Exploring assessment in STEM inquiry learning classrooms

References

• Akerson, V. L., Cullen, T. A., & Hanson, D. L. (2009). Fostering a community of practice through a professional development program to improve elementary teachers’ views of nature of science and teaching practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(10), 1090–1113. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade, H. L. (2010). Students as the definitive source of formative assessment: Academic self-assessment and the self-regulation of learning. NERA Conference Proceedings, 25, 19. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/nera_2010/25
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, H. L., Du, Y., & Wang, X. (2008). Putting rubrics to the test: The effect of a model, criteria generation, and rubric-referenced self-assessment on elementary school students’ writing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 27(2), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2008.00118.x
   Google Scholar
• ARG. (2002). Assessment for learning: 10 principles. University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, J. C., Kremer, K., & Mayer, J. (2014). Understanding students’ experiments—What kind of support do they need in inquiry tasks? International Journal of Science Education, 36(16), 2719–2749. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.930209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artigue, M., & Blomhøj, M. (2013). Conceptualizing inquiry-based education in mathematics. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45(6), 797–810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0506-6
   Google Scholar
• Barron, B., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Teaching for meaningful learning: A review of research on inquiry-based and cooperative learning. Book excerpt. George Lucas Educational Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, B., & Cowie, B. (2001). The characteristics of formative assessment in science education. Science Education, 85(5), 536–553. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernholt, S., Neumann, K., & Nentwig, P. (Eds.). (2012). Making it tangible learning outcomes in science education. Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Biggers, M., & Forbes, C. T. (2012). Balancing teacher and student roles in elementary classrooms: Preservice elementary teachers’ learning about the inquiry continuum. International Journal of Science Education, 34(14), 2205–2229. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.694146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., Harrison, C., Clare, L., Bethan, M., & Dylan, W. (Eds.). (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(6), 551–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., Wilson, M., & Yao, S.-Y. (2011). Road maps for learning: A guide to the navigation of learning progressions. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 9(2–3), 71–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/15366367.2011.591654
   Google Scholar
• Chin, C. (2006). Classroom interaction in science: Teacher questioning and feedback to students' responses. International Journal of Science Education, 28(11), 1315–1346. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600621100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffey, J. E., Hammer, D., Levin, D. M., & Grant, T. (2011). The missing disciplinary substance of formative assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1109–1136. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correia, C. F., & Harrison, C. (2020). Teachers’ beliefs about inquiry-based learning and its impact on formative assessment practice. Research in Science and Technological Education, 38(3), 355–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2019.1634040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowie, B., & Bell, B. (1999). A model of formative assessment in science education. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 6(1), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695949993026
   Google Scholar
• Cowie, B., Harrison, C., & Willis, J. (2018). Supporting teacher responsiveness in assessment for learning through disciplined noticing. The Curriculum Journal, 29(4), 464–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2018.1481442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowie, B., Moreland, J., & Otrel-Cass, K. (2013). Expanding notions of assessment for learning: Inside science and technology primary classrooms. Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Dixson, D. D., & Worrell, F. C. (2016). Formative and summative assessment in the classroom. Theory Into Practice, 55(2), 153–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1148989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolin, J., Black, P., Harlen, W., & Tiberghien, A. (2018). Exploring relations between formative and summative assessment. In J. Dolin & R. H. Evans, Transforming assessment (pp. 53–80). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dolin, J., & Evans, R. (Eds.). (2018). Transforming assessment: Through an interplay between practice, research and policy. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63248-3
   Google Scholar
• Dolin, J., & Krogh, L. B. (2010). The relevance and consequences of PISA science in a Danish context. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(3), 565–592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9207-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furtak, E. M., & Alonzo, A. C. (2010). The role of content in inquiry-based elementary science lessons: An analysis of teacher beliefs and enactment. Research in Science Education, 40(3), 425–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9128-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furtak, E. M., & Heredia, S. C. (2014). Exploring the influence of learning progressions in two teacher communities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(8), 982–1020. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furtak, E. M., Kiemer, K., Circi, R. K., Swanson, R., de León, V., Morrison, D., & Heredia, S. C. (2016). Teachers’ formative assessment abilities and their relationship to student learning: Findings from a four-year intervention study. Instructional Science, 44(3), 267–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-016-9371-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grangeat, M. (2015). Exploring the set of pedagogical knowledge, from pedagogy to content. In M. Grangeat (Ed.), Understanding science teachers’ professional knowledge growth (pp. 117–133). Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Grangeat, M. (2016). Dimensions and modalities of inquiry-based teaching: Understanding the variety of practices. Education Inquiry, 7(4), 421–442. https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v7.29863
   Google Scholar
• Grangeat, M., & Gray, P. (2007). Factors influencing teachers' professional competence development. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 59(4), 485–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820701650943
   Google Scholar
• Grangeat, M., & Gray, P. (2008). Teaching as a collective work: Analysis, current research and implications for teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 34(3), 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607470802212306
   Google Scholar
• Greene, M., & von Renesse, C. (2017). A path to designing inquiry activities in mathematics. PRIMUS, 27(7), 646–668. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2016.1211203
   Google Scholar
• Grob, R., Holmeier, M., & Labudde, P. (2019). Analysing formal formative assessment activities in the context of inquiry at primary and upper secondary school in Switzerland. International Journal of Science Education, 43(3), 407–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1663453
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harlen, W. (2009). Teaching and learning science for a better future. School Science Review, 90(333), 33–41.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, C. (2013). Changing assessment practices in science classrooms. In D. Corrigan, R. Gunstone, & A. Jones (Eds.), Valuing assessment in science education: Pedagogy, curriculum, policy (pp. 347–358). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6668-6_18
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, C. (2014). Assessment of inquiry skills in the SAILS project. Science Education International, 25(1), 112–122.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, C., Hofstein, A., Eylon, B.-S., & Simon, S. (2008). Evidence-based professional development of Science teachers in two countries. International Journal of Science Education, 30(5), 577–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701854832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazelkorn, E., Ryan, C., Beernaert, Y., Constantinou, C., Deca, L., Grangeat, M., Karikorpi, M., Lazoudis, A., Pinto-Casulleras, R., & Welzel-Breuer, M. (2015). Science education for responsible citizenship (EUR 26893). European Commission - Research and Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Heinz, J., Enghag, M., Stuchlikova, I., Cakmakci, G., Peleg, R., & Baram-Tsabari, A. (2017). Impact of initiatives to implement science inquiry: A comparative study of the Turkish, Israeli, Swedish and Czech science education systems. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 12(3), 677–708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-015-9704-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, M. (2007). Formative assessment: What Do teachers need to know and do? Phi Delta Kappan, 89(2), 140–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170708900210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawalkar, A., & Vijapurkar, J. (2013). Scaffolding science talk: The role of teachers’ questions in the inquiry classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 35(12), 2004–2027. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.604684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krajcik, J., McNeill, K. L., & Reiser, B. J. (2008). Learning-goals-driven design model: Developing curriculum materials that align with national standards and incorporate project-based pedagogy. Science Education, 92(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepareur, C., & Grangeat, M. (2018). Teacher collaboration’s influence on inquiry-based science teaching methods. Education Inquiry, 9(4), 363–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2018.1428037
   Google Scholar
• Lin, K.-Y., Hsiao, H.-S., Williams, P. J., & Chen, Y.-H. (2020). Effects of 6E-oriented STEM practical activities in cultivating middle school students’ attitudes toward technology and technological inquiry ability. Research in Science & Technological Education, 38(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2018.1561432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linn, M. C., Davis, E. A., & Bell, P. (2004). Internet environments for science education. Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Looney, J. W. (2011). Integrating formative and summative assessment: Progress toward a seamless system? (No. 58; OECD Education Working Papers). OECD. http://doi.org/10.1787/5kghx3kbl734-en
   Google Scholar
• Lotter, C., Smiley, W., Thompson, S., & Dickenson, T. (2016). The impact of a professional development model on middle school science teachers’ efficacy and implementation of inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 38(18), 2712–2741. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1259535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, J. (2002). Researching your own practice: The discipline of noticing. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, P. S. C., & McKenna, P. J. (2005). Assessment of practical work in Ireland: A critique. International Journal of Science Education, 27(10), 1211–1224. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500102573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction–what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474–496. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mottier Lopez, L., & Pasquini, R. (2017). Professional controversies between teachers about their summative assessment practices: A tool for building assessment capacity. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 24(2), 228–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2017.1293001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieminen, P., Hähkiöniemi, M., & Viiri, J. (2020). Forms and functions of on-the-fly formative assessment conversations in physics inquiry lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 43(3), 362–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1713417
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, P. (2014). When teaching makes a difference: Developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge through learning study. International Journal of Science Education, 36(11), 1794–1814. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.879621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olin, A., & Ingerman, Å. (2016). Features of an emerging practice and professional development in a science teacher team collaboration with a researcher team. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 27(6), 607–624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9477-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. (2011). Science teaching methods: A rationale for practices. School Science Review, 93(343), 93–103.
   Google Scholar
• Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. National Academy Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/10019
   Google Scholar
• Peters, M. L. (2013). Examining the relationships among classroom climate, self-efficacy and achievement in undergraduate mathematics: A multi-level analysis. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(2), 459–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9347-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rached, E., & Grangeat, M. (2020). French teachers' informal formative assessment in the context of inquiry-based learning. International Journal of Science Education, 43(3), 385–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1740818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocard, M., Cesrmley, P., Jorde, D., Lenzen, D., & Hemmo, V. (2007). Science education now: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe. European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Ropohl, M., & Rönnebeck, S. (2019). Making learning effective – Quantity and quality of pre-service teachers’ feedback. International Journal of Science Education, 41(15), 2156–2176. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1663452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönnebeck, S., Bernholt, S., & Ropohl, M. (2016). Searching for a common ground – A literature review of empirical research on scientific inquiry activities. Studies in Science Education, 52(0), 161–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2016.1206351
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Primo, M. A. (2011). Informal formative assessment: The role of instructional dialogues in assessing students’ learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.04.003
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Furtak, E. M. (2007). Exploring teachers’ informal formative assessment practices and students’ understanding in the context of scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(1), 57–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleicher, A. (2015). Schools for 21st-century learners. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264231191-en
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, R. M., & Plasman, K. (2011). Science teacher learning progressions: A review of science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge development. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 530–565. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311423382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shavelson, R. J., Young, D. B., Ayala, C. C., Brandon, P. R., Furtak, E. M., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Tomita, M. K., & Yin, Y. (2008). On the impact of curriculum-embedded formative assessment on learning: A collaboration between curriculum and assessment developers. Applied Measurement in Education, 21(4), 295–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957340802347647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2–3), 235–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500336957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, J., Cartier, J. L., & Passmore, C. M. (2005). Developing understanding through model-based inquiry. In M. S. Donovan & J. D. Bransford (Eds.), How students learn: Science in the classroom (pp. 515–565). National Academy Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11102
   Google Scholar
• Swaffield, S. (2011). Getting to the heart of authentic assessment for learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(4), 433–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2011.582838
   Google Scholar
• Tsivitanidou, O. E., Constantinou, C. P., Labudde, P., Rönnebeck, S., & Ropohl, M. (2018). Reciprocal peer assessment as a learning tool for secondary school students in modelling-based learning. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 33(1), 51–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-017-0341-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Driel, J. H., & Berry, A. (2012). Teacher professional development focusing on pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Researcher, 41(1), 26–28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11431010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waddington, D., Nentwig, P., & Schanze, S. (2007). Making it comparable: Standards in science education. Waxmann Verlag GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001
   Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2008). Beyond the scientific method: Model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Science Education, 92(5), 941–967. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, W., Huang, F., Yu, L., & Chen, S. (2018). Towards a learning-oriented assessment to improve students’ learning—A critical review of literature. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 30(3), 211–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-018-9281-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zlabkova, I., Petr, J., Stuchlikova, I., Rokos, L., & Hospesova, A. (2020). Development of teachers' perspective on formative peer assessment. International Journal of Science Education, 43(3), 428–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1713418
   Google Scholar
• Zuiker, S., & Whitaker, J. R. (2014). Refining inquiry with multi-form assessment: Formative and summative assessment functions for flexible inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 36(6), 1037–1059. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.834489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar