Frames for emotional expressions across discourse forms in an ecology course

References

• Barnosky, A. D. (2009). Heatstroke: Nature in the age of global warming. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bazerman, C. (2006). Analyzing the multidimensionality of texts. In J. L. Green, G. Camilli, & P. B. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 77–94). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Bellocchi, A., Mills, K. A., & Ritchie, S. M. (2015). Emotional experiences of preservice science teachers in online learning: The formation, disruption and maintenance of social bonds. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11, 629–652. doi: 10.1007/s11422-015-9673-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellocchi, A., Ritchie, S. M., Tobin, K., King, D., Sandhu, M., & Henderson, S. (2014). Emotional climate and high quality learning experiences in science teacher education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51, 1301–1325. doi: 10.1002/tea.21170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berland, L. K., & Hammer, D. (2012). Framing for scientific argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 68–94. doi: 10.1002/tea.20446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boiger, M., & Mesquita, B. (2012). The construction of emotion in interactions, relationships, and cultures. Emotion Review, 4, 221–229. doi: 10.1177/1754073912439765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boler, M. (1999). Feeling power: Emotions and education. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brickhouse, N. W. (2001). Embodying science: A feminist perspective on learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 282–295. doi: 10.1002/1098-2736(200103)38:3<282::AID-TEA1006>3.0.CO;2-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryce, T., & Gray, D. (2004). Tough acts to follow: The challenges to science teachers presented by biotechnological progress. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 717–733. doi: 10.1080/0950069032000138833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castano, C. (2008). Socio-scientific discussions as a way to improve the comprehension of science and the understanding of the interrelation between species and the environment. Research in Science Education, 38, 565–587. doi: 10.1007/s11165-007-9064-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, R. (2004). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, T., Kelly, G. J., & Brown, C. (2000). Ways of knowing beyond facts and laws of science: An ethnographic investigation of student engagement in scientific practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 237–258. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200003)37:3<237::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeWalt, K. M., & DeWalt, B. R. (2011). Participant observation: A guide for fieldworkers. Plymouth: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P., & Green, J. L. (1998). Discourse analysis, learning, and social practice: A methodological study. Review of Research in Education, 23, 119–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96, 606–633. doi: 10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2007). Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse & Society, 18, 53–73. doi: 10.1177/0957926507069457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H., & Goodwin, C. (2000). Emotion within situated activity. In A. Duranti (Ed.), Linguistic anthropology: A reader (pp. 239–257). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Green, J. L. (1983). Research on teaching as a linguistic process: A state of the art. Review of Research in Education, 10, 151–252.
   Google Scholar
• Green, J. L., & Dixon, C. N. (1994). Talking knowledge into being: Discursive and social practices in classrooms. Linguistics and Education, 5, 231–239. doi: 10.1016/0898-5898(93)90001-Q
   Google Scholar
• Green, J. L., Dixon, C. N., & Zaharlick, A. (2003). Ethnography as a logic of inquiry. In J. Flood, D. Lapp, J. R. Squire, & J. M. Jensen (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (pp. 201–224). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Green, J., Skukauskaite, A., Dixon, C., & Córdova, R. (2007). Epistemological issues in the analysis of video records: Interactional ethnography as a logic of inquiry. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 115–132). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gumperz, J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hertsgaard, M. (2012). The pasta crisis. Newsweek, 160, 30–35.
   Google Scholar
• Hufnagel, E. (In press). Emotional discourse as constructed in environmental science. In G. J. Kelly, & J. L. Green (Eds.), Theory and methods for sociocultural research in science and engineering education. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hufnagel, E. (2015). Preservice elementary teachers’ emotional connections and disconnections to climate change in a science course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52, 1296–1324. doi: 10.1002/tea.21245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hufnagel, E. (2017). Attending to emotional expressions about climate change: A framework for teaching and learning. In D. P. Shepardson, A. Roychoudhury, & A. Hirsch (Eds.), Teaching and learning about climate change: A framework for educators (pp. 43–55). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hufnagel, E., & Kelly, G. J. (2017). Examining emotional expressions in discourse: methodological considerations. Cultural Studies of Science Education. Advance online. doi:10.1007/s11422-017-9806-4.
   Google Scholar
• Jaber, L. Z., & Hammer, D. (2016a). Engaging in science: A feeling for the discipline. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8406, 1–47. doi: 10.1080/10508406.2015.1088441
   Google Scholar
• Jaber, L. Z., & Hammer, D. (2016b). Learning to feel like a scientist. Science Education, 100, 189–220. doi: 10.1002/sce.21202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. J. (2007). Discourse in science classrooms. In S. K. Abell, & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 443–469). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. J. (2014a). Discourse practices in science learning and teaching. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (vol. 2, pp. 321–336). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. J. (2014b). Analysing classroom activities: Theoretical and methodological considerations. In C. Bruguière, A. Tiberghien, & P. Clément (Eds.), Topics and trends in current science education: 9th ESERA conference selected contributions (pp. 353–368). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. J., & Chen, C. (1999). The sound of music: Constructing science as sociocultural practices through oral and written discourse. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 883–915. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199910)36:8<883::AID-TEA1>3.0.CO;2-I
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. J., Chen, C., & Crawford, T. (1998). Methodological considerations for studying science-in-the-making in educational settings. Research in Science Education, 28, 23–49. doi: 10.1007/BF02461640
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. J., Chen, C., & Prothero, W. (2000). The epistemological framing of a discipline: Writing science in university oceanography. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 691–718. doi: 10.1002/1098-2736(200009)37:7<691::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-G
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. J., & Green, J. (1998). The social nature of knowing: Toward a sociocultural perspective on conceptual change and knowledge construction. In B. Guzzetti & C. Hynd (Eds.), Perspectives on conceptual change: Multiple ways to understand knowing and learning in a complex world (pp. 145–181). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Keltner, D., & Gross, J. J. (1999). Functional accounts of emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 13, 467–480. doi: 10.1080/026999399379140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwah, H., Milne, C., Tsai, T., Goldman, R., & Plass, J. L. (2016). Emotional engagement, social interactions, and the development of an afterschool game design curriculum. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11, 713–740. doi: 10.1007/s11422-014-9621-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leander, K., & Prior, P. (2004). Speaking and writing: How talk and text interact in situated practices. In C. Bazerman & P. Prior (Eds.), What writing does and how it does it: An introduction to analyzing texts and textual practices (pp. 201–237). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Lutz, C. A., & Abu-Lughod, L. (1990). Emotion, discourse, and the politics of everyday life. In C. A. Lutz & L. Abu-Lughod (Eds.), Language and the politics of emotion (pp. 1–23). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, S. P., & Kelly, G. J. (2012). Beyond argumentation: Sense-making discourse in the science classroom. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Perspectives on scientific argumentation (pp. 265–281). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Milne, C., & Otieno, T. (2007). Understanding engagement: Science demonstrations and emotional energy. Science Education, 91, 523–553. doi: 10.1002/sce.20203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oatley, K. (1993). Social constructions of emotions. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 341–352). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ochs, E., & Schieffelin, B. B. (1989). Language has a heart. Text, 9, 7–25.
   Google Scholar
• Olitsky, S. (2007). Promoting student engagement in science: Interaction rituals and the Pursuit of a community of practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 33–56. doi: 10.1002/tea.20128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira, A. W., Cook, K., & Buck, G. A. (2011). Framing evolution discussion intellectually. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 257–280. doi: 10.1002/tea.20396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira, A. W., Reis, G., Chaize, D. O., & Snyder, M. A. (2014). Death discussion in science read-alouds: Cognitive, sociolinguistic, and moral processes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51, 117–146. doi: 10.1002/tea.21132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osbeck, L. M., Nersessian, N. J., Malone, K. R., & Newstetter, W. C. (2011). Science as psychology: Sense-making and identity in social practice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, S. M., Tobin, K., Hudson, P., Roth, W.-M., & Mergard, V. (2011). Reproducing successful rituals in bad times: Exploring emotional interactions of a new science teacher. Science Education, 95, 745–765. doi: 10.1002/sce.20440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, S. M., Tobin, K., Sandhu, M., Sandhu, S., Henderson, S., & Roth, W.-M. (2013). Emotional arousal of beginning physics teachers during extended experimental investigations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50, 137–161. doi: 10.1002/tea.21060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivera Maulucci, M. S. (2013). Emotions and positional identity in becoming a social justice science teacher: Nicole’s story. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50, 453–478. doi: 10.1002/tea.21081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosiek, J., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Emotional scaffolding: The emotional and imaginative dimensions of teaching and learning. In P. A. Schutz & M. Zembylas (Eds.), Advances in teacher emotion research (pp. 175–194). Boston, MA: Springer US.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). The morality of socioscientific issues: Construal and resolution of genetic engineering dilemmas. Science Education, 88, 4–27. doi: 10.1002/sce.10101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shields, S. A. (2002). Speaking from the heart. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sinatra, G. M., Broughton, S., & Lombardi, D. (2014). Emotions in science education. In R. Pekrun & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 415–436). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, R. C. (2007). True to our feelings: What our emotions are really telling us. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College.
   Google Scholar
• Vining, J., & Tyler, E. (1999). Values, emotions and desired outcomes reflected in public responses to forest management plans. Research in Human Ecology, 6, 21–34.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, M. (2005). Science as poetry: Passion v. Prescription in school science? In S. Aslop (Ed.), Beyond Cartesian dualism: Encountering affect in the teaching and learning of science (pp. 197–208). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zembal-Saul, C., McNeill, K. L., & Hershberger, K. (2013). What’s your evidence? Engaging K-5 students in constructing explanations in science. Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M. (2002). Constructing genealogies of teachers’ emotions in science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 79–103. doi: 10.1002/tea.10010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M. (2005). Emotions and science teaching: Present research and future agendas. In S. Aslop (Ed.), Beyond Cartesian dualism: Encountering affect in the teaching and learning of science (pp. 123–132). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M., & Barker, H. B. (2002). Preservice teacher attitudes and emotions: Individual spaces, community conversations and transformations. Research in Science Education, 32, 329–351. doi: 10.1023/A:1020862000107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar