Tracing bodies through liminal blends in a mixed reality learning environment

References

• Amin, T. G., Jeppsson, F., & Haglund, J. (2015). Conceptual metaphor and embodied cognition in science learning: Introduction to special issue. International Journal of Science Education, 37(5–6), 745–758. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1025245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, H. S. (1990). Generalizing from case studies. Qualitative Inquiry in Education: The Continuing Debate, 233, 242.
   Google Scholar
• Coulson, S., & Oakley, T. (2000). Blending basics. Cognitive Linguistics, 11(3/4), 175–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danish, J. A., Enyedy, N., Saleh, A., Lee, C., & Andrade, A. (2015). Science through technology enhanced play: Designing to support reflection through play and embodiment. In O. Lindwall, P. Häkkinen, T. Koschman, P. Tchounikine, & S. Ludvigsen (Eds.), Exploring the material conditions of learning: The computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL) conference (Vol. 2, pp. 332–339). The International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Danish, J., Keifert, D., Enyedy, N., Humburg, M., Tu, X., Davis, B., & Lee, C. (2018, April 13–17). Embodiment within computational models: Explorations of agency and normativity. Paper presented at the Annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001005
   Google Scholar
• diSessa, A., Hammer, D., Sherin, B., & Kolpakowski, T. (1991). Inventing graphing: Meta-representational expertise in children. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 10(2), 117–160.
   Google Scholar
• Dudis, P. G. (2004). Body partitioning and real-space blends. Cognitive Linguistics, 15(2), 223–238. doi: 10.1515/cogl.2004.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, R. A., Conant, F. R., & Greeno, J. G. (2007). Progressive refinement of hypotheses in video-supported research. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 239–254). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Enyedy, N. (2005). Inventing mapping: Creating cultural forms to solve collective problems. Cognition and Instruction, 23(4), 427–466. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2304_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enyedy, N., Danish, J. A., & DeLiema, D. (2015). Constructing liminal blends in a collaborative augmented-reality learning environment. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10(1), 7–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-015-9207-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enyedy, N., Danish, J., DeLiema, D., Saleh, A., Lee, C., Morris, N., & Illum, R. (2017, January 4-7). Social affordances of mixed reality learning environments: A case from the science through technology enhanced play project (STEP). Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Hawaii, HI.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, F., & Schultz, J. (1997). When is a context? Some issues and methods in the analysis of social competence. Mind, Culture, and Activity: Seminal Papers from the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 22–31.
   Google Scholar
• Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. B. (1998). Blending as a central process of grammar: Expanded version. Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language, Adele Goldberg, ed, 113–130.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. Turning Points in Qualitative Research: Tying Knots in a Handkerchief, 3, 143–168.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2013). The co-operative, transformative organization of human action and knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics, 46(1), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2018). Co-operative action. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R., Stevens, R., & Torralba, T. (2002). Disrupting representational infrastructure in conversations across disciplines. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 9(3), 179–210. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327884MCA0903_03
   Google Scholar
• Hutchins, E. (2005). Material anchors for conceptual blends. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(10), 1555–1577. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39–103. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0401_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keifert, D. (2015). Young children participating in inquiry: Moments of joint inquiry and questioning practices at home and in school [Doctoral dissertation]. Northwestern University. Retrieved from Proquest (3724286).
   Google Scholar
• Keifert, D. T. (2020). Domains of value in family culture. Cognition and Instruction (accepted for publication) .
   Google Scholar
• Keifert, D., Xiao, C., & Enyedy, N. (2020). Drawing on and disrupting choreographic substrate for being scientific phenomena. Analytical Designs: Goodwin's Substrates as a Tool for Studying Learning. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference of the Learning Sciences, 2020, 1471–1478.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, E. F. (1983). A feeling for the organism: The life and work of Barbara McClintock. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2006). Cultivating model-based reasoning in science education. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindgren, R., & Johnson-Glenberg, M. (2013). Emboldened by embodiment: Six precepts for research on embodied learning and mixed reality. Educational Researcher, 42(8), 445–452. https://doi.org/10.3102/001318913511661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindgren, R., Tscholl, M., Wang, S., & Johnson, E. (2016). Enhancing learning and engagement through embodied interaection within a mixed reality simulation. Computers & Education, 95, 174–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, J. Y. (2017). Multi-party, whole-body interactions in mathematical activity. Cognition and Instruction, 35(2), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2017.1282485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaels, S., & O’Connor, C. (2012). Talk science prime. TERC.
   Google Scholar
• Munaro, M., Horn, A., Illum, R., Burke, J., & Rusu, R. B. (2014, July). OpenPTrack: People tracking for heterogeneous networks of color-depth cameras. In IAS-13 Workshop Proceedings: 1st Intl. Workshop on 3D Robot Perception with Point Cloud Library (pp. 235–247).
   Google Scholar
• Nasir, N. I. S., Rosebery, A. S., Warren, B., & Lee, C. D. (2006). Learning as a cultural process: Achieving equity through diversity. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nemirovsky, R., Tierney, C., & Wright, T. (1998). Body motion and graphing. Cognition and Instruction, 16(2), 119–172. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1602_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ochs, E. (1979). Transcription as theory. In E. Ochs, & B. Shieffelin (Eds.), Developmental psychology (pp. 43–72). Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Ochs, E., Gonzales, P., & Jacoby, S. (1996). When I come down I'm in the domain state": grammar and graphic representation in the interpretive activity of physicists. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics, 13, 328–369.
   Google Scholar
• Ochs, E., & Jacoby, S. (1994). Interpretive journeys: How physicists talk and travel through graphic space. Configurations, 2(1), 151–171. doi: 10.1353/con.1994.0003
   Google Scholar
• Parrill, F., & Sweetser, E. (2004). What we mean by meaning: Conceptual integration in gesture analysis and transcription. Gesture, 4(2), 197–219. doi: 10.1075/gest.4.2.05par
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E. A. (1978). Studies in the organization of conversational interaction (pp. 7–55). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, C. V., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Kenyon, L., Achér, A., Fortus, D., … Krajcik, J. (2009). Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 632–654. doi: 10.1002/tea.20311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siry, C., & Gorges, A. (2019). Young students’ diverse resources for meaning making in science: Learning from multilingual contexts. International Journal of Science Education, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1625495
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V., & Stone, C. A. (1999). The concept of internalization in Vygotsky’s account of the genesis of higher mental functions. Lev Vygotsky: Critical Assessments, 1, 363–380.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. F. (2006). Proceedings of the 7th international conference of the learning sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, R. E., & Bradbury, L. U. (2016). The pedagogical potential of drawing and writing in a primary science multimodal unit. International Journal of Science Education, 38(17), 2621–2641. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1255369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar