References
- Atkin, J. M., & Coffey, J. (2003). Everyday assessment in the science classroom. NSTA Press.
- Atkins, L. J. (2012). Peer assessment with online tools to improve student modeling. The Physics Teacher, 50(8), 489–493. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4758155
- Atkins, L. J., & Frank, B. W. (2015). Examining the products of responsive inquiry. In A. D. Robertson, R. E. Scherr, & D. Hammer (Eds.), Responsive teaching in science and mathematics (pp. 56–84). Routledge.
- Atkins, L. J., & Salter, I. (2015). Engaging future teachers in having wonderful ideas. In Sandifer Cody & Brewe Eric (Eds.), Recruiting and educating future physics teachers: Case studies and effective practices (pp. 199–213).
- Atkins Elliott, L., Jaxon, K., & Salter, I. (2016). Composing science: A facilitator's guide to writing in the science classroom. Teachers College Press.
- Barnett, S. M., & Ceci, S. J. (2002). When and where do we apply what we learn?: A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 128(4), 612–637. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.4.612
- Barton, A. C., Tan, E., & Rivet, A. (2008). Creating hybrid spaces for engaging school science among Urban middle school girls. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 68–103. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207308641
- Bazerman, C. (2004). Intertextuality: how texts rely on other texts. In What writing does and how it does it: An introduction to analyzing texts and textual practices (pp. 83–96). Taylor & Francis.
- Boaler, J., & Greeno, J. G. (2000). Identity, agency, and knowing in mathematics worlds. In Jo Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (Vol. 1, pp. 171–200). Ablex Publishing, Greenwood Publishing Group.
- Bohannon, J. (2008). Calling all dancing scientists! Science (New York, N.Y.), 322(5899), 186–186. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.322.5899.186b
- Bransford, J. D., & Schwartz, D. L. (1999). Rethinking transfer: a simple proposal with multiple implications. Review of Research in Education, 24(1), 61–100. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X024001061
- Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics 1970–1990. In N. Balacheff, M. Cooper, & R. S. V. Warfield (Eds.). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
- Caiman, C., & Jakobson, B. (2019). The role of art practice in elementary school science. Science & Education, 28(1), 153–175. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00036-2
- Chandrasekhar, S. (2013). Truth and beauty: aesthetics and motivations in science. University of Chicago Press.
- Dewey, J. (1934/2008). Later works vol. 10: art as experience. Southern Illinois University Press. (Original work published in 1934).
- Dewey, J. (1938/1998). Experience and education. Kappa Delta Pi.
- Duncker, K., & Lees, L. S. (1945). On problem-solving. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 58(5), i. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093599
- Emdin, C., Adjapong, E., & Levy, I. (2016). Hip-hop based interventions as pedagogy/therapy in STEM. Journal for Multicultural Education, 10(3), 307–321. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JME-03-2016-0023
- Engle, R. A., Conant, F. R., & Greeno, J. G. (2000). Progressive refinement of hypotheses in video-supported research. In D. Lesh and A. Kelley (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 239–254). Erlbaum.
- Engle, R. A., Lam, D. P., Meyer, X. S., & Nix, S. E. (2012). How does expansive framing promote transfer? Several proposed explanations and a research agenda for investigating them. Educational Psychologist, 47(3), 215–231. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.695678
- Engle, R. A., Nguyen, P. D., & Mendelson, A. (2011). The influence of framing on transfer: initial evidence from a tutoring experiment. Instructional Science, 39(5), 603–628. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9145-2
- Erickson, F., & Schultz, J. (1997). When is a context? Some issues and methods in the analysis of social competence. In Cole M., Engeström Y., & Vasquez O. (Eds.), Mind, culture, and activity: Seminal papers from the laboratory of comparative human cognition (Vol. 22, pp. 5–10). New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Fischer, E. P. (2013). Beauty and the beast: The aesthetic moment in science. Springer.
- Frank, B. W., & Atkins, L. J. (2013). Adapting transformative experience surveys to undergraduate physics. In Paula V. Engelhardt, Alice Churukian, & Dyan L. Jones (Eds.), AIP conference proceedings: Physics education research conference. AAPT PER Topical Group.
- Gee, J. P. (2005). The new literacy studies: From ‘socially situated’ to the work of the social. In David Barton & Mary Hamilton (Eds.), Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context (Vol. 2, pp. 177–194). Routledge: Roz Ivanič Publisher.
- Girod, M., Rau, C., & Schepige, A. (2003). Appreciating the beauty of science ideas: Teaching for aesthetic understanding. Science Education, 87(4), 574–587. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
- Girod, M., & Wong, D. (2002). An aesthetic (Deweyan) perspective on science learning: Case studies of three fourth graders. The Elementary School Journal, 102(3), 199–224. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/499700
- Goldstone, R. L., & Wilensky, U. (2008). Promoting transfer by grounding complex systems principles. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(4), 465–516. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400802394898
- Greeno, J. G. (2006). Authoritative, accountable positioning and connected, general knowing: Progressive themes in understanding transfer. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(4), 537–547. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1504_4
- Greeno, J. G., Smith, D. R., & Moore, J. L. (1993). Transfer of situated learning. In D. K. Detterman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Transfer on trial: Intelligence, cognition and instruction (pp. 99–167). Ablex.
- Gresalfi, M. S., & Cobb, P. (2006). Cultivating students' discipline-specific dispositions as a critical goal for pedagogy and equity. Pedagogies, 1(1), 49–57. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15544818ped0101_8
- Gross, A. G., Harmon, J. E., Reidy, M., & Reidy, M. S. (2002). Communicating science: The scientific article from the 17th century to the present. Oxford University Press on Demand.
- Jornet, A., Roth, W. M., & Krange, I. (2016). A transactional approach to transfer episodes. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(2), 285–330. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2016.1147449
- Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Ablex.
- Ma, J. Y. (2016). Designing disruptions for productive hybridity: The case of walking scale geometry. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(3), 335–371. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2016.1180297
- National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. National Academies Press.
- NGSS Lead States (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. National Academies Press.
- Östman, L., & Wickman, P. O. (2014). A pragmatic approach on epistemology, teaching, and learning. Science Education, 98(3), 375–382. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21105
- Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
- Pugh, K. J. (2002). Teaching for transformative experience in science: An investigation of the effectiveness of two instructional elements. Teachers College Record, 104(6), 1101–1137. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/tcre.2002.104.issue-6
- Pugh, K. J., & Girod, M. (2017). Science, art, and experience: Constructing a science pedagogy from Dewey's aesthetics. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(1), 9–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-006-9029-0
- Pugh, K. J., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Koskey, K. L., Stewart, V. C., & Manzey, C. (2010). Motivation, learning, and transformative experience: A study of deep engagement in science. Science Education, 94(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20344
- Radoff, J., Jaber, L. Z., & Hammer, D. (2019). ‘It's scary but it's also exciting’: Evidence of meta-affective learning in science. Cognition and Instruction, 37(1), 73–92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2018.1539737
- Rommetveit, R. (1976). On the architecture of intersubjectivity. In L. Strickland (Ed.), Social psychology in transition (pp. 201–214). Springer.
- Root-Bernstein, R. S. (1989). Discovering, inventing and solving problems at the frontiers of scientific knowledge. Harvard University Press.
- Root-Bernstein, R. S. (2002). Aesthetic cognition. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 16(1), 61–77. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02698590120118837
- Wagner, J. F. (2006). Transfer in pieces. Cognition and Instruction, 24(1), 1–71. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2401_1
- Wickman, P. O. (2006). Aesthetic experience in science education: Learning and meaning-making as situated talk and action. Routledge.