Negotiating conflicting discourses. Female students’ experiences in STEM majors in an international university in Central Asia

References

• Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124390004002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asian Development Bank. Regional, & Sustainable Development Dept. (2016). Kazakhstan: country gender assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Almukhambetova, A., & Kuzhabekova, A. (2020). Factors affecting the decision of female students to enrol in undergraduate science, technology, engineering and mathematics majors in Kazakhstan. International Journal of Science Education, 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Almukhambetova, A., Kuzhabekova, A., Hernandez Torrano, D. (2021). Hidden bias, low expectations and social stereotypes. understanding female higher education students' retention in stem [Manuscript submitted for publication]. Graduate School of Education, Nazarbayev University.
   Google Scholar
• Balgabayeva, G. Z., Samarkin, S. V., Yarochkina, E. V., Taskuzhina, A. B., Amantaeva, A. B., & Nazarova, S. V. (2016). The role of women in military organization of Nomads. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(12), 5273–5281.
   Google Scholar
• Banchefsky, S., Westfall, J., Park, B., & Judd, C. M. (2016). But you don’t look like a scientist! women-scientists with feminine appearance are deemed less likely to be scientists. Sex Roles, 75(3–4), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0586-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilyalov, D. (2018). Organizational socialization and job satisfaction of faculty at Nazarbayev university in Kazakhstan. European Education, 50(3), 229–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/10564934.2017.1401436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird, S. R., & Rhoton, L. A. (2011). Women professionals’ gender strategies: Negotiating gendered organizational barriers. Handbook of Gender, Work, and Organization, 245–262.
   Google Scholar
• Blackburn, H. (2017). The status of women in STEM in higher education: A review of the literature 2007–2017. Science & Technology Libraries, 36(3), 235–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2017.1371658
   Google Scholar
• Burke, R. J., & Mattis, M. C. (eds.). (2007). Women and minorities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: Upping the numbers. Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bystydzienski, J. M., Eisenhart, M., & Bruning, M. (2015). High school is not too late: Developing girls’ interest and engagement in engineering careers. The Career Development Quarterly, 63(1), 88–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2015.00097.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J., Quincy, C., Osserman, J., & Pedersen, O. (2013). Coding in-depth semi-structured interviews: Problems of unitization and intercoder reliability and agreement. Sociological Methods and Research, 42(3), 294–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124113500475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceci, S. J., Ginther, D. K., Kahn, S., & Williams, W. M. (2014). Women in academic science: A changing landscape. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 15(3), 75–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100614541236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, N., & Stout, J. G. (2014). Girls and women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: STEMing the tide and broadening participation in STEM careers. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732214549471
   Google Scholar
• Durrani, N., & Halai, A. (2020). Gender equality, education, and development: Tensions between global, national, and local policy discourses in postcolonial contexts. In Grading goal four (pp. 65–95). Brill Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role Interpretation. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (2011). Feminism and the evolution of sex differences and similarities. Sex Roles, 64(9–10), 758–767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9949-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eddy, S. L., & Brownell, S. E. (2016). Beneath the numbers: A review of gender disparities in undergraduate education across science, technology, engineering, and math disciplines. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2017). The life of women and men in Europe. A statistical portrait. 2017 edition. Retrieved March 3, 2018 from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/infographs/womenmen/
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, E. G. (2012). Lipstick and labcoats: Undergraduate women’s gender negotiation in STEM fields. NASPA Journal About Women in Higher Education, 5(2), 115–140. https://doi.org/10.1515/njawhe-2012-1098
   Google Scholar
• Goy, S. C., Wong, Y. L., Low, W. Y., Noor, S. N. M., Fazli-Khalaf, Z., Onyeneho, N., & Ginika Uzoigwe, A. (2018). Swimming against the tide in STEM education and gender equality: A problem of recruitment or retention in Malaysia. Studies in Higher Education, 43(11), 1793–1809. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1277383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, M. J., Frederick, J., Byars-Winston, A., Hunter, A. B., & Handelsman, J. (2013). Increasing persistence of college students in STEM. Science, 341(6153), 1455–1456. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1240487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpern, D., Aronson, J., Reimer, N., Simpkins, S., Star, J., & Wentzel, K. (2007). Encouraging girls in math and science (NCER 2007-2003). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Research, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/practice_guides/20072003.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, M., Gopaul, B., Sagintayeva, A., & Apergenova, R. (2016). Learning autonomy: Higher education reform in Kazakhstan. Higher Education, 72(3), 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9953-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J., & Finneman, T. (2017) Gender trouble in the workplace: Applying Judith Butler’s Theory of Performativity to News Organizations. Feminist Media Studies, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. Basic Book.
   Google Scholar
• Kandiyoti, D. (2007). The politics of gender and the Soviet paradox: neither colonized, nor modern?. Central Asian Survey, 26(4), 601–623.
   Google Scholar
• Kelan, E. K. (2010). Gender logic and (un)doing gender at work. Gender, Work & Organization, 17, 174–194. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.2009.00459.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzhabekova, A., & Almukhambetova, A. (2017). Female academic leadership in the post-Soviet context. European Educational Research Journal, 16(2-3), 183–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzhabekova, A., Soltanbekova, A., & Almukhambetova, A. (2018). Educational flagships as brokers in international policy transfer: Learning from the experience of Kazakhstan. European Education, 50(4), 353–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/10564934.2017.1365306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzhabekova, A., Janenova, S., & Almukhambetova, A. (2018). Analyzing the experiences of female leaders in civil service in Kazakhstan: Trapped between economic pressure to earn and traditional family role expectations. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(15), 1290–1301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzhabekova, A., & Almukhambetova, A. (2019). Women’s progression through the leadership pipeline in the universities of Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Louw, M. (2007). Everyday Islam in post-Soviet Central Asia. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Makarova, E., Aeschlimann, B., & Herzog, W. (2016). Why is the pipeline leaking? Experiences of young women in STEM vocational education and training and their adjustment strategies. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 8(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40461-016-0027-y
   Google Scholar
• Margolis, J., & Fisher, A. (2002). Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Margolis, J., Fisher, A., & Miller, F. (2000). The anatomy of interest: Women in undergraduate computer science. Women's Studies Quarterly, 28(1/2), 104–127.
   Google Scholar
• Master, A., Cheryan, S., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2016). Computing whether she belongs: Stereotypes undermine girls’ interest and sense of belonging in computer science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(3), 424–437. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadows, M. (2016). Where are all the talented girls? how can we help them achieve in science technology engineering and mathematics?. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 4(2), 29–42.
   Google Scholar
• Morison, T., & Macleod, C. (2013). A performative-performance analytical approach: Infusing Butlerian theory into the narrativediscursive method. Qualitative inquiry, 19(8), 566–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, G. E. (2004). Frontier masculinity in the oil industry: The experience of women engineers. Gender, Work & Organization, 11(1), 47–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2016). Education at a Glance: OECD indicators.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, M. (2005). Body projects of young women of color in physics: Intersections of gender, race, and science. Social Problems, 52(4), 593–617. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2005.52.4.593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, A., Bagilhole, B., & Dainty, A. (2009). How women engineers do and undo gender: Consequences for gender equality. Gender, work & organization, 16(4), 411–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, A., Bagilhole, B., Dainty, A., & Neale, R. (2004). Does the engineering culture in UK higher education advance women’s careers?. Equal Opportunities International, 23(7/8), 21–38.
   Google Scholar
• Privratsky, B. G. (2001). Muslim Turkistan: Kazak religion and collective memory. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruby, A., & Hartley, M. (2017). Parallel reforms: Nazarbayev intellectual schools and Nazarbayev University. Pedagogical Dialogue (3), 31.
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski, M. (2010). What’s in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Research in Nursing & Health, 33, 77–84. doi:10.1002/nur.20362
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmi, J. (2010). The challenge of establishing world-class research universities in developing countries. University Research for Innovation, 271, 271–287.
   Google Scholar
• Salmi, J. (2016). Excellence strategies and the creation of world-class universities. In Liu, N. C., Cheng, Y., & Wang, Q. (eds.), Matching visibility and performance (pp. 13–48). Brill Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Salmon, A. (2015). A Complex Formula: Girls and Women in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics in Asia. Bangkok: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Seidimbek, A. (2013). Nazarbayev University: Integration of Western and Central Asian educational systems. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 89, 682–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.915
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, C. A., & Sax, L. J. (2011). Major selection and persistence for women in STEM. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2011(152), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.404
   Google Scholar
• Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2018). The gender-equality paradox in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Psychological Science, 29(4), 581–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617741719
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research techniques. Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, M., & Cohen, L. (2010). Spaces that matter: Gender performativity and organizational space. Organization Studies, 31(2), 175–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler-Wood, T., Ellison, A., Lim, O., & Periathiruvadi, S. (2012). Bringing up girls in science (BUGS): The effectiveness of an afterschool environmental science program for increasing female students’ interest in science careers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(1), 46–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9279-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vieyra, M., Gilmore, J., & Timmerman, B. (2011). Requiring research may improve retention in STEM fields for underrepresented women. Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly, 32(1), 13–20.
   Google Scholar
• Wasburn, M. H., & Miller, S. G. (2004). Retaining undergraduate women in science, engineering, and technology: A survey of a student organization. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 6(2), 155–168.
   Google Scholar
• Werner, C. (2003). Between family and market: Women and the new silk road in post-Soviet Kazakhstan. Gender at Work in Economic Life. New York/Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield, 115–124.
   Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum. (2016). Global gender gap report 2016.
   Google Scholar