The development and validation of the Planet Formation Concept Inventory

References

• Allen, M. J., & Yen, W. M. (1979). Introduction to measurement theory. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, J. M. (2009). Concept inventories for ASTRO 101. The Physics Teacher, 47, 439–441. doi: 10.1119/1.3225503
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, J. M., Johnson, B., Prather, E. E., & Slater, T. F. (2012). Development and validation of the star properties concept inventory. International Journal of Science Education, 34, 2257–2286. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2011.589869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardar, E. M., Prather, E. E., Brecher, K., & Slater, T. F. (2006). Development and validation of the light and spectroscopy concept inventory. Astronomy Education Review, 5(2), 103–113. doi: 10.3847/AER2006020
   Google Scholar
• Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. New York, NY: Holt.
   Google Scholar
• Ding, L., & Beichner, R. (2009). Approaches to data analysis of multiple-choice questions. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 5(2), 020103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 8410–8415. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66, 64–74. doi: 10.1119/1.18809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haladyna, T. M., Downing, S. M., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2002). A review of multiple-choice item-writing guidelines for classroom assessment. Applied Measurement in Education, 15, 309–333. doi: 10.1207/S15324818AME1503_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, J. M. (2006). Part I. Development of a concept inventory addressing students’ beliefs and reasoning difficulties regarding the greenhouse effect, Part II. Distribution of chlorine measured by the Mars Odyssey Gamma Ray Spectrometer (PhD dissertation). Tucson: University of Arizona.
   Google Scholar
• Lindell, R. S., & Olsen, J. P. (2002). Developing the lunar phases concept inventory. In The 125th national meeting of the American Association of Physics Teachers, Boise, ID.
   Google Scholar
• Lopresto, M. C., & Murrell, S. R. (2009). Using the star properties concept inventory to compare instruction with lecture tutorials to traditional lectures. Astronomy Education Review, 8(1), 010105. doi: 10.3847/AER2009014
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Plummer, J. D., Palma, C., Flarend, A., Rubin, K., Shiou Ong, Y., Botzer, B., …Furman, T. (2015). Development of a learning progression for the formation of the solar system. International Journal of Science Education, 37, 1381–1401. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2015.1036386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prather, E. E., Rudolph, A. L., & Brissenden, G. (2009). Teaching and learning astronomy in the 21st century. Physics Today, 62(10), 41–47. doi: 10.1063/1.3248478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prather, E. E., Slater, T. F., Adams, J. P., Bailey, J. M., Jones, L. V., & Dostal, J. A. (2004). Research on a lecture-tutorial approach to teaching introductory astronomy for non-science majors. Astronomy Education Review, 3(2), 122–136. doi: 10.3847/AER2004019
   Google Scholar
• Salkind, Neil J. (2010). Encyclopedia of research design. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Schlingman, W. M., Prather, E. E., Wallace, C. S., Rudolph, A. L., & Brissenden, G. (2012). A classical test theory analysis of the light and spectroscopy concept inventory national study data set. Astronomy Education Review, 11(1), 010107. doi: 10.3847/AER2012010
   Google Scholar
• Simon, M. N., Buxner, S., & Impey, C. (2018). A survey and analysis of college students' understanding of planet formation before instruction. Astrobiology, 18, 1594–1610. doi: 10.1089/ast.2017.1815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, S. J. (2014). The development and validation of the test of astronomy standards (TOAST). Journal of Astronomy and Earth Sciences Education, 1, 166–171.
   Google Scholar
• Trochim, W. M. K. (2006). The research methods knowledge base, 2nd Edition. http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, C. S., Chambers, T. G., & Prather, E. E. (2018). Item response theory evaluation of the Light and Spectroscopy Concept Inventory national data set. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(1), 010149. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.010149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, C. S., Prather, E. E., & Duncan, D. K. (2012). A study of general education astronomy students' understandings of cosmology. Part V. The effects of a new suite of cosmology lecture-tutorials on students' conceptual knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 34, 1297–1314. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2012.677960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, K. E., Willoughby, S., & Prather, E. E. (2013). Development of the Newtonian gravity concept inventory. Astronomy Education Review, 12(1), 010107. doi: 10.3847/AER2012045
   Google Scholar