References
- Anderhag, P., Hamza, K. M., & Wickman, P.-O. (2015). What can a teacher do to support students’ interest in science? A study of the constitution of taste in a science classroom. Research in Science Education, 45(5), 749–784. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9448-4
- Anderhag, P., Wickman, P. O., Bergqvist, K., Jakobson, B., Hamza, K. M., & Säljö, R. (2016). Why do secondary school students lose their interest in science? Or does it never emerge? A possible and overlooked explanation. Science Education, 100(5), 791–813. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21231
- Anderhag, P., Wickman, P.-O., & Hamza, K. M. (2015). Signs of taste for science: A methodology for studying the constitution of interest in the science classroom. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 10(2), 339–368. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9641-9
- Daugherty, M. K., & Carter, V. (2018). The nature of interdisciplinary STEM education. In M. J. de Vries (Ed.), Handbook of technology education (pp. 159–171). Springer International Publishing.
- Dewey, J. (1897/1972). ‘The aesthetic element in education’, reprinted in 1972, John Dewey: The early work, 1882–1898, vol. 5. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University.
- Dewey, J. (1934/1987). ‘Art as experience’, reprinted in 1987, John Dewey: The late work, 1925–1953, vol. 10, Carbondale: Southern Illinois University.
- Erickson, F. (2006). Definition and analysis of data from videotape: Some research procedures and their rationales. In J. L. Green, G. Camilli, P. Elmore, A. Skukauskaite, & E. Grace (Eds.), Handbook of contemporary methods in educational research (pp. 177–192). American Educational Research Association.
- Ferguson, J., Aranda, G., Tytler, R., & Gorur, R. (2019). Video research – purposeful selection from rich data sets. In L. Xu, G. Aranda, & D. Clarke (Eds.), Video-based research in education – cross-disciplinary perspectives (pp. 124–139). Routledge.
- Gee, J. P. (2014). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. Routledge.
- Girod, M., Rau, C., & Schepige, A. (2003). Appreciating the beauty of science ideas: Teaching for aesthetic understanding. Science Education, 87(4), 574–587. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1054
- Girod, M., & Wong, D. (2002). An aesthetic (Deweyan) perspective on science learning: Case studies of three fourth graders. The Elementary School Journal, 102(3), 199–224. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/499700
- Innes, R. E. (2019). Peirce and Dewey think about art: Quality and the theory of signs. Semiotica, 228(151), 103–133. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2018-0079
- Jakobson, B., & Wickman, P.-O. (2008a). Art in science class vs science in art class: A study in elementary school. Éducation et Didactique, 2(3), 141–157. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4000/educationdidactique.396
- Jakobson, B., & Wickman, P.-O. (2008b). The roles of aesthetic experience in elementary school science. Research in Science Education, 38(1), 45–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9039-8
- Jakobson, B., & Wickman, P.-O. (2015). What difference does art make in science? A comparative study of meaning-making at elementary school. Interchange, 46(4), 323–343. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-015-9262-6
- Leher, R., Konald, C., & Kim, M. (2006). Constructing data, modeling chance in the middle school [Paper presentation]. Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
- Lehrer, R. (2009). Designing to develop disciplinary dispositions: Modeling natural systems. American Psychologist, 64(8), 759–771. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.64.8.759
- Lehrer, R., & Kim, M. J. (2009). Structuring variability by negotiating its measure. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 21(2), 116–133. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217548
- Lehrer, R., Kobiela, M., & Weinberg, P. J. (2013). Cultivating inquiry about space in a middle school mathematics classroom. ZDM, 45(3), 365–376. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0479-x
- Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2006). Cultivating model-based reasoning in science education. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 371–388). Cambridge University Press.
- Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2012). Seeding evolutionary thinking by engaging children in modeling its foundations. Science Education, 96(4), 701–724. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20475
- Lemke, J. (2004). The literacies of science. In E. W. Saul (Ed.), Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives on theory and practice (pp. 33–47). International Reading Association/National Science Teachers Association.
- Lemke, J. (2015). Feeling and meaning: A unitary bio-semiotic account. In P. P. Trifonas (Ed.), International handbook of semiotics (pp. 589–616). Springer.
- Lidar, M., Lundqvist, E., & Östman, L. (2006). Teaching and learning in the science classroom: The interplay between teachers’ epistemological moves and students’ practical epistemology. Science Education, 90(1), 148–163. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20092
- Marginson, S., Tytler, R., Freeman, B., & Roberts, K. (2013). STEM: Country comparisons-international comparisons of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education. Canberra: Australian Council of Learned Academies. https://acola.org.au/wp/project-2/
- Östman, L., & Wickman, P.-O. (2014). A pragmatic approach on epistemology, teaching, and learning. Science Education, 98(3), 375–382. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21105
- Peirce, C. S. (1894/1998). What is a sign? In N. Houser, A. De Tienne, J. R. Eller, C. L. Clark, A. C. Lewis, & D. B. Davis (Eds.), The essential Peirce - selected philosophical writings - Volume 2 (1893–1913) (pp. 4–10). Indiana University Press.
- Peirce, C. S. (1903/1998). The three normative sciences. In N. Houser, A. De Tienne, J. R. Eller, C. L. Clark, A. C. Lewis, & D. B. Davis (Eds.), The essential Peirce - selected philosophical writings - Volume 2 (1893–1913) (pp. 196–207). Indiana University Press.
- Peirce, C. S. (1907/1998). Pragmatism. In N. Houser, A. De Tienne, J. R. Eller, C. L. Clark, A. C. Lewis, & D. B. Davis (Eds.), The essential Peirce - selected philosophical writings - Volume 2 (1893–1913) (pp. 398–433). Indiana University Press.
- Rorty, R. (1991). Objectivity, relativism, and truth: Philosophical papers - volume 1. Cambridge University Press.
- Sensevy, G., & Bloor, T. (2019). Cooperative didactic engineering. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 1–5). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77487-9_100037-1
- Shusterman, R. (1992/2000). Pragmatist aesthetics: Living beauty, rethinking art. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
- Sinclair, N. (2001). The aesthetic “is” relevant. For the Learning of Mathematics, 21(1), 25–32.
- Sinclair, N. (2006). Mathematics and beauty: Aesthetic approaches to teaching children. Teachers College Press.
- Sinclair, N. (2007). The aesthetic sensibilities of mathematicians. In N. Sinclair, D. Pimm, & W. Higginson (Eds.), Mathematics and the aesthetic: New approaches to an ancient affinity (pp. 87–104). Springer.
- Sinclair, N. (2008). Attending to the aesthetic in the mathematics classroom. For the Learning of Mathematics, 28(1), 29–35.
- Sinclair, N. (2009). Aesthetics as a liberating force in mathematics education? ZDM Mathematics Education, 41(1–2), 45–60. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0132-x
- Tytler, R., Ferguson, J., & White, P. (2020). A pedagogy for learning data modelling through constructing, evaluating and orchestrating representational systems. Learning: Research and Practice, 6(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2020.1750672
- Tytler, R., Prain, V., & Hubber, P. (2018). Representation construction as a core disciplinary literacy. In K.-S. Tang & K. Danielsson (Eds.), Global developments in literacy research for science education (pp. 301–317). Springer.
- Tytler, R., Prain, V., Hubber, P., & Waldrip, B. (2013). Constructing representations to learn in science. Sense Publishers.
- Wickman, P.-O. (2004). The practical epistemologies of the classroom: A study of laboratory work. Science Education, 88(3), 325–344. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10129
- Wickman, P.-O. (2006). Aesthetic experience in science education: Learning and meaning-making as situated talk and action. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Wickman, P.-O., & Östman, L. (2002a). Learning as discourse change: A sociocultural mechanism. Science Education, 86(5), 601–623. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10036
- Wickman, P.-O., & Östman, L. (2002b). Induction as an empirical problem: How students generalize during practical work. International Journal of Science Education, 24(5), 465–486. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110074756
- Wittgenstein, L. (1953/1967). Philosophical investigations (3rd ed.). Blackwell.