901
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Revisiting the scientific habits of mind scale for socio-scientific issues in the Indonesian context

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 2430-2447 | Received 04 May 2019, Accepted 20 Oct 2019, Published online: 03 Nov 2019

References

  • Albe, V. (2008a). Students’ positions and considerations of scientific evidence about a controversial socioscientific issue. Science & Education, 17(8–9), 805–827. https://doi.org//10.1007/s11191-007-9086-6
  • Albe, V. (2008b). When scientific knowledge, daily life experience, epistemological and social considerations intersect: Students’ argumentation in group discussions on a socio-scientific issue. Research in Science Education, 38, 67–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9040-2
  • Arif, A. (2016). Analisis yuridis pengrusakan hutan (deforestasi) dan degradasi hutan terhadap lingkungan [Juridical analysis of forest destruction (deforestation) and forest degradation on the environment]. Jurisprudentie, 3(1), 33–41. Retrieved from: http://journal.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/Jurisprudentie/article/view/3622/3319
  • Bağ, H., & Çalık, M. (2017). A thematic review of argumentation studies at the K-8 level. Education and Science, 42(190), 281–303. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2017.6845
  • Bishop, G. F. (2005). The illusion of public opinion: Fact and artifact in American public opinion polls. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Burke, L., Selik, E., & Holmes, M. (2002). Reefs at risks in Southeast Asia. Washington: World Resource Institute.
  • Çalik, M., & Ayas, A. (2008). A critical review of the development of the Turkish science curriculum. In R. K. Coll & N. Taylor (Eds.), Science education in context: An international examination of the influence of context on science curricula development and implementation (pp. 161–174). Rotterdam: Sense Publication.
  • Çalik, M., & Cobern, W. W. (2017). A cross-cultural study of CKCM efficacy in an undergraduate chemistry classroom. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(4), 691–709. https://doi.org//10.1039/c7rp00016b
  • Çalik, M., & Coll, R. (2012). Investigating socio-scientific issues via scientific habits of mind: Development and validation of the scientific habits of mind survey. International Journal of Science Education, 34(12), 1909–1930. https://doi.org//10.1080/09500693.2012.685197
  • Çalik, M., & Karataş, FÖ. (2019). Does a ‘science, technology and social change’ course improve scientific habits of mind and attitudes towards socioscientific issues? Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 44(6), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2018v44n6.3
  • Çalik, M., Turan, B., & Coll, R. K. (2014). A cross-age study of elementary student teachers’ scientific habits of mind concerning socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(6), 1315–1340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9458-0
  • Carter, S. R. (2016). Using confirmatory factor analysis to manage discriminant validity issues in social pharmacy research. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 38(3), 731–737.
  • Chambongo, P. E., Nguku, P., Wasswa, P., & Semali, I. (2016). Community vaccine perceptions and its role on vaccination uptake among children aged 12-23 months in the Ileje District. Tanzania: A Cross Section Study. Pan African Medical Journal, 23(162), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2016.23.162.8925
  • Christensen, C. K. (2007). Waiting for certainty: Young people, mobile phones and uncertain science (Doctoral Dissertation). Queensland University of Technology, Queensland.
  • Coll, R. K., Taylor, N., & Lay, M. C. (2009). Scientists’ habits of mind as evidenced by the interaction between their science training and religious beliefs. International Journal of Science Education, 31(6), 725–755. https://doi.org//10.1080/09500690701762621
  • Craig-Hare, J., Ault, M., & Rowland, A. (2017). The effect of socio-scientific topics on discourse within an online game designed to engage middle school students in scientific argumentation. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 3(2), 110–125. https://doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.325783
  • Crick, B. (1998). Education for citizenship and the teaching of democracy in schools. London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.
  • Dalgety, J., Coll, R. K., & Jones, A. (2003). The development of the chemistry attitudes and experiences questionnaire (CAEQ). Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 649–668. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10103
  • Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J. A. (2000). Introducing LISREL. London: Sage Publications.
  • Draper, G., Vincent, T., Kroll, M. E., & Swanson, J. (2005). Childhood cancer in relation to distance from high voltage power lines in England and Wales: A case-control study. BMJ, 330(7503), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.330.7503.1290
  • Ebenezer, J., Chacko, S., Kaya, O. N., Koya, S. K., & Ebenezer, D. K. (2010). The effects of common knowledge construction model sequence of lessons on science achievement and relational conceptual change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(1), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20295
  • Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272
  • Fensham, P. J. (1985). Science for all: A reflective essay. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 17(4), 415–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027850170407
  • Fernie, K. J., & Reynolds, S. J. (2005). The effects of electromagnetic fields from power lines on avian reproductive biology and physiology: A review. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B, 8(2), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10937400590909022
  • Gauld, C. F. (1982). The scientific attitude and science education: A critical reappraisal. Science Education, 66, 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730660113
  • Gauld, C. F. (2005). Habits of mind, scholarship and decision making in science and religion. Science & Education, 14, 291–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-004-1997-x
  • Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Boudreau, M. C. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4(1), 1–57. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.00407
  • Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1992). Monte Carlo evaluations of goodness of fit indices for structural equation models. Sociological Methods and Research, 21(2), 132–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002002
  • Grooms, J., Sampson, V., & Golden, B. (2014). Comparing the effectiveness of verification and inquiry laboratories in supporting undergraduate science students in constructing arguments around socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 36(9), 1412–1433. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.891160
  • Grootveld, M., Silwood, C. J. L., Addis, P., Claxson, A., Serra, B. B., & Viana, M. (2001). Health effects of oxidized heated oils. Foodservice Research International, 13(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4506.2001.tb00028.x
  • Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
  • Hariyadi, H. (2016). Agenda-setting pembangunan PLTN dan pencapaian ketahanan listrik (studi di Jepara dan Pangkal Pinang) [The agenda-setting of nuclear power plant development and achievement of electrical resistance, study case in Jepara and Pangkal Pinang]. Jurnal Ekonomi & Kebijakan Publik, 7(2), 127–142. https://doi.org/10.22212/jekp.v7i2.594
  • Hidayah, A., Sunarti, S., & Hakim, L. (2017). Potensi dan pengembangan objek wisata bahari Tulamben, kabupaten Karangasem Bali [Potential and development of Tulamben marine tourism object, Karangasem regency, Bali]. Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis, 50(2), 93–98.
  • Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  • Indraswari, R. R., & Yuhan, R. J. (2017). Factors affecting the delay first birth in rural Indonesia: An analysis of the 2012 IDHS. Jurnal Kependudukan Indonesia, 12(1), 1–12.
  • Irawati, I., Cahyo, H. N., Retnara, I. W., & Guntur. (2009, October). Peran jaringan energi kelistrikan saluran udara tegangan ekstra tinggi (SUTET) dalam pembangunan perkotaan berkelanjutan [The role of extra high voltage airways electricity network in sustainable urban development]. Paper presented at Seminar Nasional Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota ITS, Surabaya.
  • Kagoné, M., Yé, M., Nébié, E., Sié, A., Müller, O., & Beiersmann, C. (2018). Community perception regarding childhood vaccinations and its implications for effectiveness: A qualitative study in rural Burkina Faso. BMC Public Health, 18(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5244-9
  • Kakaiya, R., Lopez, L. L., & Nelson, A. L. (2017). Women’s perceptions of contraceptive efficacy and safety. Contraception and Reproductive Medicine, 2(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-017-0046-5
  • Kolomuç, A., & Çalık, M. (2019). A comparison of academic staff’s scientific habits of mind via socioscientific issues. Yuksekogretim Dergisi, 9(1), 67–74. https://doi.org/10.2399/yod.18.039
  • Kolsto, S. D. (2001). To trust or not to trust, … ‘pupils’ ways of judging information encountered in a socio-scientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 23(9), 877–901. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690010016102
  • Korolija, J. N., Rajic, S., & Mandic, L. M. (2008). Education about diet through chemistry learning. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 9, 65–73.
  • Levinson, R. (2006). Towards a theoretical framework for teaching controversial socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 28(10), 1201–1224. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600560753
  • Linder, C., Östman, L., & Wickman, P.-O. (2007). Proceedings of the Linnaeus Tercentenary Symposium: Promoting scientific literacy: Science education research in transaction. Uppsala, Sweden: Uppsala University.
  • Lucas, B., & Hanson, J. (2014). Thinking like an engineer: Using engineering habits of mind to redesign engineering education for global competitiveness. Paper presented at 42nd Annual Conference, Brimingham.
  • Mastel. (2017). Hasil survey mastel tentang wabah hoax nasional [Mastel survey result about national hoax epidemic]. Jakarta: Mastel. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
  • McKinnon, M., & Vos, J. (2015). Engagement as a threshold concept for science education and science communication. International Journal of Science Education, Part B Communication and Public Engagement, 5(4), 297–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2014.986770
  • Ministry of Agriculture. (2016). Regulasi perberasan, beras sebagai barang kebutuhan pokok [Rice regulation, rice as staple needs]. Jakarta: Ministry of Agriculture.
  • Mizuta, A. H., Succi, G. d. M., Montalli, V. A. M., & Succi, R. C. d. M. (2018). Perceptions on the importance of vaccination and vaccine refusal in a medical school. Revista Paulista de Pediatria, 37(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-0462/;2019;37;1;00008
  • MUI. (2009). Fatwa nomor 11 tahun 2009 tentang hukum alkohol [Fatwa number 11 of 2009 concerning the law of alcohol]. Jakarta: Komisi Fatwa Majelis Ulama Indonesia.
  • Murdiyarso, D., Dewi, S., Lawrence, D., & Seymour, F. (2011). Moratorium hutan Indonesia: Batu loncatan untuk memperbaiki tata kelola hutan? [Indonesia’s forest moratorium: A stepping stone to better forest governance?]. (Working Paper No. 76) Retrieved from: https://www.cifor.org/library/3561/
  • Nuangchalerm, P. (2009). Development of socioscientific issues-based teaching for preservice science teachers. Journal of Social Sciences, 5(3), 239–243.
  • Patterson, E., Wall, R., Fitzgerald, G. F., Ross, R. P., & Stanton, C. (2012). Health implications of high dietary omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids. Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism, 2012, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/539426
  • Prabandari, G. M., Musthofa, S. B., & Kusumawati, A. (2018). Beberapa faktor yang berhubungan dengan penerimaan ibu terhadap imunisasi Measles Rubella pada anak SD di desa Gumpang, Kecamatan Kartasura, Kabupaten Sukoharjo [Several factors related to mothers’ acceptance toward Measles Rubella immunization of elementary students in Gumpang, Kartasura, Sukoharjo]. Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat, 6(4), 573–581.
  • Prasojo, M. N. B. (2015). Konstruksi sosial masyarakat terhadap alam gunung merapi: Studi kualitatif tentang kearifan lokal yang berkembang di Desa Tlogolele Kecamatan Selo Kabupaten Boyolali [Community social construction of the nature of Mount Merapi: A qualitative study of local wisdom that developed in Tlogolele Village, Selo District, Boyolali Regency]. Jurnal Analisa Sosiologi, 4(2), 31–46.
  • Priyono, D. (2014, March 10). 10 hotel langgar perda [10 hotels violated regulations]. Tata Ruang dan Pertanahan. http://tataruangpertanahan.com/kliping-330-10-hotel-langgar-perda.html
  • Purba, C. P. P., Nanggara, S. G., Ratriyono, M., Apriani, I., Rosalina, L., Sari, N. A., & Meridian, A. H. (2014). Potret keadaan hutan Indonesia [The snapshot of Indonesian forest condition]. Bogor: Forest Watch Indonesia.
  • Purnama, S. (2016, September 2). 50 persen wilayah Yogyakarta dan Sleman krisis air [50 percent of the Yogyakarta region and Sleman have a water crisis]. Berita Universitas Gadjah Mada. https://www.ugm.ac.id/id/berita/12410-50.persen.wilayah.yogyakarta.dan.sleman.krisis.air
  • Purwaningsih, E. (2013). Jamu, obat tradisional asli Indonesia: Pasang surut pemanfaatannya di Indonesia [Herbs, traditional medicines native to Indonesia: The ups and downs of their use in Indonesia]. eJournal Kedokteran Indonesia, 1(2), 85–59. https://doi.org/10.23886/ejki.1.2065.85-89
  • Rahem, A. (2018). Identifikasi kandungan alkohol dalam obat di apotik melalui pengamatan pada kemasan sekunder [Identification of alcohol content in medicines at the pharmacy through observation on secondary packaging]. Journal of Halal Product and Research, 1(2), 44–49.
  • Rizkita, L., Suwono, H., & Susilo, H. (2016). Pengaruh pembelajaran socio-scientific problem-based learning terhadap keterampilan metakognitif dan hasil belajar kognitif siswa kelas X SMAN Kota Malang [The effects of socio-scientific problem-based learning toward metacognitive skills and cognitive achievement of students tenth grader of public senior high school in Malang]. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 1(4), 732–738.
  • Sadler, T. D. (2004a). Informal reasoning regarding socio-scientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513–536. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20009
  • Sadler, T. D. (2004b). Moral and ethical dimensions of socio-scientific decision-making as integral components of scientific literacy. Science Educator, 13(1), 39–48.
  • Sadler, T. D. (2009). Situated learning in science education: Socio-scientific issues as contexts for practice. Studies in Science Education, 45(1), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260802681839
  • Sari, L. O. R. K. (2006). Pemanfaatan obat tradisional dengan pertimbangan manfaat dan keamanannya [Use of traditional medicine with consideration of benefits and safety]. Majalah Ilmu Kefarmasian, 3(1), 1–7.
  • Saunders, K. J., & Rennie, L. J. (2013). A pedagogical model for ethical inquiry into socioscientific issues in science. Research in Science Education, 43(1), 253–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9248-z
  • Setambah, M. A. B. (2018). Measurement model of reasoning skills among science students based on socio scientific issues (SSI). Indonesian Research Journal in Education, 2(1), 74–85.
  • Steinkuehler, C., & Duncan, S. (2008). Scientific habits of mind in virtual worlds. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17, 530–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-008-9120-8
  • Subiantoro, A. W. (2011, November). Socio-scientific issues and its potency on biology instruction for character education in Indonesia. Paper presented at Fourth international Conference on science and Mathematics education, Penang, Malaysia.
  • Suryono, S., Wibowo, E., Ario, R., Taufik, N., & Nuraini, R. A. T. (2018). Kondisi terumbu karang di Perairan Pantai Empu Rancak, Mlonggo, Kabupaten Jepara [Coral reef condition in Coastal Waters of Empu Rancak, Mlonggo, Regency of Jepara]. Jurnal Kelautan Tropis, 21(1), 49–54. https://doi.org/10.14710/jkt.v21i1.2301
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
  • Taylor, S., Rizk, N., Quinn, F., Coll, R. K., McClune, W., & Taylor, N. (2018). Subjective decision-making in healthcare: The case of vaccinations. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 26(5), 1–19.
  • Tonin, S. (2018). Economic value of marine biodiversity improvement in coralligenous habitats. Ecological Indicators, 85, 1121–1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.11.017
  • Trochim, W. M. (1999). The research methods knowledge base (2nd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Atomic Dog.
  • Ullman, J. B. (2001). Structural equation modeling. In B. G. Tabachnick & L. S. Fidell (Eds.), Using multivariate statistics (4th ed., pp. 653–771). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Ultay, N., & Çalik, M. (2012). A thematic review of studies into the effectiveness of context-based chemistry curricula. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(6), 686–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9357-5
  • Utomo, Y. W. (2017, March 12). Kapal inggris rusak 1.600 meter persegi terumbu karang Raja Ampat [The British ship damaged 1,600 square meters of the Raja Ampat coral reef]. Kompas. com https://sains.kompas.com/read/2017/03/12/15330081/kapal.inggris.rusak.1.600.meter.persegi.terumbu.karang.raja.ampat
  • Vinuesa, M. A. T., & Torralba, T. (2010). Historic cities and tourism: Functional dynamics and urban policy. The Open Urban Studies Journal, 3, 47–57.
  • Widiarti, A., Bachri, A. A., & Husaini, H. (2016). Analisis pengaruh faktor perilaku terhadap pemanfaatan kearifan lokal sebagai obat tradisional oleh masyarakat di Kota Palangka Raya [Analysis of the influence of behavioral factors on the use of local wisdom as traditional medicine by the community in the City of Palangka Raya]. Jurnal Berkala Kesehatan, 2(1), 30–40. https://doi.org/10.20527/jbk.v2i1.4842
  • Wu, Y. T., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). High school students’ informal reasoning regarding a socio-scientific issue, with relation to scientific epistemological beliefs and cognitive structures. International Journal of Science Education, 33(3), 371–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903505661
  • Yahaya, J. M., Zain, A. N. M., & Karpudewan, M. (2012). Understanding socio-scientific issues in a low literate society for the achievement of the millennium development goals. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(12), 3372–3375.
  • Yellamraju, T., Magana, A. J., & Boutin, M. (2017). Investigating engineering students’ habits of mind: A case study approach. Proceedings from the 124th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Colombus, OH.
  • Yulianto, S. (2016). Kajian kerusakan lingkungan akibat kegiatan pariwisata di Desa Nglanggeran, Kecamatan Patuk, Kabupaten Gunungkidul, Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta [environmental damage study due to tourism activities in Nglanggeran Village, Patuk District, Gunungkidul Regency, Special Region of Yogyakarta] (Master’s Thesis) Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.
  • Yuningsih, R. (2012). Pengobatan tradisional di unit pelayanan kesehatan [Traditional medicine in the health care unit]. Info Singkat Kesejahteraan Sosial, 1(5), 9–12.
  • Zaiţ, A., & Bertea, P. E. (2011). Methods for testing discriminant validity. Management & Marketing, 9(2), 217–224.
  • Zeidler, D. L. (1984). Moral issues and social policy in science education: Closing the literacy gap. Science Education, 68, 411–419. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730680406
  • Zeidler, D. L., Walker, K. A., Ackett, W. A., & Simmons, M. L. (2002). Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas. Science Education, 86(3), 343–367. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10025

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.