Development of teachers’ perspective on formative peer assessment

References

• Abell, S. K., & Lederman, N. G. (2007). Handbook of research on science education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlabaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. (2002). Reforming science teaching. What research says about inquiry? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1–12. doi: 10.1023/A:1015171124982
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, C., & Palm, T. (2017). Characteristics of improved formative assessment practice. Education Inquiry, 8(2), 104–122. doi: 10.1080/20004508.2016.1275185
   Google Scholar
• Birman, B. F., Desimone, L., Porter, A. C., & Garet, M. S. (2000). Designing professional development that works. Educational Leadership, 57, 28–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing a theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. doi: 10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P. J., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchard, M. R., & Sampson, V. D. (2018). Fostering impactful research experiences for teachers (RETs). Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 447–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15. doi: 10.3102/0013189X033008003
   Google Scholar
• Box, C., Skoog, G., & Dabbs, J. M. (2015). A case study of teacher personal practice assessment theories and complexities of implementing formative assessment. American Educational Research Journal, 52(5), 956–983. doi: 10.3102/0002831215587754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, D. A., & Carless, R. R. (2010). Peer assessment in a test-dominated setting: Empowering, boring or facilitating examination preparation? Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 9(1), 3–15. doi: 10.1007/s10671-009-9077-2
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, B., & Cowie, B. (2010). Collaborative research for assessment for learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 979–986. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolin, J., & Evans, R. (2018). Transforming assessment: Through an interplay between practice, research and policy. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Dolin, J., & Evans, R. H. (2013). The contribution of formative assessment and self-efficacy to inquiry learning. In M. H. Hoveid & P. Gray (Eds.), Inquiry in science education and science teacher education (pp. 125–145). Trondheim: Akademika Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, R., Clesham, R., Dolin, J., Hošpesová, A., Birch Jensen, S., Nielsen, J. A., … Zlabkova, I. (2018). Teacher Perspectives about using formative assessment (227–248). In J. Dolin & R. Evans (Eds.), Transforming assessment (pp. 141–173). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M., & Hargreaves, A. (1992). Teacher development and educational change. Washington, DC: The Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. (2003). What makes professional development effective? Phi Delta Kappan, 84(10), 748–750. doi: 10.1177/003172170308401007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R., & Yoon, K. S. (2009). What works in professional development? Phi Delta Kappan, 90(7), 495–500. doi: 10.1177/003172170909000709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazelkorn, E., Ryan, C., Beernaert, Y., Constantinou, C., Deca, L., Grangeat, M., … Welzel-Breuer, M. (2015). Science education for Responsible Citizenship (No. EUR 26893). Brussels: European Commission - Research and Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Heinz, J., Enghag, M., Stuchlíková, I., Cakmakci, G., Peleg, R., & Baram-Tsabari, A. (2018). Impact of initiatives to implement science inquiry: A comparative study of the Turkish, Israeli, Swedish and Czech science education systems. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 13(2), 607–615. doi: 10.1007/s11422-016-9787-8
   Google Scholar
• Heitink, M. C., Van der Kleij, F. M., Veldkamp, B. P., Schildkamp, K., & Kippers, W. B. (2016). A systematic review of prerequisites for implementing assessment for learning in classroom practice. Educational Research Review, 17, 50–62. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2015.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, M. (2007). Formative assessment: What do teachers need to know and do? Phi Delta Kappan, 89(2), 140–145. doi: 10.1177/003172170708900210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingston, N., & Nash, B. (2011). Formative assessment: A meta-analysis and a call for research. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30(4), 28–37. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3992.2011.00220.x
   Google Scholar
• Popping, R. (1988). On agreement indices for nominal data. In W. E. Saris & I. N. Gallhofer (Eds.), Sociometric research: Volume 1, data collection and scaling (pp. 90–105). New York: St. Martin's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reavey, P. (2018). Visual methods in psychology: Using and interpreting images in qualitative research. Kobenhaven: Nota.
   Google Scholar
• Rocard, M., Csermely, P., Jorde, D., Lenzen, D., Walberg-Henriksson, H., & Hemmo, V. (2007). Science education now: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe (1st ed.). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/report-rocard-on-science-education_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Šeďová, K., Švaříček, R., & Šalamounová, Z. (2012). Komunikace ve školní třídě [Communication in the classroom]. Praha: Portál.
   Google Scholar
• Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4–14. doi: 10.3102/0013189X029007004
   Google Scholar
• Shepard, L. A. (2005). Linking formative assessment to Scaffolding. Educational Leadership, 63(3), 66–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strijbos, J. W., & Sluijsmans, D. (2010). Unravelling peer assessment: Methodological, functional, and conceptual developments. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 265–269. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strijbos, J., & Wichmann, A. (2018). Promoting learning by leveraging the collaborative nature of formative peer assessment with instructional scaffolds. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 33(1), 1–9. doi: 10.1007/s10212-017-0353-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuchlíková, I., Petr, J., & Papáček, M. (2013). Inquiry-based teaching and future teachers’ attitudes towards it. In M. H. Hoveid & P. Grey (Eds.), Inquiry in science education and science Teacher education. Research on teaching and learning through inquiry based approaches in science (teacher) education (pp. 167–189). Trondheim: Akademika Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, X., & Yang, Y. (2018). Generalized McNemar’s test for homogeneity of the marginal distributions. Retrieved from http://www2.sas.com/proceedings/forum2008/382-2008.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sunal, D., Hodges, J., Sunal, C., Whitaker, K., Freeman, L., Edwards, L., et al. (2001). Teaching science in higher education: Faculty professional development and barriers to change. School Science and Mathematics, 101(5), 246–257. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2001.tb18027.x
   Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249–276. doi: 10.3102/00346543068003249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J. (2009). Peer assessment. Theory Into Practice, 48(1), 20–27. doi: 10.1080/00405840802577569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Bossche, P., Gijselaers, W., Segers, M., & Kirschner, P. A. (2006). Social and cognitive factors driving teamwork in collaborative learning environments: Team learning beliefs and behaviors. Small Group Research, 37(5), 490–521. doi: 10.1177/1046496406292938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Gennip, N. A. E., Segers, M. S. R., & Tillema, H. H. (2009). Peer assessment for learning from a social perspective: The influence of interpersonal variables and structural features. Educational Research Review, 4(1), 41–54. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2008.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Zundert, M., Sluijsmans, D. M. A., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2010). Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 270–279. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, R. F. (2003). Clinical case formulation in the research program “Subjective Theories”. Patients with chronic diseases. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 19(3), 185–194. doi: 10.1027//1015-5759.19.3.185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox, J., Kruse, J. V., & Clough, M. P. (2015). Teaching science through inquiry: Seven common myths about this time-honored approach. The Science Teacher, 82, 62–67.
   Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M. (2003). Inquiry projects in science teacher education: What can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice? Science Education, 87(1), 112–143. doi: 10.1002/sce.10044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar