Year-long teacher professional development on fifth grade student science outcomes

References

• Allen, J. P., Pianta, R. C., Gregory, A., Mikami, A. Y., & Lun, J. (2011). An interaction-based approach to enhancing secondary school instruction and student achievement. Science, 333(6045), 1034–1037. doi: 10.1126/science.1207998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. (1998). Service-learning and teacher education. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Teaching and Teacher Education. [ED421481].
   Google Scholar
• Armour, K. M., & Yelling, M. (2004). Professional development and professional learning: Bridging the gap for experienced physical education teachers. European Physical Education Review, 10, 71–93. doi: 10.1177/1356336X04040622
   Google Scholar
• Banilower, E. R., Smith, P. S., Weiss, I. R., Malzahn, K. A., Campbell, K. M., & Weis, A. M. (2013). Report of the 2012 national survey of science and mathematics education. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Chicago and La Salle, Illinois: Open Court Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, B., Rasberry, M., & Williams, A. (2007). Recruiting and retaining quality teachers for high-needs schools: Insights from NBCT summits and other policy initiatives, national strategy forum.
   Google Scholar
• Blamey, A., & Mackenzie, M. (2007). Theories of change and realistic evaluation SAGE publications (Los Angeles, London. New Delhi and Singapore, 13(4), 439–455. doi: 10.1177/1356389007082129
   Google Scholar
• Blank, R. K., & De la Alas, N. (2009). Effects of teacher professional development on gains in student achievement: How meta-analysis provides scientific evidence useful to education leaders. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, H., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins, effectiveness, and applications. Colorado Springs: BCSC.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• D’Agostino, R. (1998). Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Statistics in Medicine, 17(19), 2265–2281. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19981015)17:19<2265::AID-SIM918>3.0.CO;2-B
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeJarnette, N. (2012). America’’s children: Providing early exposure to STEM (science, technology, engineering and math) initiatives. Education, 133(1), 77–84.
   Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures’. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. doi: 10.3102/0013189X08331140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M. (2011). R and D: A primer on effective professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(6), 68–71. doi: 10.1177/003172171109200616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M., Porter, A. C., Garet, M. S., Yoon, K. S., & Birman, B. F. (2002). Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 81–112. doi: 10.3102/01623737024002081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaconu, Dana Viorica, Radigan, Judy, Suskavcevic, Milijana, & Nichol, Carolyn. (2012). A Multi-Year Study of the Impact of the Rice Model Teacher Professional Development on Elementary Science Teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 34(6), 855–877. doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.642019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dusenbury, L., Brannigan, R., Falco, M., & Hansen, W. B. (2003). A review of research on fidelity of implementation: Implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings. Health Education Research, 18(2), 237–256. doi: 10.1093/her/18.2.237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulp, S. L. (2002). 2000 national survey of science and mathematics education: Status of elementary school science teaching. Chapel Hill: Horizon Research. Retrieved from http://www.horizon-research.com
   Google Scholar
• Furtwengler, S. (2015). Effects of participation in a post-secondary honors program with covariate adjustment using propensity score. Journal of Advanced Academics, 26, 274–293. doi: 10.1177/1932202X15603365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, F., Bendall, S., Heller, P., & Poole, R. (2003). Constructing ideas in physical science: Field test version. Armonk, NY: It’s About Time.
   Google Scholar
• Hawley, W. D., & Valli, L. (1998). The essentials of effective professional development: A new consensus. In L. S. Darling Hammond, & G. Sykes (Eds.), The heart of the matter: Teaching as a learning profession (pp. 86–124). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, J. I., Daehler, K. R., Wong, N., Shinohara, M., & Miratrix, L. W. (2012). Differential effects of three professional development models on teacher knowledge and student achievement in elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(3), 333–362. doi: 10.1002/tea.21004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, C. H., Blunk, M. L., Charalambous, C. Y., Lewis, J. M., Phelps, G. C., Sleep, L., & Ball, D. L. (2008). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and the mathematical quality of instruction: An exploratory study. Cognition and Instruction, 26(4), 430–511. doi: 10.1080/07370000802177235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hord, S., & Roussin, J. (2013). Implementing change through learning; concerns-based concepts, tools, and strategies for guiding change. Reference and Research Book News.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. C., & Fargo, J. D. (2010). Urban school reform enabled by transformative professional development: Impact on teacher change and student learning of science. Urban Education, 45(1), 4–29. doi: 10.1177/0042085909352073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (2002). Student achievement through staff development (3rd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Kahle, J. B., & Kronebusch, M. (2003). Science teacher education: From a fractured system to a seamless continuum. Review of Policy Research, 20(4), 585–602. doi: 10.1046/j.1541-1338.2003.00040.x
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, M. (1998). Form and substance in inservice teacher education. Madison, WI: National Institute for Science Education, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, L., & Gabel, D. (2005). Effectiveness of a constructivist approach to science instruction for prospective elementary teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 27(10), 1143–1162. doi: 10.1080/09500690500069442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P. W., Love, N., & Stiles, K. (1998). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lumpe, A., Czerniak, C., Haney, J., & Beltyukova, S. (2012). Beliefs about teaching science: The relationship between elementary teachers’ participation in professional development and student achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 34(2), 153–166. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2010.551222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, L. C., Heron, P. R. L., Shaffer, P. S., & Stetzer, M. R. (2006). Improving the preparation of K-12 teachers through physics education research. American Journal of Physics, 74(9), 763–767. doi: 10.1119/1.2209244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, L. C., Shaffer, P. S., & Constantinou, C. P. (2000). Preparing teachers to teach physics and physical science by inquiry. Physics Education, 35(6), 411–416. Retrieved from http://www.phys.washington.edu/groups/peg/pubsa.html - abs2a doi: 10.1088/0031-9120/35/6/306
   Google Scholar
• Mead, Louise S., & Mates, Anton. (2009). Why Science Standards are Important to a Strong Science Curriculum and How States Measure Up. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 2(3), 359–371. doi:10.1007/s12052-009-0155-y
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. (2001). Teaching Evolution Do State Science Standards Matter? Reports of the National Centre for Science Education, 21(1-2), 9–21.
   Google Scholar
• Moseley, C., & Ramsey, S. J. (2008). Elementary teachers’ progressive understanding of inquiry through the process of reflection. School Science and Mathematics, 108, 49–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2008.tb17804.x
   Google Scholar
• Mowbray, C. T., Holter, M. C., Teague, G. B., & Bybee, D. (2003). Fidelity criteria: Development, measurement, and validation. American Journal of Evaluation, 24(3), 315–340. doi: 10.1177/109821400302400303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning / committee on development of an addendum to the national science education standards on scientific inquiry, center for science, mathematics, and engineering education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., & Waters, E. (2002). Four assumptions of multiple regression that researchers should always test. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 2. Retrieved from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=8&n=2
   Google Scholar
• Polly, D., McGee, J., Wang, C., Martin, C., Lambert, R., & Pugalee, D. K. (2015). Linking professional development, teacher outcomes, and student achievement: The case of a learner-centred mathematics program for elementary school teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 72, 26–37. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2015.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Texas Education Agency-Lonestar. (2013). Retrieved on http://loving1.tea.state.tx.us/lonestar/Home.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Texas Education Agency. (2011). Retrieved on http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/aeis/2011/.
   Google Scholar
• Texas Education Agency. (2013). Retrieved on http://www.tea.state.tx.us/index.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Silverstein, S. C., Dubner, J., Miller, J., Glied, S., & Loike, J. D. (2009). Teachers’ participation in research programs improves their students’ achievement in science. Science, 326, 440–442. doi: 10.1126/science.1177344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southerland, S. A., Smith, L. K., Sowell, S. P., & Kittleson, J. M. (2007). Chapter 2 resisting unlearning: Understanding science education’s response to the United States’s national accountability movement’’. Review of Research in Education, 31, 45–77. doi: 10.3102/0091732X07300046045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational Researcher, 30, 23–28. doi: 10.3102/0013189X030003023
   Google Scholar
• Supovitz, J. A. (2001). Translating teaching practice into improved student achievement. In S. H. Fuhrman (Ed.), From the capitol to the classroom. Standards-based reform in the states (pp. 81–98). Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Supovitz, J. A., & Turner, H. M. (2000). The effects of professional development on science teaching practices and classroom culture. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 963–980. doi: 10.1002/1098-2736(200011)37:9<963::AID-TEA6>3.0.CO;2-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tai, R. H. (2008). Research on student interest and performance: Factors within a teacher’s influence. Washington, DC: Chemical Sciences Roundtable, National Academy of Science.
   Google Scholar
• Tai, R., Loehr, J., & Sadler, P. (2005). Factors influencing success in introductory college chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(9), 987–1012. doi: 10.1002/tea.20082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoemmes, F., & Kim, E. (2011). A systematic review of propensity score methods in the social sciences. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46, 90–118. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2011.540475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers’ practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 137–158. doi:10.1002/1098-2736(200102)38:2<137::AID-TEA1001>3.0.CO;2-U
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Overschelde, J. P. (2013). Project lead the way students more prepared for higher education. American Journal of Engineering Education, 4(1), 1.
   Google Scholar
• Vasquez, J. (2005, January 10). Bring back elementary science education. National Science Teachers Association Express. Retrieved from http://science.nsta.org/nstaexpress/nstaexpress_2004_01_10_letter.htm
   Google Scholar
• Wayne, A. J., Yoon, K. S., Zhu, P., Cronen, S., & Garet, M. S. (2008). Experimenting with teacher professional development: Motives and methods. Educational Researcher, 37(8), 469–479. doi: 10.3102/0013189X08327154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, R. C., Darling-Hammond, L., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad. Technical Report.. National Staff Development Council.
   Google Scholar
• Wenglinsky, H. (2000). How teaching matters: Bringing the classroom back into discussions of teacher quality. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Wenglinsky, H., & Silverstein, S. C. (2007). The science training teachers need. Educational Leadership, 64(4), 24–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, K. W., Duncan, T., Lee, S. W., Scarloss, B., & Shapley, K. L. (2007). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement (REL 2007- No. 033). REL Southwest.
   Google Scholar