940
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Teaching chemistry in context: what we know from teachers’ lesson plans

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1208-1227 | Received 12 Oct 2020, Accepted 16 Mar 2021, Published online: 29 Mar 2021

References

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., Waters, M., & Le, A. P. (2008). Representations of nature of science in high school chemistry textbooks over the past four decades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(7), 835–855. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20226
  • Bennett, J., Lubben, F., & Hogarth, S. (2007). Bringing science to life: A synthesis of the research evidence on the effects of context-based and STS approaches to science teaching. Science Education, 91(3), 347–370. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20186
  • Berg, L. B., & Lune, H. (2017). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (9th ed.). Pearson.
  • Bernard, R. H., Wutich, A., & Ryan, W. G. (2017). Analyzing qualitative data systematic approaches (2nd ed.). SAGE.
  • Broman, K., & Parchmann, I. (2014). Students’ application of chemical concepts when solving chemistry problems in different contexts. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(4), 516–529. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RP00051J
  • Bybee, R. W., & Mau, T. (1986). Science and technology related global problems: An international survey of science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23(7), 599–618. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660230704
  • Cheung, K. C., Sit, P. S., Mak, S. K., & Ieong, M. K. (2019). Macao-PISA 2018 Report: Assessment of scientific, reading, mathematical literacy performance of 15-year-old students from an international comparison perspective. Macao: Educational Testing and Assessment Research Centre, University of Macau.
  • Darby, L. (2010). Subject culture and pedagogies: Comparing secondary mathematics and science. Lambert Academic Publishing.
  • De Jong, O. (2008). Context-based chemical education: How to improve it? Chemical Education International, 8(1), 1–7.
  • DSEDJ. (2017a). Requirements of basic academic attainments of natural sciences for junior secondary schools. Available: http://www.dsedj.gov.mo
  • DSEDJ. (2017b). Requirements of basic academic attainments of natural sciences for senior secondary schools. Available: http://www.dsedj.gov.mo
  • DSEDJ. (2019). The regulation of the annual award scheme on instructional design. Available: http://www.dsedj.gov.mo
  • Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 268–291. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07309371
  • Edwards, A. (2001). Researching pedagogy: A sociocultural agenda. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 9(2), 161–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681360100200111
  • Gilbert, J. K. (2006). On the nature of ‘context’ in chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 957–976. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600702470
  • Gilbert, J. K., Bulte, A. M. W., & Pilot, A. (2011). Concept development and transfer in context based science education. International Journal of Science Education, 33(6), 817–837. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.493185
  • Herranen, J., Kousa, P., Fooladi, E., & Aksela, M. (2019). Inquiry as a context-based practice - a case study of pre-service teachers’ beliefs and implementation of inquiry in context-based science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 41(14), 1977–1998. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1655679
  • Hodson, D. (2014). Learning science, learning about science, doing science: Different goals demand different learning methods. International Journal of Science Education, 36(15), 2534–2553. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.899722
  • Holt, C. L., & Kysilka, M. (2006). Instructional patterns: Strategies for maximizing student learning. Sage Publications.
  • Jacobs, C. L., Martin, S. N., & Otieno, T. C. (2008). A science lesson plan analysis instrument for formative and summative program evaluation of a teacher education program. Science Education, 92(6), 1096–1126. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20277
  • King, D. T. (2007). Teacher beliefs and constraints in implementing a context based approach in chemistry. Teaching Science: The Journal of the Australian Science Teachers Association, 53(1), 14–18.
  • King, D. T. (2012). New perspectives on context-based teaching: Using a dialectical sociocultural approach to view teaching and learning. Studies in Science Education, 48(1), 51–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2012.655037
  • King, D. T., & Ritchie, S. M. (2013). Academic success in context-based chemistry: Demonstrating fluid transitions between concepts and context. International Journal of Science Education, 35(7), 1159–1182. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.774508
  • Klassen, S. (2006). A theoretical framework for contextual science teaching. Interchange, 37(1-2), 31–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-006-8399-8
  • Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A review or the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331–359. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290404
  • Mitman, A. L., Mergendoller, J. R., Marchman, V. A., & Packer, M. J. (1987). Instruction addressing the components of scientific literacy and its relation to student outcomes. American Educational Research Journal, 24(4), 611–633. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312024004611
  • OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2016). PISA 2015 results (Volume I): Excellence and equity in education. OECD Publishing.
  • Overman, M., Vermunt, J. D., Meijer, P. C., Bulte, A. M., & Brekelmans, M. (2014). Students’ perceptions of teaching in context-based and traditional chemistry classrooms: Comparing content, learning activities, and interpersonal perspectives. International Journal of Science Education, 36(11), 1871–1901. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.880004
  • Pedretti, E., & Nazir, J. (2011). Currents in STSE education: Mapping a complex field, 40 years on. Science Education, 95(4), 601–626. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20435
  • Pilot, A., & Bulte, A. M. (2006). The use of “context” as a challenge for the chemistry curriculum: Its successes and the need for further development and understanding. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 1087–1112. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600730737
  • Roberts, D. A. (1982). Developing the concept of ‘curriculum emphases’ in science education. Science Education, 66(2), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730660209
  • Roberts, D. B., & Bybee, W. R. (2014). Scientific literacy, science literacy, and science education. In N. G. Lederman, & S. K. Abel (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 545–558). Routledge.
  • Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientifc decision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 112–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20042
  • Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(17), 137–146.
  • Stuckey, M., Hofstein, A., Mamlok-Naaman, R., & Eilks, I. (2013). The meaning of ‘relevance’in science education and its implications for the science curriculum. Studies in Science Education, 49(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.802463
  • Tarkin, A., & Uzuntiryaki-Kondakci, E. (2017). Implementation of case-based instruction on electrochemistry at the 11th grade level. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(4), 659–681. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RP00062F
  • Tolvanen, S., Jansson, J., Vesterinen, V. M., & Aksela, M. (2014). How to use historical approach to teach nature of science in chemistry education? Science & Education, 23(8), 1605–1636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-013-9646-x
  • van Driel, J. H., Bulte, A. M., & Verloop, N. (2005). The conceptions of chemistry teachers about teaching and learning in the context of a curriculum innovation. International Journal of Science Education, 27(3), 303–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690412331314487
  • van Driel, J. H., Bulte, A. M., & Verloop, N. (2008). Using the curriculum emphasis concept to investigate teachers’ curricular beliefs in the context of educational reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(1), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270601078259
  • van Manen, M. (1999). The language of pedagogy and the primacy of student experience. In J. Loughran (Ed.), Researching teaching: Methodologies and practices for understanding pedagogy (pp. 13–27). Falmer Press.
  • Vogelzang, J., & Admiraal, W. F. (2017). Classroom action research on formative assessment in a context-based course. Educational Action Research, 25(1), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2016.1177564
  • Vong, S. K. (2014). An archeological and genealogical study of Macao teacher education policy. Journal of South China Normal University, 14(6), 50–55. (in Chinese).
  • Vos, M. A. J., Taconis, R., Jochems, W. M., & Pilot, A. (2011). Classroom implementation of context-based chemistry education by teachers: The relation between experiences of teachers and the design of materials. International Journal of Science Education, 33(10), 1407–1432. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.511659
  • Vos, M. A. J., Taconis, R., Jochems, W. M. G., & Pilot, A. (2010). Teachers implementing context-based teaching materials: A framework for case-analysis in chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 11(3), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1039/C005468M
  • Wei, B. (2016). School science teaching and learning in Macao: Problems and challenges. In M.-H. Chiu (Ed.), Science education research and practice in Asia - challenges and opportunities (pp. 55–70). Springer.
  • Wei, B. (2019). Science teacher education in Macao: A critical review. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 5(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-019-0036-9
  • Wei, B. (2020). The change of the intended senior high school chemistry curriculum in China: Focus on intellectual demands. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RP00115H
  • Wei, B., & Thomas, G. P. (2005a). Rationale and approaches for embedding scientific literacy into the new junior secondary school chemistry curriculum in the People’s Republic of China. International Journal of Science Education, 27(12), 1477–1493. (SSCI). https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500154129
  • Wei, B., & Thomas, G. P. (2005b). Explanations for the transition of the junior secondary school chemistry curriculum in the People’s Republic of China during the period from 1978 to 2001. Science Education, 89(3), 451–469. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20051
  • Wei, B., & Thomas, G. P. (2006). An examination of the change of the junior secondary school chemistry curriculum in the People’ Republic of China: In the view of scientific literacy. Research in Science Education, 36(4), 403–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9012-y
  • Wieringa, N., Janssen, F. J. J. M., & Van Driel, J. H. (2011). Biology teachers designing context-based lessons for their classroom practice - The importance of rules-of-thumb. International Journal of Science Education, 33(17), 2437–2462. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.553969

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.