References
- Anderhag, P., Hamza, K. M., & Wickman, P.-O. (2015). What can a teacher do to support students’ interest in science? A study of the constitution of taste in a science classroom. Research in Science Education, 45(5), 749–784. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9448-4
- Aspelund, K. (2006). The design process. Fairchild.
- Ball, P. (2019). Artist of deep time. Nature, 568(7752), 457–458. doi:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01240-4
- Berland, L. K., & Reiser, B. J. (2011). Classroom communities’ adaptations of the practice of scientific argumentation. Science Education, 95(2), 191–216. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20420
- Braund, M. & Reiss, M.J. (2019). The ‘great divide’: How the arts contribute to science and science education. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education. 19(3), 219–236. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-019-00057-7
- Chandrasekhar, S. (1987). Truth and beauty: Aesthetics and motivations in science. Univ. of Chicago Press.
- Chappell, M. J., & Varelas, M. (2020). Ethnodance and identity: Black students representing science identities in the making. Science Education, 104(2), 193–221. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21558
- Dowell, W. (2006). Throwing the sociological imagination into the garbage: Using students waste disposal habits to illustrate C. Wright mills’s concept. Teaching Sociology, 34(2), 150–155. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X0603400205
- Green, J. L., & Wallat, C. (1981). Ethnography and language in educational settings. Ablex.
- Handspring Puppet Company. (n.d). http://www.handspringpuppet.co.za/our-work/handspring-productions/war-horse-2/
- Hannigan, S. (2018). A theoretical and practice-informed reflection on the value of failure in art. Thinking Skills and Creativity 30, 171-179. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187117301694 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.02.012
- Kondrup Hardahl, L., Wickman, P.-O. & Caiman, C. (2019). The body and the production of phenomena in the science laboratory: Taking charge of a tacit science content. Science & Education, 28(8), 865–895. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00063-z
- Jones, C., & Galison, P. (1998). Introduction. In C. Jones, & P. Galison (Eds.), Picturing science, producing art (pp. 1–23). Routledge.
- Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. K. (2002). Modelling, teachers’ views on the nature of modelling, and implications for the education of modellers. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 369–387. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110110142
- Kemp, M. (2000). Visualizations, The nature book of art and science. Oxford University Press.
- Kress, G. (2000). Design and transformation: New theories of meaning. In B. Cope, & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 153–161). Routledge.
- Lemke, J. (2015). Feeling and meaning: A unitary bio-semiotic account. In P. P. Trifonas (Ed.), International handbook of semiotics (pp. 589–616). Springer.
- Manz, E., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2020). Rethinking the classroom science investigation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(7), 1148–1174. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21625
- Melbourne Zoos. (n.d.). Fighting extinction: Priority native threatened species. https://www.zoo.org.au/fighting-extinction/priority-native- threatened-species
- Prain, V. (2020). Researching students’ aesthetic responses in science inquiry. In P. White, R. Tytler, J. C. Clark, & J. Ferguson (Eds.), Methodological approaches to STEM education research (pp. 21–33). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
- Rector, T., Arcand, K., & Watzke, M. (2015). Coloring the universe: An insiders look at making spectacular images of space. University of Alaska Press.
- Root-Bernstein, R. S. (1989). Discovering. Harvard University Press.
- Tytler, R., Prain, V., & Hannigan, S. (2020). Expanding the languages of science and how they are learnt. Research in Science Education, 50(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09952-8
- Waldrip, B., & Prain, V. (2013). Teachers’ initial response to a representational focus. In R. Tytler, P. Hubber, & B. Waldrip (Eds.), Constructing representations to learn science (pp. 15–30). Sense.
- Wickman, P.-O. (2006). Aesthetic experience in science education: Learning and meaning-making as situated talk and action. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Wickman, P.-O., & Östman, L. (2002). Learning as discourse change: A sociocultural mechanism. Science Education, 86(5), 601–623. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10036