References
- Adams, A. E., Randall, S., & Traustadottir, T. (2015). A tale of two sections: An experiment to compare the effectiveness of a hybrid versus a traditional lecture format in introductory microbiology. CBE – Life Sciences Education, 14(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-08-0118
- Alvarez, L. C. G. (2005). Seven principles of good teaching practice: Predictors of perceived learning and satisfaction with online courses. University of Nebraska. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/dissertations/AAI3186855/
- Amaral, K., & Shank, J. (2010, December 15). Enhancing student earning and retention with blended learning class guides. Educause Quarterly. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2010/12/enhancing-student-learning-and-retention-with-blended-learning-class-guides
- Angus, S. D., & Watson, J. (2009). Does regular online testing enhance student learning in the numerical sciences? Robust evidence from a large data set. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 255–272. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00916.x
- Aspden, L., & Helm, P. (2004). Making the connection in a blended learning environment. Educational Media International, 41(3), 245–252. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09523980410001680851
- Atherton, M., Shah, M., Vazquez, J., Griffiths, Z., Jackson, B., & Burgess, C. (2017). Using learning analytics to assess student engagement and academic outcomes in open access enabling programmes. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 32(2), 119–136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2017.1309646
- Au, T., Li, S., & Ma, G. (2003). Applying and evaluating models to predict customer attrition using data mining techniques. Journal of Comparative International Management, 6(1), 10–22. https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/JCIM/article/view/442
- Babb, S., Stewart, C., & Johnson, R. (2010). Constructing communication in blended learning environments: Students’ perceptions of good practice in hybrid courses – ProQuest. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(4), 735-753. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1497198759?pq-origsite=gscholar
- Babb, S., Stewart, C., & Johnson, R. (2014). Applying the seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education to blended learning environments. In L. Kyei-Blankson, & E. Ntulil (Eds.), Practical applications and experiences in K-20 blended learning environments (pp. 192–212). Information Science Reference. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-4912-5.ch013
- Bliuc, A.-M., Goodyear, P., & Ellis, R. A. (2007). Research focus and methodological choices in studies into students’ experiences of blended learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(4), 231–244. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IHEDUC.2007.08.001
- Chickering, A. W., & Ehrmann, S. C. (1996). Implementing the seven principles: Technology as a lever. American Association of Higher Education Bulletin, 49(2), 3–6.
- Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. American Association for Higher Education, 080(120), 3–7. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED282491.pdf
- Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1999). Development and adaptations of the seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1999(80), 75–81. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.8006
- Credé, M., Roch, S. G., & Kieszczynka, U. M. (2010). Class attendance in college: A meta-analytic review of the relationship of class attendance with grades and student characteristics. Review of Educational Research, 80(2), 272–295. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310362998
- Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69(9), 970–977. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1374249
- Dawson, S., Bakharia, A., Locker, L., & Heathcote, E. (2011). ‘Seeing’ networks: visualising and evaluating student learning networks. Australian Learning and Teaching Council (ALTC). https://ltr.edu.au/resources/CG9_994_Lockyer_Report_2011.pdf
- Dreon, O. (2013). Applying the seven principles for good practice to the online classroom. Faculty Focus. https://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/online-education/applying-the-seven-principles-for-good-practice-to-the-online-classroom/
- Drysdale, J. S., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. J., & Halverson, L. R. (2013). An analysis of research trends in dissertations and theses studying blended learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 17, 90–100. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IHEDUC.2012.11.003
- Durlak, J. A. (2009). How to select, calculate, and interpret effect sizes. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 34(9), 917–928. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsp004
- Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
- Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IHEDUC.2004.02.001
- Gelo, O., Braakmann, D., & Benetka, G. (2008). Quantitative and qualitative research: Beyond the debate. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 42(3), 266–290. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-008-9078-3
- Gikandi, J. W., Morrow, D., & Davis, N. E. (2011). Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2333–2351. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.004
- Gleadow, R., Macfarlan, B., & Honeydew, M. (2015). Design for learning - a case study of blended learning in a science unit. F1000Research, 4(1), 898. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.7032.2.
- Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definitions, current trends and future directions. In C. Bonk, & C. R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (1st ed., pp. 3–21). Pfeiffer Publishing. https://doi.org/10.2307/4022859
- Graham, C. R. (2013). Emerging practice and research in blended learning. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (3rd ed., pp. 333–350). Routledge. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258477665_Emerging_practice_and_research_in_blended_learning/link/02e7e5284f001da2c3000000/download
- Halverson, L. R., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. J., & Drysdale, J. S. (2012). An analysis of high impact scholarship and publication trends in blended learning. Distance Education, 33(3), 381–413. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2012.723166
- Jones, A., & Baker, A. (2005). Curriculum, learning and effective pedagogy in science education for New Zealand: Introduction to special issue. International Journal of Science Edcuation, 27(2), 131–143. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000276686
- Joy, E. H., & Garcia, F. E. (2000). Measuring learning effectiveness: A new look at no-significant-difference findings. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, 4(1), 33–39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v4i1.1909
- Karoglu, A.K, Kiraz, E., & Ozden, Y. (2014). Good practice principles in an undergraduate blended course design. Education and Science, 39(173), 249–263.
- Kooker, E. W. (1976). Changes in grade distributions associated with changes in class attendance policies. Psychology: A Journal of Human Behavior, 13, 56–57.
- Kritzinger, A., Lemmens, J.-C., & Potgieter, M. (2018a). Learning strategies for first-year biology: Towards moving the “murky middle”. CBE – Life Sciences Education, 17(3), ar43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-10-0211
- Kritzinger, A., Lemmens, J.-C., & Potgieter, M. (2018b). Improving the quality of learning in a blended learning environment for first-year biology. In J. Domenech, P. Merello, E. de la Poza, & D. Blazquez (Eds.), 4th international conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd’18) (pp. 159–166). Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València.
- Lasry, N., Mazur, E., & Watkins, J. (2008). Peer instruction: From Harvard to the two-year college. American Journal of Physics, 76(11), 1066–1069. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2978182
- Lieu, R., Wong, A., Asefirad, A., & Shaffer, J. F. (2017). Improving exam performance in introductory biology through the use of preclass reading guides. CBE Life Sciences Education, 16(3), ar46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-11-0320
- Liu, Q., Peng, W., Zhang, F., Hu, R., & Yan, W. (2016). The effectiveness of blended learning in health professions: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(1), e2. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4807
- Lockyer, L., Heathcote, E., & Dawson, S. (2013). Informing pedagogical action: Aligning learning analytics with learning design. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1439–1459. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479367
- Lyman, F. (1981). The responsive classroom discussion: The inclusion of all students. In A. S. Anderson (Ed.), Mainstreaming digest (pp. 109–113). University of Maryland College of Education.
- Martin, F., & Parker, M. A. (2014). Use of synchronous virtual classrooms : Why, who, and how ? MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 192–210. https://search.proquest.com/openview/46f49230fa8e6755f3ec0db97395c9bc/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2030650
- Pereira, J. A., Pleguezuelos, E., Merí, A., Molina-Ros, A., Molina-Tomás, M. C., & Masdeu, C. (2007). Effectiveness of using blended learning strategies for teaching and learning human anatomy. Medical Education, 41(2), 189–195. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02672.x
- Richardson, J. T. E. (2011). Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in education research. Educational Research Review, 6(2), 135–147. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.12.001
- Seidel, E., & Kutieleh, S. (2017). Using predictive analytics to target and improve first year student attrition. Australian Journal of Education, 61(2), 200–218. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944117712310
- Siemens, G., & Long, P. (2011). Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. EDUCAUSE Review, 46(4), 30–32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2330601.2330605
- Stockwell, B. R., Stockwell, M. S., Cennamo, M., & Jiang, E. (2015). Blended learning improves science education. Cell, 162(5), 933–936. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.08.009
- Student Success Collaborative. (2014). The Murky middle project. https://www.eab.com/technology/student-success-collaborative/members/white-papers/the-murky-middle-project
- Tirrell, T., & Quick, D. (2012). Chickering’s seven princicples of good practice: Student attrition in community college online courses. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 36(8), 580–590. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10668920903054907
- Twigg, C. A. (2015). Improving learning and reducing costs: Fifteen years of course redesign. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 47(6), 6–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2015.1089753
- Vickrey, T., Rosploch, K., Rahmanian, R., Pilarz, M., & Stains, M. (2015). Research-based implementation of peer instruction: A literature review. CBE Life Sciences Education, 14(1), es3. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-11-0198