The I files, the truth is out there: science teachers’ constructs of inquiry

References

• Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1–12. doi: 10.1023/A:1015171124982
   Google Scholar
• Atkin, J. M., & Black, P. (2003). Inside science education reform: A history of curricular and policy change. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bassey, M. (1999). Case study research in educational settings. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berliner, D. (2011). Rational responses to high stakes testing: The case of curriculum narrowing and the harm that follows. Cambridge Journal of Education, 41(3), 287–302. doi: 10.1080/0305764X.2011.607151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevins, S., & Price, G. (2016). Reconceptualising inquiry in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 38(1), 17–29. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2015.1124300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. W. (2004). Scientific inquiry and science teaching. In L. B. Flick & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and the nature of science (pp. 1–14). Boston: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, L. (2008). Sociocultural influences on science education: Innovation for contemporary times. Science Education, 92(1), 165–181. doi: 10.1002/sce.20228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, B. A. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 916–937. doi: 10.1002/1098-2736(200011)37:9<916::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, B. A. (2007). Learning to teach science as inquiry in the rough and tumble of practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(4), 613–642. doi: 10.1002/tea.20157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deignan, T. (2009). Enquiry-based learning: Perspectives on practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(1), 13–28. doi: 10.1080/13562510802602467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Directorate General Education and Culture. (2005). Key data on education in Europe. Brussels: Eurydice.
   Google Scholar
• Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287–312. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudu, W. T., & Vhurumuku, E. (2012). Teachers’ practices of inquiry when teaching investigations: A case study. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(6), 579–600. doi: 10.1007/s10972-012-9287-y
   Google Scholar
• Epting, F. R., Probert, J. S., & Pittman, S. D. (1993). Alternative strategies for construct elicitation: Experimenting with experience. International Journal of Personal Construct Psychology, 6, 79–98. doi: 10.1080/08936039308404333
   Google Scholar
• Germann, P. J., Haskins, S., & Auls, S. (1996). Analysis of nine high school biology laboratory manuals: Promoting scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 475–499. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199605)33:5<475::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-O
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gess-Newsome, J., Southerland, S. A., Johnston, A., & Woodbury, S. (2003). Educational reform, personal practical theories, and dissatisfaction: The anatomy of change in college science teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 731–767. doi: 10.3102/00028312040003731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Hand, B., Wallace, C. W., & Yang, E.-M. (2004). Using a science writing heuristic to enhance learning outcomes from laboratory activities in seventh-grade science: Quantitative and qualitative aspects. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 131–149. doi: 10.1080/0950069032000070252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28–54. doi: 10.1002/sce.10106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, L., Reid, D., & Bevins, S. C. (1997). Teachers’ perceptions of mentoring in a collaborative model of initial teacher training. Journal of Education for Teaching, 23(3), 253–262. doi: 10.1080/02607479719990
   Google Scholar
• Kaberman, Z., & Dori, Y. J. (2009). Question posing, inquiry and modelling skills of chemistry students in the case-based computerised laboratory environment. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(3), 597–625. doi: 10.1007/s10763-007-9118-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs (2 vols.). New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivism, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krajcik, J. S., Czerniak, C., & Berger, C. (2002). Teaching science in elementary and middle school classrooms: A project-based approach (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Linn, M. C., Davies, E. A., & Bell, P. (2004). Inquiry and technology. In M. C. Linn, E. A. Davies, & P. Bell (Eds.), Internet environments for science education (pp. 3–28). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Millar, R., & Osborne, J. F.1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. London: King’s College London.
   Google Scholar
• Nuthall, G. (2005). The cultural myths and realities of classroom teaching and learning: A personal journey. Teachers College Record, 107(5), 895–934. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2005.00498.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office for Qualifications and Examinations (Ofqual). (2009). Ofqual: The launch brochure. Retrieved from http://www.ofqual.gov.uk
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., & Collins, S. (2000). Pupils’ and parents’ views of the school science curriculum. London: Kings College London/Wellcome Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, D. H. (2009). Student interest generated during an inquiry skills lesson. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(2), 147–165. doi: 10.1002/tea.20263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PISA, O. D. (2015). Science framework. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/Draft%20PISA%202015%20Science%20Framework%20.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pope, M., & Denicolo, P. (2001). Transformative education: Personal construct approaches to practice and research. London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Ramnarain, U. (2014). Teachers’ perceptions of inquiry-based learning in urban, suburban, township and rural high schools: The context-specificity of science curriculum implementation in South Africa. Teaching and Teacher Education, 38, 65–75. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2013.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutherford, F. J. (1964). The role of inquiry in science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2(2), 80–84. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660020204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadeh, I., & Zion, M. (2009). The development of dynamic inquiry performances within an open inquiry setting: A comparison to guided inquiry setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(10), 1137–1160. doi: 10.1002/tea.20310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjoberg, S. (2004). Attitudes and interests in science and technology. Paper presented to a conference on increasing human resources for science and technology in Europe, European Commission, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Thornberg, R. (2012). Informed grounded theory. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 56(3), 243–259. doi: 10.1080/00313831.2011.581686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, W. W., Klopfer, L. E., Aikenhead, G. S., & Robinson, J. T. (1981). The role of inquiry in science education: Analysis and recommendations. Science Education, 65(1), 33–50. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730650106
   Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M. (2003). Inquiry projects in science teacher education: What can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice? Science Education, 87(1), 112–143. doi: 10.1002/sce.10044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M. (2004). Folk theories of ‘inquiry’: How preservice teachers reproduce the discourse and practices of an atheoretical scientific model. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 481–512. doi: 10.1002/tea.20010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yerrick, K. R. (2000). Lower track science students’ argumenation and open inquiry instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(8), 807–838. doi: 10.1002/1098-2736(200010)37:8<807::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zion, M., & Mendelovici, R. (2012). Moving from structured to open inquiry: Challenges and limits. Science Education International, 23(4), 383–399.
   Google Scholar