References
- Borko, H., Koellner, K., & Jacobs, J. (2014). Examining novice teacher leaders’ facilitation of mathematics professional development. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 33, 149–167. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.11.003
- Byington, T. A., & Tannock, M. T. (2011). Professional development needs and interests of early childhood education trainers. Early Childhood Research and Practice, 13(2). Retrieved from http://ecrp.uiuc.edu/v13n2/byington.html
- Campbell, C., Osmond-Johnson, P., Faubert, B., Zeichner, K., Hobbs-Johnson, A., Brown, S., … Steffensen, K. (2017). The state of educators’ professional learning in Canada: Final research report. Oxford, OH: Learning Forward.
- Claesgens, J., Rubino-Hare, L., Bloom, N., Fredrickson, K., Henderson-Dahms, C., Menasco, J., & Sample, J. C. (2013). Professional development integrating technology: Does delivery format matter? Science Educator, 22(1), 10–18.
- Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Dede, C. (2013, October). The five dimensions for attaining scale: Implications for higher education initiatives. Presented at college changes everything: Scaling Up Conference, Normal, IL. Retrieved from http://www.collegechangeseverything.org/events/scalingup-media/Keynote-Scaling_Up-A_How-To_Guide.pdf
- Dede, C., & Knox, A. (2010, February 10). How to scale school success. Edutopia. Retrieved from https://www.edutopia.org/scale-processes-replication-strategy
- Dede, C., & Rockman, S. (2007). Lessons learned from studying how innovations can achieve scale. Threshold, 5, 4–10.
- The Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8. doi: 10.3102/0013189X032001005
- Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38, 181–199. doi: 10.3102/0013189X08331140
- Dusenbury, L., Brannigan, R., Falco, M., & Hansen, W. B. (2003). A review of research on fidelity of implementation: Implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings. Health Education Research, 18, 237–256. doi: 10.1093/her/18.2.237
- Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. Wittrockk (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 119–161). New York, NY: MacMillan.
- Fullan, M., & Hargreaves, A. (2016). Bringing the profession back in: Call to action. Oxford, OH: Learning Forward.
- George, A. A., Hall, G. E., & Stiegelbauer, S. M. (2006). Measuring implementation in schools: The stages of concern questionnaire. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
- Gresham, F. M., Gansle, K. A., Noell, G. H., Cohen, S., & Rosenblum, S. (1993). Treatment integrity of school-based behavioral intervention studies: 1980–1990. School Psychology Review, 22, 254–272.
- Grierson, A. L., & Woloshyn, V. E. (2013). Walking the talk: Supporting teachers’ growth with differentiated professional learning. Professional Development in Education, 39(3), 401–419. doi: 10.1080/19415257.2012.763143
- Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching, 8, 381–391. doi: 10.1080/135406002100000512
- Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7, 238. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.238
- Heck, D. J., Plumley, C. L., Stylianou, D. A., Smith, A. A., & Moffett, G. (2019). Scaling up innovative learning in mathematics: Exploring the effect of different professional development approaches on teacher knowledge, beliefs, and instructional practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 102, 1–24. doi: 10.1007/s10649-019-09895-6
- Jeanpierre, B., Oberhauser, K., & Freeman, C. (2005). Characteristics of professional development that effect change in secondary science teacher’s classroom practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 668–690. doi: 10.1002/tea.20069
- Kennedy, M. M. (2016). How does professional development improve teaching? Review of Educational Research, 86, 945–980. doi:10.3102/003465431562680 doi: 10.3102/0034654315626800
- Krell, D. E., & Dana, N. F. (2012). Facilitating action research: A study of coaches, their experiences, and their reflections on leading teachers in the process of practitioner inquiry. Professional Development in Education, 38(5), 827–844. doi: 10.1080/19415257.2012.666052
- Kuenzi, J. J. (2008). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education: Background, federal policy, and legislative action. Congressional Research Service Reports, 35. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/crsdocs/35
- Lawrenz, F., Huffman, D., Appeldoorn, K., & Sun, T. (2002). CETP core evaluation, classroom observation handbook. Minneapolis, MN: CAREI.
- Learning Forward. (2011). Standards for professional learning. Oxford: Learning Forward. Retrieved from https://learningforward.org/standards-for-professional-learning/
- Loucks-Horsley, S., Love, N., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., & Hewson, P. W. (2003). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
- Luft, J. A., & Hewson, P. W. (2014). Research on teacher professional development programs in science. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 899–910). New York, NY: Routledge.
- MaKinster, J., & Trautmann, N. (2014). The nature of teacher knowledge necessary for the effective use of geospatial technologies to teach science. In J. Makinster, N. Trautmann, & M. Barnett (Eds.), Teaching science and investigating environmental issues with geospatial technology: Designing effective professional development for secondary teachers (pp. 333–353). New York, NY: Springer.
- Margolis, J., & Doring, A. (2013). What do today’s teachers want (and not want) from teacher leaders? The New Educator, 9(3), 192–209. doi: 10.1080/1547688X.2013.806724
- Markham, T., Larmer, J., & Ravitz, J. (2003). Project based learning handbook: A guide to standards-focused project based learning for middle and high school teachers (2nd ed.). Oakland, CA: Wilsted & Taylor.
- Mathison, S. (2005). Encyclopedia of evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Means, B., Confrey, J., House, A., & Bhanot, R. (2008). STEM high schools. Specialized science technology engineering and mathematics secondary schools in the U.S. Menlo Park, CA: SRI. Retrieved from https://www.sri.com/sites/default/files/publications/imports/STEM_Report1_bm08.pdf
- National Research Council. (2011). Successful K-12 STEM education: Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved from https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13158/successful-k-12-stem-education-identifying-effective-approaches-in-science. doi: 10.17226/13158
- Newman, I., & McNeil, K. A. (1998). Conducting survey research in the social sciences. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
- O’Dwyer, J. B., & Atlı, H. H. (2015). A study of in-service teacher educator roles, with implications for a curriculum for their professional development. European Journal of Teacher Education, 38(1), 4–20. doi: 10.1080/02619768.2014.902438
- Perry, E., & Boylan, M. (2018). Developing the developers: Supporting and researching the learning of professional development facilitators. Professional Development in Education, 44(2), 254–271. doi: 10.1080/19415257.2017.1287767
- President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST). (2015). Report to the president and congress ensuring leadership in federally funded research and development in information technology. Washington, DC: The White House.
- Rubino-Hare, L., Bloom, N., & Whitworth, B. A. (2019). Implications from a scale up of geospatial technology professional development program for secondary teachers. In K. Graziano (Ed.), Proceedings of society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 1673–1678). Las Vegas, NV: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved June 4, 2019 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/207868/
- Rubino-Hare, L., Claesgens, J., Bloom, N., Fredrickson, K., Henderson-Dahms, C., & Sample, J. (2013, April). Investigating what pedagogical practices persist when professional learning institutes end. A paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching. Rio Grande, Puerto Rico.
- Rubino-Hare, L., Evans, E., Manone, M., Palmer, A., & Sample, J. C. (2016). Power of data teacher guide. Teacher guide for power of data teacher workshops.
- van Driel, J. H., et al. (2012). Current trends and missing links in studies on teacher professional development in science education: A review of design features and quality of research. Studies in Science Education, 48(2), 129–160. doi: 10.1080/03057267.2012.738020
- Wallace, M. R. (2009). Making sense of the links: Professional development, teacher practices, and student achievement. Teachers College Record, 111, 573–596.
- Webster, M. (2019). Merriam-Webster online dictionary.
- Whitworth, B. A., & Chiu, J. L. (2015). Professional development and teacher change: The missing leadership link. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(2), 121–137. doi: 10.1007/s10972-014-9411-2
- Whitworth, B. A., Rubino-Hare, L., & Bloom, N. E. (Forthcoming). Scaling professional development: Lessons learned from the Power of Data project.