Board game design: an educational tool for understanding environmental issues

References

• Akcaoglu, M., & Green, L. S. (2019). Teaching systems thinking through game design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9596-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. W., Krajcik, J., Duschl, R., Gunckel, K., Tsurusaki, B., & Draney, K. (2008, March). Learning progressions for environmental science literacy. Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Baltimore, MD, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Ardoin, N. M., Bowers, A. W., Roth, N. W., & Holthuis, N. (2018). Environmental education and K-12 student outcomes: A review and analysis of research. The Journal of Environmental Education, 49(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2017.1366155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assaraf, O. B.-Z., & Orion, N. (2005). Development of system thinking skills in the context of earth system education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(5), 518–560. http://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bar-Yam, Y. (1997). Dynamics of complex systems (Vol. 213). Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Bar-Yam, Y. (2002). General features of complex systems. In Encyclopedia of life support systems (EOLSS) (pp. 1). UNESCO, EOLSS Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Batzri, O., Assaraf, O. B. Z., Cohen, C., & Orion, N. (2015). Understanding the earth systems: Expressions of dynamic and cyclic thinking among university students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(6), 761–775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9562-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berland, L. K., Schwarz, C. V., Krist, C., Kenyon, L., Lo, A. S., & Reiser, B. J. (2016). Epistemologies in practice: Making scientific practices meaningful for students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(7), 1082–1112. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley, B. C. (2000). Interactive multimedia and model-based learning in biology. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 895–935. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900416848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley, W. (1968). Modern systems research for the behavioral scientist; a sourcebook. Aldine Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T., Roscoe, R. D., Slotta, J. D., Roy, M., & Chase, C. C. (2012). Misconceived causal explanations for emergent processes. Cognitive Science, 36(1), 1–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01207.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, D., Nelson, B., Sengupta, P., & D’Angelo, C. (2009, October). Rethinking science learning through digital games and simulations: Genres, examples, and evidence. Learning science: Computer games, simulations, and education workshop sponsored by the National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Clement, J. (2000). Model based learning as a key research area for science education. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 1041–1053. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900416901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement, J. J., & Rea-Ramirez, M. A. (2008). Model based learning and instruction in science. In Model Based Learning and Instruction in Science (1–9).
   Google Scholar
• Covitt, B. A., Gunckel, K. L., & Anderson, C. W. (2009). Students’ developing understanding of water in environmental systems. The Journal of Environmental Education, 40(3), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.40.3.37-51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, B. A. (2012). Moving the essence of inquiry into the classroom: Engaging teachers and students in authentic science. In Issues and challenges in science education research (pp. 25–42). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Castell, S., & Jenson, J. (2003). OP-ED serious play. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35(6), 649–665. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027032000145552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 268–291. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07309371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, M. J., & Forman, E. A. (2006). Redefining disciplinary learning in classroom contexts. In J. Green & A. Luke (Eds.), Review of educational research (Vol. 30, pp. 1–32). American Education Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, G. T., & Stern, P. C. (2002). Environmental problems and human behavior. Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Giere, R. N. (2004). How models are used to represent reality. Philosophy of Science, 71(5), 742–752. https://doi.org/10.1086/425063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Gravemeijer, K., Cobb, P., Bowers, J., & Whitenack, J. (2000). Symbolizing, modeling, and instructional design. In P. Cobb, E. Yackel, & K. McClain (Eds.), Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms: Perspectives on discourse, tools, and instructional design. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Grosslight, L., Unger, C., Jay, E., & Smith, C. (1991). Understanding models and their use in science: Conceptions of middle and high school students and experts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 799–822. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660280907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunckel, K. L., Mohan, L., Covitt, B. A., & Anderson, C. W. (2012). Addressing challenges in developing learning progressions for environmental science literacy. In Learning progressions in science (pp. 37–75). Brill Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R., & Greeno, J. G. (2008). Conceptual learning. In 21st century education: A reference handbook (Vol. 1, pp. 212–221).
   Google Scholar
• Halloun, I. A. (2007). Mediated modeling in science education. Science & Education, 16(7–8), 653–697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-006-9004-3
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (2000). A typology of school science models. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 1011–1026. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900416884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse, M. B. (1966). Models and analogies in science. University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Jordan, R., Eberbach, C., & Sinha, S. (2017). Systems learning with a conceptual representation: A quasi-experimental study. Instructional Science, 45(1), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-016-9392-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Marathe, S., & Liu, L. (2007). Fish swim, rocks sit, and lungs breathe: Expert-novice understanding of complex systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(3), 307–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400701413401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hmelo, C. E., Holton, D. L., & Kolodner, J. L. (2000). Designing to learn about complex systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(3), 247–298. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS0903_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, H., & Anderson, C. W. (2012). A learning progression for energy in socio-ecological systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(9), 1149–1180. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. J. (2008). Inquiry, activity, and epistemic practice. In R. Duschl, & R. Grandy (Eds.), Teaching scientific inquiry (pp. 99–117). Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Knuuttila, T. (2005). Models as epistemic artefacts: Toward a non-representationalist account of scientific representation. Philosophical Studies. Helsingin yliopisto.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (2010). Teaching and learning science as argument. Science Education, 94(5), 810–824. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladyman, J., Lambert, J., & Wiesner, K. (2013). What is a complex system? European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 3(1), 33–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-012-0056-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1990). Drawing things together. Representation in scientific practice. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Harvard university press.
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2006). Cultivating model-based reasoning in science education. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R., Schauble, L., Carpenter, S., & Penner, D. (2000). The inter-related development of inscriptions and conceptual understanding. In P. Cobb, E. Yackel, & K. McClain (Eds.), Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms: Perspectives on discourse, tools, and instructional design (pp. 325–360). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, S. T., & Wilensky, U. (2005, April). An analysis of student patterns of exploration with NetLogo models embedded in the connected chemistry environment. The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montréal, Quebec, Canada (pp. 11–15).
   Google Scholar
• Levy, S. T., & Wilensky, U. (2008). Inventing a “mid level” to make ends meet: Reasoning between the levels of complexity. Cognition and Instruction, 26(1), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000701798479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louca, L. T., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2012). Modeling-based learning in science education: Cognitive, metacognitive, social, material and epistemological contributions. Educational Review, 64(4), 471–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2011.628748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manz, E. (2012). Understanding the codevelopment of modeling practice and ecological knowledge. Science Education, 96(6), 1071–1105. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metz, K. E. (2011). Young children can be sophisticated scientists. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(8), 68–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171109200815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded source book. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2011). Learning science through computer games and simulations. National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nersessian, N. (2008). Model-based reasoning in scientific practice. In R. A. Duschl & R. E. Grandy (Eds.), Teaching scientific inquiry: Recommendations for research and implementation (pp. 57–79). Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Nersessian, N. J. (1995). Should physicists preach What they practice? Constructive modeling in Doing and learning physics. Science & Education, 4(3), 203–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00486621
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oh, P. S., & Oh, S. J. (2011). What teachers of science need to know about models: An overview. International Journal of Science Education, 33(8), 1109–1130. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.502191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orgill, M., York, S., & MacKellar, J. (2019). Introduction to systems thinking for the chemistry education community. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(12), 2720–2729. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Computers, children, and powerful ideas (p. 255). Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Passmore, C., & Stewart, J. (2002). A modeling approach to teaching evolutionary biology in high schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(3), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlov, O. V., Kim, Y. J., & Whitlock, C. (2019). Food fight. Learning, Education, and Games, 3, 100.
   Google Scholar
• Penner, D. (2000). Explaining systems: Investigating middle school students’ understanding of emergent phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(8), 784–806. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200010)37:8<784::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-E
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plummer, J. D., & Krajcik, J. (2010). Building a learning progression for celestial motion: Elementary levels from an earth-based perspective. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(7), 768–787. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pluta, W. J., Chinn, C. A., & Duncan, R. G. (2011). Learners’ epistemic criteria for good scientific models. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(5), 486–511. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puttick, G., & Tucker-Raymond, E. (2018). Building systems from scratch: An exploratory study of students learning about climate change. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(4), 306–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-017-9725-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salen-Tekinbaş, K., Gresalfi, M., Peppler, K., & Santo, R. (2014). Gaming the system: Designing with gamestar mechanic. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salen-Tekinbaş, K. S., & Zimmerman, E. (2004). Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Salen, K. (2007). Gaming literacies: A game design study in action. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 16(3), 301–322.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, C. V., Passmore, C., & Reiser, B. J. (2017). Moving beyond “knowing about” science to making sense of the world. In C. V. Schwarz, C. Passmore, & B. J. Reiser (Eds.), Helping students make sense of the world using next generation science and engineering practices (pp. 3–22). NSTA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, C. V., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Kenyon, L., Achér, A., Fortus, D., … Krajcik, J. (2009). Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 632–654. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengupta, P., & Wilensky, U. (2009). Learning electricity with NIELS: Thinking with electrons and thinking in levels. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 14(1), 21–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-009-9144-z
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, I., Barker, M., & Jones, A. (2003). Promoting mental model building in astronomy education. International Journal of Science Education, 25(10), 1205–1225. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069022000017270a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vattam, S., Goel, A., Rugaber, S., Hmelo–Silver, C., Jordan, R., Gray, S., & Sinha, S. (2011). Understanding complex natural systems by articulating structure-behavior-function models. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 14(1), 66–81.
   Google Scholar
• Wagh, A., Cook-Whitt, K., & Wilensky, U. (2017). Bridging inquiry-based science and constructionism: Exploring the alignment between students tinkering with code of computational models and goals of inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(5), 615–641. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagh, A., & Wilensky, U. (2018). EvoBuild: A quickstart toolkit for programming agent-based models of evolutionary processes. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(2), 131–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilensky, U. (1999). GasLab: an extensible modeling toolkit tor exploring statistical mechanics. In N. Roberts, W. Feurzeig, & B. Hunter (Eds.), Computer modeling and simulation in science education (pp. 151–178). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wilensky, U., & Reisman, K. (2006). Thinking like a wolf, a sheep, or a firefly: Learning biology through constructing and testing computational theories–an embodied modeling approach. Cognition and instruction, 24(2), 171–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2008). Beyond the scientific method: Model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Science Education, 92(5), 941–967. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, S. A., & Hmelo-Silver, C. (2017). Introduction to special issue: Models and tools for systems learning and instruction. Instructional Science, 45(1), 1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar