Science teachers’ use of argumentation instructional model: linking PCK of argumentation, epistemological beliefs, and practice

References

• Alozie, N. M., Moje, E. B., & Krajcik, J. S. (2010). An analysis of the supports and constraints for scientific discussion in high school project‐based science. Science Education, 94(3), 395–427. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berland, L. K., Schwarz, C. V., Krist, C., Kenyon, L., Lo, A. S., & Reiser, B. J. (2016). Epistemologies in practice: Making scientific practices meaningful for students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(7), 1082–1112. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buehl, M. M. (2008). Assessing the multidimensionality of students’ epistemic beliefs across diverse cultures. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Knowing, knowledge and beliefs (pp. 65–112). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cavagnetto, A. R. (2010). Argument to foster scientific literacy: A review of argument interventions in K–12 science contexts. Review of Educational Research, 80(3), 336–371. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310376953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheuk, T. (2016). Discourse practices in the new standards: The role of argumentation in common core-era next generation science standards classrooms for English language learners. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 20(3), 92–111.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fives, H., & Buehl, M. M. (2017). The functions of beliefs: Teachers’ personal epistemology on the Pinning Block. In G. Schraw, J. L. Brownlee, L. Olafson, & M. V. Brye (Eds.), Teachers’ personal Epistemologies: Evolving models for informing practice (pp. 25–55). Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gess-Newsome, J. (2015). A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK: Results of the thinking from the PCK Summit. In J. L. Berry & P. J. Friedrichsen (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 28–42). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• González-Howard, M., & McNeill, K. L. (2017, April 22–25). Variation in how teachers support student critique in argumentation discussions [Paper presentation]. Annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Antonio, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Hand, B., Park, S., & Suh, J. K. (2018). Examining teachers’ shifting epistemic orientations in improving students’ scientific literacy through adoption of the science writing heuristic approach. In K. Tang & K. Danielsson (Eds.), Global developments in literacy research for science education (pp. 339–355). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hofer, B. K. (2004). Personal epistemology as a psychological and educational construct: An introduction. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 1–14). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, G., & Leagon, M. (2014). Science teacher Attitudes and beliefs: Reforming practice. In S. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. 2, pp. 830–848). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Khishfe, R. (2014). Explicit nature of science and argumentation instruction in the context of socioscientific issues: An effect on student learning and transfer. International Journal of Science Education, 36(6), 974–1016. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.832004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight-Bardsley, A., & McNeill, K. L. (2016). Teachers’ pedagogical design capacity for scientific argumentation. Science Education, 100(4), 645–672. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Ablex Publishing Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, S., & Roehrig, G. (2019). Exploring science teachers’ argumentation and personal epistemology about global climate change. Research in Science Education, 49(1), 173–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9617-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loughran, J. J., Berry, A., Mulhall, P., & Woolnough, J. (2006). Understanding and valuing the development of pedagogical content knowledge in science teacher education. In I. Eilks & B. Ralle (Eds.), Towards research‐based science teacher education (pp. 65–76). Shaker Verlag GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Marco-Bujosa, L. M., McNeill, K. L., González-Howard, M., & Loper, S. (2017). An exploration of teacher learning from an educative reform-oriented science curriculum: Case studies of teacher curriculum use. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(2), 141–168. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L., & Berland, L. (2017). What is (or should be) scientific evidence use in k-12 classrooms? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(5), 672–689. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L., González-Howard, M., Katsh-Singer, R., & Loper, S. (2016). Pedagogical content knowledge of argumentation: Using classroom contexts to assess high-quality PCK rather than pseudoargumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(2), 261–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L., González-Howard, M., Katsh-Singer, R., & Loper, S. (2017). Moving beyond pseudoargumentation: Teachers’ enactments of an educative science curriculum focused on argumentation. Science Education, 101(3), 426–457. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L., & Knight, A. M. (2013). Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of scientific argumentation: The impact of professional development on K–12 teachers. Science Education, 97(6), 936–972. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). National science education standards. National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. The National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. (2014). Teaching scientific practices: Meeting the challenge of change. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(2), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9384-1
   Google Scholar
• Reiser, B. J. (2013, September). What professional development strategies are needed for successful implementation of the Next Generation science standards [Paper presentation]. Invitational Research Symposium on Science Assessment (Vol. 24, p. 25).
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, V., & Blanchard, M. R. (2012). Science teachers and scientific argumentation: Trends in views and practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(9), 1122–1148. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, V., Enderle, P., & Grooms, J. (2013). Argumentation in science education: Helping students understand the nature of scientific argumentation so they can meet the new science standards. The Science Teacher, 80(5), 30–33.
   Google Scholar
• Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 498–504. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.3.498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinatra, G. M. (2016). Thoughts on knowledge about thinking about knowledge. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Braten (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 479–491). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Suh, J. K., & Park, S. (2017). Exploring the relationship between pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) and sustainability of an innovative science teaching approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 64, 246–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.01.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S. (2003). Exploring the relationships between conceptual change and intentional learning. Intentional Conceptual Change, 377–406.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, J. P., & Sampson, V. (2013). Learning to argue and arguing to learn: Argument‐driven inquiry as a way to help undergraduate chemistry students learn how to construct arguments and engage in argumentation during a laboratory course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(5), 561–596. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, I. A., Reznitskaya, A., Bourdage, K., Oyler, J., Glina, M., Drewry, R., … Nelson, K. (2017). Toward a more dialogic pedagogy: Changing teachers’ beliefs and practices through professional development in language arts classrooms. Language and Education, 31(1), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2016.1230129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research. Design and methods. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar