3,775
Views
30
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Exploring a theoretical model of climate change action for youth

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 2389-2409 | Received 13 Feb 2019, Accepted 12 Oct 2019, Published online: 03 Nov 2019

References

  • Ackerman, B. A., & Fishkin, J. S. (2005). Deliberation day. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Aikenhead, G. S. (2006). Science education for everyday life: Evidence-based practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
  • American Psychological Association, American Educational Research Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (APA, AERA, & NCME). (2014). Standards for educational & psychological tests.
  • Arbuckle, J. G., Morton, L. W., & Hobbs, J. (2013). Farmer beliefs and concerns about climate change and attitudes toward adaptation and mitigation: Evidence from Iowa. Climatic Change, 118(3–4), 551–563.
  • Ardoin, N. M., Bowers, A. W., Roth, N. W., & Holthuis, N. (2018). Environmental education and K-12 student outcomes: A review and analysis of research. The Journal of Environmental Education, 49(1), 1–17.
  • Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psychosocial determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(1), 14–25.
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191.
  • Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4) (pp. 71–81). New York: Academic Press. (Reprinted in H. Friedman [Ed.], Encyclopedia of mental health. San Diego: Academic Press, 1998).
  • Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(3), 75–78.
  • Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents, 5(1), 307–337.
  • Barton, A. C., & Roth, W. M. (2004). Rethinking scientific literacy. New York: Routledge.
  • Bogner, J., Pipatti, R., Hashimoto, S., Diaz, C., Mareckova, K., Diaz, L., … Zhang, T. (2008). Mitigation of global greenhouse gas emissions from waste: Conclusions and strategies from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report. Working Group III (Mitigation). Waste Management & Research, 26(1), 11–32.
  • Bord, R. J., O'Connor, R. E., & Fisher, A. (2000). In what sense does the public need to understand global climate change? Public Understanding of Science, 9(3), 205–218.
  • Busch, K., Henderson, J. & Stevenson, K. (2018). Broadening epistemologies and methodologies in climate change education research. Environmental Education Research. doi:10.1080/13504622.2018.1514588.
  • Cameron, W. B. (1963). Informal sociology: A casual introduction to sociological thinking (Vol. 21). New York: Random House.
  • Carvalho, A. (2010). Media (ted) discourses and climate change: A focus on political subjectivity and (dis) engagement. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(2), 172–179.
  • Cavalier, R., Attari, S., Dawson, T., & Schweizer, V. (2008). A deliberative poll on climate change. In UNITAR-Yale conference on environment and democracy, May (pp. 10–11).
  • Cialdini, R. B. (2007). Descriptive social norms as underappreciated sources of social control. Psychometrika, 72(2), 263.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
  • DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582–601.
  • de Kwaadsteniet, E. W., van Dijk, E., Wit, A., De Cremer, D., & de Rooij, M. (2007). Justifying decisions in social dilemmas: Justification pressures and tacit coordination under environmental uncertainty. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(12), 1648–1660.
  • Desimone, L. M., & Le Floch, K. C. (2004). Are we asking the right questions? Using cognitive interviews to improve surveys in education research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26(1), 1–22.
  • DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale development: Theory and applications (Vol. 26). Sage Publications.
  • De Vreede, C., Warner, A., & Pitter, R. (2014). Facilitating youth to take sustainability actions: The potential of peer education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 45(1), 37–56.
  • Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Fishkin, J. S. (2011). When the people speak: Deliberative democracy and public consultation. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Flora, J. A., Saphir, M., Lappé, M., Roser-Renouf, C., Maibach, E. W., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2014). Evaluation of a national high school entertainment education program: The Alliance for Climate Education. Climatic Change, 127(3–4), 419–434.
  • Fortner, R. W., Lee, J. Y., Corney, J. R., Romanello, S., Bonnell, J., Luthy, B., … Ntsiko, N. (2000). Public understanding of climate change: Certainty and willingness to act. Environmental Education Research, 6(2), 127–141.
  • Gallup. (2017). Global warming concern at three-decade high in US. Retrieved from https://www.gallup.com/poll/206030/global-warming-concern-three-decade-high.aspx?g_source=CATEGORY_CLIMATE_CHANGE&g_medium=topic&g_campaign=tiles
  • Gardner, G. T., & Stern, P. C. (2008). The short list: The most effective actions US households can take to curb climate change. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 50(5), 12–25.
  • Gifford, R. (2011). The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. American Psychologist, 66(4), 290.
  • Gliem, J. A., & Gliem, R. R. (2003). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales. Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education.
  • Habermas, J. (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 6). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Heimlich, J. E., & Ardoin, N. M. (2008). Understanding behavior to understand behavior change: A literature review. Environmental Education Research, 14(3), 215–237.
  • Hemphill, J. F. (2003). Interpreting the magnitudes of correlation coefficients. American Psychologist, 58(1), 78–79.
  • Hess, D. E., & McAvoy, P. (2014). The political classroom: Evidence and ethics in democratic education. New York: Routledge.
  • Hines, J. M., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1987). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Environmental Education, 18(2), 1–8.
  • Hodson, D. (1999). Going beyond cultural pluralism: Science education for sociopolitical action. Science Education, 83(6), 775–796.
  • Hornsey, M. J., Harris, E. A., Bain, P. G., & Fielding, K. S. (2016). Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change. Nature Climate Change, 6(6), 622.
  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: a Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.
  • Jakobsson, A., Mäkitalo, Å, & Säljö, R. (2009). Conceptions of knowledge in research on students’ understanding of the greenhouse effect: Methodological positions and their consequences for representations of knowing. Science Education, 93(6), 978–995.
  • Jeffries, H., Stanisstreet, M., & Boyes, E. (2010). Knowledge about the ‘greenhouse effect’: Have college students improved? Research in Science & Technological Education, 19(2), 205–221.
  • Kahan, D. M. (2012). Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection: An experimental study. Judgment and Decision Making, 8, 407–24.
  • Kahan, D. M., Peters, E., Wittlin, M., Slovic, P., Ouellette, L. L., Braman, D., & Mandel, G. (2012). The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nature Climate Change, 2(10), 732–735.
  • Kaiser, F. G., & Gutscher, H. (2003). The proposition of a general version of the theory of planned behavior: Predicting ecological behavior1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(3), 586–603.
  • Keith, T. Z. (2014). Multiple regression and beyond: An introduction to multiple regression and structural equation modeling. New York: Routledge Publishing.
  • Kelsey, E., & Dillon, J. (2005). “If the public knew better, they would act better”: The pervasive power of the myth of the ignorant public. In R. B. Stevenson & J. Dillon (Eds.), Engaging environmental education: Learning, culture, and agency (pp. 1–12). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  • Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260.
  • Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., Feinberg, G., & Rosenthal, S. (2015). Climate change in the American mind: October, 2015. Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven, CT: Yale Program on Climate Change Communication.
  • Leiserowitz, A., Smith, N., & Marlon, J. (2011). American teens’ knowledge of climate change. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change Knowledge.
  • Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 151–173.
  • Lorenzoni, I., Nicholson-Cole, S., & Whitmarsh, L. (2007). Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global Environmental Change, 17(3–4), 445–459.
  • Mansfield, E. R., & Helms, B. P. (1982). Detecting multicollinearity. The American Statistician, 36(3a), 158–160.
  • McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2011). Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States. Global Environmental Change, 21(4), 1163–1172.
  • Mead, E., Roser-Renouf, C., Rimal, R. N., Flora, J. A., Maibach, E. W., & Leiserowitz, A. (2012). Information seeking about global climate change among adolescents: The role of risk perceptions, efficacy beliefs, and parental influences. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 20(1), 31–52.
  • Milfont, T. L. (2012). The interplay between knowledge, perceived efficacy, and concern about global warming and climate change: A one-year longitudinal study. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 32(6), 1003–1020.
  • Monroe, M. C., Plate, R. R., Oxarart, A., Bowers, A., & Chaves, W. A. (2017). Identifying effective climate change education strategies: A systematic review of the research. Environmental Education Research, 25(6), 791–812.
  • Muthén, B., & Muthén, L. (2007). Mplus 4.2. Los Angeles: Muthen & Muthen.
  • National Research Council. (2012a). Climate change education in formal settings, K–14: A workshop summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • National Research Council. (2012b). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • Niebert, K., & Gropengiesser, H. (2013). Understanding and communicating climate change in metaphors. Environmental Education Research, 19(3), 282–302.
  • Öhman, J., & Öhman, M. (2013). Participatory approach in practice: An analysis of student discussions about climate change. Environmental Education Research, 19(3), 324–341.
  • Osborne, J. (2007). Science education for the twenty first century. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(3), 173–184.
  • Osborne, J. (2010). Science for citizenship. In J. Osborne & J. Dillon (Eds.), Good Practice in Science Teaching: What Research has to say (225–240). United Kingdom: McGraw Hill.
  • Pew Research Center. (2016, October 4). The politics of climate. Retrieved from https://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/14/2016/10/14080900/PS_2016.10.04_Politics-of-Climate_FINAL.pdf
  • Presser, S., Couper, M. P., Lessler, J. T., Martin, E., Martin, J., Rothgeb, J. M., & Singer, E. (2004). Methods for testing and evaluating survey questions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68(1), 109–130.
  • Rawls, J. (1997). The idea of public reason. Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, 93, 108–114.
  • Schumacher, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2016). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Shepardson, D. P., Choi, S., Niyogi, D., & Charusombat, U. (2011). Seventh grade students’ mental models of the greenhouse effect. Environmental Education Research, 17(1), 1–17.
  • Shepardson, D. P., Niyogi, D., Choi, S., & Charusombat, U. (2011). Students’ conceptions about the greenhouse effect, global warming, and climate change. Climatic Change, 104(3–4), 481–507.
  • Shi, J., Visschers, V. H., Siegrist, M., & Arvai, J. (2016). Knowledge as a driver of public perceptions about climate change reassessed. Nature Climate Change, 6(8), 759.
  • Steinberg, L., & Morris, A. S. (2001). Adolescent development. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 83–110.
  • Stern, P. C. (2000). New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407–424. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00175
  • Stevenson, K. T., Peterson, M. N., & Bondell, H. D. (2018). Developing a model of climate change behavior among adolescents. Climatic Change, 151(3-4), 589–603.
  • Stevenson, K. T., Peterson, M. N., & Bondell, H. D. (2019). The influence of personal beliefs, friends, and family in building climate change concern among adolescents. Environmental Education Research, 25(6), 832–845.
  • Stevenson, K. T., Peterson, M. N., Bondell, H. D., Moore, S. E., & Carrier, S. J. (2014). Overcoming skepticism with education: Interacting influences of worldview and climate change knowledge on perceived climate change risk among adolescents. Climatic Change, 126(3–4), 293–304.
  • Stevenson, K. T., Peterson, M. N., & Bradshaw, A. (2016). How climate change beliefs among US teachers do and do not translate to students. PLoS one, 11(9). e0161462.
  • Stocklmayer, S. M., & Bryant, C. (2012). Science and the public—What should people know? International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 2(1), 81–101.
  • Tasquier, G., & Pongiglione, F. (2017). The influence of causal knowledge on the willingness to change attitude towards climate change: Results from an empirical study. International Journal of Science Education, 39(13), 1846–1868.
  • Tobler, C., Visschers, V. H., & Siegrist, M. (2012). Consumers’ knowledge about climate change. Climatic Change, 114(2), 189–209.
  • United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) and United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). (2016). Action for climate empowerment: Guidelines for accelerating solutions through education, training and public awareness.
  • US Global Change Research Program (USGCRP). (2009). Climate Literacy: The Essential Principles of Climate Science, A Guide for Individuals and Communities. [Brochure]. Retrieved from http://www.globalchange.gov/resources/educators/climate-literacy
  • Vainio, A., & Paloniemi, R. (2013). Does belief matter in climate change action? Public Understanding of Science, 22(4), 382–395. doi: 10.1177/0963662511410268
  • Valdez, R. X., Peterson, M. N., & Stevenson, K. T. (2018). How communication with teachers, family and friends contributes to predicting climate change behaviour among adolescents. Environmental Conservation, 45(2), 183–191.
  • van der Linden, S. L., Leiserowitz, A. A., Feinberg, G. D., & Maibach, E. W. (2015). The scientific consensus on climate change as a gateway belief: Experimental evidence. PloS one, 10(2), e0118489.
  • Vaske, J. J. (2008). Survey research and analysis: Applications in parks, recreation and human dimensions. State College, PA: Venture Publishing.
  • Whitmarsh, L. (2011). Scepticism and uncertainty about climate change: Dimensions, determinants and change over time. Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 690–700.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.