Moving talk forward: novice science teachers approximate the practice of leading science discourse

References

• Achieve. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, R. (2008). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk (4th ed.). Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Ambitious Science Teaching. (2015). A discourse primer for science teachers. [PDF document] http://ambitiousscienceteaching.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Discourse-Primer.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of bloom’s taxonomy of Educational objectives (complete edition). Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Biggers, M., Forbes, C. T., & Zangori, L. (2013). Elementary teacher’s curriculum design and pedagogical reasoning for supporting students’ comparison and evaluation of evidence-based explanations. The Elementary School Journal, 114(1), 48–72. https://doi.org/10.1086/670738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. S. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Candela, A. (2005). Students’ participation as co-authoring of school institutional practices. Culture Psychology, 11(3), 321. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X05055523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cazden, B. C. (1988). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Chapin, S. H., O’Connor, C., & Anderson, N. C. (2003). Classroom discussions: Using math talk to help students learn. Math Solutions Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Chapin, S. H., O'Connor, C., & Anderson, N. C. (2009). Classroom discussions: Using math talk to help students learn, grades K-6 (2nd ed). Math Solutions Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, C. (2006). Classroom interaction in science: Teacher questioning and feedback to students’ responses. International Journal of Science Education, 28(11), 1315–1346. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600621100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, C. (2007). Teacher questioning in science classrooms: Approaches that stimulate productive thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 815. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christodoulou, A., & Osborne, J. (2014). The science classroom as a site of epistemic talk: A case study of a teacher’s attempts to teach science based on argument. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(10), 1275–1300. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clift, R. T., & Brady, P. (2005). Research on methods courses and field experiences. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. M. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education (pp. 309–424). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D. (1995). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational research, 64: 1-35. Constructivism and beyond. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 3–25). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Cornelius, L. L., & Herrenkohl, L. R. (2004). Power in the classroom: How the classroom environment shapes students’ relationships with each other and with concepts. Cognition and Instruction, 22(4), 467–498. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690Xci2204_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correnti, R., Stein, M. K., Smith, M., Scherrer, J., McKeown, M., Greeno, J., & Ashley, A. (2015). Improving teaching at scale: Design for the scientific measurement and learning of discourse practice. In Book: Socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue (pp. 303–321). American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Duit, R., & Treagust, D. (1998). Learning in science: From behaviourism towards social constructivism and beyond. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 3–25). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Duschl, R. (2008). Quality argumentation and epistemic criteria. In S. Erduran & M. P. Jiménez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research (pp. 159–175). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Shouse, A. W. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom. Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Engle, R. (2006). Framing interactions to foster generative learning: A situative explanation of transfer in a community of learners classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(4), 451–498. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1504_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdogan, I., & Campbell, T. (2008). Teacher questioning and interaction patterns in classrooms facilitated with differing levels of constructivist teaching practices. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1891–1914. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701587028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, M. (2008a). Disciplinary authority and accountability in scientific practice and learning. Science Education, 92(3), 404–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, M. (2008b). “Grasp of practice” as a reasoning resource for inquiry and nature of science understanding. Science & Education, 17(2), 147–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-006-9045-7
   Google Scholar
• Ford, M., & Wargo, B. (2011). Dialogic framing of scientific content for conceptual and epistemic understanding. Science Education, 96(3), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghousseini, G., & Herbst, P. (2016). Pedagogies of practice and opportunities to learn about classroom mathematics discussions. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19(1), 79–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-014-9296-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimes, P., McDonald, S., & van Kampen, P. (2019). “We’re getting somewhere”. development and implementation of a framework for the analysis of productive science discourse. Science Education, 103(1), 5–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., & Williamson, P. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record, 111(9), 2055–2100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, C., Phillips, R., & Penuel, W. (2012). Examining teachers’ instructional moves aimed at developing students’ ideas and questions in learner-centered science classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(7), 769–788. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-011-9237-0
   Google Scholar
• Keeley, P., Eberle, F., & Farrin, L. (2005). Uncovering student ideas in science: 25 formative assessment probes. National Science Teachers Association Press. Vol 1.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. J. (2008). Inquiry, action and epistemic practice. In R. A. Duschl & R. E. Grandy (Eds.), Teaching scientific inquiry: Recommendations for research and implementation (pp. 99–107). Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. J., McDonald, S., & Wickman, P.-O. (2012). Science learning and epistemology. In B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (vol. 1, pp. 281–291). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kier, M., & Lee, T. (2017). Exploring the role of identity in elementary preservice teachers who plan to specialize in science. Teaching and Teacher Education, 61(1), 199–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knorr-Cetina, K. D. (1981). The manufacture of knowledge: An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kovalainen, M., & Kumpulainen, K. (2005). The discursive practice of participation in an elementary classroom community. Instructional Science, 33(3), 213–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-005-2810-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampert, M. (2010). Learning teaching in, from and for practice: What do we mean? Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109347321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Learning in doing: Social, cognitive, and computational perspectives. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lehesvuori, S., Viiri, J., & Rasku-Puttonen, H. (2011). Introducing dialogic teaching to science student teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(8), 705–727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-011-9253-0
   Google Scholar
• Leinhardt, G., & Steele, M. (2005). Seeing the complexity to standing to the side: Instructional dialogues. Cognition and Instruction, 23(1), 87–163. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2301_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Longino, E. H. (2002). The fate of knowledge. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyle, S. (2008). Dialogic teaching: Discussing theoretical contexts and reviewing evidence from classroom practice. Language and Education, 22(3), 222–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780802152499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, M. (1993). Scientific practice and ordinary action: Ethnomethodology and social studies of science. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. (2008). Talk and the development of reasoning and understanding. Human Development, 51(1), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1159/00013158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. (2010). The analysis of classroom talk: Methods and methodologies. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709909X479853
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaels, S., & O’Connor, C. (2015). Conceptualizing talk moves as tools: Professional development approaches for academically productive discussion. In Socializing intelligence through talk and dialogue (pp. 347–361). American Educational Research Association. https://doi.org/10.3102/978-0-935302-43-1_27
   Google Scholar
• Minstrell, M., & Kraus, P. (2005). Guided inquiry in science classrooms. In M. S. Donovan & J. Bransford (Eds.), How students learn science in the classroom (pp. 475–514). National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moje, E., Collazo, T., Carillo, R., & Marx, R. (2001). Maestro what is ‘quality?': Language, literacy, and discourse in project-based science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(4), 469–498. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molinari, L., & Mameli, C. (2010). Classroom dialogic discourse: An observational study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 3857–3860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.604
   Google Scholar
• Mortimer, E. F. (1998). Multivoicedness and univocality in classroom discourse: An example from theory of matter. International Journal of Science Education, 20(1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980200105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, D., Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1989). The construction zone: Working for cognitive change in school. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parrish, S. (2010). Number talks: Helping children build mental math and computation strategies, grades K-5. Math Solutions.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, H., Lee, O., & Valdés, G. (2012). Language demands and opportunities in relation to Next Generation Science Standards for English language learners: What teachers need to know. Commissioned Papers on Language and Literacy Issues in the Common Core State Standards and Next Generation Science Standards, 94(2012), 32–32.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W. M. (2008). The nature of scientific conceptions: A discursive psychological perspective. Educational Research Review, 3(1), 30–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2007.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, W. M., & Lucas, K. B. (1997). From “truth” to “invented reality": A discourse analysis of high school physics students’ talk about scientific knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(2), 145–179. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199702)34:2<145::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, M. B. (1986). Wait time: Slowing down may be a way of speeding up!. Journal of Teacher Education, 37(1), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248718603700110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roychoudhury, A., & Rice, D. (2010). Discourse of making sense of data: Implications for elementary science teachers’ education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21(2), 181–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-009-9165-4
   Google Scholar
• Russman, U., & Lane, A. B. (2016). Doing the talk: Discussion, dialogue, and discourse in action: Introduction. International Journal of Communication, 10, 4034–4039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W. A., & Morrison, K. (2003). High school students’ ideas about theories and theory change after a biological inquiry unit. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(4), 369–392. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, P. (1998). Teacher talk and meaning making in science classrooms: A vygotskian analysis and review. Studies in Science Education, 32(1), 45–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057269808560127
   Google Scholar
• Scott, P. H., Mortimer, E. F., & Aquiar, O. G. (2006). The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse: A fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons. Science Education, 90(4), 605–631. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sfard, A., & McClain, K. (2002). Analyzing tools: Perspectives on the role of designed artifacts in mathematics learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(2 & 3), 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS11,2-3n_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, M. A., & Blume, G. W. (1996). Justification in the mathematics classroom: A study of elementary prospective teachers. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(96)90036-X
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, M. K., Engle, R., Smith, M., & Hughes, E. (2015). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussion: Helping teachers learn to better incorporate student thinking. In Socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue (pp. 1–14). American Educational Research Association. https://doi.org/10.3102/978-0-935302-43-1_29
   Google Scholar
• Stein, M. K., & Matsumura, L. C. (2009). Measuring instruction for teacher learning. In D. H. Gitomer (Ed.), Measurement issues and assessment for teaching quality (pp. 179–206). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tobin, K., Briscoe, C., & Holman, J. (1990). Overcoming constraints to effective elementary science teaching. Science Education, 74(4), 409–420. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730740402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobin, K., & Tippins, D. (1993). Constructivism as a referent for teaching and learning. In K. Tobin & D. Tippins (Eds.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 3–22). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Tsui, A. B. M., Marton, F., Mok, I. A. C., & Ng, D. F. P. (2004). Questions and the space of learning. In F. Marton & A. B. M. Tsui (Eds.), Classroom discourse and the space of learning (pp. 113–137). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A. (1996). Discourse, power and access. In C. R. Caldas-Coulthard & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis (pp. 84–104). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A. (2003). Discourse, knowledge and ideology: Reformulating Old questions and proposing some New Solutions (Rep.). The Washington Post Company.
   Google Scholar
• Van Ed, E. A., & Conroy, J. (2009). Using the performance assessment for california teachers to examine pre-service teachers’ conceptions of teaching mathematics for understanding. Issues in Teacher Education, 18(1), 83–100.
   Google Scholar
• van Eijck, M., & Roth, W.-M. (2011). Cultural diversity in science education through novelization: Against the epicization of science and cultural centralization. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(7), 824–847. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Zee, E. H., Hammer, D., Bell, M., Roy, P., & Peter, J. (2005). Learning and teaching science as inquiry: A case study of elementary school teachers’ investigations of light. Science Education, 89(6), 1007–1042. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Zee, E. H., Iwasyk, M., Kurose, A., Simpson, D., & Wild, J. (2001). Student and teacher questioning during conversations about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 159–190. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200102)38:2<159::AID-TEA1002>3.0.CO;2-J
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G. (1993). Reevaluating the IRF sequence: A proposal for the articulation of theories of activity and discourse for the analysis of teaching and learning in the classroom. Linguistics and Education, 5(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-5898(05)80001-4
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zangori, L., & Forbes, C. T. (2013). Preservice elementary teachers and explanation construction: Knowledge-for-practice and knowledge-in-practice. Science Education, 97(2), 310–330. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar