Conceptual change in socioscientific issues: learning about obesity

References

• Cheng, M. M. W., & Leung, J. S. C. (in press). Critical thinking across disciplines in university general education: Obesity as a socioscientific issue. In A. Berry, D. Gunstone, D. Corrigan, C. Buntting, & A. Jones (Eds.), Education in the 21st century: STEM, creativity and critical thinking. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.965823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63(1), 1–49. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543063001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Domoff, S. E., Hinman, N. G., Koball, A. M., Storfer-Isser, A., Carhart, V. L., Baik, K. D., & Carels, R. A. (2012). The effects of reality television on weight bias: An examination of The Biggest Loser. Obesity, 20(5), 993–998. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2011.378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (2012). How can conceptual change contribute to theory and practice in science education? In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 107–118). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Eastwood, J. L., Schlegel, W. M., & Cook, K. L. (2011). Effects of an interdisciplinary program on students’ reasoning with socioscientific issues and perceptions of their learning experiences. In T. D. Sadler (Ed.), Socio-scientific issues in the classroom: Teaching, learning and research (pp. 89–126). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, G. D., Wadden, T. A., Makris, A. P., Davidson, D., Sanderson, R. S., Allison, D. B., & Kessler, A. (2003). Primary care physicians’ attitudes about obesity and its treatment. Obesity Research, 11(10), 1168–1177. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2003.161
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fraser, B. J., Tobin, K. G., & McRobbie, C. J. (2012). Second international handbook of science education. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Haider-Markel, D. P., & Joslyn, M. R. (2018). “Nanny state” Politics: Causal attributions about obesity and support for regulation. American Politics Research, 46(2), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X17691493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, J. L., Pomeranz, J. L., Lobstein, T., & Brownell, K. D. (2009). A crisis in the marketplace: How food marketing contributes to childhood obesity and what can be done. Annual Review of Public Health, 30(1), 211–225. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.031308.100304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman, B. C. (2018). Students’ environmental NOS views, compassion, intent, and action: Impact of place-based socioscientific issues instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(4), 600–638. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson, D. (2014). Becoming part of the solution: Learning about activism, learning through activism, learning from activism. In J. L. Bencze & S. Alsop (Eds.), Activist science and technology education (pp. 67–98). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, S., & Zeidler, D. L. (2017). A case for the use of conceptual analysis in science education research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(4), 538–551. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kautiainen, S., Koivusilta, L., Lintonen, T., Virtanen, S. M., & Rimpelä, A. (2005). Use of information and communication technology and prevalence of overweight and obesity among adolescents. International Journal of Obesity, 29(8), 925–933. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0802994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkin, D. (2012). Misconceptions about “misconceptions”: Preservice secondary science teachers’ views on the value and role of student ideas. Science Education, 96(5), 927–959. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (2013). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G., & Abell, S. K. (2014). Handbook of research on science education (Vol. 2). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. C., & Grace, M. (2012). Students’ reasoning and decision making about a socioscientific issue: A cross-context comparison. Science Education, 96(5), 787–807. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leinhardt, G., & Ravi, A. (2013). Changing historical conceptions of history. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (2nd ed., pp. 253–268). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leung, J. S. C. (2020). Students’ adherences to epistemic understanding in evaluating scientific claims. Science Education, 104(2), 164–192. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung, J. S. C., Wong, A. S. L., & Yung, B. H. W. (2015). Understandings of nature of science and multiple perspective evaluation of science news by non-science majors. Science & Education, 24(7-8), 887–912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-014-9736-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaren, L. (2007). Socioeconomic status and obesity. Epidemiologic Reviews, 29(1), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxm001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mialon, M., Swinburn, B., Allender, S., & Sacks, G. (2016). Systematic examination of publicly-available information reveals the diverse and extensive corporate political activity of the food industry in Australia. BMC Public Health, 16(1), 283–295. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-2955-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Newton, M. H., & Zeidler, D. L. (2020). Developing socioscientific perspective taking. International Journal of Science Education, 42(8), 1302–1319. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1756515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., Rafanelli, S., & Kind, P. (2018). Toward a more coherent model for science education than the crosscutting concepts of the next generation science standards: The affordances of styles of reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(7), 962–981. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozturk, N., & Yilmaz-Tuzun, O. (2017). Preservice science teachers’ epistemological beliefs and informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues. Research in Science Education, 47(6), 1275–1304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9548-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelletier, J. E., Graham, D. J., & Laska, M. N. (2014). Social norms and dietary behaviors among young adults. American Journal of Health Behavior, 38(1), 144–152. https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.38.1.15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potvin, P., & Cyr, G. (2017). Toward a durable prevalence of scientific conceptions: Tracking the effects of two interfering misconceptions about buoyancy from preschoolers to science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(9), 1121–1142. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potvin, P., Sauriol, É, & Riopel, M. (2015). Experimental evidence of the superiority of the prevalence model of conceptual change over the classical models and repetition. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(8), 1082–1108. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puhl, R. M., Latner, J. D., O'Brien, K., Luedicke, J., Danielsdottir, S., & Forhan, M. (2015). A multinational examination of weight bias: Predictors of anti-fat attitudes across four countries. International Journal of Obesity, 39(7), 1166–1173. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2015.32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe, M., & Grace, M. (2003). Science education for citizenship: Teaching socio-scientific issues. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roost, A. C. (2016). Losing it: The construction and stigmatization of obesity on reality television in the United States. Journal of Popular Culture, 49(1), 174–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpcu.12377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rundgren, S. N., & Rundgren, C. J. (2010). SEE-SEP: From a separate to a holistic view of socioscientific issues. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning & Teaching, 11(1), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., Barab, S. A., & Scott, B. (2007). What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry. Research in Science Education, 37(4), 371–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9030-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., & Donnelly, L. A. (2006). Socioscientific argumentation: The effects of content knowledge and morality. International Journal of Science Education, 28(12), 1463–1488. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600708717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., Foulk, J. A., & Friedrichsen, P. J. (2017). Evolution of a model for socio-scientific issue teaching and learning. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 5(2), 75–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 112–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. P., diSessa, A. A., & Roschelle, J. (1994). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(2), 115–163. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0302_1
   Google Scholar
• Taber, K. S. (2001). Shifting sands: A case study of conceptual development as competition between alternative conceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 23(7), 731–753. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690010006572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taber, K. S. (2014). Student thinking and learning in science: Perspectives on the nature and development of learners’ ideas. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S. (2013). International handbook of research on conceptual change (2nd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Y. T., & Tsai, C. C. (2007). High school students’ informal reasoning on a socio-scientific issue: Qualitative and quantitative analyses. International Journal of Science Education, 29(9), 1163–1187. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601083375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L. (2014). Socioscientific issues as a curriculum emphasis: Theory, research, and practice. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Volume II, pp. 697–726). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L., Herman, B. C., & Sadler, T. D. (2019). New directions in socioscientific issues research. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0008-7
   Google Scholar