References
- Abd-El-Khalick, F., BouJaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., Niaz, M., Treagust, D., & Tuan, H. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397–419. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10118
- Allal, L., & Mottier Lopez, L. (2005). Formative assessment of learning: A review of publications in French. In Formative assessment – improving learning in secondary classrooms (pp. 241–264). OECD Publication. https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:17429
- Artigue, M., & Blomhøj, M. (2013). Conceptualizing inquiry-based education in mathematics. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45(6), 797–810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0506-6
- Ateh, C. (2015). Science teachers’ Elicitation practices: Insights for formative assessment. Educational Assessment, 20(2), 112–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2015.1028619
- Bernholt, S., Rönnebeck, S., Ropohl, M., Köller, O., & Parchmann, I. (2013). Report on current state of the art in formative and summative assessment in IBE in STM – part I. (Research Report No. 1. ISSN: 2246-2325). Department of Science Education, University of Copenhagen.
- Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2003). ‘In praise of educational research’: Formative assessment. British Educational Research Journal, 29(5), 623–637. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192032000133721
- Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment. Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
- Breslyn, W., & McGinnis, J. R. (2012). A comparison of exemplary biology, chemistry, earth science, and physics teachers’ conceptions and enactment of inquiry. Science Education, 96(1), 48–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20469
- Brown, J. (2012). The current status of STEM education research. Journal of STEM Education, 13(5), 7–11. https://www.jstem.org/jstem/index.php/JSTEM/article/view/1652
- Cazden, C., (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Variations in lesson structure (pp. 53-79). Portsmouth: Heinemann.
- Chen, C.-H., Crockett, M. D., Namikawa, T., Zilimu, J., & Lee, S. H. (2012). Eighth grade mathematics teachers’ formative assessment practices in SES-different classrooms: A Taiwan study. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(3), 553–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-011-9299-7
- Cisterna, D., & Gotwals, A. W. (2018). Enactment of ongoing formative assessment: Challenges and opportunities for professional development and practice. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(3), 200–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2018.1432227
- Cizek, G. J. (2010). An Introduction to formative assessment: History, characteristics, and challenges. In H. L. Andrade & G. J. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 3–17). Routledge.
- Cobb, P., Confrey, J., DiSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001009
- Cowie, B. (2005). Student commentary on classroom assessment in science: A sociocultural interpretation. International Journal of Science Education, 27(2), 199–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000276721
- Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A
- Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part Harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 268–291. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07309371
- Duschl, R. A., & Gitomer, D. H. (1997). Strategies and challenges to changing the focus of assessment and instruction in science classrooms. Educational Assessment, 4(1), 37–73. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326977ea0401_2
- Duschl, R. A., & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education. Studies in Science Education, 38(1), 39–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260208560187
- Gotwals, A. W., & Birmingham, G. (2016). Eliciting, Identifying, interpreting, and responding to students’ ideas: Teacher candidates’ Growth in formative assessment practices. Research in Science Education, 46(3), 365–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9461-2
- Gotwals, A. W., Philhower, J., Cisterna, D., & Bennett, S. (2015). Using video to examine formative assessment practices as Measures of Expertise for mathematics and science teachers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(2), 405–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9623-8
- Grangeat, M. (2015). Exploring the set of pedagogical knowledge, from pedagogy to content. In M. Grangeat (Ed.), Understanding science teachers’ professional knowledge growth (pp. 117–133). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-313-1_7
- Harlen, W., Artigue, M., Justin Dillon, J., & Léna, P. (2012, December). Learning through inquiry background resources for implementing inquiry in science and mathematics at school. Research Report. http://www.fibonacci-project.eu/
- Hazelkorn, E., Ryan, C., Beernaert, Y., Constantinou, C., Deca, L., Grangeat, M., & Welzel-Breuer, M. (2015). Science education for responsible citizenship (Report No. EUR 26893). European Commission – Research and Innovation.
- Hickey, D., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Cross, D. (2012). Assessment as learning: Enhancing discourse, understanding, and achievement in Innovative science curricula. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(10), 1240–1270. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21056
- Lebeaume, J. (2011). L’investigation pour l’enseignement des sciences: actualités des enjeux. Dans Grangeat, M., (dir.) Les démarches d’investigation dans l’enseignement scientifique Pratiques de classe, travail collectif enseignant, acquisitions des élèves. Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon: Lyon, 19–34.
- Mehan, H. (1979). What time is it, Denise? ‘Asking known information questions in classroom discourse’. Theory Into Practice, 28(4), 285–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405847909542846
- Mercer, N., Dawes, L., Wegerif, R., & Sams, C. (2004). Reasoning as a scientist: Ways of helping children to use language to learn science. British Educational Research Journal, 30(3), 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920410001689689
- Ministère de l’Education Nationale. (2008). Programme du Collège [Lower secondary programs]. Bulletin officiel special, n° 6 du 28 août 2008.
- Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classroom. Open University Press.
- National Research Council. (2015). Guide to implementing the next Generation science Standards. The National Academies Press.
- Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994–1020. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20035
- Papinczak, T., Young, L., & Groves, M. (2007). Peer assessment in problem-based learning: A qualitative study. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 12(2), 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-005-5046-6
- Rudolph, J. N. (2000). Reconsidering the `nature of science’ as a curriculum component. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(3), 403–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/002202700182628
- Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Furtak, M. E. (2007). Exploring teachers’ informal formative assessment practices and students’ understanding in the context of scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(1), 57–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20163
- Ruiz-Primo, M.-A., Furtak, E.-M., Ayala, C., Yin, Y., & Shavelson, R. (2010). Formative assessment, Motivation, and science learning. In H. Andrade & G. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 139–158). Routledge.
- Scott, P. H., Mortimer, E. F., & Aguiar, O. G. (2006). The Tension between Authoritative and dialogic discourse: A Fundamental Characteristic of Meaning making interactions in high school science lessons. Science Education, 90(4), 605–631. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20131
- Tiberghien, A., Malkoun, L., Buty, C., Souassy, N., & Mortimer, E. (2007). Analyse des savoirs en jeu en classe de physique à différentes échelles de temps. In G. Sensevy & A. Mercier (Eds.), Agir ensemble: Eléments de théorisation de l'action conjointe du professeur et des élèves (pp. 93–122). PUR.
- Tillema, H., Leenknecht, M., & Segers, M. (2011). Assessing assessment quality: Criteria for quality assurance in design of (peer) assessment for learning – a review of research studies. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.004
- Treagust, D., Jacobowitz, R., Gallagher, J., & Parker, J. (2001). Using assessment as a guide in teaching for understanding: A case study of a middle school science class learning about Sound. Science Education, 85(2), 137–157. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X(200103)85:2<137::AID-SCE30>3.0.CO;2-B
- Wong, V., & Dillon, J. (2019). Crossing the boundaries: Collaborations between mathematics and science departments in English secondary (high) schools. Research in Science & Technological Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2019.1636024