Scrutinising the positions of students and teacher engaged in argumentation in a high school physics classroom

References

• Andersson, J., & Enghag, M. (2017). The relation between students’ communicative moves during laboratory work in physics and outcomes of their actions. International Journal of Science Education, 39(2), 158–180. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2016.1270478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Razavieh, A., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Berland, L. K. (2011). Explaining variation in how classroom communities adapt the practice of scientific argumentation. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(4), 625–664. doi: 10.1080/10508406.2011.591718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berland, L. K., & McNeill, K. L. (2010). A learning progression for scientific argumentation: Understanding student work and designing supportive instructional contexts. Science Education, 94(5), 765–793. doi: 10.1002/sce.20402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berland, L. K., & Reiser, B. J. (2009). Making sense of argumentation and explanation. Science Education, 93(1), 26–55. doi: 10.1002/sce.20286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berland, L. K., & Reiser, B. J. (2011). Classroom communities’ adaptations of the practice of scientific argumentation. Science Education, 95(2), 191–216. doi: 10.1002/sce.20420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carspecken, P. F. (1996). Critical ethnography in educational research: A theoretical and practical guide. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2010). Students’ questions and discursive interaction: Their impact on argumentation during collaborative group discussions in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(7), 883–908. doi: 10.1002/tea.20385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., & Clark, D. B. (2013). Learning through collaborative argumentation. In C. E. Hmelo-Silver, C. A. Chinn, C. K. K. Chan, & A. M. O’Donnell (Eds.), International handbook of collaborative learning (pp. 314–332). New York: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Christodoulou, A., & Osborne, J. (2014). The science classroom as a site of epistemic talk: A case study of a teacher's attempts to teach science based on argument. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(10), 1275–1300. doi: 10.1002/tea.21166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, D. B., Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., Menekse, M., & Erkens, G. (2007). Technology-enhanced learning environments to support students’ argumentation. In S. Erduran & M. P. Jiménez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in science education (pp. 217–243). Dordre-cht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, B. (2014). From inquiry to scientific practices in the science classroom. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. 2, pp. 515–541). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20(1), 43–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5914.1990.tb00174.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, V., & Venville, G. J. (2009). High-school students’ informal reasoning and argumentation about biotechnology: An indicator of scientific literacy? International Journal of Science Education, 31(11), 1421–1445. doi: 10.1080/09500690801992870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287–312. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duit, R., Niedderer, H., & Schecker, H. (2007). Teaching physics. In S. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook on science education (pp. 599–630). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Erduran, S., & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2008). Argumentation in science education. Perspectives from classroom-based research. Dordre-cht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Evagorou, M., & Osborne, J. (2013). Exploring young students’ collaborative argumentation within a socioscientific issue. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(2), 209–237. doi: 10.1002/tea.21076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2000/2001). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99–125.
   Google Scholar
• Harré, R., & Langenhove, L. V. (1991). Varieties of positioning. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 21(4), 393–407. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5914.1991.tb00203.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harré, R., & Moghaddam, F. M. (Eds.). (2003). The self and others: Positioning individuals and groups in personal, political, and cultural contexts. New York: Praeger (Greenwood Publishing Group).
   Google Scholar
• Hazari, Z., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M., & Shanahan, M. C. (2010). Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 978–1003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, K., & Corey, C. (2001). Viewing classrooms as cultural contexts for fostering scientific literacy. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 32(2), 214–243. doi: 10.1525/aeq.2001.32.2.214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, K., Nastasi, B. K., & Pressley, M. (1999). Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussions. Cognition and Instruction, 17(4), 379–432. doi: 10.1207/S1532690XCI1704_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Reigosa, C. (2006). Contextualizing practices across epistemic levels in the chemistry laboratory. Science Education, 90, 707–733. doi: 10.1002/sce.20132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. J., & Takao, A. (2002). Epistemic levels in argument: An analysis of university oceanography students’ use of evidence in writing. Science Education, 86(3), 314–342. doi: 10.1002/sce.10024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khishfe, R. (2012). Relationship between nature of science understandings and argumentation skills: A role for counterargument and contextual factors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(4), 489–514. doi: 10.1002/tea.21012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (1993). Science as argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 77, 319–337. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730770306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manz, E. (2015). Representing student argumentation as functionally emergent from scientific activity. Review of Educational Research, 85(4), 553–590. doi: 10.3102/0034654314558490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L., Katsh-Singer, R., González-Howard, M., & Loper, S. (2016). Factors impacting teachers’ argumentation instruction in their science classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 38(12), 2026–2046. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2016.1221547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L., & Pimentel, D. S. (2010). Scientific discourse in three urban classrooms: The role of the teacher in engaging high school students in argumentation. Science Education, 94(2), 203–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC). (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, By states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, S., Philips, L., & Osborne, J. (2007). Scientific inquiry: The place of interpretation and argumentation. In J. Luft, R. Bell, & J. Gess-Newsome (Eds.), Science as inquiry in the secondary setting (pp. 87–98). Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, A. W., Akerson, V. L., & Oldfield, M. (2012). Environmental argumentation as sociocultural activity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(7), 869–897. doi: 10.1002/tea.21020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. F., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994–1020. doi: 10.1002/tea.20035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., Simon, S., Christodoulou, A., Howell-Richardson, C., & Richardson, K. (2013). Learning to argue: A study of four schools and their attempt to develop the use of argumentation as a common instructional practice and its impact on students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(3), 315–347. doi: 10.1002/tea.21073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryu, S., & Sandoval, W. A. (2015). The influence of group dynamics on collaborative scientific argumentation. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(2), 335–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., Chambers, W. F., & Zeidler, L. D. (2004). Student conceptualizations of the nature of science in response to a socioscientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 26(4), 387–409. doi: 10.1080/0950069032000119456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., & Donnelly, L. A. (2006). Socioscientific argumentation: The effects of content knowledge and morality. International Journal of Science Education, 28(12), 1463–1488. doi: 10.1080/09500690600708717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, V., & Clark, D. (2009). The impact of collaboration on the outcomes of scientific argumentation. Science Education, 93(3), 448–484. doi: 10.1002/sce.20306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W. A. (2003). Conceptual and epistemic aspects of students’ scientific explanations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(1), 5–51. doi: 10.1207/S15327809JLS1201_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweizer, D. M., & Kelly, G. J. (2005). An investigation of student engagement in a global warming debate. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(1), 75–84. doi: 10.5408/1089-9995-53.1.75
   Google Scholar
• Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2–3), 235–260. doi: 10.1080/09500690500336957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabak, I., & Baumgartner, E. (2004). The teacher as partner: Exploring participant structures, symmetry, and identity work in scaffolding. Cognition and Instruction, 22(4), 393–429. doi: 10.1207/s1532690Xci2204_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. (1972). Human understanding: Vol. 1, The collective use and evolution of concepts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., & Eemeren, F. H. (2004). A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach (Vol. 14). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Von Aufschnaiter, C., Erduran, S., Osborne, J., & Simon, S. (2008). Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Case studies of how students’ argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 101–131. doi: 10.1002/tea.20213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton, D. (1998). The new dialectic: Conversational contexts of argument. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J., & Buck, G. (2015). The relationship between Chinese students' subject matter knowledge and argumentation skills. International Journal of Science Education, 37(2), 340–366. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2014.987713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., & Buck, G. (2016). Understanding a high school physics teacher's pedagogical content knowledge of argumentation. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 27(5), 577–604. doi: 10.1007/s10972-016-9476-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., & Buck, G. (2018). Exploring the use of debate to enhance elementary teacher candidates' argumentation skills. New Waves-Educational Research & Development, 21(1), 30–47.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson-Lopez, A., Sias, C. M., Strong, A. R., Garlick, J. W., Minichiello, A., Acosta Feliz, J. A., & Weingart, S. (2018). Argumentation in K-12 Engineering Education: A Review of the Literature (Fundamental). Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/29816
   Google Scholar
• Zare, P., & Othman, M. (2013). Classroom debate as a systematic teaching/learning approach. World Applied Sciences Journal, 28(11), 1506–1513.
   Google Scholar
• Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students’ knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35–62. doi: 10.1002/tea.10008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar