Investigating the development of pre-service science teachers’ NOSI views and related teaching practicesFootnote^*

* This paper was presented at International Conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), Atlanta, GA, USA. March 10–13, 2018.

References

• Abd-El-Khalick, F., BouJaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., … Tuan, H. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397–419. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ759869&site=eds-live doi: 10.1002/sce.10118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS]. (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS]. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy: A project 2061 report. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Başkale, H. (2016). Nitel araştırmalarda geçerlik, güvenirlik ve örneklem büyüklüğünün belirlenmesi [Determination of validity, reliability and sample size in qualitative studies]. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi, 9(1), 23–28.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, R. L., Smetana, L., & Binns, I. (2005). Simplifying inquiry instruction. The Science Teacher, 72(7), 30–33.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purpose to practice. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, R., Taylor, J., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Carlson, J., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCE 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. A report for Office of Science Education National Institutes of Health.
   Google Scholar
• Çavuş-Güngören, S., & Öztürk, E. (2017, May 11–14). Assessing pre-service science teachers’ views about scientific inquiry by using the views about scientific inquiry (VASI) questionnaire. IX. International Congress of Educational research, Ordu, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, B (2014). From inquiry to scientific practices in the science classroom. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol 2, pp. 515–541). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, R. (2007). Constructivism and social constructivism. Theoretical frameworks for research in chemistry/science education (pp. 28–50). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Goldston, M. J., Dantzler, J., Day, J., & Webb, B. (2013). A psychometric approach to the development of a 5E lesson plan scoring instrument for inquiry-based teaching. Journal Science Teacher Education, 24, 527–551. doi: 10.1007/s10972-012-9327-7
   Google Scholar
• Hanuscin, D., Lee, M. H., & Akerson, V. L. (2011). Elementary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for teaching the nature of science. Science Education, 95(1), 145–167. doi: 10.1002/sce.20404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, C., & Rooks, D. (2010). Managing inquiry-based science: Challenges in enacting complex science instruction in elementary and middle school. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21(2), 227–240. doi: 10.1007/s10972-009-9172-5
   Google Scholar
• Kablan, Z. (2012). The effects of level of cognitive learning and concrete experience on teacher candidates’ lesson planning and application skills. Education and Science, 37(63), 239–253.
   Google Scholar
• Keys, C. W., & Kennedy, V. (1999). Understanding inquiry science teaching in context: A case study of an elementary teacher. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 10, 315–333. doi: 10.1023/A:1009406511999
   Google Scholar
• Kind, V. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge in science education: Perspectives and potential for progress. Studies in Science Education, 45(2), 169–204. doi: 10.1080/03057260903142285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leblebicioglu, G., Metin, D., Capkinoglu, E., Cetin, P. S., Eroglu Dogan, E., & Schwartz, R. (2017). Changes in students’ views about nature of scientific inquiry at a science camp. Science & Education, 26(7–9), 889–917. doi: 10.1007/s11191-017-9941-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831–879). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (1998). Avoiding de-natured science: Activities that promote understandings of the nature of science. In W. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 83–126). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, N., Lederman J., Akubo, M., Barlow, B. J., Bartels, S., Blanquet, E., Blonder, R., … Schwartz, R. (2017, April, 22–25) Admin symposium: International collaborative investigation of beginning seventh grade students’ understandings of scientific inquiry. In Presented at National Association of research science teaching (NARST), San Antonio, TX, U.S.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, J. S., Lederman, N. G., Bartos, S. A., Bartels, S. L., Meyer, A. A., & Schwartz, R. S. (2014). Meaningful assessment of learners’ understandings about scientific inquiry- the views about scientific inquiry (VASI) questionnaire. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(1), 65–83. doi: 10.1002/tea.21125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (7th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Mesci, G. (2016). Preservice science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for nature of science and nature of scientific inquiry: A successful case study (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations/1606
   Google Scholar
• Mesci, G., & Schwartz, R. S. (2017). Changing pre-service science teachers’ views of nature of science: Why some conceptions may be more easily altered than others. Research in Science Education, 47, 329–351. doi: 10.1007/s11165-015-9503-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, D. Z., Meyer, A. A., Nabb, K. A., Connell, M. G., & Avery, L. M. (2013). A theoretical and empirical exploration of intrinsic problems in designing inquiry activities. Research in Science Education, 43, 57–76. doi:10.1007/s11165-011-9243-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mıhladız, G., & Doğan, A. (2017). Investigation of the pre-service science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge about the nature of science. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 32(2), 380–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of National Education [MoNE]. (2013/2018). İlköğretim kurumları fen bilimleri dersi öğretim programı [Primary education institutions’ science instruction program]. Ankara: Talim Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı.
   Google Scholar
• Namdar, B., & Kucuk, M. (2018). Pre-service science teachers’ practices of critiquing and revising 5E lesson plans. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(6), 468–484. doi:10.1080/1046560X.2018.1469188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council [NRC]. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council [NRC]. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council [NRC]. (2012). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, D. A., & Bybee, R. W. (2014). Scientific literacy, science literacy, and science education. In N. G. Lederman, & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. 2, pp. 545–558). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, R. S., & Crawford, B. A. (2004). Authentic scientific inquiry as a context for teaching nature of science: Identifying critical elements for success. In L. Flick & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science: Implications for teaching, learning, and teacher education (pp. 331–356). Dordecth: Kluwer Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N., Khishfe, R., Lederman, J. S., Matthews, L., & Liu, S. (2002). Explicit/ reflective instructional attention to nature of science and scientific inquiry: Impact on student learning. Paper presented at the 2002 annual international conference of the association for the education of teachers in science, Charlotte, NC.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N., & Lederman, N. (2008, March 30–April 2). An instrument to assess views of scientific inquiry: The VOSI questionnaire. Paper presented at the international conference of the National Association for research in science teaching. Baltimore, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Senler, B. (2015). Middle school students’ views of scientific inquiry: An international comparative study. Science Education International, 26(2), 166–179.
   Google Scholar
• Songer, N., Lee, H., & Kam, R. (2001, April). Technology-rich inquiry science in urban classrooms: What are the barriers to inquiry pedagogy? A paper presented at the 2001 Annual Meeting of the American Educational research Association (AERA), Seatle, WA.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basic of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Van Driel, J. H., De Jong, O., & Verloop, N. (2002). The development of pre-service chemistry teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Science Teacher Education, 86, 572–590. doi:10.1002/sce.10010.
   Google Scholar