1,108
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Evolution of pre-service teachers’ attitudes towards learning science during an introductory science unit

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1520-1541 | Received 10 Nov 2017, Accepted 05 Jun 2018, Published online: 17 Jun 2018

References

  • ACARA. (2017). Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. Foundation to year 10 curriculum. Retrieved from https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/science/
  • Ainley, M., & Ainley, J. (2011). Student engagement with science in early adolescence: The contribution of enjoyment to students’ continuing interest in learning about science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 4–12. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.08.001
  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Englewood-Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
  • Barmby, P., Kind, P. M., & Jones, K. (2008). Examining changing attitudes in secondary school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(8), 1075–1093. doi: 10.1080/09500690701344966
  • Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84(6), 740–756. doi: 10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6<740::AID-SCE4>3.0.CO;2-3
  • Blank, R. K. (2012). What is the impact of decline in science instructional time in elementary school? Noyce Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.csssscience.org/downloads/NAEPElemScienceData.pdf
  • Bleicher, R. E., & Lindgren, J. (2005). Success in science learning and preservice science teaching self-efficacy. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16(3), 205–225. doi: 10.1007/s10972-005-4861-1
  • Carifio, J., & Perla, R. J. (2007). Ten common misunderstandings, misconceptions, persistent myths and urban legends about Likert scales and Likert response formats and their antidotes. Journal of Social Sciences, 3(3), 106–116. doi: 10.3844/jssp.2007.106.116
  • Crawford, B. A. (2007). Learning to teach science as inquiry in the rough and tumble of practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 613–642. doi: 10.1002/tea.20157
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research In Personality, 19(2), 109–134. doi: 10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6
  • Enochs, L. G., & Riggs, I. M. (1990). Further development of an elementary science teaching efficacy belief instrument: A preservice elementary scale. School Science and Mathematics, 90(8), 694–706. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1990.tb12048.x
  • Espinosa, L. (2011). Pipelines and pathways: Women of color in undergraduate STEM majors and the college experiences that contribute to persistence. Harcard Education Review, 81(2), 209–241.
  • Fitzgerald, A., Dawson, V., & Hackling, M. (2013). Examining the beliefs and practices of four effective Australian primary science teachers. Research in Science Education, 43(3), 981–1003. doi: 10.1007/s11165-012-9297-y
  • Fuesting, M. A., Diekman, A. B., & Hudiburgh, L. (2017). From classroom to career: The unique role of communal processes in predicting interest in STEM careers. Social Psychology of Education, 20(4), 875–896. doi: 10.1007/s11218-017-9398-6
  • Gardner, P. L. (1975). Attitudes to science: A review. Studies in Science Education, 2(1), 1–41. doi: 10.1080/03057267508559818
  • Glynn, S. M., Brickman, P., Armstrong, N., & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2011). Science motivation questionnaire II: Validation with science majors and nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1159–1176. doi: 10.1002/tea.20442
  • Glynn, S. M., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Brickman, P. (2009). Science motivation questionnaire: Construct validation with nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(2), 127–146. doi: 10.1002/tea.20267
  • Hackling, M., Goodrum, D., & Rennie, L. J. (2001). The state of science in Australian secondary schools. Australian Science Teachers’ Journal, 47(4), 6–17.
  • Haney, J. J., Lumpe, A. T., Czerniak, C. M., & Egan, V. (2002). From beliefs to actions: The beliefs and actions of teachers implementing change. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(3), 171–187. doi: 10.1023/A:1016565016116
  • Holmes, K., Gore, J., Smith, M., & Lloyd, A. (2017). An integrated analysis of school students’ aspirations for STEM careers: Which student and school factors are most predictive? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. doi:10.1007/s10763-016-9793-z.
  • Hurtado, S., Newman, C. B., Tran, M. C., & Chang, M. J. (2010). Improving the rate of success for underrepresented racial minorities in STEM fields: Insights from a national project. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2010(148), 5–15. doi: 10.1002/ir.357
  • Kaufman, L., & Rousseeuw, P. J. (2009). Finding groups in data: An introduction to cluster analysis. New Jersey: Wiley.
  • Kennedy, J., Lyons, T., & Quinn, F. (2014). The continuing decline of science and mathematics enrolments in Australian high schools. Teaching Science, 60(2), 34–46.
  • Kenny, J. (2010). Preparing pre-service primary teachers to teach primary science: A partnership-based approach. International Journal of Science Education, 32(10), 1267–1288. doi: 10.1080/09500690902977994
  • Knaggs, C. M., & Sondergeld, T. A. (2015). Science as a learner and as a teacher: Measuring science self-efficacy of elementary preservice teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 115(3), 117–128. doi: 10.1111/ssm.12110
  • Krapp, A., & Prenzel, M. (2011). Research on interest in science: Theories, methods, and findings. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 27–50. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2010.518645
  • Liang, L. L., & Gabel, D. L. (2005). Effectiveness of a constructivist approach to science instruction for prospective elementary teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 27(10), 1143–1162. doi: 10.1080/09500690500069442
  • Loughran, J. J. (2007). Science teacher as learner. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1043–1065). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
  • Lumpe, A., Czerniak, C., Haney, J., & Beltyukova, S. (2012). Beliefs about teaching science: The relationship between elementary teachers’ participation in professional development and student achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 34(2), 153–166. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2010.551222
  • Mallow, J. V. (1978). A prescription for science anxiety. Curriculum Review, 17(4), 330–331.
  • Mallow, J. V., Kastrup, H., Bryant, F. B., Hislop, N., Shefner, R., & Udo, M. (2010). Science anxiety, science attitudes, and gender: Interviews from a binational study. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(4), 356–369. doi: 10.1007/s10956-010-9205-z
  • Mazlo, J., Dormedy, D., Niemoth-Anderson, J., Urlacher, T., Carson, G., Haas, E., & Kelter, P. (2002). What motivates students in the lab? Journal of College Science Teaching, 31(5), 318–321.
  • McDonnough, J. T., & Matkins, J. J. (2010). The role of field experience in elementary preservice teachers’ self-efficacy and ability to connect research to practice. School Science and Mathematics, 110(1), 13–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2009.00003.x
  • Mircioiu, C., & Atkinson, J. (2017). A comparison of parametric and non-parametric methods applied to a Likert scale. Pharmacy, 5(2), 26. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy5020026
  • Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079. doi: 10.1080/0950069032000032199
  • Palmer, D. H. (2002). Factors contributing to attitude exchange amongst preservice elementary teachers. Science Teacher Education, 86(1), 122–138.
  • Palmer, D., Dixon, J., & Archer, J. (2015). Changes in science teaching self-efficacy among primary teacher education students. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(12), 27–40. doi: 10.14221/ajte.2015v40n12.3
  • Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., & Perry, R. P. (2005). Achievement emotions questionnaire (AEQ). User’s manual. Munich: Department of Psychology, University of Munich.
  • Petersen, J. E., & Treagust, D. F. (2014). School and university partnerships: The role of teacher education institutions and primary schools in the development of preservice teachers’ science teaching efficacy. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(9). Retrieved from http://ro.ecu.edu.au/ajte/vol39/iss9/10 doi: 10.14221/ajte.2014v39n9.2
  • Quinnell, R., May, E., & Peat, M. (2012). Conceptions of biology and approaches to learning of first year biology students: Introducing a technique for tracking changes in learner profiles over time. International Journal of Science Education, 34(7), 1053–1074. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2011.582653
  • Rugutt, J. K., Ellet, C., & Culross, R. (2003). Discriminating student learning and efficacy levels in higher education: Contributions of classroom environment and teaching and learning effectiveness. Planning and Changing, 34(3–4), 229–249.
  • Schiefele, U., Krapp, A., & Winteler, A. (1992). Interest as a predictor of academic achievement: A meta-analysis of research. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 183–212). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (2009). Engagement as an organizational construct in the dynamics of motivational development. In K. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 223–254). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • TIMSS. (2015). Science 4th and 8th grade. Students’ attitudes towards science. IEA's trends in international mathematics and science study. Retrieved from http://timss2015.org/download-center/
  • Tosun, T. (2000). The beliefs of preservice elementary teachers toward science and science teaching. School Science and Mathematics, 100(7), 374–379. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2000.tb18179.x
  • van Aalderen-Smeets, S., & Walma van der Molen, J. H. (2013). Measuring primary teachers’ attitudes toward teaching science: Development of the dimensions of attitude toward science (DAS) instrument. International Journal of Science Education, 35(4), 577–600. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2012.755576
  • van Aalderen-Smeets, S., & Walma van der Molen, J. H. (2015). Improving primary teachers’ attitudes toward science by attitude-focused professional development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(5), 710–734. doi: 10.1002/tea.21218
  • van Aalderen-Smeets, S., Walma van der Molen, J. H., & Asma, L. J. F. (2012). Primary teachers’ attitudes toward science: A new theoretical framework. Science Education, 96(1), 158–182. doi: 10.1002/sce.20467
  • van Aalderen-Smeets, S. I., Walma van der Molen, J. H., van Hest, E. G. W. C. M., & Poortman, C. (2017). Primary teachers conducting inquiry projects: Effects on attitudes towards teaching science and conducting inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 39(2), 238–256. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2016.1277280
  • Zusho, A., Pintrich, P. R., & Coppola, B. (2003). Skill and will: The role of motivation and cognition in the learning of college chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1081–1094. doi: 10.1080/0950069032000052207

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.