References
- Black, P., & Harrison, C. (2004). Science inside the Black Box: Assessment for learning in the science classroom. NfER Nelson.
- Black, P., Harrison, C., Marshall, B., Wiliam, D., & Lee, C. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Open University Press.
- Boud, D. (1995). Assessment and learning: Contradictory or complementary? In P. Knight (Ed.), Assessment for learning in higher education (pp. 35–48). Kogan Page.
- Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.691462
- Brky, A. (2015). Accelerating how we learn to improve. Educational Researcher, 44(9), 467–477. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X15621543
- Brookhart, S. (2008). How to give effective feedback to your students. ASCD.
- Brookhart, S. (2018). Learning is the primary source of coherence in assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 37(1), 35–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12190
- Carless, D. (2013). Trust and its role in facilitating dialogic feedback. In D. Boud, & E. Molloy (Eds.), Feedback in higher and professional education: Understanding it and doing it well (pp. 90–103). Routledge.
- Coffey, J. E., Hammer, D., Levin, D. M., & Grant, T. (2011). The missing disciplinary substance of formative assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1109–1136. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20440
- Cowie, B. (1998). The role of questions in classroom assessment. SAMEpapers, 98, 41–53.
- Cowie, B. (2005). Pupil commentary on assessment for learning. The Curriculum Journal, 16(2), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585170500135921
- Cowie, B. (2015). Equity, ethics and engagement: Principles for quality formative assessment in primary science classrooms. In C. Milne, K. Tobin, & D. DeGennaro (Eds.), Sociocultural studies and implications for science education, cultural studies of science education (pp. 117–133). Springer. DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-4240-6_6
- Cowie, B., & Bell, B. (1999). A model of formative assessment in science education. Assessment in Education, 6(1), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/107319119900600111
- Cowie, B., Harrison, C., & Willis, J. (2018). Supporting teacher responsiveness in assessment for learning through disciplined noticing. The Curriculum Journal, 29 (4), 464–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2018.1481442.
- Cowie, B., & Moreland, J. (2015). Leveraging disciplinary practices to support students’ active participation in formative assessment. Assessment in Education, 22(2), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2015.1015960
- Cowie, B., Moreland, J., & Otrel-Cass, K. (2013). Expanding notions of assessment for learning. Sense.
- Crooks, T. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 58(14), 438–481. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543058004438
- Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. The Macmillan Company.
- Dolin, J., Black, P., Harlen, W., & Tiberghien, A. (2018). Exploring relations between summative and formative assessment. In J. Dolin & R. Evans (Eds.), Transforming assessment: Through interplay between practice, research and policy (pp. 53–80). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63248-3_3
- Dolin, J., Bruun, J., Constantinou, C. P., Dillon, J., Jorde, D., & Labudde, P. (2018). Policy aspects: How to change practice and in what direction. In J. Dolin & R. Evans (Eds.), Transforming assessment: Through interplay between practice, research and policy (pp. 249–278). Springer.
- Dolin, J., & Evans, R. (2018). Transforming assessment through an interplay between practice, research and policy. Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-63248-3.
- Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 268–291. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07309371
- Dysthe, O. (1996). The multivoiced classroom: Interactions of writing and classroom discourse. Written Communication, 13(3), 385–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088396013003004
- Ecclestone, K., & Pryor, J. (2003). ‘Learning Careers’ or ‘Assessment Careers’? The impact of assessment systems on learning. British Educational Research Journal, 29(4), 471–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920301849
- Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom. Methuen/Routledge.
- Ellegaard, M., Damsgaard, L., Bruun, J., & Johannsen, B. (2017). Patterns in the form of formative feedback and student response. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43 (5), 260–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1403564.
- Esterhazy, R., & Damsa, C. (2017). Unpacking the feedback process: An analysis of undergraduate students’ interactional meaning-making of feedback comments. Studies in Higher Education, 43 (5). https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1359249.
- Evans, C. (2013). Making sense of assessment feedback in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 83(1), 70–120. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312474350
- Fletcher, A. (2018). Help seeking: Agentic learners initiating feedback. Educational Review, 70(4), 389–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2017.1340871
- Gipps, C. (1999). Sociocultural aspects to assessment. Review of Educational Research, 24, 353–392. doi:10.3102/0091732x.
- Gittner, A., & Harrison, C. (2019). How do you develop research-informed practice? School Science Review, 100(373), 60–68.
- Grob, R., Holmeier, M., & Labudde, P. (2019). Analysing formal formative assessment activities in the context of inquiry at primary and upper secondary school in Switzerland. International Journal of Science Education, 0(0), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1663453
- Harlen, W. (2011). Assessment & inquiry-based science education: Issues in policy and practice. Global Network of Science Academies (IAP) Science Education Programme.
- Harrison, C. (2006). Banishing the quiet classroom. Education Review, 19(2), 67–77.
- Harrison, C. (2013). Collaborative action research as a tool for generating formative feedback on teachers’ classroom assessment practice: The KREST project. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 19(2), 202–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2013.741839
- Harrison, C. (2014). Assessment of inquiry skills in the SAILS project. Science Education International, 25, 112–122.
- Harrison, C. (2015). Assessment for learning in science classrooms. Journal of Research in STEM Education, 1(2), 78–86.
- Harrison, C., Constantinou, C. P., Correia, C. F., Grangeat, M., Hähkiöniemi, M., Livitzis, M., Nieminen, P., Papadouris, N., Rached, E., Serret, N., Tiberghien, A., & Viiri, J. (2018). Assessment on-the-fly: Promoting and collecting evidence of learning through dialogue. In J. Dolin & R. Evans (Eds.), Transforming assessment: Through an interplay between practice, research and policy (pp. 83–107). Springer. ISBN 9783319632476.
- Harrison, C., & Howard, S. (2009). Inside the Primary Black Box: Assessment for Learning in the Classroom. GLAssessment.
- Heritage, M. (2013). Formative assessment in practice: A process of inquiry and action. Harvard Education Press.
- Heritage, M., & Heritage, J. (2013). Teacher questioning: The epicenter of instruction and assessment. Applied Measurement in Education, 26(3), 176–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2013.793190
- Heritage, M., Kim, J., Vendlinski, T., & Herman, J. (2009). From evidence to action: A seamless process in formative assessment? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28(3), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2009.00151.x
- Hickey, D. (2015). A situative response to the conundrum of formative assessment. Assessment in Education, 22(2), 202–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2015.1015404
- Leahy, S., Lyon, C., Thompson, M., & Wiliam, D. (2005). Classroom assessment: Minute–by minute and day–by–day. Educational Leadership, 63(3), 18–24. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ745452.
- Lemke, J. (2000a). Multimedia literacy demands of the scientific curriculum. Linguistics and Education, 10(3), 247–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-5898(99)00009-1
- Lemke, J. (2000b). Across the scales of time: Artefacts, activities, and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind, Culture and Activity, 7(4), 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327884MCA0704_03
- Looney, J. (2011). Integrating formative and summative assessment: Progress toward a seamless system? OECD education working paper no. 58. OECD.
- Lucas, B., Claxton, G., & Spencer, E. (2013). Progression in student creativity in school: First steps towards new forms of formative assessments. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 86, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k4dp59msdwk-en
- Marshall, B., & Drummond, J. (2006). How teachers engage with assessment for learning: Lessons from the classroom. Research Papers in Education, 21(2), 133–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520600615638
- Mercer, N. (1995). Guided construction of knowledge: Talk amongst teachers and students. Multilingual Matters.
- Mercer, N. (2008). The seeds of time: Why classroom dialogue needs a temporal analysis. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(1), 33–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400701793182
- Moss, P. (2008). Sociocultural implications for assessment I: Classroom assessment. In P. Moss, D. Pullan, J. Gee, E. Haertel, & L. Young (Eds.), Assessment, equity and opportunity to learn (pp. 222–258). Cambridge University Press.
- Moss, P., Pullin, D., Gee, J., Haertel, E., & Young, L. (2008). Assessment, equity, and opportunity to learn. Cambridge University Press.
- Nicol, D. (2010). From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 501–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602931003786559
- Nieminen, P., Hähkiöniemi, M., & Viiri, J. (2020). Forms and functions of on-the-fly formative assessment conversations in physics inquiry lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 0(0), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1713417
- OECD. (2013). Synergies for better learning: An international perspective on evaluation and assessment. OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264190658-en
- Price, M., Handley, K., & Millar, J. (2011). Feedback: Focusing attention on engagement. Studies in Higher Education, 36(8), 879–896. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.483513
- Rached, E., & Grangeat, M. (2020). French teachers’ informal formative assessment in the context of inquiry-based learning. International Journal of Science Education, 0(0), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1740818
- Richards, J., Elby, A., Luna, M., Robertson, A., Levin, D., & Nyeggen, C. (2020). Reframing the responsiveness challenge: A framing-anchored explanatory framework to account for irregularity in novice teachers’ attention and responsiveness to student thinking. Cognition and Instruction, 38(2), 116–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2020.1729156
- Ropohl, M., & Rönnebeck, S. (2019). Making learning effective – quantity and quality of pre-service teachers’ feedback. International Journal of Science Education, 41(15), 2156–2176. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1663452
- Ruiz-Primo, M., & Furtak, E. (2007). Exploring teachers’ informal formative assessment practices and students’ understanding in the context of scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(1), 57–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20163
- Sadler, D. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714
- Sadler, D. (2010). Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 535–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903541015
- Scott, P., Mortimer, E., & Ametller, J. (2011). Pedagogical link-making: A fundamental aspect of teaching and learning scientific conceptual knowledge. Studies in Science Education, 47(1), 3–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2011.549619
- Sezen-Barrie, A., & Kelly, G. (2017). From the teacher’s eyes: Facilitating teachers noticing on informal formative assessments (IFAs) and exploring the challenges to effective implementation. International Journal of Science Education, 39(2), 181–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1274921
- Shavelson, R., Young, D., Ayala, C., Brandon, P., Furtak, E., Ruiz-Primo, M., Tomita, M., & Yin, Y. (2008). On the impact of curriculum-embedded formative assessment on learning: A collaboration between curriculum and assessment developers. Applied Measurement in Education, 21(4), 295–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957340802347647
- Shepard, L. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X029007004
- Shepard, L., Penuel, W., & Davidson, K. (2016). Using formative assessment to create coherent and equitable assessment systems. University of Colorado Boulder.
- Shepard, L., Penuel, W., & Pellegrino, J. (2018). Using learning and motivation theories to coherently link formative assessment, grading practices, and large-scale assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 37(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12189
- Shute, V. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795
- Stobart, G. (2008). Testing times: The uses and abuses of assessment. Routledge.
- Torrance, H., & Pryor, J. (2001). Developing formative assessment in the classroom: Using action research to explore and modify theory. British Educational Research Journal, 26(5), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920120095780
- Tschannen-Moran, M., & Barr, M. (2004). Fostering student learning: The relationship of collective teacher efficacy. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 3(3), 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760490503706
- Zlabkova, I., Petr, J., Stuchlikova, I., Rokos, L., & Hospesova, A. (2020). Development of teachers’ perspective on formative peer assessment. International Journal of Science Education, 0(0), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1713418