Learning democratic participation? Meaning-making in discussion of socioscientific issues in science education

References

• Aikenhead, G. (2006). Science education for everyday life: Evidence-based practice. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bencze, L., & Carter, L. (2011). Globalizing students acting for the common good. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 648–669. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berland, L. K., & McNeill, K. L. (2010). A learning progression for scientific argumentation: Understanding student work and designing supportive instructional contexts. Science Education, 94(5), 765–793. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billig, M. (2001). Discursive, rhetorical and ideological messages. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. J. Yates (Eds.), Discourse theory and practice: A reader (pp. 210–221). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Billig, M., Condor, S., Edwards, D., Gane, M., Middleton, D., & Radley, A. (1988). Ideological dilemmas: A social psychology of everyday thinking. SAGE Publication Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Borg, C., Gericke, N., Höglund, H.-O., & Bergman, E. (2012). The barriers encounter by teachers implementing education for sustainable development: Discipline bound differences and teaching traditions. Research in Science & Technological Education, 30(2), 23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2012.699891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, J., Ideland, M., Malmberg, C., & Grace, M. (2014). Climate change and everyday life: Repertoires children use to negotiate a socio-scientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 36(9), 1491–1509. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.891159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christenson, N., Rundgren, S.-N., & Höglund, H.-O. (2012). Using the SEE-SEP model to analyze upper secondary students’ use of supporting reasons in arguing socioscientific issues. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(3), 342–352. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9328-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal of Theory for Social Behavior, 20(1), 43–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1990.tb00174.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edley, N. (2001). Analysing masculinity: Interpretative repertoires, ideological dilemmas and subject positions. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as data: A guide for analysis (pp. 109–228). The Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Feinstein, N. (2011). Salvaging science literacy. Science Education, 95(1), 168–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, A. (2002). Mutualism: A different agenda for environmental and science education. International Journal of Science Education, 24(11), 1201–1215. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690210136611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grace, M. (2009). Developing high quality decision-making discussions about biological conservation in a normal classroom setting. International Journal of Science Education, 31(4), 551–570. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701744595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haglund, J., & Hultén, M. (2017). Tension between visions of science education: The case of energy quality in Swedish secondary science curricula. Science and Education, 26(3-4), 323–344. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-017-9895-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasslöf, H. (2015). The educational challenge in ‘education for sustainable development’: Qualification, social change and the political. [Doctoral dissertation, Malmö university]. Malmö Universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 645–670. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ideland, M., & Malmberg, C. (2012). Body talk: Students’ identity construction while discussing a socioscientific issue. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7(2), 279–305. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9381-7
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, B. B., & Schnack, K. (1997). The action competence approach in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 3(2), 163–178. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1350462970030205
   Google Scholar
• Jickling, B., & Wals, A. E. J. (2008). Globalization and environmental education: Looking beyond sustainable development. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270701684667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidman, G., & Fensham, P. (2020). Intended, achieved and unachieved values of science education: A historical review. In D. Corrigan, C. Buntting, A. Fitzgerald, & A. Jones (Eds.), Values in science education: The shifting sands (pp. 173–190). Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Kolstø, S. D. (2001a). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education, 85(3), 291–310. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolstø, S. D. (2001b). ‘To trust or not to trust – pupils’ ways of judging information encountered in a socio-scientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 23(9), 877–901. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690010016102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, R. (2010). Science education and democratic participation: An uneasy congruence? Studies in Science Education, 46(1), 69–119. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260903562433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindahl, M., & Lundin, M. (2016). How do 15-16 year old students use scientific knowledge to justify their reasoning about human sexuality and relationships? Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 121–130. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundegård, I., & Caiman, C. (2019). Didaktik för naturvetenskap och hållbar utveckling: Fem former av demokratiskt deltagande [Education for science and sustainable development: Four forms of democratic participation]. NorDiNa, 15(1), 38–53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5617/nordina.4822
   Google Scholar
• Lundegård, I., & Wickman, P.-O. (2007). Conflicts of interest: An indispensable element of education for sustainable development. Environmental Education Research, 13(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620601122566
   Google Scholar
• Lundström, M., Ekborg, M., & Ideland, M. (2012). To vaccinate or not to vaccinate: How teenagers justified their decision. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7(1), 193–221. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9384-4
   Google Scholar
• Mogensen, F. (1997). Critical thinking: A central element in developing action competence in health and environmental education. Health Education Research Theory & Practice, 12(4), 429–436. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/her/12.4.429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mogensen, F., & Schnack, K. (2010). The action competence approach and the “new” discourses of education for sustainable development: Competence and quality criteria. Environmental Education Research, 16(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620903504032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. A. (2012a). Co-opting science: A preliminary study of how students invoke science in value-laden discussions. International Journal of Science Education, 34(2), 275–299. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.572305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. A. (2012b). Science in discussions: An analysis of the use of science content in socioscientific discussions. Science Education, 96(3), 428–456. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. A. (2013). Delusions about evidence: On why scientific evidence should not be the main concern in socioscientific decision making. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 13(4), 373–385. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2013.845323
   Google Scholar
• Öhman, J. (2006). Pluralism and criticism in environmental education and education for sustainable development: A practical understanding. Environmental Education Research, 12(2), 149–163. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620600688856
   Google Scholar
• Öhman, J., & Öhman, M. (2012). Participatory approach in practice: An analysis of student discussions about climate change. Environmental Education Research, 19(3), 324–341. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2012.695012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öhman, M., & Öhman, J. (2012). Harmoni eller konflikt?: En fallstudie av meningsinnehållet i utbildning för hållbar utveckling [Harmony or conflict?: A case study of the conceptual meaning of education for sustainable development]. NorDiNa, 8(1), 59–72.
   Google Scholar
• Orlander Arvola, A., & & Lundegård, I. (2012). ‘It’s her body’: When students’ argumentation shows displacement of content in a science classroom. Research in Science Education, 42(6), 1121–1145. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9237-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections. A report to the nuffield foundation. King’s College London.
   Google Scholar
• Östman, L. (1995). Socialisation och mening: No-utbildning som politiskt och miljömoraliskt problem [Socialization and meaning: Science education as a political and environmental moral problem]. [Doctoral dissertation, Uppsala university]. Uppsala Universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Östman, L., & Almqvist, J. (2011). What do values and norms have to do with scientific literacy. In C. Linder, L. Östman, D. A. Roberts, P.-O. Wickman, G. Erickson, & A. MacKinnon (Eds.), Exploring the landscape of scientific literacy (pp. 160–175). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ottander, K. (2015).Gymnasieelevers diskussioner utifrån hållbar utveckling [Upper secondary school students’ discussions arising from sustainability issues].[Doctoral dissertation, Umeå university]. Umeå universitet, Umeå.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behavior. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe, M., & Grace, M. (2003). Science education for citizenship: Teaching socio-scientific issues. Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, J., & Wetherell, M. (2003). The discursive climate of singleness: The consequences for women's negotiation of a single identity. Feminism & Psychology, 13(4), 489–510. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/09593535030134014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, A. D. (2007). Scientific literacy/science literacy. In S. K. Abell, & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 729–780). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, D. A., & Bybee, R. W. (2014). Scientific literacy, science literacy, and science education. In N. G. Lederman, & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. 2 (pp. 545–558). Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M., & McGinn, M. (1997). Deinstitutionalising school science: Implications of a strong view of situated cognition. Research in Science Education, 27(4), 497–513. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461477
   Google Scholar
• Rudsberg, K., & Öhman, J. (2010). Pluralism in practice – experiences from Swedish evaluation, school development and research. Environmental Education Research, 16(1), 95–111. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620903504073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudsberg, K., & Öhman, J. (2015). The role of knowledge in participatory and pluralistic approaches to ESE. Environmental Education Research, 21(7), 955–974. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2014.971717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudsberg, K., Öhman, J., & Östman, L. (2013). Analyzing students’ learning in classroom discussions about socioscientific issues. Science Education, 97(4), 594–620. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513–536. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D. (2009). Situated learning in science education: Socio-scientific issues as contexts for practice. Studies in Science Education, 45(1), 1–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260802681839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D. (2011). Situating socio-scientific issues in classrooms as a means of achieving goals of science education. In T. D. Sadler (Ed.), Socio-scientific issues in the classroom: Teaching, learning and research (pp. 1–11). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., Barab, S. A., & Scott, B. (2007). What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry? Research in Science Education, 37(4), 371–391. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9030-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 112–138. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, W. L. (2014). Debate on global warming as a socio-scientific issue: Science teaching towards political literacy. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 9(3), 663–674. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9596-x
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W., & Gough, S. (2003). Sustainable development and learning: Framing the issues. RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Simonneaux, L. (2014). From promoting the techno-sciences to activism: A variety of objectives involved in their teaching of SSIs. In L. Bencze, & S. Alsop (Eds.), Activist science and technology education (pp. 99–111). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Simonneaux, J., & Simonneaux, L. (2012). Educational configurations for teaching environmental socioscientific issues within the perspective of sustainability. Research in Science Education, 42(1), 75–94. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9257-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonneaux, L., & Simonneaux, J. (2009a). Socio-scientific reasoning influenced by identities. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 4(3), 705–711. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-008-9145-6
   Google Scholar
• Simonneaux, L., & Simonneaux, J. (2009b). Students’ socio-scientific reasoning on controversies from the viewpoint of education for sustainable development. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 4(3), 657–687. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-008-9141-x
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket. (2011). Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and the recreational centre 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Svanfeldt, K., & Svensson, M. (2000). Naturkunskap.: Kurs A, Medan jorden snurrar. Natur och kultur.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency for Education. (1998). Tema tillståndet i världen [State of the world]. Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency for Education. (2011). Kursplaner Naturkunskap [Syllabus science studies]. https://www.skolverket.se/undervisning/gymnasieskolan/laroplan-program-och-amnen-i-gymnasieskolan/gymnasieprogrammen/amne?url=1530314731%2Fsyllabuscw%2Fjsp%2Fsubject.htm%3FsubjectCode%3DNAK%26courseCode%3DNAKNAK01a1%26tos%3Dgy&sv.url=12.5dfee44715d35a5cdfa92a3#anchor_NAKNAK01a1
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, C.-C., & Liu, S.-Y. (2005). Developing a postdimensional instrument for assessing students’ epistemological views towards science. International Journal of Science Education, 27(13), 1621–1638. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500206432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Poeck, K., & Vandenabeele, J. (2012). Learning from sustainable development: Education in the light of public issues. Environmental Education Research, 18(4), 541–552. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2011.633162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M., & Potter, J. (1992). Mapping the language of racism; Discourse and the legitimation of exploitation. Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M., Taylor, S., & Yates, S. J. (2001). Introduction. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. J. Yates (Eds.), Discourse theory and practice, a reader (pp. 1–8). SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, S., & Potter, J. (2008). Discursive psychology. In C. Willig, & W. Stainton-Rogers (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology (pp. 73–90). SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Winther Jørgensen, M., & Phillips, L. (2000). Diskursanalys som teori och metod. Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L. (2014). Socioscientific issues as a curriculum emphases: Theory, research and practice. In N. G. Lederman, & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. II (pp. 697–726). Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L., Applebaum, S. M., & Sadler, T. D. (2011). Enacting a socioscientific issues classroom: Transformative transformations. In T. Sadler (Ed.), Socio-scientific issues in science classrooms: Teaching, learning and research (pp. 277–306). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L., Herman, B. C., & Sadler, T. D. (2019). New directions in socioscientific issues research. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research 1(11).
   Google Scholar
• Zeyer, A., & Roth, W.-M. (2009). A mirror of society: A discourse analytic study of 15- to 16-year-old Swiss students’ talk about environment and environmental protection. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 4(4), 961–998. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-009-9217-2
   Google Scholar
• Zeyer, A., & Roth, W.-M. (2013). Post-ecological discourse in the making. Public Understanding of Science, 22(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510394949
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar