References
- Ambrose, B. S., Heron, P. R. L., Vokos, S., & McDermott, L. C. (2002). Student understanding of light as an electromagnetic wave: Relating the formalism to physical phenomena. American Journal of Physics, 67(10), 891–898. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.19144
- Ambrose, B. S., Shaffer, P. S., Steinberg, R. N., & McDermott, L. C. (1999). An investigation of student understanding of single-slit diffraction and double-slit interference. American Journal of Physics, 67(2), 146–155. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.19210
- Bach, T. (2015). More chemistry with light! More light in chemistry!. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 54(39), 11294–11295. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201507439
- Barth-cohen, L. A., & Wittmann, M. C. (2017). Aligning coordination class theory with a new context: Applying a theory of individual learning to group learning. Science Education, 101(2), 333–363. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21264
- Cooper, M. M., & Stowe, R. L. (2018). Chemistry education research: from personal empiricism to evidence, theory, and informed practice [Review-article]. Chemical Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00020
- Dangur, V., Avargil, S., Peskin, U., & Dori, Y. J. (2014). Learning quantum chemistry via a visual-conceptual approach: students’ bidirectional textual and visual understanding. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RP00025K
- Didiş, N. (2015). The analysis of analogy use in the teaching of introductory quantum theory. Chemical Education Research and Practice, 16(2), 355–376. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RP00011D
- Didiş, N., EryIlmaz, A., & Erkoç, Ş. (2014). Investigating students’ mental models about the quantization of light, energy, and angular momentum. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 10(2), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020127
- diSessa, A. A. (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10(2–3), 105–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.1985.9649008
- diSessa, A. A. (2002). Why “conceptual ecology” is a good idea. In Margarita Limon & Lucia Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change (pp. 29–60). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
- diSessa, A. A. (2018). A friendly introduction to “knowledge in pieces”: Modeling types of knowledge and their roles in learning. In G. Kaiser, H. Forgasz, M. Graven, A. Kuzniak, E. Simmt, & B. Xu (Eds.), Invited lectures from the 13th international congress on mathematical education (pp. 65–84). Springer International Publishing.
- diSessa, A. A., Sherin, B. L., & Levin, M. (2016). Knowledge analysis. In A.A. diSessa, M. Levin, & N.J.S. Brown (Eds.), Knowledge and interaction (pp. 30–71).
- diSessa, A. A., & Wagner, J. F. (2005). What coordination has to say about transfer. In J.P. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning (pp. 121–154). Information Age Publishing.
- Duncan, R. G., & Rivet, A. E. (2013). Science learning progressions. Science, 339(6118), 396–397. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1228692
- Duschl, R., Maeng, S., & Sezen, A. (2011). Learning progressions and teaching sequences: a review and analysis. Studies in Science Education, 47(2), 123–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2011.604476
- Forbes, M. D. E. (2015). What we talk about when we talk about light. ACS Central Science, 1(7), 354–363. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.5b00261
- Fredlund, T., Linder, C., & Airey, J. (2015). A social semiotic approach to identifying critical aspects. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 4(3), 302–316. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-01-2015-0005
- Galili, I., & Hazan, A. (2000). Learners’ knowledge in optics: Interpretation, structure and analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 57–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900290000
- Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 8(4), 597–606.
- Hammer, D. (1996). Misconceptions or P-prims: How may alternative perspectives of cognitive structure influence instructional perceptions and intentions. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5(2), 97–127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0502_1
- Hammer, D., Elby, A., Scherr, R. E., & Redish, E. F. (2005). Resources, framing, and transfer. In J.P. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning (pp. 89–119). Information Age Publishing.
- Henriksen, E. K., Angell, C., Vistnes, A. I., & Bungum, B. (2018). What is light? Students’ reflections on the wave-particle duality of light and the nature of physics. In Science and education ( Vol. 27). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-9963-1
- Heywood, D. S. (2005). Primary trainee teachers’ learning and teaching about light: Some pedagogic implications for initial teacher training. International Journal of Science Education, 27(12), 1447–1475. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500153741
- Jones, D. L., & Zollman, D. (2014). Understanding vision: Students’ use of light and optics resources. European Journal of Physics, 35, 5. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/35/5/055023
- Kaltakci-Gurel, D., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2016). Identifying pre-service physics teachers’ misconceptions and conceptual difficulties about geometrical optics. European Journal of Physics, 37, 4. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/37/4/045705
- Karakostas, V., & Hadzidaki, P. (2005). Realism vs. constructivism in contemporary physics: The impact of the debate on the understanding of quantum theory and its instructional process. Science and Education, 14(7–8), 607–629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-004-5156-1
- Levrini, O., & diSessa, A. A. (2008). How students learn from multiple contexts and definitions: Proper time as a coordination class. Physical Review Special Topics – Physics Education Research, 4(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010107
- Maeyer, J., & Talanquer, V. (2010). The role of intuitive heuristics in students’ thinking: Ranking chemical substances. Science Education, 94(6), 963–984. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20397
- Mannila, K., Koponen, I. T., & Niskanen, J. A. (2002). Building a picture of students’ conceptions of wave- and particle-like properties of quantum entities. European Journal of Physics, 23(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/23/1/307
- Maurines, L. (2010). Geometrical reasoning in wave situations: The case of light diffraction and coherent illumination optical imaging. International Journal of Science Education, 32(4), 1895–1926. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903271389
- McKagan, S. B., Handley, W., Perkins, K. K., & Wieman, C. E. (2007). A research-based curriculum for teaching the photoelectric effect. American Journal of Physics, 87, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2978181
- Önder, F. (2016). Development and validation of the photoelectric effect concept inventory. European Journal of Physics, 37, 5. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/37/5/055709
- Ozcan, O. (2015). Investigating students’ mental models about the nature of light in different contexts. European Journal of Physics, 36, 6. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/36/6/065042
- Pyburn, D. T., & Pazicni, S. (2014). Applying the multilevel framework of discourse comprehension to evaluate the text characteristics of general chemistry textbooks. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(6), 778–783. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed500006u
- Selley, N. J. (1996). Towards a phenomenography of light and vision. International Journal of Science Education, 18(7), 837–846. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069960180708
- Singh, C., & Marshman, E. (2015). Review of student difficulties in upper-level quantum mechanics. Physical Review Special Topics – Physics Education Research, 11(2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.020117
- Stefani, C., & Tsaparlis, G. (2009). Students’ levels of explanations, models, and misconceptions in basic quantum chemistry: A phenomenographic study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(5), 520–536. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20279
- Steinberg, R. N., Oberem, G. E., & McDermott, L. C. (2005). Development of a computer-based tutorial on the photoelectric effect. American Journal of Physics, 64(11), 1370–1379. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18360
- Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988593
- Taber, K. S. (2005). Learning quanta: Barriers to stimulating transitions in student understanding of orbital ideas. Science Education, 89(1), 94–116. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20038
- Talanquer, V. (2013a). How do students reason about chemical substances and reactions? In George Tsaparlis & Hannah Sevian (Eds.), Concepts of matter in science education (pp. 331–346). Springer.
- Talanquer, V. (2013b). When atoms want. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(11), 1419–1424. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed400311x
- Taslidere, E. (2016). Development and use of a three-tier diagnostic test to assess high school students’ misconceptions about the photoelectric effect. Research in Science and Technological Education, 34(2), 164–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2015.1124409
- Thaden-Koch, T. C., Dufresne, R. J., & Mestre, J. P. (2006). Coordination of knowledge in judging animated motion. Physical Review Special Topics – Physics Education Research, 2(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.2.020107
- Viennot, L., & de Hosson, C. (2015). From a Subtractive to Multiplicative Approach: A concept-driven interactive pathway on the selective absorption of light. International Journal of Science Education, 37(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.950186
- Widiyatmoko, A., & Shimizu, K. (2018). Literature review of factors contributing to students’ misconceptions in light and optical instruments. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 13(1), 853–863.
- Wosilait, K., Heron, P. R. L., Shaffer, P. S., & McDermott, L. C. (2002). Addressing student difficulties in applying a wave model to the interference and diffraction of light. American Journal of Physics, 67(S1), S5–S15. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.19083