783
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Why do some students opt out of fieldwork? Using expectancy-value theory to explore the hidden voices of non-participants

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1576-1599 | Received 03 Dec 2019, Accepted 25 Apr 2021, Published online: 08 May 2021

References

  • Anđelković, S., Dedjanski, V., & Pejic, B. (2017). Pedagogical benefits of fieldwork of the students at the Faculty of Geography in the light of the Bologna process. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 42(1), 110–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2017.1379058
  • Boyle, A., Maguire, S., Martin, A., Milsom, C., Nash, R., Rawlinson, S., Turner, A., Wurthmann, S., & Conchie, S. (2007). Fieldwork is good: The student perception and the affective domain. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 31(2), 299–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260601063628
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  • Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309
  • Davies, C. (2008). Resource 4 – Learning and Teaching in Labs. The Higher Education Academy Engineering Subject Centre.
  • DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). SAGE.
  • Dillon, J., Rickinson, M., Teamey, K., Morris, M., Choi, M. Y., Sanders, D., & Benefield, P. (2006). The value of outdoor learning: Evidence from research in the UK and elsewhere. School Science Review, 87(320), 107–111.
  • Dunphy, A., & Spellman, G. (2009). Geography fieldwork, fieldwork value and learning styles. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 18(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382040802591522
  • Durik, A. M., Vida, M., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Task values and ability beliefs as predictors of high school literacy choices: A developmental analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(2), 382–393. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.2.382
  • Dykas, M. J., & Valentino, D. W. (2016). Predicting performance in an advanced undergraduate field camp experience. Journal of Geoscience Education, 64(4), 314–322. https://doi.org/10.5408/15-128.1
  • Easton, E., & Gilburn, A. (2012). The field course effect: Gains in cognitive learning in undergraduate biology students following a field course. Journal of Biological Education, 46(1), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2011.568063
  • Eccles, J. S. (2005). Subjective task value and the Eccles et al. Model of achievement-related choices. In A. J. Elliot, & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 105–121). The Guildford Press.
  • Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
  • Flake, J. K., Barron, K. E., Hulleman, C., McCoach, B. D., & Welsh, M. E. (2015). Measuring cost: The forgotten component of expectancy-value theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 232–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.03.002
  • Fleischner, T. L., Espinoza, R. E., Gerrish, G. A., Greene, H. W., Kimmerer, R. W., Lacey, E. A., Pace, S., Parrish, J. K., Swain, H. M., Trombulak, S. C., Weisberg, S., Winkler, D. W., & Zander, L. (2017). Teaching biology in the field: Importance, challenges, and solutions. BioScience, 67(6), 558–567. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix036
  • France, D., & Haigh, M. (2018). Fieldwork@40: Fieldwork in geography higher education. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 42(4), 498–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2018.1515187
  • Furnell, J., & Scott, G. (2015). Are we all on the same page? Teacher, graduate and student perceptions of the importance of skills thought to enhance employability. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education (8), 1–10.
  • Gaspard, H., Dicke, A. L., Flunger, B., Brisson, B. M., Hafner, I., Nagengast, B., & Trautwein, U. (2015). Fostering adolescents’ value beliefs for mathematics with a relevance intervention in the classroom. Developmental Psychology, 51(9), 1226–1240. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000028
  • George-Williams, S. R., Ziebell, A. L., Kitson, R. R. A., Coppo, P., Thompson, C. D., & Overton, T. L. (2018). ‘What do you think the aims of doing a practical chemistry course are?’ A comparison of the views of students and teaching staff across three universities. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(2), 463–473. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7rp00177k
  • Goulder, R., Scott, G. W., & Scott, L. J. (2012). Students’ perception of biology fieldwork: The example of students undertaking a preliminary year at a UK university. International Journal of Science Education, 35(8), 1385–1406. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.708796
  • Guo, J., Parker, P. D., Marsh, H. W., & Morin, A. J. (2015). Achievement, motivation, and educational choices: A longitudinal study of expectancy and value using a multiplicative perspective. Developmental Psychology, 51(8), 1163–1176. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039440
  • Healey, M., & Jenkins, A. (2000). Kolb’s experiential learning theory and Its Application in Geography in Higher education. Journal of Geography, 99(5), 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221340008978967
  • Hill, J., & Woodland, W. (2002). An Evaluation of foreign fieldwork in promoting deep learning: A preliminary investigation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(6), 539–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293022000020309
  • Hodson, D. (2005). Teaching and learning Chemistry in the laboratory: A critical look at the research. Educación Química, 16(1), 30–38. https://doi.org/10.22201/fq.18708404e.2005.1.66134
  • Jiang, Y., Rosenzweig, E. Q., & Gaspard, H. (2018). An expectancy-value-cost approach in predicting adolescent students’ academic motivation and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 54, 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.06.005
  • Kent, M., Gilbertson, D. D., & Hunt, C. O. (1997). Fieldwork in geography teaching: A critical review of the literature and approaches. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 21(3), 313–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098269708725439
  • Kuzon, W., Urbanchek, M., & McCabe, S. (1996). The seven deadly sins of statistical analysis. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 37(3), 265–272. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-199609000-00006
  • Lambert, D., & Reiss, M. (2014). The place of fieldwork in geography and science qualifications. Institute of Education, University of London.
  • Larsen, C., Walsh, C., Almond, N., & Myers, C. (2017). The “real value” of field trips in the early weeks of higher education: The student perspective. Educational Studies, 43(1), 110–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2016.1245604
  • Li, C.-H. (2016). The performance of ML, DWLS, and ULS estimation with robust corrections in structural equation models with ordinal variables. Psychological Methods, 21(3), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000093
  • LWEC. (2012). Most wanted II: Postgraduate and professional skills needs in the environmental sector. Living With Environmental Change and Natural Environment Research Council.
  • Maguire, S. (1998). Gender Differences in attitudes to undergraduate fieldwork. Area, 30(3), 207–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.1998.tb00065.x
  • Mauchline, A. L., Peacock, J., & Park, J. R. (2013). The future of bioscience fieldwork in UK Higher Education. Bioscience Education, 21(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.11120/beej.2013.00014
  • Maw, S. J., Mauchline, A. L., & Park, J. R. (2011). Biological fieldwork provision in Higher education. Bioscience Education, 17(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3108/beej.17.1
  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
  • Morgan, D. L. (2014). Integrating qualitative and quantitative methods: A pragmatic approach. SAGE Publications. https://methods.sagepub.com/book/integrating-qualitative-and-quantitative-methods-a-pragmatic-approach
  • Musu-Gillette, L. E., Wigfield, A., Harring, J. R., & Eccles, J. S. (2015). Trajectories of change in students’ self-concepts of ability and values in math and college major choice. Educational Research and Evaluation, 21(4), 343–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2015.1057161
  • Nagengast, B., Trautwein, U., Kelava, A., & Ludtke, O. (2013). Synergistic effects of expectancy and value on homework engagement: The case for a within-person perspective. Multivariate Behavioural Research, 48(3), 428–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2013.775060
  • Nairn, K., Higgitt, D., & Vanneste, D. (2000). International perspectives on fieldcourses. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 24(2), 246–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/713677382
  • Norman, G. (2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(5), 625–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y
  • Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
  • Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. SAGE PUBLICATIONS.
  • Peacock, J., & Bacon, K. L. (2018). Enhancing student employability through urban ecology fieldwork. Higher Education Pedagogies, 3(1), 440–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2018.1462097
  • Peacock, J., Mewis, R., & Rooney, D. (2018). The use of campus based field teaching to provide an authentic experience to all students. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 42(4), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2018.1460805
  • Peasland, E. L., Henri, D. C., Morrell, L. J., & Scott, G. W. (2019). The influence of fieldwork design on student perceptions of skills development during field courses. International Journal of Science Education, 41(17), 2369–2388. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1679906
  • Perez, T., Dai, T., Kaplan, A., Cromley, J. G., Brooks, W. D., White, A. C., Mara, K. R., & Balsai, M. J. (2019). Interrelations among expectancies, task values, and perceived costs in undergraduate biology achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 72, 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.04.001
  • QAA. (2018). UK quality code for higher education advice and guidance: Learning and teaching. QAA. https://www.qaa.ac.uk/docs/qaa/quality-code/qc-a-g-learning-and-teaching.pdf?sfvrsn=1f2ac181_6
  • QAA. (2019a). Subject benchmark statement: Biosciences. The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education.
  • QAA. (2019b). Subject benchmark statement: Earth sciences, environmental sciences and environmental studies. The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education.
  • QAA. (2019c). Subject benchmark statement: Geography. The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education.
  • QSR. (2015). NVivo qualitative data analysis Software (Version 11). QSR International Pty Ltd.
  • R Core Team. (2018). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
  • Reid, N., & Shah, I. (2007). The role of laboratory work in university chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(2), 172–185. https://doi.org/10.1039/B5RP90026C
  • Revelle, W. (2017). psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research. Northwestern University. https://cran.r-project.org/package=psych
  • Rosenzweig, E. Q., Wigfield, A., & Hulleman, C. S. (2020). More useful or not so bad? Examining the effects of utility value and cost reduction interventions in college physics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(1), 166–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000370
  • Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://www.jstatsoft.org/article/view/v048i02 https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
  • Scott, G. W., Goulder, R., Wheeler, P., Scott, L. J., Tobin, M. L., & Marsham, S. (2012). The value of fieldwork in life and environmental sciences in the context of Higher Education: A case study in learning about biodiversity. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-010-9276-x
  • Scott, G. W., Humphries, S., & Henri, D. C. (2019). Expectation, motivation, engagement and ownership: Using student reflections in the conative and affective domains to enhance residential field courses. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 43(3), 280–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2019.1608516
  • Stokes, A., & Boyle, A. P. (2009). The undergraduate geoscience fieldwork experience: Influencing factors and implications for learning. Geological Society of America Special Papers, 461, 291–311.
  • Stokes, A., Magnier, K., & Weaver, R. (2011). What is the use of fieldwork? Conceptions of students and staff in geography and geology. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 35(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2010.487203
  • Sutcliffe, J., & O’Reilly, C. (2010). Ecological skills: Mind the gap(s). Kew Bulletin, 65(4), 529–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12225-011-9243-6
  • Symes, W., & Putwain, D. W. (2016). The role of attainment value, academic self-efficacy, and message frame in the appraisal of value-promoting messages. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(3), 446–460. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12117
  • Tavares, O. (2017). The role of students’ employability perceptions on Portuguese higher education choices. Journal of Education and Work, 30(1), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2015.1122180
  • Thomas, C. (2009). Employability of GEES graduates: The approach of the environment agency. Planet, 21(1), 21–24. https://doi.org/10.11120/plan.2009.00210021
  • Trautwein, U., Ludtke, O., Schnyder, I., & Niggli, A. (2006). Predicting homework effort. Support for a domain-specific, multilevel homework model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(2), 438–456. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.2.438
  • Tucker, F., & Horton, J. (2018). “The show must go on!” fieldwork, mental health and wellbeing in geography, Earth and environmental sciences. Area, 51(1), 84–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12437
  • van der Eijk, C., & Rose, J. (2015). Risky business: Factor analysis of survey data – Assessing the probability of incorrect dimensionalisation. PLOS ONE, 10(3), 1-31. Article e0118900. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118900
  • Wadgave, U., & Khairnar, M. R. (2016). Parametric tests for Likert scale: For and against. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 24, 67–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2016.08.016
  • Wakeham, W. (2016). Wakeham Review of STEM Degree Provision and Graduate Employability. Department for Business Innovation and Skills and Higher Education Funding Council for England. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/518582/ind-16-6-wakeham-review-stem-graduate-employability.pdf
  • Wall, G. P., & Speake, J. (2012). European geography higher education fieldwork and the skills agenda. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 36(3), 421–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2011.641110
  • Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
  • Wilson, H., Leydon, J., & Wincentak, J. (2016). Fieldwork in geography education: Defining or declining? The state of fieldwork in Canadian undergraduate geography programs. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 41(1), 94–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2016.1260098
  • Wu, F., & Fan, W. (2016). Academic procrastination in linking motivation and achievement-related behaviours: A perspective of expectancy-value theory. Educational Psychology, 37(6), 695–711. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2016.1202901

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.