatis, K., & Gialamas, V. (2009). Learning secondary mathematics with technology: Exploring the complex interrelationship between students’ attitudes, engagement, gender and achievement. Computers & Education, 52, 562–570. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broll, W., Lindt, I., Herbst, I., Ohlenburg, J., Braun, A. K., & Wetzel, R. (2008). Toward next-gen mobile AR games. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 28(4), 40–48. doi: 10.1109/MCG.2008.85
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronack, S. C. (2011). The role of immersive media in online education. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 59, 113–117. doi: 10.1080/07377363.2011.583186
   Google Scholar
• Chang, H.-Y., Hsu, Y.-S., & Wu, H.-K. (2016). A comparison study of augmented reality versus interactive simulation technology to support student learning of a socio-scientific issue. Interactive Learning Environments, 24, 1148–1161. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2014.961486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, H.-Y., & Lee, S. W.-Y. (2015, August). Development of a survey for assessing perceptions of socioscientific reasoning about nuclear power plant development. Paper presented at the 11th conference of the european science education research association (ESERA), Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, H.-Y., Wang, C.-Y., Lee, M.-H., Wu, H.-K., Liang, J.-C., Lee, S. W.-Y., … Tsai, C.-C. (2015). A review of features of technology-supported learning environments based on participants’ perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 223–237. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, H.-Y., Yu, Y.-T., Wu, H.-K., & Hsu, Y.-S. (2016). The impact of a mobile augmented reality game: Changing students’ perceptions of the complexity of socio-scientific reasoning. In Spector J. M., ‌Tsai C.-C., ‌Sampson D. G., Kinshuk, Huang R., Chen N.-S., & Resta P. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th IEEE international conference on advanced learning technologies (pp. 312–313). Austin, TX: IEEE Technical Committee on Learning Technology. (ISBN: 978-1-4673-9041-5).
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., & Mitchell, R. (2009). Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18, 7–22. doi: 10.1007/s10956-008-9119-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggert, S., Nitsch, A., Boone, W. J., Nückles, M., & Bögeholz, S. (2017). Supporting students’ learning and socioscientific reasoning about climate change—the effect of computer-based concept mapping scaffolds. Research in Science Education, 47, 137–159. doi: 10.1007/s11165-015-9493-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, S.-C., Hsu, Y.-S., Chang, H.-Y., Chang, W.-H., Wu, H.-K., & Chen, C.-M. (2016). Investigating the effects of structured and guided inquiry on students’ development of conceptual knowledge and inquiry abilities: A case study in Taiwan. International Journal of Science Education, 38, 1945–1971. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2016.1220688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, J. J., Barkus, E., & Yavorsky, C. (2006). Path analysis. In J. J. Foster, E. Barkus, & C. Yavorsky (Eds.), Understanding and using advanced statistics (pp. 89–102). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Henrie, C. R., Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2015). Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning: A review. Computers & Education, 90, 36–53. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman, B. C. (2015). The influence of global warming science views and sociocultural factors on willingness to mitigate global warming. Science Education, 99, 1–38. doi: 10.1002/sce.21136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, Y.-S., & Lin, S.-S. (2017). Prompting students to make socioscientific decisions: Embedding metacognitive guidance in an e-learning environment. International Journal of Science Education, 39, 1–16. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2017.1312036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, G. J., Wu, P. H., Zhuang, Y. Y., & Huang, Y. M. (2013). Effects of the inquiry-based mobile learning model on the cognitive load and learning achievement of students. Interactive Learning Environments, 21(4), 338–354. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2011.575789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jho, H., Yoon, H.-G., & Kim, M. (2014). The relationship of science knowledge, attitude and decision making on socio-scientific issues: The case study of students’ debates on a nuclear power plant in Korea. Science & Education, 23, 1131–1151. doi: 10.1007/s11191-013-9652-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klopfer, E. (2008). Augmented learning: Research and design of mobile educational games. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klosterman, M. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2010). Multi-level assessment of scientific content knowledge gains associated with socioscientific issues-based instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 32, 1017–1043. doi: 10.1080/09500690902894512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kudryavtsev, A., Stedman, R. C., & Krasny, M. E. (2012). Sense of place in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 18, 229–250. doi: 10.1080/13504622.2011.609615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., & Bracken, C. C. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research, 28, 587–604. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00826.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madden, T. J., Ellen, P. S., & Ajzen, I. (1992). A comparison of the theory of planned behavior and the theory of reasoned action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 3–9. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/toc/pspc/18/1 doi: 10.1177/0146167292181001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D. (2004). Moral sensitivity and its contribution to the resolution of socio-scientific issues. Journal of Moral Education, 33, 339–358. doi: 10.1080/0305724042000733091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., Barab, S. A., & Scott, B. (2007). What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry? Research in Science Education, 37, 371–391. doi: 10.1007/s11165-006-9030-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., Chambers, F. W., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). Student conceptualizations of the nature of science in response to a socioscientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 387–409. doi: 10.1080/0950069032000119456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., & Donnelly, L. A. (2006). Socioscientific argumentation: The effects of content knowledge and morality. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 1463–1488. doi: 10.1080/09500690600708717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakschewski, M., Eggert, S., Schneider, S., & Bögeholz, S. (2014). Students’ socioscientific reasoning and decision-making on energy-related issues—development of a measurement instrument. International Journal of Science Education, 36, 2291–2313. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2014.920550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2009). Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster “epistemic engagement” and “cognitive presence” in online education. Computers & Education, 52, 543–553. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheppard, B. H., Hartwick, J., & Warshaw, P. R. (1988). The theory of reasoned action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 325–343. doi: 10.1086/209170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shernoff, D. J., Kelly, S., Tonks, S. M., Anderson, B., Cavanagh, R. F., Sinha, S., & Abdi, B. (2016). Student engagement as a function of environmental complexity in high school classrooms. Learning and Instruction, 43, 52–60. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squire, K., & Klopfer, E. (2007). Augmented reality simulations on handheld computers. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16, 371–413. doi: 10.1080/10508400701413435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, H.-K., Lee, S. W.-Y., Chang, H.-Y., & Liang, J.-C. (2013). Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education, 62, 41–49. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y.-T., & Tsai, C.-C. (2011). High school students’ informal reasoning regarding a socio-scientific issue, with relations to scientific epistemological beliefs and cognitive structures. International Journal of Science Education, 33, 371–400. doi: 10.1080/09500690903505661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y.-T., & Tsai, C.-C. (2012). The effects of university students’ argumentation on socio-scientific issues via on-line discussion in their informal reasoning regarding this issue. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Perspectives on scientific argumentation: Theory, practice and research (pp. 221–234). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y.-F. (2011). Engaging students in an online situated language learning environment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24, 181–198. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2010.538700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar